ライフサイエンスコーパス: source of infection

1 de hospital mortality was 52% (21-85% across sources of infection).

2 infection, indicating that fowl were not the source of infection.

3 as been hypothesized that animals may be the source of infection.

4 enovirus in the immunosuppressed host as the source of infection.

5 hypervariable VNTR locus, indicates a common source of infection.

6 of the patients had fever with no documented source of infection.

7 water supply was implicated as the probable source of infection.

8 ion must be given to reducing this potential source of infection.

9 al venous catheter and without an underlying source of infection.

10 ar resorts on Lake Malawi is the most likely source of infection.

11 olved with catheter removal, without another source of infection.

12 ltiple diagnostic tests failed to localize a source of infection.

13 < 0.001), fever, urinary or skin/soft-tissue source of infection.

14 virus replication and are a potential tissue source of infection.

15 late source, which suggested a non-livestock source of infection.

16 cal course, vaccination status, and possible source of infection.

17 departments for prompt investigation of the source of infection.

18 hould stimulate clinicians to identify a new source of infection.

19 ents, to determine whether there is a common source of infection.

20 t the GP surgery did not identify an ongoing source of infection.

21 bacteria represent food but also a potential source of infection.

22 ggest that direct transmission was the major source of infection.

23 rug users with skin/wound as the predominant source of infection.

24 pasteurised milk in the past is the probable source of infection.

25 scites that occurs in the absence of a local source of infection.

26 scites that occurs in the absence of a local source of infection.

27 scutaneous implantation is also an important source of infections.

28 d with severe sepsis, suggesting alternative sources of infection.

29 as used to interview patients about possible sources of infection.

30 lic gram-negative bacteria, suggesting water sources of infection.

31 PS and fever were evaluated to exclude other sources of infection.

32 rase chain reaction (PCR) to identify common sources of infection.

33 nd patients were interviewed about potential sources of infection.

34 ce samples, capable of identifying important sources of infection.

35 n of cases of zoonotic infection to putative sources of infection.

36 ecting conditioned responses to noningestive sources of infection.

37 e need to address maternal and environmental sources of infection.

38 c variants great distances from the original sources of infection.

39 those obtained from suspected environmental sources of infection.

40 dies performed promptly to confirm potential source of infection (1C); administration of broad-spectr

41 8 [1.007-2.319]; p = 0.046), and a pulmonary source of infection (2.063 [1.363-3.122]; p = 0.0001).

42 The exact source of infection among travelers to Tioman Island rem

43 h Gram-negative BSI, 75% had a urinary tract source of infection and Escherichia coli was the most co

44 ranscriptomic response is independent of the source of infection and includes signatures reflecting i

45 ve patient outcomes by rapidly identifying a source of infection and monitoring the response to treat

46 poultry in the live bird markets removed the source of infection and no further human cases of H5N1 i

47 ation for peritonitis, which obliterates the source of infection and purges the peritoneal cavity, ma

48 hough infectious fleas might be an important source of infection and transmission via blocked fleas i

49 went 243 PET/CT studies in search of a focal source of infection and were included in the study.

50 ked to the outbreak in order to identify the source of infections and prevent additional illnesses.

51 agnostics may enable early identification of sources of infection and improve outbreak control.

52 To identify sources of infection and risk factors for illness, an ep

53 pread has hampered identification of precise sources of infection and the assessment of the efficacy

54 nosa infections, whereas underlying disease, source of infection, and severity of acute presentation

55 re most frequently identified as the primary source of infection, and therefore, reduction in E. coli

56 of arrival, weekend or nighttime admission, source of infection, and trainee involvement in care.

57 , factors that influence susceptibility, key sources of infection, and differences in virulence betwe

58 in the incidence of sepsis within all major sources of infection, and males and blacks have greater

59 ce of, and describe the causative organisms, sources of infection, and risk factors for, severe mater

60 The urinary tract was the only source of infection associated with a trend toward lower

61 Subjects were assigned 1 of 20 anatomic sources of infection based on clinical diagnosis and/or

62 n epidemic was probably produced by multiple sources of infection because of deficient sanitary condi

63 it is difficult to attribute human cases to sources of infection because there is little epidemiolog

64 id environments can serve as a reservoir and source of infection by this pathogen.

65 ected observers who independently scored the source of infection (by affected organ system or site),

66 actory and susceptible individuals, a single source of infection can lead to sustained infection in t

67 healthcare disparities, with respect to the source of infection, causal organisms, and chronic comor

68 o 8 mg/liter were matched based on pathogen, source of infection, comorbidities, and disease severity

69 patient with a TIPS and no other detectable source of infection despite an extensive search.

70 re differentially regulated according to the source of infection, enriched for IFN signaling and anti

71 Poultry are the likely source of infection for humans on the basis of sequence

72 These individuals might be the source of infection for patients with confirmed MERS who

73 ently infected patient was implicated as the source of infection for three others.

74 tes from humans suggests there may be common sources of infection for both dogs and humans.

75 phylogenetic analyses, we could identify the source of infection in a replication-competent clone tha

76 er in Los Angeles, California, as a possible source of infection in AIDS and non-AIDS patients.

77 g confirmed the water supply as the probable source of infection in both cases, with the clinical iso

78 They should be suspected as the source of infection in every hemodialysis patient that p

79 ginosa pathogen, in particular, is a leading source of infection in hospital settings, with few avail

80 ause of the retrospective nature and unknown source of infection in most human studies, direct eviden

81 ces in demographics, severity of illness, or source of infection in patients randomized to placebo or

82 ongly suggesting that these animals were the source of infection in the human case.

83 t Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent source of infection in the neonatal intensive care unit

84 Phylogenetic analysis excluded a common source of infection in this apparent outbreak.

85 lenses and the preservative solution was the source of infection in this outbreak.

86 The premixed ink was the common source of infection in this outbreak.

87 The results indicate that chicken is a major source of infection in young urban children, although no

88 ection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common source of infections in burn patients that have impaired

89 his study was designed to elucidate possible sources of infection in an isolated, rural population in

90 is further generalized to allow for multiple sources of infection including external inoculum and hos

91 Several sources of infection, including contamination by air, so

92 e 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) were major sources of infection-induced IL-9 production, the adopti

93 ow the epidemic size varies with the initial source of infection is far more complex.

94 Correct classification of the source of infection is important in observational and in

95 After stratification by the source of infection, males (proportionate ratio 1.16, 95

96 and infecting isolates, suggesting that the source of infections may be endogenous host organisms.

97 We recorded initial vital signs, the source of infection, mortality at 28 days, blood lactate

98 bability that one sampled host is the direct source of infection of another host in a pathogen gene g

99 d skeletal muscle from such birds could be a source of infection of humans and animals.

100 ot common, must be recognized as a potential source of infection of native polycystic kidneys in immu

101 Unsampled cases may act as either a common source of infection or as an intermediary in a transmiss

102 ality for MRSA infection irrespective of the source of infection or MIC methodology (odds ratio [OR],

103 iated with treatment failure irrespective of source of infection or MIC methodology (OR, 2.69; 95% CI

104 econd population emanated from an additional source of infection or the two were transmitted from the

105 ive on presentation (p = 0.017) or who had a source of infection other than pneumonia (p = 0.006).

106 re Assessment (p < 0.05) scores, and for the source of infection (p < 0.05).

107 of frequency of various comorbid conditions, source of infection, pathogens and their susceptibility

108 up, was instrumental in swiftly locating the source of infections, preventing further illnesses and d

109 The effect of the source of infection (pulmonary vs. nonpulmonary) on the

110 approaches to account for uncertainty in the source of infection, recall uncertainty, and unobserved

111 Although confirming the catheter as a source of infection remains challenging, the Infectious

112 always clear if these reservoirs can act as source of infection resulting in cases of Legionnaires'

113 After adjusting for differences in the source of infection, sex, age, chronic hepatic dysfuncti

114 After adjusting for source of infection, sex, age, nutritional status, histo

115 Infants with bacteremia and no known source of infection should be carefully examined because

116 Anatomic source of infection should be considered in future trial

117 ch that includes transmission from all three sources of infection simultaneously and uses sensitivity

118 f Balamuthia: In trying to locate a possible source of infection, soil and water samples from the chi

119 patients to clean their lenses is a possible source of infections, specimens isolated from the faucet

120 Retrovirus screening of potential sources of infection, such as laboratory research animal

121 we adjusted for several variables including source of infection, the effect of diabetes on the incid

122 The role of the blood or skin as a source of infection to sand flies remains unclear, and t

123 ildren or mothers, requires knowledge of the source of infection to the infants.

124 es performed promptly to confirm a potential source of infection (UG); administration of broad-spectr

125 a case and verify two household cats as the source of infection using repetitive-element PCR (rep-PC

126 Interobserver agreement for classifying sources of infection using Centers for Disease Control a

127 The frequency of reported sources of infection varied by county, but the largest s

128 Agreement regarding the source of infection was 89% (183/206) and 69% (142/206)

129 ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-1.08); an unknown source of infection was associated with a greater likeli

130 e antimicrobials after onset of hypotension, source of infection was associated with death after adju

131 The observed diagnostic agreement for source of infection was classified as partial (i.e., mat

132 Although no definitive source of infection was determined from this case, this

133 The source of infection was identified as wooden tongue depr

134 sical BCG instillation were selected and the source of infection was investigated.

135 The source of infection was not determined; however, fomite

136 signs of sepsis (five patients), in whom the source of infection was not immediately localized to any

137 e 142 episodes for which a complete match on source of infection was obtained, the interobserver agre

138 erwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT in search of a focal source of infection was performed.

139 d for 27 chains of transmission in which the source of infection was unknown.

140 pregnancy outcomes in humans although their sources of infection were not determined.

141 The major sources of infection were the lungs (44%) and abdomen (3

142 The source of infection with the highest standardized hospit

143 Source of infection, with different causative organisms

144 ith that of control subjects, independent of source of infection, with eukaryotic initiation factor 2