ライフサイエンスコーパス: sound localization

1 pacity for auditory spatial awareness (e.g., sound localization).

2 tion is crucial for binaural comparisons and sound localization.

3 ner's ears, distorting the binaural cues for sound localization.

4 and level differences that are critical for sound localization.

5 rebral cortex and how it could contribute to sound localization.

6 ener's ears, distorting the spatial cues for sound localization.

7 many auditory functions, most importantly in sound localization.

8 aminaris and thereby adjust the precision of sound localization.

9 ributes of eye position-dependent effects on sound localization.

10 tes interaural intensity differences used in sound localization.

11 ons (HRTFs), spectral cues used for vertical sound localization.

12 system, and auditory cortex is necessary for sound localization.

13 ortant component of the circuitry underlying sound localization.

14 n of the MNTB may be rapidly modified during sound localization.

15 n owls, early experience markedly influences sound localization.

16 TD-sensitive neurons contribute to mammalian sound localization.

17 e differences (ITDs) that underlie azimuthal sound localization.

18 e is most important for pitch perception and sound localization.

19 population code, which can also be used for sound localization.

20 es (ITDs) are an important cue for azimuthal sound localization.

21 auditory functions such as echolocation and sound localization.

22 information about auditory space other than sound localization.

23 , and it probably performs a crucial role in sound localization.

24 ural level difference (ILD), a major cue for sound localization.

25 stem circuitry mediating the early stages of sound localization.

26 cludes the use of the auditory forebrain for sound localization.

27 NL) provide a neural substrate for azimuthal sound localization.

28 s signal detection in noisy environments and sound localization.

29 ezoid body (MNTB) plays an important role in sound localization.

30 de of the midline, enhances the precision of sound localization.

31 APs), which is used for such computations as sound localization.

32 odes of auditory brainstem axons involved in sound localization.

33 The auditory cortex is necessary for sound localization.

34 measured frequency-dependent biases in human sound localization.

35 formation from the two ears, as required for sound localization.

36 s dual-optimality at 8 kHz with unparalleled sound localization.

37 or colliculus (ICC) plays a critical role in sound localization.

38 sential auditory brainstem relay involved in sound localization.

39 ibitory hub considered critical for binaural sound localization.

40 nt with the long-standing "duplex" theory of sound localization.

41 naptic properties to the specific demands of sound localization.

42 ation of interaural time differences used in sound localization.

43 ploit interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localization.

44 l hearing loss is responsible for their poor sound localization.

45 ulus intensity and timing are major cues for sound localization.

46 inputs dictates the resolution of azimuthal sound localization.

47 cessing interaural time disparities used for sound localization.

48 erence encoder that computes information for sound localization.

49 primary auditory cortex (A1) is involved in sound localization.

50 tral cochlear nucleus (VCN) is essential for sound localization.

51 ll mammals use both of the binaural cues for sound localization.

52 mulation and are thought to be important for sound localization.

53 ral intensity differences, which are used in sound localization.

54 Sound localization, a fundamental process in hearing, is

55 ding of temporal information is critical for sound localization, a task with direct behavioral releva

56 The sound localization abilities of three rhesus monkeys wer

57 ry auditory cortex neurons at predicting the sound localization ability across different stimulus fre

58 ea contain enough information to account for sound localization ability, but neurons in other tested

59 icient information to account for horizontal sound localization ability.

60 auditory brainstem, which is responsible for sound localization ability.

61 ve and mechanistic explanation for the fly's sound-localization ability from a new perspective, and i

62 ng corticocollicular neurons, whereas normal sound-localization accuracy was unaffected.

63 We systematically and directly quantified sound localization across a broad spatial range and over

64 To preserve sound localization acuity following changes in the acous

65 n the ICs mediate gain control that enhances sound localization acuity.

66 The passive sound-localization acuity of Egyptian fruit bats (Rouset

67 uired for cholinergic-mediated relearning of sound localization after occlusion of one ear.

68 uired for cholinergic-mediated relearning of sound localization after occlusion of one ear.

69 at found that the capacity to recover normal sound localization after restoration of normal vision wa

70 Sound localization along the azimuth depends on the sens

71 neurons that are essential for low-frequency sound localization and auditory scene segregation, and s

72 MSO neurons perform a critical role in sound localization and binaural hearing.

73 ermine whether Kv1.1 activity contributes to sound localization and examined anesthetized mice for ab

74 monstrate independent processing streams for sound localization and identification analogous to the '

75 and whether selective attention facilitates sound localization and identification by modulating thes

76 at the eardrums, generating complex cues for sound localization and identification.

77 dly assessing cochlear functions involved in sound localization and perception of vocalizations.

78 provide precisely timed spike trains used in sound localization and pitch identification, receive slo

79 d encoding of low frequencies likely affects sound localization and pitch perception in the auditory

80 iscrimination of sounds in background noise, sound localization and protecting the cochleae from acou

81 ral time differences (ITDs), a major cue for sound localization and signal detection in noise, their

82 damental for processing timing cues used for sound localization and signal discrimination in complex

83 hlear implants (CIs) provide improvements in sound localization and speech perception in noise over u

84 These findings redefine the role of MNTB in sound localization and suggest that the inhibitory netwo

85 ll's in vivo receptor potential, crucial for sound localization and ultimately survival.

86 The primary cues for binaural sound localization are comprised of interaural time and

87 hway where the basic computations underlying sound localization are initiated and heightened activity

88 old a key position in the timing pathway for sound localization, are readily identifiable, and exhibi

89 n a rich environment, the capacity to adjust sound localization away from normal extended to later in

90 itory nerve in a pathway that contributes to sound localization based on interaural timing difference

91 l superior olive (MSO) play a unique role in sound localization because of their ability to compare t

92 lopment, adult ferrets show some recovery of sound localization behavior after long-term monaural occ

93 This suggests that both sound localization behavior and ear anatomy are fine-tun

94 Adaptive changes also take place in sound localization behavior, as demonstrated by the fact

95 auditory cortex (A1) is essential for normal sound localization behavior, but previous studies of the

96 s a powerful influence on the calibration of sound localization behavior.

97 Sound localization by auditory brainstem nuclei relies o

98 f the medial superior olive analyze cues for sound localization by detecting the coincidence of binau

99 ing acoustics alone, the brain also improves sound localization by incorporating spatially precise vi

100 A major focus of this article is the use of sound localization by normal hearing, hearing impaired,

101 sting that this mechanism may play a role in sound localization, by providing new avenues of communic

102 an brain region, the principal nuclei of the sound localization circuit in the auditory brainstem, nu

103 potassium currents in the auditory brainstem sound localization circuit of male mice.

104 n for input timing adjustment in a brainstem sound localization circuit.

105 ent as well as in temporal processing in the sound localization circuit.

106 ty as well as the immediate response of this sound localization circuit.

107 ovel mechanisms by which immature inhibitory sound-localization circuits become optimized.

108 Sound localization critically depends on detection of di

109 on of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localization critically depends on the similarity

110 tory thalamic neurons to a major category of sound localization cue, interaural time differences (ITD

111 the mechanisms generating the tuning to the sound localization cue.

112 pacity of spike timing over rate codes using sound localization cues as an example.

113 The central auditory system translates sound localization cues into a map of space guided, in p

114 medial superior olive (MSO) convey azimuthal sound localization cues through modulation of their rate

115 y all possible types of binaural response to sound localization cues were represented.

116 ICC neurons to dynamically encode interaural sound localization cues while maintaining an invariant r

117 l specializations that enable them to detect sound localization cues with microsecond precision.

118 measured the tuning of Ipc units to binaural sound localization cues, including interaural timing dif

119 ges into two pathways that process different sound localization cues, interaural time differences (IT

120 with identified roles in processing binaural sound localization cues, the role of the SPON in hearing

121 ) and level differences (ILDs), the dominant sound localization cues.

122 neurons within the N.Ov to tonal stimuli and sound localization cues.

123 nd abnormal coding of frequency and binaural sound localization cues.

124 ion known to be required for transmission of sound localization cues.

125 Neurons in the medial superior olive process sound-localization cues via binaural coincidence detecti

126 tion for the effects of pinna orientation on sound-localization cues.

127 ech encoding plays a significant role in the sound localization deficits experienced by BiCI users.

128 r processing on NH performance suggests that sound localization deficits may persist even for BiCI pa

129 t a circuit similar to the Jeffress model of sound localization, establishing a place code along an i

130 ere trained to discriminate binaural cues to sound localization, eventually allowing measurement of t

131 These data suggest different mechanisms of sound localization for two different behaviors.

132 Although the mechanisms of sound localization have been studied extensively, the ne

133 Developmental studies of sound localization have shown that adaptation to asymmet

134 Apart from sound localization, however, much about the role of this

135 me differences (ITDs), which is essential to sound localization in a variety of species and allows re

136 ons in experience-dependent recalibration of sound localization in adult ferrets by selectively killi

137 e this method to probe the representation of sound localization in auditory neurons of chinchillas an

138 approaches can be integrated in the study of sound localization in barn owls.

139 st the model using the system that underlies sound localization in barn owls.

140 Additionally, FF sound localization in BiCI users was measured in the sam

141 e further support for the Jeffress model for sound localization in birds.

142 st encoder of interaural time difference for sound localization in birds.

143 ty of the circuitry underlying low-frequency sound localization in both birds and mammals.

144 ts observed in the vertical plane by testing sound localization in both planes in groups of blind and

145 Sound localization in humans depends largely on interaur

146 ese experiments extend the prior findings on sound localization in mice, and the dependence of PPI on

147 blind individuals and the special problem of sound localization in people with dual sensory loss.

148 , suggesting a subcortical origin for robust sound localization in reverberant environments.

149 importance of the ILD-processing pathway for sound localization in reverberation.

150 ncy is thought to be crucial for the task of sound localization in the auditory brainstem.

151 he coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in the avian auditory brainstem.

152 le of incidence, producing cues for monaural sound localization in the spectra of the stimuli at the

153 incidence detectors subserving low-frequency sound localization in which the location of a sound sour

154 ultiple auditory brainstem nuclei, including sound localization information such as interaural level

155 p nucleus laminaris neurons to pass specific sound localization information to higher processing cent

156 It is known that the two cues for azimuthal sound localization, interaural intensity or level differ

157 For example, sound localization is a behavior that is partially learn

158 Sound localization is one of the sensory abilities disru

159 the thalamo-telencephalic auditory pathway, sound localization is subserved by a nontopographic repr

160 with the hypothesis that the role of passive sound localization is to direct the eyes for visual scru

161 In the auditory system, sound localization must account for movements of the hea

162 is finding suggests that the highly accurate sound localization of human observers is consistent with

163 Our findings reveal a novel dependence of sound localization on commissural processing.

164 Although auditory cortex is necessary for sound localization, our understanding of how the cortex

165 used to create stimulus sets varying in two sound-localization parameters each.

166 n between auditory synapses in the mammalian sound localization pathway is described.

167 e prominent in a developing GABA/glycinergic sound-localization pathway.

168 und localization, the present study measured sound localization performance in NH subjects listening

169 y was correlated with accuracy of individual sound localization performance.

170 e auditory brainstem and participates in the sound localization process with fast and well-timed inhi

171 nterhemispheric communication is involved in sound localization processes underlying spatial hearing.

172 The current dominant model of binaural sound localization proposes that the lateral position of

173 corticocollicular neurons to participate in sound localization relearning, we investigated the effec

174 Sound localization relies on the neural processing of mo

175 known to variably, but inconsistently, shift sound localization, suggesting subtle shortcomings in th

176 rabbits, that prevailing decoding models of sound localization (summed population activity and the p

177 rior olive (LSO), a nucleus in the mammalian sound localization system that receives inhibitory input

178 In this study, we used the barn owl's sound localization system to address this question.

179 olive (LSO), which is part of the mammalian sound localization system.

180 insurmountable size constraint in engineered sound-localization systems.

181 osterior parietal cortex as mice performed a sound localization task.

182 ecialized auditory tests (dichotic tasks and sound localization tests) for accurate interpretation of

183 ll more demanding by the process of binaural sound localization that utilizes separate computations o

184 ct of CI speech encoding on horizontal-plane sound localization, the present study measured sound loc

185 erior olive (MSO) encode cues for horizontal sound localization through comparisons of the relative t

186 ) and the auditory arcopallium (AAr) mediate sound localization through the presence of neurons that

187 icity allows the neural circuitry underlying sound localization to be customized to individual charac

188 p a simple paradigm using visual guidance of sound localization to gain insight into how the brain co

189 l features imposed by the pinna for vertical sound localization was shown by the breakdown in localiz

190 Visually guided biases in sound localization were induced in seven humans and two

191 ctions to four key target nuclei involved in sound localization (which is the foundation of auditory

192 One instance of this is sound localization, which improves with increasing bandw