ライフサイエンスコーパス: spectacle

1 best corrected visual acuity was >20/40 with spectacles).

2 s) and when they were squinting (not wearing spectacles).

3 were randomized to ready-made or custom-made spectacles.

4 lated to eye diseases is not reversible with spectacles.

5 red after discontinuation of the use of near spectacles.

6 e addition lenses) or single-distance vision spectacles.

7 tifocal compared with single-distance vision spectacles.

8 .3 +/- 4.4 days) after the provision of free spectacles.

9 (72.4%) would be suitable for off-the-shelf spectacles.

10 ith the result that 33% of subjects required spectacles.

11 n of the optical displacement imposed by the spectacles.

12 so reliably reduce a patient's dependency on spectacles.

13 eady-made (n = 232) or custom-made (n = 228) spectacles.

14 ate knowledge and favorable attitude towards spectacles.

15 se of suboptimal UCDVA and need for distance spectacles.

16 en in the observation group who did not need spectacles.

17 95 % CI 1.20-6.50) had good knowledge about spectacles.

18 .4 [1.3] years) were eligible for ready-made spectacles (2.0% undergoing screening and 86.0% undergoi

19 Children were randomly assigned to overminus spectacles (-2.50 D over cycloplegic refraction) or obse

20 ine [LogMAR 0], while 7.9% presented wearing spectacles, 3.8% had impaired colour vision, 1.5% had gr

21 Of the 1142 subjects who would benefit from spectacles, 827 (72.4%) would be suitable for off-the-sh

22 perimentally examined how wearing multifocal spectacles affects stair and step negotiation.

23 majority of PNVI is likely correctable with spectacles, allocation of resources to provide correctiv

24 rable to those of more expensive custom-made spectacles among eligible school-aged children.

25 e to achieve satisfactory visual acuity with spectacle and contact lens correction alone.

26 corneal curvature, and axial length between spectacle and contact lens wearers.

27 %) participants had adequate knowledge about spectacles and 90.4 % had favorable attitude towards spe

28 problems some older adults have with updated spectacles and after cataract surgery.

29 y options for patients who are intolerant of spectacles and contact lenses.

30 er from aniseikonia and can be intolerant of spectacles and contact lenses.

31 Owls were fitted with prismatic or control spectacles and provided rich auditory-visual experience:

32 tions: when their eyes were aligned (wearing spectacles) and when they were squinting (not wearing sp

33 ng corrective lenses, save for the patient's spectacles, and so patients are sometimes tested in the

34 Most children were eligible for ready-made spectacles, and the proportion wearing ready-made specta

35 Ready-made spectacles are suitable for the majority of individuals

36 Spectacles are the most frequently used options for corr

37 When this bias relaxes after reading spectacles are worn, there is a hyperopic shift of the r

38 ferior to the proportion wearing custom-made spectacles at 3 to 4 months.

39 Proportion of children wearing their spectacles at unannounced visits 3 to 4 months after the

40 d no preference for sweet compounds, but the spectacled bear (intact Tas1r2) did.

41 Each received monovision spectacles, contact lenses, or both with distance correc

42 ng the follow-up of included uncorrected and spectacle corrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA/CDVA),

43 Clinical outcome parameters included best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corne

44 itute Visual Functioning Questionnaire; best spectacle-corrected and uncorrected visual acuities were

45 In all eyes, the mean postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (0.13 +/- 0.17 logMAR)

46 The mean postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA in decimal equiv

47 Primary outcome measure was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) 3 months after

48 Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after DMEK was

49 The primary outcomes were change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and change in

50 toperative quality of vision, including best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and contrast s

51 ain outcome measures were postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and endothelia

52 Outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and endothelia

53 The outcomes examined were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and scar size

54 Mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) at presentatio

55 The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) for each case

56 toperative visual acuity, postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was measured a

57 as determined by slit-lamp examination; best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was measured u

58 Postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was recorded a

59 e relationships between DSEK timing and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) while accounti

60 Our main outcome measures were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) with astigmati

61 We assessed 3-month best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 3-month infil

62 g tomographies, endothelium cell count, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and anterior

63 0 mm), central corneal thickness (CCT), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and endotheli

64 ism, and treatment on outcomes, 3-month best-spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and infiltrat

65 Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and topograph

66 urgery (mean follow-up, 21+/-7 months), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), best contact

67 Incidence of graft rejection, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corne

68 ystrophy at a tertiary referral center, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal HOAs,

69 me measures in DMEK recipients included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial c

70 Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refr

71 T-DSAEK or DSAEK, based on preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), recipient cen

72 Outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, a

73 type of pneumatic dissection obtained; best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refractive as

74 Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), sphere and cy

75 luded uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective ma

76 tailed ophthalmic examinations included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), tear film pro

77 Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA; in logarithm o

78 um angle of resolution [logMAR] units), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA; measured in lo

79 l of inflammation (P = 0.44), change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.68), or resolut

80 lment showed significant improvement in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3 months if cortico

81 The primary outcome was best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3 months; secondary

82 corticosteroids (vs placebo) on 3-month best spectacle-corrected visual acuity in patients who receiv

83 cases had significantly better 3-month best spectacle-corrected visual acuity than voriconazole-trea

84 Preoperative spectacle-corrected visual acuity was </=20/200 in 8 pat

85 erative follow-up of 6 months (n = 20), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 or better an

86 surgery, in 26 (83.8%) of 31 patients, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better wi

87 The outcome of 3-week best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was significantly asso

88 s in PCT at the 12-o'clock position and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were not significantly

89 Improvements in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were used to calculate

90 The mean gain in visual acuity (lens vs spectacle-corrected visual acuity) was 0.54 +/- 0.18 (de

91 isual results are excellent (preserving best spectacle-corrected visual acuity), and the procedure pr

92 s included rate of reepithelialization, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and infiltrate or sca

93 Visits included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, anterior segment opti

94 Outcomes included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, infiltrate/scar size,

95 ring control of inflammation, change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, resolution of macular

96 rium species and adjusting for baseline best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, the natamycin-treated

97 The primary outcome was 3-month best spectacle-corrected visual acuity.

98 tween children who were treated with partial spectacle correction and those who were not.

99 Appropriate spectacle correction can be prescribed to patients with

100 opia continue as the primary indications for spectacle correction following cataract surgery.

101 Three patients (5.1%) reported the need for spectacle correction for certain activities.

102 The benefits of spectacle correction for infants with hyperopia can be a

103 Does partial spectacle correction of infants' refractive errors, whic

104 Astigmatic correction may include spectacle correction or contact lenses, but if this fail

105 ildren with hyperopia may benefit from early spectacle correction or preventive therapy.

106 en who are most likely to benefit from early spectacle correction or preventive treatment.

107 ct surgery coupled with IOL implantation and spectacle correction was 37.5% ( approximately $4000) mo

108 The need for spectacle correction was determined by cycloplegic refra

109 rgery) and refractive error (reversible with spectacle correction) continue to cause most cases of bl

110 o 9 months were assigned to treated (partial spectacle correction) or untreated groups.

111 After refraction and spectacle correction, the prevalence of visual impairmen

112 s (ages 22-57 years) were examined with best spectacle correction.

113 in so doing, decrease their dependence upon spectacle correction.

114 fying children who had astigmatism requiring spectacle correction.

115 other patients (94.8%) reported never using spectacle correction.

116 A recent study suggested that updated spectacles could increase fall rate in frail older peopl

117 These findings suggest that ready-made spectacles could substantially reduce costs for school-b

118 The spectacle coverage percentage, calculated as [met need/(

119 In Bangladesh, there is low spectacle coverage with a large unmet need.

120 SE, deviation from predicted refraction, or spectacle cylinder at 1 month or at 1 year.

121 erlap was associated with a 0.50-D change in spectacle cylinder from 1 month to 1 year.

122 lorrhexis-optic overlap, 60% had a change in spectacle cylinder of more than 0.50 D from 1 month to 1

123 d tests and services in an attempt to reduce spectacle dependence in combination with cataract surger

124 ned circuitry: owls reared wearing prismatic spectacles develop an adaptive microcircuit that coexist

125 out 25 % of the participants have been using spectacles during the study.

126 rtical toe clearance when wearing multifocal spectacles, elderly individuals may be at greater risk o

127 ollowing eligibility criteria for ready-made spectacles: failed vision screening at the 6/9 level in

128 dren wearing their study spectacles or plano spectacles for the children in the observation group who

129 on (non-overminus spectacles if needed or no spectacles) for 8 weeks.

130 The adjusted odds ratio of being spectacle free was 7.51 (95% confidence interval, 3.89-1

131 e refraction in the same treatment, offering spectacle-free vision in daily life in most of the patie

132 group as a whole after the provision of free spectacles: function, 11.2 points (P = 0.0001); symptoms

133 Green spectacles gave way during the early 1900s to dark glass

134 graphic and optical characteristics, but not spectacle group.

135 ated that elderly people who wear multifocal spectacles have an increased risk of tripping, particula

136 ore highly educated were more likely to wear spectacles; however, most spectacle wearers (81%) had in

137 ic refraction) or observation (non-overminus spectacles if needed or no spectacles) for 8 weeks.

138 a pilot randomized clinical trial, overminus spectacles improved distance control at 8 weeks in child

139 visual incapacitation resulting from loss of spectacles, improving the rate of early detection of ocu

140 7%), topical lubricants in 8 patients (36%), spectacles in 1 patient (5%), and superficial keratectom

141 tact lenses, rigid gas permeable lenses, and spectacles in children.

142 ted to assess the effectiveness of overminus spectacles in treating IXT, particularly the effect on c

143 Today, patients often expect to achieve spectacle independance after cataract surgery.

144 l [CI], -0.10 to -0.04) and provided greater spectacle independence (risk ratio [RR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0

145 at 60 cm; and high patient satisfaction and spectacle independence 3 months postoperatively.

146 ion despite some optical phenomena; and high spectacle independence 3 months postoperatively.

147 ltifocal intraocular lens (MFIOL) allows for spectacle independence after cataract surgery and is thu

148 ients' experience, satisfaction and level of spectacle independence after surgery.

149 especially if surgeons intend to prioritize spectacle independence and patient autonomy at intermedi

150 ual acuity, resulting in high levels of both spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.

151 fractive bifocal IOLs produce high levels of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.

152 l acuity outcomes, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence at 3 months of 2 diffractive (non

153 To develop a questionnaire quantifying spectacle independence following cataract surgery.

154 RSIQ is a patient-reported measure assessing spectacle independence following cataract surgery.

155 Spectacle independence is becoming increasingly importan

156 he qualitative results, the Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ) was develop

157 uestionnaire (PRSIQ) was developed to assess spectacle independence via items that assess what patien

158 Complete spectacle independence was achieved in 69 of 84 (82.1%)

159 ve quality of vision, optical phenomena, and spectacle independence was performed.

160 Patients' satisfaction and spectacle independence were evaluated with questionnaire

161 ctive performance, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated.

162 ve quality of vision, optical phenomena, and spectacle independence were performed.

163 at toric IOLs provided better UCDVA, greater spectacle independence, and lower amounts of residual as

164 uded other questionnaire data (CatQuest-9SF, spectacle independence, vision satisfaction, and dysphot

165 p a patient-reported questionnaire assessing spectacle independence.

166 nd growing, with a high level of interest in spectacle independence.

167 The primary outcome was spectacle independence.

168 motivated patients who would like to achieve spectacle independence.

169 have excellent uncorrected visual acuity and spectacle independence.

170 use of the PRSIQ total score as a measure of spectacle independence.

171 support the use of the PRSIQ as a measure of spectacle independence.

172 distance visual acuity (UCDVA) and distance spectacle independence.

173 The IOLs were equivalent in achieving spectacle independence; 98% were "satisfied" to "very sa

174 rovided better uncorrected visual acuity and spectacles independence for intermediate/close-up and fa

175 l toric IOL implantation results in a higher spectacle independency for distance vision compared with

176 Spectacle independency for distance vision was achieved

177 Spectacle independency for distance vision, uncorrected

178 ime of cataract surgery will fail to achieve spectacle independency in 20% to 30% of patients.

179 rowing number of patients who wish to remain spectacle independent after cataract surgery, and this n

180 ecnis ZM900 were more likely to report being spectacle independent but also more likely to undergo IO

181 ed that patients often considered themselves spectacle independent yet, when probed, it was determine

182 The effect of early spectacle intervention has been debated, with some evide

183 The effects of spectacle interventions to correct refractive errors are

184 Use of single-vision distance spectacles led to an increased single-limb support time,

185 Use of single-vision distance spectacles led to improvements in landing control, consi

186 of blur is not an important error signal for spectacle lens compensation and therefore probably not f

187 vere astigmatic blur does not interfere with spectacle lens compensation.

188 The optical design of a spectacle lens had significant impact on reading perform

189 in 18 infant monkeys by securing a diffuser spectacle lens in front of one eye and a clear plano len

190 infant rhesus monkeys by securing a diffuser spectacle lens in front of one eye and a clear, zero-pow

191 k-old white Leghorn chicks wore a unilateral spectacle lens of +15 or -15 D for 6 hours or 3 days.

192 th, corneal curvature, or myopia relative to spectacle lens wear.

193 he retinal transcriptome in chicks wearing a spectacle lens, a well-established means of inducing ref

194 eprivation was produced either with diffuser spectacle lenses (n = 30) or by surgical eyelid closure

195 es rapidly compensate for defocus imposed by spectacle lenses by changing their rate of elongation an

196 one of three different strengths of diffuser spectacle lenses in front of the treated eye and a clear

197 ic and selective blue-violet light filtering spectacle lenses in patients affected by central or peri

198 Both diffusers and spectacle lenses induce myopia in mice under photopic co

199 The operation of these spectacle lenses is based on electrical control of the r

200 t monkeys were reared wearing -3 diopter (D) spectacle lenses over one eye that produced relative hyp

201 emmetropization or compensation for imposed spectacle lenses requires the visual system to distingui

202 r impact resistance than other commonly used spectacle lenses that conform to prevailing eyewear stan

203 Reading was performed with three types of spectacle lenses with a different clear near field of vi

204 (50) had non surgical treatment for control (spectacle lenses, occlusion, prisms, exercises) and 17%

205 the defocus imposed by positive or negative spectacle lenses.

206 e with compensation for positive or negative spectacle lenses.

207 Reading was performed with three types of spectacle lenses: a single-vision lens (SVL; 60 degrees

208 study was conducted to assess the effects of spectacle magnification on step negotiation.

209 the increased risk may be due to changes in spectacle magnification.

210 ned to wear soft contact lenses (n = 247) or spectacles (n = 237) for 3 years.

211 y and outcomes in ametropic children who are spectacle noncompliant and unsuitable for contact lens w

212 ed back from the Moon to see the magnificent spectacle of Earth-rise.

213 nder von Humboldt observed the extraordinary spectacle of native fisherman collecting electric eels (

214 critical review, it is pointed out that the spectacle of nature's spontaneous tinkering with the str

215 tifocal compared with single-distance vision spectacles on minimum toe clearance and risk of tripping

216 aring multifocal compared with single-vision spectacles (one-sided Fisher's exact test P = 0.025).

217 e standard of care for treating aphakia when spectacle or contact lens correction is not viable.

218 ral disorders have chronic difficulties with spectacle or contact lens wear.

219 ced by rearing 26 infant monkeys with either spectacle or diffuser lenses secured in front of one or

220 Colored spectacle or intraocular lens filters reduce both propor

221 yopia and strabismus who fail treatment with spectacles or contact lenses.

222 conducted with children wearing their study spectacles or plano spectacles for the children in the o

223 anges in the environment, such as magnifying spectacles or standing on a tilting platform.

224 regarding whether persons currently wearing spectacles or suffering from a chronic illnesses could d

225 ired only YAG-Laser and 14 (5.5%) required a spectacle prescription only.

226 Optical treatment was provided as spectacles (prescription based on a cycloplegic refracti

227 presbyopia for subjective measurements (near spectacle prescriptions and add powers) was indicated, m

228 dures, surgical procedures, medications, and spectacle prescriptions.

229 eared with horizontally displacing prismatic spectacles (prisms) acquire a novel auditory space map i

230 When juvenile owls are reared with prismatic spectacles (prisms) that displace the visual field later

231 Ready-made spectacles produce large but slightly smaller improvemen

232 determine whether less expensive ready-made spectacles produce rates of spectacle wear at 3 to 4 mon

233 mpact on self-reported visual functioning of spectacle provision for school-aged children in Oaxaca,

234 hen the subjects wore single-vision distance spectacles, rather than tending to "drop" onto the lower

235 stigated short-term adaptation to first near-spectacle reading correction on the accommodative-stimul

236 acles, SCL, RGPL, and spectacle wear; or (B) spectacles, RGPL, SCL, and spectacle wear.

237 eatments (2-3 weeks for each treatment): (A) spectacles, SCL, RGPL, and spectacle wear; or (B) specta

238 senting acuity (uncorrected or with original spectacles), tested 4 weeks after the provision of free

239 er in the 27 children treated with overminus spectacles than in the 31 children who were observed wit

240 s been induced by exposing owls to prismatic spectacles that cause a large, horizontal shift of the v

241 When owls are raised wearing prismatic spectacles that displace the visual field in azimuth, th

242 When barn owls are raised wearing spectacles that horizontally displace the visual field,

243 (1) We equipped owls with prismatic spectacles that optically displaced the visual field by

244 on is altered by rearing owls with prismatic spectacles that shift the visual field in azimuth, ITD t

245 een studied in owls forced to wear prismatic spectacles that shift their visual field.

246 Owls were raised wearing prismatic spectacles that shifted the visual field in the horizont

247 s areas for improvement (e.g., off-the-shelf spectacles) that may enable Bangladesh to achieve the go

248 ent of the visual field by wearing prismatic spectacles, the ITD tuning of ICX neurons becomes system

249 Provision of spectacles to children in this setting had a significant

250 n = 235) or SVLs (n = 234), the conventional spectacle treatment for myopia, and were followed for 3

251 ion lenses (SVLs; n = 234), the conventional spectacle treatment, and were observed for 3 years.

252 nsidered and the child should be followed in spectacles until no further improvement is recorded, whi

253 est refraction, keratometry, adverse events, spectacle use, and photographic documentation of IOL rot

254 es and 90.4 % had favorable attitude towards spectacle use.

255 ude, practice and associated factors towards spectacles use among adult population of Gondar town, no

256 However, practice of spectacles use is poor.

257 CI 14-10.72) had favorable attitude towards spectacles use.

258 Eye health education related to spectacles utilization need to be given due emphasis by

259 rtical toe clearance when wearing multifocal spectacles (variance ratio, 1.53; P = 0.0004).

260 riod and then 2 months after the use of near spectacles was discontinued.

261 Visual acuity with spectacles was measured using the Amblyopia Treatment St

262 acles, and the proportion wearing ready-made spectacles was not inferior to the proportion wearing cu

263 Treatment (other than spectacles) was prescribed for 9 participants (6.1%) age

264 , tested 4 weeks after the provision of free spectacles, was 6/9 (range, 6/6-6/120).

265 SCL wearing compared with RGPL and baseline spectacle wear (P<0.05), although mean differences were

266 ntributions of the two principal treatments (spectacle wear and occlusion) to outcome are unknown.

267 nsive ready-made spectacles produce rates of spectacle wear at 3 to 4 months comparable to those of m

268 Rates of spectacle wear in the 2 arms were similar among 139 of 1

269 refractive adaptation: an 18-week period of spectacle wear with six weekly measurements of logarithm

270 efractive adaptation" (18 weeks of full-time spectacle wear), and "occlusion" (6 hours of patching pe

271 nce control, baseline near control, prestudy spectacle wear, and prior IXT treatment.

272 ealth programs in India without compromising spectacle wear, at least in the short term.

273 acle wear; or (B) spectacles, RGPL, SCL, and spectacle wear.

274 er after 2 months of discontinuation of near spectacle wear.

275 h treatment): (A) spectacles, SCL, RGPL, and spectacle wear; or (B) spectacles, RGPL, SCL, and specta

276 report dry eye disease (52.3%), followed by spectacle wearers (23.9%) and clinical emmetropes (7.1%)

277 ore likely to wear spectacles; however, most spectacle wearers (81%) had inadequate correction.

278 7, 95% confidence interval = 7.55-20.26) and spectacle wearers (adjusted odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confi

279 emiologic research has shown that multifocal spectacle wearers (bifocal and progressive addition lens

280 difference between contact lens wearers and spectacle wearers was not statistically significant (95%

281 ne or both eyes (64 % of these were habitual spectacle wearers), need for improvement was present in

282 ice as likely to fall than are nonmultifocal spectacle wearers, with this risk further increasing whe

283 r year greater for contact lens wearers than spectacle wearers.

284 visual function compared with both RGPL and spectacle wearing at baseline, although mean effect size

285 y nystagmus characteristics or compared with spectacle wearing.

286 ntly reduce nystagmus compared with baseline spectacle wearing.

287 Aberrometry measurements of the eye and spectacles were made centrally, 30 degrees nasally, temp

288 Spectacles were prescribed for children < 48 months of a

289 sured before and after single-vision reading spectacles were worn for near tasks over a 2-month perio

290 tios did not change significantly after near spectacles were worn.

291 ingle-distance vision rather than multifocal spectacles when walking.

292 Subjects without spectacles with less than 6/12 in the better eye (n = 83

293 They were randomly assigned to wear yellow spectacles with or without the left lens occluded, and w