ライフサイエンスコーパス: species extinction

1 single threat, but multiple threats lead to species extinction.

2 e than perceived when looking exclusively at species extinctions.

3 singly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions.

4 ors are strongly correlated to the timing of species extinctions.

5 in developing a more comprehensive theory of species extinctions.

6 he principle defense against forest loss and species extinctions.

7 global biodiversity loss requires preventing species extinctions.

8 eases can cause rapid population declines or species extinctions.

9 plification, loss of ecosystem services, and species extinctions.

10 icated in 87 bird, 45 mammal, and 10 reptile species extinctions-58% of these groups' contemporary ex

11 Accelerating rates of species extinctions and disease emergence underscore the

12 is predicted that climate change will cause species extinctions and distributional shifts in coming

13 missions, reduce land clearing and resultant species extinctions, and help prevent such diet-related

14 resulting in temporal mismatches, nonrandom species extinctions, and loss of spatial co-occurrences

15 Species extinctions are accelerating globally, yet the m

16 Species extinctions are biased towards higher trophic le

17 The processes leading up to species extinctions are typically characterized by prolo

18 examine the effects of habitat conversion on species extinctions assume that habitat conversion occur

19 Species extinction at Seymour Island occurred in two pul

20 in host exposure to infection and to reduce species extinction caused by diseases.

21 The current species extinction crisis is being exacerbated by an inc

22 heory suggests that the best response to the species extinction crisis is to spend money as soon as i

23 Estimations of species extinction dates are rarely definitive, yet decl

24 Our data indicate that beyond global species extinctions Earth is experiencing a huge episode

25 Species extinction following habitat loss is well docume

26 Revealing the consequences of species extinctions for ecosystem function has been a ch

27 Accelerating rates of species extinction have prompted a growing number of res

28 Over the past decade, accelerating rates of species extinction have prompted an increasing number of

29 by concern over ecological hazards, such as species extinction if such organisms were to be released

30 t loss and fragmentation, is a key driver of species extinction in spatial extended communities.

31 efensive symbiont on population dynamics and species extinctions in an experimental community compose

32 roevolution may therefore be as important as species extinctions in shaping the response of microbial

33 of double jeopardy proposes that the risk of species extinction is elevated if species that are endem

34 We show that species extinction is generally expected to reduce biotu

35 There is increasing evidence that species extinctions jeopardize the functioning of ecosys

36 esults wherein the probability of a resident species' extinction just balances the probability of an

37 are discernibly responding to the threat of species extinction, just 10% of network capacity is devo

38 Despite global efforts to combat tropical species extinctions, lack of high-quality, objective inf

39 ns are projected to reach 39% worldwide, and species extinctions may reach 20%.

40 , if anything, underestimated the impacts of species extinction on the productivity of ecosystems.

41 reveal likely evidence of two separate multi-species extinctions, one synchronous with bolide impact

42 competition significantly increased rates of species extinction over a broad disturbance gradient, an

43 Projections of species extinction rates are controversial because inver

44 Species extinction rates due to human activities are hig

45 least three orders of magnitude higher than species extinction rates, so there is a pressing need to

46 s, or species richness, also alter predicted species extinction rates.

47 To assess the role of human disturbances in species' extinction requires an understanding of the spe

48 s for conservation outcomes that will reduce species extinction risk and promote recolonization of ex

49 evelop a pair approximation model to explore species extinction risk in a lattice-structured landscap

50 orrelation of disturbance likewise increased species extinction risk, but only for local dispersers.

51 ernationally agreed criteria for classifying species extinction risk, that languages are more threate

52 eveals patterns in the causes and drivers of species' extinction risk that may not be evident solely

53 exposure to climate change in assessments of species' extinction risk.

54 e change, and altered disturbance regimes on species' extinction risk.

55 g protected areas (Target 11) and preventing species extinctions (Target 12).

56 tions might become a greater cause of global species extinction than direct habitat destruction.

57 tory environmental feedbacks result in fewer species extinctions, that is, in increased species persi

58 The ratio of species extinctions to introductions has been comparable

59 onship between North American range size and species' extinction-to-colonization ratios.

60 mazon metacommunity and estimate likely tree-species extinctions under published optimistic and nonop

61 A considerable number of species extinctions will have taken place.

62 Predicting when future species extinctions will occur is necessary for directin

63 bitat loss and fragmentation generally cause species extinction, with stronger effects occurring at h

64 However, averting human-induced species extinctions within AZE sites requires enhanced p