ライフサイエンスコーパス: specimen collection

1 techniques used for clinical measurements or specimen collection.

2 by a record of antibiotic treatment prior to specimen collection.

3 isolation from AFP cases with known month of specimen collection.

4 (69%) received OPV 3-106 months before stool specimen collection.

5 ive PCR results if there are delays in stool specimen collection.

6 221V infection received oseltamivir prior to specimen collection.

7 ly 1 patient had received oseltamivir before specimen collection.

8 rom controls who received antibiotics before specimen collection.

9 m its intrinsic nature and not from improper specimen collection.

10 ptable results obtained up to 72 hours after specimen collection.

11 ipation consistently, including for biologic specimen collection.

12 oup had dHSV PCR results reported <4 h after specimen collection.

13 and infant pairs (median age at the time of specimen collection, 40 days; range, 1-331 days), 52 (43

14 tely HCV-infected subjects (mean duration of specimen collection, 72 months after seroconversion).

15 of 471 encounters were managed with a single specimen collection (94.9% urine), with 12.7% positive f

16 at the same time, providing efficiencies of specimen collection and characterization.

17 ssaging promoted rapid ARI/ILI reporting and specimen collection and could represent a promising appr

18 traditional criteria for diagnostic corneal specimen collection and culture were randomized to the o

19 Sensitivity varied by timing of specimen collection and DENV serotype.

20 Recommendations for specimen collection and handling have been developed for

21 To determine the effects of specimen collection and handling procedures on quantitat

22 meant to promote identifiable standards for specimen collection and handling within and across breas

23 fined catchment population and adjusting for specimen collection and healthcare-seeking practices.

24 ecimens should be processed within 30 min of specimen collection and maintained at 37 degrees C, sinc

25 Greater emphasis on fecal specimen collection and overcoming barriers to pursuing

26 copy number values obtained with suboptimal specimen collection and processing procedures.

27 Our goal was to devise methods for specimen collection and processing that preserve HIF-1al

28 An HIV-1 DNA PCR assay with simple specimen collection and processing was developed and eva

29 due to limitations in case ascertainment and specimen collection and processing.

30 xamination; blood, urine, and cervicovaginal specimen collection and repository; laboratory assays; a

31 test increased with increasing time between specimen collection and testing.

32 new nylon-flocked swab designed to optimize specimen collection and to minimize entrapment of the sp

33 Neisseria gonorrhoeae because of the ease of specimen collection and transport.

34 ementation of a Common Protocol for data and specimen collection, and are poised to address this crit

35 on that prevented trachoma grading or ocular specimen collection, and have a guardian who could provi

36 ls of clinician involvement, facility types, specimen collection, and laboratory techniques.

37 e of assays between studies, difficulties in specimen collection, and problems in interpreting the pr

38 od, subgingival plaque, and crevicular fluid specimen collection; and medical and dental histories.

39 However, maternal daily DOT and specimen collection at drug concentration steady state p

40 Immediately following specimen collection by patients, a trained clinician obt

41 If participants met prespecified specimen collection criteria, we collected nasopharyngea

42 agnostics) was evaluated as a nasopharyngeal specimen collection device to be used for methicillin-re

43 ted with blood, serum, and plasma spotted on specimen collection devices (cards) which were extracted

44 tigation of A-226 and M-TFN filter papers as specimen collection devices for HIVDR monitoring surveys

45 Early specimen collection did not improve viral detection rate

46 eaction (LCR) have the potential to simplify specimen collection for gonorrhea diagnosis.

47 minations included cervical and vulvovaginal specimen collection for Pap and HPV DNA testing.

48 l, calendar time, time from illness onset to specimen collection, frailty score, and Charlson comorbi

49 In our UTI and rectal specimen collections, hra was positively associated with

50 tro inoculation of pig corneas and following specimen collection in patients with presumed bacterial

51 Differences in the timing of specimen collection in pregnancy, selective culture meth

52 tions are a feasible alternative to cervical specimen collections in this population, and the use of

53 iates the necessity of multiple and wasteful specimen collection is high on the wish-list of practici

54 Specimen collection kits were distributed to clinics in

55 linearity, and analytical sensitivity across specimen collection matrices (serum, EDTA, ACD-A), and h

56 ulture were randomized to the order of first specimen collection method: ESwab or a sample directly p

57 monstrate the utility of both the STM and PC specimen collection methods and show good agreement betw

58 We assessed the performance of alternative specimen collection methods for tuberculosis diagnosis i

59 ver, these assays may often require invasive specimen collection methods, such as female cervical and

60 Due to the ease of specimen collection, NP swabs may be preferable for the

61 guanide can inhibit PCR, and we suggest that specimen collection occur prior to topical treatment to

62 to evaluate the impact of increased biologic specimen collection on participation.

63 Specimen collection order did not appear to affect the d

64 sed with longer durations of symptoms before specimen collection (P=.01).

65 especified analysis, blinded per prospective-specimen-collection, retrospective-blinded-evaluation (P

66 Considering the timing of specimen collection, serology results, patient vaccinati

67 To determine the optimal timing of stool specimen collection, studies of wild and vaccine poliovi

68 The simplicity of specimen collection suggests that saliva offers a practi

69 culture reports with respect to the order of specimen collection technique used.

70 dized case definitions, clinical procedures, specimen collection techniques, and laboratory methods h

71 Two alternative specimen collection technologies appear promising and ca

72 when whole blood was processed within 2 h of specimen collection the levels of HIV-1 RNA detected in

73 The mean time from specimen collection to acyclovir discontinuation was 17.

74 history, physical examination, and clinical specimen collection to determine if they had polio.

75 MTBDRplus diagnostic shortened the time from specimen collection to patient MDR tuberculosis therapy

76 We calculated time from specimen collection to phenotypic second-line DST result

77 esting (DST) may take 4 weeks or longer from specimen collection to the availability of results.

78 ean time interval of 5.69 +/- 0.37 days from specimen collection to the availability of RT-PCR result

79 Important factors, such as specimen collection, urinalysis interpretation, culture

80 time from Ebola treatment unit discharge to specimen collection was 142 days (IQR 127-159).

81 ian number of days between illness onset and specimen collection was 9.

82 al blinded study visit and consented to anal specimen collection were included in the analysis (4210

83 laboratory surveillance could be improved if specimen collection were simplified.