ライフサイエンスコーパス: social support

1 y, pre-existing psychiatric conditions, poor social support).

2 ors as competing responsibilities or loss of social support.

3 ide opportunities for group intervention and social support.

4 s were stress symptoms, quality of life, and social support.

5 h measures of HF-specific quality of life or social support.

6 sociated with treatment include drug use and social support.

7 enabling factors (MEF), stress, coping, and social support.

8 site, event-related loss of spouse, and low social support.

9 e RPS group reported improvement in diabetes social support.

10 r age at LT, allograft longevity, and strong social support.

11 ession, optimism, multiple life changes, and social support.

12 ession given high hurricane exposure and low social support.

13 ronary risk factors but not by job strain or social support.

14 ences in how primates behave when in need of social support.

15 eractions, such as familiarity, control, and social support.

16 lupus erythematosus (SLE): self-efficacy and social support.

17 nancial and housing problems, and inadequate social support.

18 e predicts change in depression symptoms and social support.

19 is, major changes in functioning, or limited social support.

20 experienced anaphylaxis and will have lower social support.

21 se-prevention planning, self-monitoring, and social support.

22 lowed by trait anxiety, age, anaphylaxis and social support.

23 stress response and higher receptiveness for social support.

24 ental stage with respect to the aetiology of social support.

25 ess perception, self-efficacy, and perceived social support.

26 demographic or environmental influences, and social support.

27 not confounded by socioeconomic variables or social support.

28 comorbidities, and polypharmacy, as well as social support.

29 ts with higher insurance coverage levels and social support.

30 challenges because of poverty and inadequate social supports.

31 spaces (21%); support of community-initiated social support (21%); and basic counselling for groups a

32 Needs were mainly social support (53%) and establishing goals of care (28%

33 o different indicators of social capital and social support across countries.

34 ioural coping mechanisms-physical avoidance, social support, affiliative, aggressive and displacement

35 onditions of high hurricane exposure and low social support after adjustment for sex, ancestry (as de

36 al functioning, mental health, and emotional social support after surgery have poorer self-perceived

37 erative functional status, age, obesity, and social support all influenced the discharge destination

38 Greater perceived social support, also potentially modifiable, was associa

39 actors, with the quality and availability of social supports among the most important environmental f

40 so had measures of stressful life events and social support and a depression symptom score, as well a

41 Associations between social support and age-related cognitive decline vary ac

42 N), 2279 (97.8%) completed surveys to assess social support and barriers to exercise, resulting in th

43 We aimed to describe the association between social support and barriers to participation with exerci

44 Evidence regarding social support and birth weight is also reviewed with at

45 caregiver depression, burden, self-care, and social support and care recipient problem behaviors thro

46 caregiver depression, burden, self-care, and social support and care recipient problem behaviors.

47 s for CVD, a patient's readiness for change, social support and community resources that support beha

48 mined black immigrants, who may benefit from social support and country-of-origin foods in black immi

49 comes and can affect patients' perception of social support and depressive affect.

50 Psychosocial factors, such as social support and distress, are associated with changes

51 home, yet she is bedbound and lacks adequate social support and financial resources to manage safely.

52 teria for review and investigated aspects of social support and heart failure self-care behaviors.

53 Poor social support and high barriers to exercise were associ

54 ed an explosion of epidemiologic research on social support and human health.

55 und between perceived levels of neighborhood social support and infant birth weight.

56 positively associated with greater perceived social support and less severe illness-related grief.

57 iovascular risk in their owners by providing social support and motivation for physical activity.

58 rences and within-person changes in positive social support and negative social support were independ

59 Nonfunctional social support and noninclusion of the liver in the visc

60 e domains (Moods and emotions, Autonomy, and Social support and peers); average differences in QoL be

61 n the general population in only one domain (Social support and peers; mean difference -2.7 [0.25 SD]

62 ected publications focusing on links between social support and physical health are summarized.

63 Moreover, these innovations require social support and political will in order to be success

64 Social support and positive effects of the donation on r

65 Calling for help recruits social support and promotes survival.

66 iew the literature on interpersonal traumas, social support and risk for PTSD and integrate findings

67 iterature regarding the relationship between social support and self-care behaviors in individuals wi

68 te levels of depression and anxiety but good social support and self-efficacy in communicating with t

69 ES may influence levels of resources such as social support and SOC, which mediate stress and in turn

70 ure symptomatology, and the subcomponents of social support and social problem-solving increase the l

71 symptomatology and coping resources, such as social support and social problem-solving, on depression

72 Social support and social relationships have been repeat

73 t association was found between instrumental social support and survival, even after adjustment for c

74 hborhoods to assess mean levels of perceived social support and used US Census data to estimate neigh

75 t group (ISG) members benefit from receiving social support and, according to the helper therapy prin

76 sment of symptoms, psychological status, and social supports and should receive palliative care early

77 ternal psychosocial factors (stress, coping, social support) and adolescent dental behavior/access.

78 in psychosocial factors (e.g., hopelessness, social support) and cancer progression.

79 nges (diet, activity, stress management, and social support), and the men in the control group underw

80 life events, 2) parenting stress, 3) lack of social support, and 4) parental worries.

81 ty that involves impaired cognition, lack of social support, and an inability to function independent

82 predicted by better mental health, emotional social support, and better self-rated interaction with h

83 RQOL (SF-36; Liver Disease Quality of Life), social support, and cognition (Neuropsychological Impair

84 rotein, obesity, alcohol use, sleep quality, social support, and depression), adjusted odds ratio (OR

85 vascular risk factors, socioeconomic status, social support, and depressive symptoms (0.83; 95% CI, 0

86 were adjusted for age, sex, education, pain, social support, and depressive symptoms and were compare

87 o predict adherence, such as depressed mood, social support, and disease severity level.

88 d tobacco use, baseline WHO stage 4 disease, social support, and duration of ART.

89 uation modeling revealed that self-efficacy, social support, and family hardiness had positive effect

90 portant reasons included depression, lack of social support, and fear of being a financial drain on f

91 It was hypothesized that race or ethnicity, social support, and functional status are independently

92 ce of patient age, gender, insurance status, social support, and functional status on decisions to op

93 ance abuse problems and mental illness, lack social support, and have no medical insurance.

94 Lymphoma symptom burden, less social support, and having received a transplantation we

95 coping skills, poor mental functioning, poor social support, and helplessness.

96 troviral drugs, acceptance of HIV diagnosis, social support, and increased confidence in their abilit

97 quality of patient care, caregiving quality, social support, and level of unmet caregiving assistance

98 ore abnormal illness-related behaviors, less social support, and lower levels of self reported mental

99 increase work-related capabilities, improve social support, and manage depression.

100 omen: parental warmth, neuroticism, divorce, social support, and marital satisfaction.

101 those who reported low job satisfaction, low social support, and monotonous work had an increased ris

102 We examined relationships among distress, social support, and natural killer (NK) cell activity in

103 ty, cognitive function, psychological state, social support, and nutritional status.

104 Demographics, social support, and perceived health showed little corre

105 who had better physical function, emotional social support, and positive ratings regarding the quali

106 he 2004 hurricanes about hurricane exposure, social support, and posthurricane PTSD and major depress

107 efficacy, couples communication about lupus, social support, and problem solving, in the form of a 1-

108 ter control is made for depressive symptoms, social support, and psychiatric conditions and medicatio

109 drugs combined with psychological therapies, social support, and rehabilitation, but a pressing need

110 s on improving knowledge, coping, self-care, social support, and self-management strategies.

111 lationships between FACT subscales and mood, social support, and social desirability.

112 olving, behavioral activation, strengthening social support, and stress management.

113 e (educational attainment, lifetime traumas, social support, and substance misuse), 4) adulthood (his

114 al factors mental health, self-efficacy, and social support, and the activity level measured by the a

115 ing self-esteem and self-efficacy, promoting social support, and ultimately motivating positive chang

116 social outcomes (HRQoL, anxiety, depression, social support, and work performance).

117 ffects include minority race/ethnicity, poor social supports, and poor perceived health.

118 nutritional status, psychological state, and social support; and a review of the patient's medication

119 nor KT), psychosocial characteristics (e.g., social support, anxiety, depression), or transplant know

120 Social support appears to have a positive relationship o

121 Social support appears to influence both heart failure s

122 ly basic research on the positive effects of social support are also widespread.

123 High levels of social trust and social support are associated with life satisfaction aro

124 s self-efficacy, problem-solving skills, and social support, are important regardless of the specific

125 Social support at baseline and at one year was predicted

126 Greater social support at child's age 3 was directly associated

127 tor symptoms, stressful life events, and low social support at each visit were each independently ass

128 zed shame and self-blame and lower levels of social support availability, which subsequently increase

129 osure, internalized reactions to stigma, and social support availability.

130 a cancer disclosure, internalized shame, and social support availability.

131 eassurance, and religious approval), needing social support (avoiding family conflict, unrelenting in

132 ic graft-vs-host disease (P =.01), with less social support before HCT (P =.001), and women (P<.001)

133 ic transplant recipients and those with less social support before HCT (P< or =.01).

134 stressor-3 h of acute immobilization-impacts social-support behaviors differently when experienced in

135 es also consistently identify perceptions of social support both before and after a traumatic event a

136 ghts the potentially significant impact that social support can have on cancer detection, treatment,

137 are experiencing many major life changes and social support can help them adjust to the associated en

138 In times of stress, social support can serve as a potent buffering mechanism

139 udy investigates how college students can be social support catalysts for organ donation and how soci

140 , organ function, comorbidity, polypharmacy, social support, cognitive and/or psychosocial factors, o

141 Perceived social support, cognitive functioning, and posttraumatic

142 red with the control group (P = .005) and in social support compared with the SET group (P = .012).

143 AG genotypes reported seeking more emotional social support, compared with those with the AA genotype

144 jective health status, and poorer subjective social support confer a higher risk for poor outcome.

145 onditions of high hurricane exposure and low social support, confirming and extending previous resear

146 improving stress levels, quality of life and social support [CORRECTED] for distressed survivors of b

147 Improved social support could indicate greater reliance on social

148 psychosocial factors, including life events, social support, depression, pregnancy-related anxiety, p

149 acy of pain management, decision making, and social support during and after the death of their child

150 lf-reports of 7 life events and 3 sources of social support during the periconceptional period among

151 ST by examining its direct and indirect (eg, social support) effects compared with a nondirective sup

152 and intimate partner abuse) and needed more social support (eg, long-term welfare receipt and unempl

153 loss of a child and whether professional or social support facilitate the long-term grief process.

154 e reviews the influences of psychopathology, social support, family issues, dialysis unit culture, an

155 in, and still existed when there was greater social support for breastfeeding.

156 social approaches are effective, introducing social support for physical activity within communities

157 Adherence interventions and increased social support for those most at risk should be consider

158 ity improvement, enhanced by community-based social support for treatment adherence.

159 of intervention by maintaining or enhancing social support for women soon after their breast cancer

160 including emotion regulation, parenting, and social support, for children who are exposed to war.

161 Among men, higher-than-average positive social support from a spouse/partner was associated with

162 95% CI: 0.000, 0.012); whereas high negative social support from all relationship types was associate

163 For women, higher-than-average positive social support from children (beta = 0.037, 95% CI: 0.01

164 ender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, social support, functional status, and insurance, respon

165 esults are consistent with the evidence that social support has beneficial effects on human health an

166 epressive affect and decreased perception of social support have been linked with mortality in severa

167 is worse), as were responses to questions on social support (higher is better).

168 failure symptomatology, and subcomponents of social support (i.e., belonging, tangible, and appraisal

169 All four types of social support (i.e., emotional support, instrumental/ta

170 Social support improved over time but the duration of un

171 wering of anxiety, improvements in perceived social support, improved dietary habits, and reduction i

172 o identify potential stressors and available social support in order to promote psychological adaptat

173 ducation, verbal intelligence, stresses, and social support in parenting) and the home environment [H

174 y risk factor, whereas stable settlement and social support in the host country have a positive effec

175 ction analyses showed that, for men, greater social support increased the likelihood of both HIV test

176 dical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Duke Social Support Index.

177 there was no consistent association between social support indicators and mortality.

178 in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) Social Support Instrument (ESSI).

179 ithout access to emotional support (Enriched Social Support Instrument score of <19 vs. > or = 19) ha

180 es the morning after a conflict than after a social support interaction compared with low-hostile cou

181 rch unit admission, couples had a structured social support interaction, and during the second admiss

182 sites following marital conflicts than after social support interactions.

183 iatric conditions, the extent and quality of social support is a strong determinant of outcome such t

184 Likewise, social support is processed by some of the same neural r

185 behavioral/psychological (illness behavior, social support, learned helplessness, smoking, drinking)

186 ct of patient care on other activities, less social support, less sense of control over life, and les

187 ggest that a variety of stressors can induce social support-like behaviors.

188 severity, socioeconomic factors, education, social support, literacy, and trust reduced these racial

189 emale sex, greater age, being employed, less social support, longer drive time to CR, lower neighborh

190 th high TA were also associated with reduced social support, lower optimism, higher hostility, and gr

191 Depression and low perceived social support (LPSS) after myocardial infarction (MI) a

192 e threat, and posttrauma factors such as low social support, maladaptive coping strategies, and paren

193 performance status, cognitive function, and social support may affect decision making and complicate

194 isturbance, lower quality of life, and lower social support may be at risk for both short- and long-t

195 However, social support may positively influence an individual's

196 ated to recovery time, financial issues, and social support, may result in greater SWL after donation

197 bution of potential explanatory variables to social support measured.

198 further improve long-term survival including social support measures, visceral transplantation has ac

199 .e., depressive symptoms, perceived control, social support, medication adherence, sodium intake, and

200 mortality, as well as how SES differences in social support might account for SES differences in mort

201 nality (BFI-10), religious beliefs (SBI-15), social support (MOS), the mental and physical components

202 ion: (1) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), (2) The Depression Anxiety Stres

203 ons per year on diet, physical activity, and social support (n=2262).

204 drug use; sleep quality; physical activity; social support; natural killer (NK) cell number and cyto

205 in multiple linear regression included less social support, negative appraisals of life threat and t

206 on recent (past 6 months) sex, drug-use, and social-support network members (n = 897 ties).

207 erty, lack of private health insurance, poor social-support network, low self-efficacy (the patient's

208 increase network resilience in, for example, social support networks and logistics networks.

209 nary effort involving health care providers, social support networks, family, and friends.

210 The aim of this study was to describe social support, networks and perceived satisfaction, exp

211 .g., demographic variables, trauma exposure, social support), not taking the geographic nature of the

212 ife-years, and functional status; receipt of social support, nutritional, rehabilitative, and fertili

213 The social support of group hunting and territory defence ar

214 of life (HRQoL), mental health and perceived social support) of HCV patients receiving DAAs therapy p

215 nding our understanding of the influences of social support on health.

216 urrent knowledge related to the influence of social support on heart failure self-care behaviors.

217 l designs, to determine the effectiveness of social support on self-care behaviors in individuals wit

218 Lack of social support or access to healthcare prevents young he

219 l support could indicate greater reliance on social support or becoming more adept at mobilising reso

220 Different levels of social support or depression were not associated with pr

221 Some interventions, such as increases in social support or the education of mothers about respons

222 cy (OR 0.79/5 points, 95% CI 0.67-0.93), and social support (OR 0.86/10 points, 95% CI 0.75-0.98), an

223 l status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82), poor social support (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.47), self-pay (

224 Moderate to severe symptom burden, limited social support, or having received a transplantation sho

225 aphics, disease severity, education, income, social support, or trust.

226 Partners reported less social support (P < .001), dyadic satisfaction (P < .05)

227 job characteristics, functional status, and social support (P < or = 0.05).

228 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social support (p = 0.013, Hospital Anxiety and Depressi

229 hold heads with greater reputations had more social support partners (measured as network indegree ce

230 on loss and use of instrumental coping, good social support, positivity, and use of assistive aids.

231 l health scores, as well as better emotional social support, predicted more favorable self-perceived

232 strong determinant of outcome such that high social support predicts symptom improvement and remissio

233 lth measures, substance use history, current social support, recent stressor exposures, and, from the

234 port: social attachment, a type of emotional social support reflecting connections with others, and i

235 ng connections with others, and instrumental social support reflecting the availability of tangible a

236 ging support was the most beneficial type of social support related to depression.

237 This prospective study examined how social support relates to long-term survival among conse

238 d without coronary artery disease, including social support, relaxation therapy, yoga, meditation, co

239 nt hospice and have neither the home nor the social support required for home hospice.

240 iers to exercise, resulting in the perceived social support score (PSSS) and barriers to exercise sco

241 Social support scores did not change during follow-up.

242 Social support scores were low, compared with those from

243 cifically cultural norms regarding emotional social support seeking.

244 We found that moderate stress increased social support-seeking behavior in rat cagemates and fac

245 d frequently are unable to access health and social support services.

246 We focused on two types of social support: social attachment, a type of emotional s

247 oL and individual (sense of coherence [SOC], social support, stress, oral health beliefs, dental beha

248 alth Index (MHI5) and Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS).

249 ial support using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey).

250 on care, score on the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, and score on the Center for Epide

251 ss associated with HCT, patients need a good social support system and a secure financial net.

252 of patient education, autonomy, and a strong social support system in improving rates of PD use in th

253 are, economic considerations, and family and social support systems also play a key role in the inten

254 the possible relationships between religious social support systems and other dimensions of congregat

255 These data suggest that cultural and social support systems can lead to divergent real-world

256 n that aims to treat depression by enhancing social support, teaching coping skills, and income-gener

257 trade-off between academic success and peer social support that creates a dilemma not typically enco

258 or stressors, a panic attack, a low level of social support, the death of a friend or relative during

259 tegration of increased physical activity and social support to alter modern diets and lifestyles hold

260 of coping such as optimism, resilience, and social support to be associated with less psychological

261 tant to offer evidence-based psychologic and social support to ensure that transplant clinical succes

262 enotype interacts with disaster exposure and social support to moderate risk of these phenotypes.

263 potentially important benefits of providing social support to others.

264 concentrated on further linking measures of social support to physical health outcomes.

265 uire optimized educational, psychologic, and social support to reach the educational level of their p

266 logical symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and social support to standardized psychiatric interviews an

267 ldren, and (iii) demonstrates the ability of social supports to further moderate risk for depression.

268 raphic characteristics, depressive symptoms, social support, treatment regimen, and years with diabet

269 ficacy Scale physical function subscale, and social support using the Medical Outcomes Study Social S

270 ncy by Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale, and social support using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measu

271 (versus low, ORs, 2.44 and 1.64), having low social support (versus high, ORs=2.78 and 1.40), and hav

272 model subjective well-being as a function of social support, volunteering and social trust, controlli

273 Social support was assessed 3 times in the 24.4-year per

274 Social support was assessed in 1992 and 2000 as the pres

275 Greater preoperative social support was associated with improved bodily pain

276 ths (6 months after the intervention ended), social support was higher (4.4 versus 4.1; P = 0.03), se

277 Social support was related to higher NK cytotoxicity in

278 Perceived social support was significantly higher during the treat

279 Received social support was unrelated to mortality across all gro

280 ences and within-person changes in levels of social support were associated with age-related cognitiv

281 Female sex and negative aspects of social support were associated with anxiety disorder in

282 Parity, diabetes, fibroids, and poor social support were associated with prevalent incontinen

283 ltivariate analysis, monotonous work and low social support were found to be the strongest independen

284 nges in positive social support and negative social support were independently associated with cognit

285 Hypothetical patient age, BMI, and social support were most influential.

286 Measures of social support were not associated with cancer mortality

287 l function, demographic characteristics, and social support were significant correlates of improvemen

288 al burden, self-rated health, and subjective social support were significant independent predictors o

289 Job strain and social support were weakly related to CHD and did not ex

290 measures of the quality and availability of social supports were found to moderate risk for depressi

291 re, the low-expression 5-HTTLPR variant, low social support) were at 4.5 times the risk of developing

292 Higher PSSS indicated higher levels of social support, whereas higher BTES indicated more barri

293 usting included improved physical health and social support, which was especially important within th

294 Regular social support with bond partners could lead to better h

295 s research has demonstrated relationships of social support with disease-related biomarkers in patien

296 ndependent associations of both distress and social support with NK cell activity in TIL.

297 iation of maternal stressful life events and social support with risks of gastroschisis and hypospadi

298 The authors examined the associations of social support with socioeconomic status (SES) and with

299 lth insurance coverage, and a lower level of social support, with consistent findings across countrie

300 es included African American ethnicity, less social support, worse functional status, and a greater b