ライフサイエンスコーパス: speaker

1 er to a greater extent than from the foreign speaker.

2 in participants listening to and seeing the speaker.

3 es of five Khoisan individuals and one Bantu speaker.

4 se and elicited approach behavior toward the speaker.

5 ople is the perceived emotional state of the speaker.

6 o track the temporal speech envelope of that speaker.

7 f vowel pronunciation in time and age of the speaker.

8 ational pitch contour, phonetic content, and speaker.

9 ing that are otherwise hidden in monolingual speakers.

10 ntity marker and expressive resource for its speakers.

11 (e.g., a dog bark) in 14 English monolingual speakers.

12 even in the presence of multiple concurrent speakers.

13 ere sequentially presented from two adjacent speakers.

14 ists that was primarily associated with Khoe speakers.

15 d today only among Central American Chibchan-speakers.

16 r systems and by cultural transmission among speakers.

17 likelihood of women appearing as colloquium speakers.

18 ve speakers looked more like those of native speakers.

19 essing biomedical information for non-native speakers.

20 ed in non-native speakers compared to native speakers.

21 igh degree of biological uniformity of their speakers.

22 ing for the gender and rank of the available speakers.

23 s in how linguistic forms are copied between speakers.

24 as then analyzed and compared to that of the speakers.

25 he presence of spatially separated competing speakers.

26 late; Bolivian-Spanish speakers; and English speakers.

27 infants' demonstrated preference for native speakers.

28 The conference hosted 35 renowned speakers, 100 posters, 20 short talks, and a preconferen

29 (33.9%) compared with Spanish (29%) or other speakers (20.4%).

30 estigators, including 55 invited world-class speakers, 25 short oral presenters, and 100 poster prese

31 In experiments 1-5, nonsigning English speakers accurately distinguished between telic (e.g., "

32 In speech, speakers adjust their articulatory movement magnitude ac

33 Subjects were 49 healthy English speakers ages 19-62 (30 female).

34 eaker, as if subjects were listening to that speaker alone.

35 Musicians and Cantonese speakers also showed superior working memory capacity re

36 temporal profiles of brain responses in the speaker and listeners respectively, in turn affecting co

37 isease duration (45 German-Italian bilingual speakers and 40 monolingual speakers) were included.

38 ssembled an amazing forum, which included 53 speakers and 67 poster presentations from laboratories a

39 The speakers and audience discussed the special challenges i

40 al Khoesan groups, and highlights that Bantu speakers and Coloured individuals have different mixture

41 We show (a) how speakers and comprehenders use covert imitation and forw

42 research has shown that the degree to which speakers and listeners exhibit similar brain activity pa

43 rance increases such neural coupling between speakers and listeners.

44 ndings support the notion that tone language speakers and musically trained individuals have higher p

45 s of the non-Khoisan groups, including Bantu-speakers and non-Africans, experienced population declin

46 All participants (speakers and observers) were monitored via electrocardio

47 Jeanne Nerbonne and Nipavan Chiamvimonvat as speakers and panel discussants.

48 ed the fMRI response time courses of English speakers and Russian speakers who listened to a real-lif

49 the GLN contributes to the visibility of its speakers and the global popularity of the cultural conte

50 ture of the networks connecting multilingual speakers and translated texts, as expressed in book tran

51 onstrated that the success with which single speakers and vowels can be decoded from auditory cortica

52 se temporal dependencies arise between adult speakers' and listeners' neural activity.

53 ons across the (right) mid-anterior STG/STS (speakers) and bilateral mid-posterior STG/STS (vowels),

54 retary, Treasurer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the A

55 cretary-Treasurer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the A

56 retary, Treasurer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the A

57 s, students, engineers, technicians, invited speakers, and guests from North and South America, Germa

58 Half of the participants were English speakers, and half were not.

59 k, multitalker babble was presented from all speakers, and pairs of speech tokens were sequentially p

60 ese social biases, the preference for native speakers, and propose that this preference may result fr

61 en a subject listens to one of two competing speakers, and show that the brainstem response is consis

62 ences are active in the brains of individual speakers, and they are demonstrably distinct from sensor

63 an hunter-gatherer isolate; Bolivian-Spanish speakers; and English speakers.

64 els and organ systems was presented, and the speakers aptly illustrated the unique power of each.

65 e rhythm of a piece of music, the words of a speaker are all examples of temporally structured sensor

66 Personal interest stories of the speakers are discussed, along with the relationships amo

67 ences in speech understanding when competing speakers are present, as in a crowded restaurant.

68 Using a high-density speaker array, we show that the preferred direction and

69 ears ago, a second expansion of Austronesian-speakers arrived in Near Oceania and the descendants of

70 ish listeners rated pairs of native-language speakers as more dissimilar than foreign-language speake

71 ectral and temporal features of the attended speaker, as if subjects were listening to that speaker a

72 ocessed automatically by the brain of native speakers, as revealed by whole-head electrical recording

73 A top-notch slate of invited speakers, assembled by conference organizers or committe

74 dy examines gender differences in colloquium speakers at 50 prestigious US colleges and universities

75 The underrepresentation of women as invited speakers at international scientific conferences exempli

76 The perceived underrepresentation of female speakers at prominent scientific meetings is currently a

77 Here, several of the speakers at that conference answer questions posed by Na

78 sented in ASCB's leadership and as symposium speakers at the annual meeting.

79 ing behavior in these games by assuming that speakers attempt to be informative and that listeners us

80 Comparisons of the demographics of speakers, attendees, and ORGN members are made, and supe

81 (sight, sound, and touch), the location of a speaker (audition and sight), and the rhythm or duration

82 owels /a/, /i/, and /u/) spoken by different speakers (boy, girl, male) and performed a delayed-match

83 speech adapts only to the intensity of that speaker but not to the intensity of the background speak

84 r, (ii) this variability is attested between speakers but not within a speaker, (iii) this variabilit

85 Musicians can perform at different tempos, speakers can control the cadence of their speech, and ch

86 ssifier trained solely on examples of single speakers can decode both attended words and speaker iden

87 the acoustic similarity of both phonetic and speaker categories.

88 erior temporal gyrus/sulcus (STG/STS) during speaker categorization and in the right posterior tempor

89 for Epidemiologic Research hosted 17 invited speakers charged by the Executive Committee with present

90 different word orders are known to influence speakers' choices, but the underlying neural mechanisms

91 witch mechanisms are activated in non-native speakers compared to native speakers.

92 Behaviorally, speakers compensated for perturbations by changing their

93 general had smaller MMNs compared to English speakers, confirming previous studies demonstrating sens

94 poken object-label mappings across different speaker contexts.

95 The keynote speaker, Craig Pikaard, opened the meeting with his pres

96 To tackle this challenge, speakers described methods for assessing the nutrient de

97 Last, speakers described the role of dairy products in global

98 Nine subjects listened to recordings of a speaker describing visual scenes that varied in the degr

99 ir mother tongue better than they do foreign speakers despite their limited speech comprehension abil

100 ers as more dissimilar than foreign-language speakers, despite their inability to understand the mate

101 While non-Japanese speakers did not change their conversation topics signif

102 ech comprehension abilities, suggesting that speaker discrimination may rely on familiarity with the

103 res of voice perception (vocal size, gender, speaker discrimination) and voice recognition (familiari

104 Speakers discussed potential challenges to clinical tran

105 inese and English adult participants to rate speaker dissimilarity in pairs of sentences in English o

106 We conclude that signers gesture just as speakers do.

107 electively listening to one of two competing speakers, either of different or the same sex, using mag

108 urer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the APA Committee

109 urer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the APA Committee

110 urer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the APA Committee

111 hether congruent visual input of an attended speaker enhances cortical selectivity in auditory cortex

112 were more likely than women to be colloquium speakers even after controlling for the gender and rank

113 speech enhances our ability to comprehend a speaker, even in noise-free conditions.

114 We show that (i) Korean speakers exhibit substantial variability regarding this

115 Invited speakers' expertise covered basic as well as translation

116 All speakers expressed a sense of urgency about the affordab

117 Speaker fees (31.7%), consulting fees (21.6%), and resea

118 Consulting fees and speaker fees were associated with highest payment amount

119 We found that early Bantu speakers first moved southward, through the equatorial r

120 Speakers focused on translational and clinical applicati

121 A session, followed by a panel discussion of speakers from both sessions.

122 etween Khanty and Bashkir, a group of Turkic speakers from Southern Urals region.

123 Instead, contextual cues such as speaker gaze can provide similar information with a lowe

124 Native speakers had enhanced neural processing of the formant f

125 ons in the Pickering & Garrod (P&G) model of speaker-hearer coordination in dialogue.

126 The keynote speaker, Ian Willis, opened the meeting with his present

127 The influence of language familiarity upon speaker identification is well established, to such an e

128 tch-to-sample task on either speech sound or speaker identity.

129 speakers can decode both attended words and speaker identity.

130 erent information about phonetic features or speaker identity.

131 s attested between speakers but not within a speaker, (iii) this variability controls interpretation

132 positions for session moderators and invited speakers.IMPORTANCE Politicians and media members have a

133 s excel at selectively listening to a target speaker in background noise such as competing voices.

134 k of four acoustic stimuli via an ultrasonic speaker in random order: (1) 50 kHz USVs, (2) 22 kHz USV

135 selectively to one out of several competing speakers in a "cocktail party" situation is a highly dem

136 to one out of several simultaneously talking speakers in a "cocktail party" situation is a highly dem

137 reek-speaking participants showed that Greek speakers in general had smaller MMNs compared to English

138 issue of Brain Research includes articles by speakers in this meeting and others, which together synt

139 The work of the speakers in this symposium shows that TEs are expressed

140 were included, allowing the investigation of speaker-independent representations of individual words.

141 xpect to receive information from the native speaker, indicating that infants were preparing to learn

142 Analysis of the phonetic and speaker information in neural activations revealed that

143 ly, we show a joint encoding of phonetic and speaker information, where the neural representation of

144 listeners use Bayesian inference to recover speakers' intended referents.

145 r is saying, but also, importantly, when the speaker is saying it.

146 l movements relay information about what the speaker is saying, but also, importantly, when the speak

147 s can greatly help in understanding what the speaker is saying.

148 ng of Remote Oceanic islands by Austronesian speakers is a fascinating and yet contentious part of hu

149 dition, the population history of Athapaskan speakers is complex, with the Tlich being distinct from

150 ormation, where the neural representation of speakers is dependent on phoneme category.

151 that most of the vocabulary of the Malagasy speakers is derived from the Barito group of the Austron

152 the intensity of the attended and background speakers is separately varied over an 8-dB range, the ne

153 l pronouns, such as 'I' and 'you', require a speaker/listener to continuously re-map their reciprocal

154 ivation increased with predictability in the speaker, listeners' pSTG activity instead decreased for

155 clear proclivity for male-dominated invited speaker lists.

156 groups from northern Cameroon and non-Bantu speakers living in present-day Nigeria and Ghana.

157 rs were assessed using a restricted range of speaker locations designed to match those found in clini

158 ntly, the networks of more fluent non-native speakers looked more like those of native speakers.

159 effects or drift, or do languages with more speakers lose features due to a process of simplificatio

160 ction and comprehension are interwoven, with speakers making predictions of their own utterances and

161 ly, the results show that lips on the Target speaker matched to a secondary (Mask) speaker's audio se

162 ing analyses of the gender parity of invited speakers may allow the ongoing discussions to be informe

163 s and readers to infer the intended message (speaker meaning) from the coded meaning of the linguisti

164 ce in Island Southeast Asia, or Austronesian speakers migrated to and through the mainland, admixing

165 experience predicted how well native English speakers (N=120) discriminated Norwegian tonal and vowel

166 Mandarin native speakers named colored line drawings of objects using co

167 Capitalizing on speakers' natural variability, we contrasted the respons

168 n English syllable in three groups of native speakers, non-native nonmusicians, and non-native musici

169 functions ranging from threat assessment to speaker normalization.

170 contours directly reflected the encoding of speaker-normalized relative pitch but not absolute pitch

171 The speakers not only described how metabolic flux adapts to

172 to a state of phonetic equilibrium, in which speakers of all ages share a similar phonetic profile.

173 Speakers of all human languages regularly use intonation

174 Do speakers of all languages use segmental speech sounds wh

175 using electroencephalography (EEG) in fluent speakers of American Sign Language (ASL) as they watch v

176 We asked native speakers of Chinese fluent with English to indicate whet

177 across vast geographic distances and between speakers of different language families.

178 Slavic speakers of Eastern Europe are, in general, very similar

179 panish-English bilinguals and control native speakers of English in a semantic categorisation task on

180 Non-native speakers of English who hold nursing qualifications from

181 at the neural level in native and non-native speakers of English who were overtly naming pictures of

182 ntial (ERP) and tested native and non-native speakers of English.

183 oups, of whom 4 were non-native and 7 native speakers of English.

184 However, speakers of Eskimo-Aleut languages from the Arctic inher

185 honemes, but the bulk of evidence comes from speakers of European languages in which the orthographic

186 ntal units of phonological encoding even for speakers of languages that do not encode such units orth

187 could help make English texts accessible to speakers of other languages.

188 erage genomes for 83 Aboriginal Australians (speakers of Pama-Nyungan languages) and 25 Papuans from

189 alKhomani Bushmen of South Africa, including speakers of the nearly extinct N|u language.

190 etreat of a language is the interaction with speakers of the same language.

191 However, 7-mo-old infants discriminate speakers of their mother tongue better than they do fore

192 nce from nuclear and mtDNA loci suggest that speakers of these language families share a distinct bio

193 ly represented, raising the possibility that speakers of these languages do not use phonemes as funda

194 varies unpredictably across a population of speakers of what is ostensibly a single language.

195 hat people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise

196 A major exception is in Chibchan speakers on both sides of the Panama isthmus, who have a

197 sicians to that of tone-language (Cantonese) speakers on tasks of auditory pitch acuity, music percep

198 ons for graphene, such as remote non-contact speakers, optical-switching acoustic devices, etc.

199 then retrieval/reexposure effects on either speaker or listener, with a focus on retrieval-induced f

200 ct with to a much higher degree than English speakers or the global average.

201 We compiled the full rosters of invited speakers over the last 35 years for four prominent inter

202 brought together consortium members, outside speakers, patient advocacy groups, and young investigato

203 We continuously presented native Chinese speakers peripherally with Chinese homophone characters

204 Do languages with larger speaker populations change faster due to a greater capac

205 ns ago, among upper castes and Indo-European speakers predominantly.

206 to reviewing existing evidence in the field, speakers presented their own original research to provid

207 mprehension/production explains intra-/inter-speaker priming.

208 eversal of the well-established finding that speakers produce less sophisticated language than they c

209 We find that the gestures speakers produce when they talk are integral to communic

210 y that was not present in the English native speakers, raising the possibility that additional attent

211 es shifting the pitch of the feedback that a speaker receives, known as pitch-shifted feedback.

212 Finally, the WICB Speaker Referral Service provides a list of outstanding

213 nds in which the salience of intonational or speaker-related (suprasegmental) vocal cues was increase

214 h segmental phonemic cues and suprasegmental speaker-related and emotional prosodic cues.

215 mpared a "same sentence" condition, in which speakers repeated the study utterances at test, and a "d

216 ased on cortical responses to the mixture of speakers reveal the salient spectral and temporal featur

217 absent in Eskimo-Aleut and northern Na-Dene speakers, revealed that this haplogroup arose in North A

218 s and licenses (1 of 13 [7.7%]), and faculty/speaker roles (2 of 48 [4.2%]).

219 s and licenses (1 of 22 [4.6%]), and faculty/speaker roles (21 of 189 [11.1%]) in 2014.

220 ch the neural activity is coupled across the speaker's and listener's brains during production and co

221 Target speaker matched to a secondary (Mask) speaker's audio severely increase the participants' comp

222 was significantly more synchronous with the speaker's brain activity for highly predictive contexts

223 of the following: stock ownership, employee, speaker's bureau, and consultant).

224 Seeing a speaker's face as he or she talks can greatly help in un

225 The behavioral benefit of seeing a speaker's face during conversation is especially pronoun

226 Seeing a speaker's face enhances speech intelligibility in advers

227 response to speech, we found that viewing a speaker's face enhances the capacity of auditory cortex

228 e behavioral benefit arising from seeing the speaker's face was not predicted by changes in local enc

229 peech comprehension is improved by viewing a speaker's face, especially in adverse hearing conditions

230 This is because the speaker's facial movements relay information about what

231 rence between oscillatory brain activity and speaker's lip movements and demonstrated significant ent

232 ce between activity in visual cortex and the speaker's lips.

233 y predicted when they were less similar to a speaker's median production, even though the prediction

234 You can form a good idea of the different speaker's mood and affective state, as well as more subt

235 We also explore how a speaker's motive to form a shared reality with listeners

236 e of intonation contours independent of each speaker's pitch range.

237 and either inferred the authenticity of the speaker's state, or judged how much laughs were contagio

238 s in cardiac activity that were based on the speaker's stress level.

239 hesis that a listener's ability to predict a speaker's utterance increases such neural coupling betwe

240 s a remarkable ability to attend to a single speaker's voice in a multi-talker background.

241 ticipants and the presence of a woman on the speaker selection committee correlated with improved par

242 a suggest that those who invite and schedule speakers serve as gender gatekeepers with the power to c

243 Interestingly Greek native speakers showed some P3a activity that was not present i

244 Compared with English speakers, Spanish speakers were less likely to have high

245 We next show that sign-naive speakers spontaneously project these principles to novel

246 r but not to the intensity of the background speaker, suggesting an object-level intensity gain contr

247 quencies did not differ from those of native speakers, suggesting that musical training may compensat

248 When speakers talk, they gesture.

249 that are reliably activated in the brains of speakers telling a 15-min-long narrative.

250 oscopy (fNIRS) to record brain activity of 3 speakers telling stories and 15 listeners comprehending

251 We argue that evidence from speakers' tendency to repeat their own and others' struc

252 supported by finding that, within non-native speakers, there was less auditory feedback for those wit

253 (a) Gesture reflects speakers' thoughts, often their unspoken thoughts, and t

254 (b) Gesture can change speakers' thoughts.

255 eparing to learn information from the native speaker to a greater extent than from the foreign speake

256 e created a "phantom road" using an array of speakers to apply traffic noise to a roadless landscape,

257 al in the online control of speech, allowing speakers to compare their self-produced speech signal wi

258 etoencephalographic imaging (MEG-I) in human speakers to demonstrate that efference copy prediction d

259 Encouraging speakers to gesture can thus provide another route for t

260 idea, but it is not clear what it means for speakers to predict their own utterances, and how predic

261 ontribution of western central African Bantu speakers to the ancestry of African Americans, whose gen

262 ng more like Yeniseian, Ugric, and Samoyedic speakers to the north, and southern Altaians having grea

263 on, here we gauge the sensitivity of English speakers to the putative universal syllable hierarchy (e

264 Proficient language use requires speakers to vary word order and choose between different

265 n of possible instances, or tokens, in which speakers use AAVE rather than SAE speech features.

266 subjects watched and listened to videos of a speaker uttering consonant vowel (CV) syllables /ba/ and

267 tude growth were calculated for an ear canal speaker versus the intracochlear actuator for tone burst

268 The task dependency of speaker/vowel classification demonstrates that the infor

269 Speaker/vowel classification relied on distinct but over

270 gs selected by a music therapist via ambient speakers) vs standard care.

271 ologists that attended the meeting, choosing speakers was a unique challenge.

272 also found that genetic adaptation of Bantu speakers was facilitated by admixture with local populat

273 The difference between native and non-native speakers was further supported by finding that, within n

274 ed in a listening task with two simultaneous speakers, we demonstrate that population responses in no

275 an Information Masking Task with concurrent speakers, we find significantly more errors in the decis

276 , whereas the odds that it rushed toward the speaker were more than sixfold higher.

277 ch word, pronunciations from three different speakers were included, allowing the investigation of sp

278 Compared with English speakers, Spanish speakers were less likely to have high scores in pizza a

279 Here, speakers were separated by 15 degrees around the midline

280 talian bilingual speakers and 40 monolingual speakers) were included.

281 ormal healthy human subjects (native English speakers) were scanned while they listened to 10 consona

282 ients were excluded if they were not English speakers, were not prescribed treatment for their acne,

283 moting preferential tracking of the attended speaker, whereas without visual input no significant att

284 In contrast, French speakers who had never been exposed to Chinese did not r

285 e birth and differed from monolingual French speakers who had never been exposed to Chinese.

286 igmatic isolated population of Indo-European speakers who have been living for centuries in the Hindu

287 time courses of English speakers and Russian speakers who listened to a real-life Russian narrative a

288 tional magnetic resonance imaging in English speakers who underwent a 12 week intensive French immers

289 MRI data acquired before training in English speakers who underwent a 12 week intensive French immers

290 line activity after the earthquake, Japanese speakers, who are assumed to be more directly affected b

291 ual feedback where they attempted to mimic a speaker whose mouth was seen on an iPod screen; (ii) spe

292 he expectation that interactions with native speakers will provide better opportunities for learning.

293 POPULATION: Literate, native-English speakers with and without AMD.

294 Even verbally fluent speakers with ASD display distinctive qualities in sign

295 Recent studies reveal that tonal language speakers with autism have enhanced neural sensitivity to

296 Vocal laughter fills conversations between speakers with normal hearing and between deaf users of A

297 n activity was significantly correlated with speakers' with a delay.

298 ides a summary of the data presented by each speaker, with a focus on quantitative techniques and the

299 entations are seen for the speech of the two speakers, with each being selectively phase locked to th

300 This conference brought together speakers working in different areas of cancer research (