ライフサイエンスコーパス: speech perception

1 ict and decision uncertainty during impaired speech perception).

2 ural processes that are specific to auditory speech perception.

3 early oscillation-based selection influences speech perception.

4 knowledge are integrated in the brain during speech perception.

5 nfluence is modulatory but not necessary for speech perception.

6 vidual variability in children's audiovisual speech perception.

7 t the motor system is critically involved in speech perception.

8 ive and expressive language, and outcomes of speech perception.

9 f both types of cues would negatively affect speech perception.

10 s thought to mediate phonological aspects of speech perception.

11 c categorization and be important for robust speech perception.

12 al sulcus (pSTS) is known to be critical for speech perception.

13 e pure tone hearing loss, and marked loss of speech perception.

14 enewed interest in gesture-based theories of speech perception.

15 er the motor cortex has an essential role in speech perception.

16 syllable patterns and is critical for normal speech perception.

17 s exist and that they affect auditory-visual speech perception.

18 her this simulation process is necessary for speech perception.

19 ransients and may be especially relevant for speech perception.

20 perceptual and cognitive functions, such as speech perception.

21 h visual information about lip movements for speech perception.

22 agrammatism and subjective difficulties with speech perception.

23 sensitive period for bimodal integration in speech perception.

24 s-by-synthesis" mechanism in auditory-visual speech perception.

25 ach of the major theoretical perspectives on speech perception.

26 t, from activation of brain areas underlying speech perception.

27 temporal lobe neural systems engaged during speech perception.

28 d discourse tracking (CDT) as the measure of speech perception.

29 s for the neural mechanisms underlying human speech perception.

30 the brain tracks lip movements to help with speech perception.

31 al network computer simulation of disordered speech perception.

32 evidence for a Predictive Coding account of speech perception.

33 reliability of them to identify deficits in speech perception.

34 als in a region of the brain specialized for speech perception.

35 o accounts of how prior knowledge influences speech perception.

36 xtend current mechanistic perspectives on AV speech perception.

37 ability of articulatory codes during passive speech perception.

38 n of sensorimotor information during passive speech perception.

39 y of amblyopia have impaired visual-auditory speech perception.

40 ementation of top-down control in continuous speech perception.

41 lations in 22 participants during continuous speech perception.

42 information from the articulators influences speech perception.

43 listeners activate motor brain areas during speech perception.

44 from language-universal to language-specific speech perception.

45 s' knowledge of speech production to explain speech perception.

46 ing day-to-day functioning on tasks, such as speech perception.

47 accompany learning drive changes in auditory speech perception.

48 reports implicating premotor cortex (PMC) in speech perception.

49 he hierarchical generative models underlying speech perception.

50 tral and temporal benefits to yield improved speech perception.

51 t least in part, for their difficulties with speech perception.

52 Speech perception after implantation can vary widely--we

53 imately .3 between cognitive performance and speech perception, although some variability in associat

54 Speech perception among cochlear implant (CI) listeners

55 nnel noise-vocoded speech, thereby impairing speech perception and assessing whether this evokes doma

56 de modulation encoding is critical for human speech perception and complex sound processing in genera

57 nvolved in both language-specific processes (speech perception and comprehension, verbal working memo

58 spheres are equally and actively involved in speech perception and interpretation.

59 provides a link between auditory signals of speech perception and motor programs of speech productio

60 ing, key for understanding behaviors such as speech perception and multimodal sensory integration.

61 e close connection between brain systems for speech perception and production, and in particular, ind

62 temporal, frontal and parietal lobes linking speech perception and production.

63 inks between the phonological mechanisms for speech perception and production.

64 nspeech categories, and the relation between speech perception and production.

65 cortex, consistent with previous findings in speech perception and production.

66 though evidence for this has been limited to speech perception and production.

67 explain the foundations of the link between speech perception and speech production.

68 aring loss can produce prolonged deficits in speech perception and temporal processing.

69 redictive top-down control during continuous speech perception and that top-down control is largely d

70 tex will inform our growing understanding of speech perception and the processing of other complex so

71 rticular those forming the prerequisites for speech perception and understanding.

72 voices in schizophrenia arise from disrupted speech perception and verbal working memory systems rath

73 aced with restoration of hearing thresholds, speech perception, and synchronous activity in auditory

74 r skills with the auditory skills underlying speech perception, and the possible phylogenetic interac

75 distortions can lead to systematic errors in speech perception, and therefore hearing aid prescriptio

76 esponses can perform transformations between speech-perception- and speech-production-based represent

77 , with benefits shown to extend to untrained speech perception as well.

78 In speech perception, as in other domains, two functionally

79 Results suggest that speech perception automatically triggers motor action, b

80 ovided by studies that have investigated (a) speech perception, (b) intensity discrimination, and (c)

81 shold elevation and associated reductions in speech perception because speech sounds, especially cons

82 surements to investigate interactions during speech perception between native phonemes and talker's v

83 istive technology may improve not only their speech perception but also their connection and orientat

84 y cortical oscillations could play a role in speech perception by fostering hemispheric triage of inf

85 These results transform theories of speech perception by suggesting that even at the initial

86 Some of the age-related decline in speech perception can be accounted for by peripheral sen

87 e rather than specialization is critical for speech-perception capabilities that some have suggested

88 ed model of causal inference in multisensory speech perception (CIMS) that predicts the perception of

89 sults support a predictive coding account of speech perception; computational simulations show how a

90 arpened Signals and Prediction Errors during speech perception could both explain these behavioural a

91 tudy, sentence recognition from the Mandarin speech perception database was measured in adult and ped

92 Subsequent tests of Mandarin speech perception demonstrated that exposure to Mandarin

93 The primary symptom in humans is poor speech perception despite normal pure tone audiometry.

94 s article, we review the literature on human speech perception development within the context of this

95 her electrophysiological, psychophysical, or speech perception effects.

96 ll as sounds, and lip-reading contributes to speech perception, even for listeners with good hearing,

97 ural ENV coding was a primary contributor to speech perception, even in noise; and (2) neural TFS con

98 measures and then evaluated with subjective speech perception experiments for both normal hearing an

99 o stimulus-brain rhythm interaction predicts speech perception facilitation.

100 tures and language and it suggests a role in speech perception for the motor system underlying speech

101 left-sided dominance in Wernicke's area for speech perception has been demonstrated in 2.5-mo-old ba

102 Speech perception has been studied for over a half centu

103 Two long-opposing views of speech perception have posited a basis either in acousti

104 Debates about motor theories of speech perception have recently been reignited by a burs

105 ver, most functional neuroimaging studies of speech perception have used metalinguistic tasks that re

106 tions for: (i) perception-action theories of speech perception, (ii) the impact of "motherese" on ear

107 The HINT tests for speech perception in background noise, the major complai

108 s that a similar organization might underlie speech perception in humans.

109 rom background noise, leading to deficits in speech perception in modulated background noise.SIGNIFIC

110 ovide improvements in sound localization and speech perception in noise over unilateral CIs, bilatera

111 However, no benefit for speech perception in noise was found for the dual-proces

112 entation of repeating elements is crucial to speech perception in noise, since it allows superior "ta

113 ich can be considered a process analogous to speech perception in noise.

114 elated positively with behavioral indices of speech perception in noise.

115 dict variability in hearing-aid outcomes for speech perception in noise.

116 he SMS than auditory regions for categorical speech perception in noise.

117 understanding of the neural basis for robust speech perception in noise.

118 negatively by aging, potentially diminishing speech perception in noisy environments.

119 essed speech on bimodal listeners' telephone speech perception in quiet environments.

120 e most important known determinants of later speech perception in young children after cochlear impla

121 ul example of this phenomenon is categorical speech perception, in which a continuum of acoustically

122 e implanted safely and that their subsequent speech perception is at least as good as children implan

123 Therefore, a key step in audiovisual speech perception is deciding whether auditory and visua

124 A striking property of speech perception is its resilience in the face of acous

125 Recent psychophysics data suggest that speech perception is not limited by the capacity of the

126 Human speech perception is profoundly influenced by vision.

127 Speech perception is supported by both acoustic signal d

128 The influence of speech production on speech perception is well established in adults.

129 ts high temporal acuity, which is pivotal to speech perception, is a central issue of auditory scienc

130 S), a brain region known to be important for speech perception, is complex, with some regions respond

131 order language processes, or bilateral, like speech perception, is controversial.

132 During speech perception, linguistic elements such as consonant

133 The robustness of speech perception might, in part, result from multiple,

134 These results demonstrate that during speech perception, missing acoustic content is synthesiz

135 Speech perception most strongly activated superior tempo

136 Historic theories of speech perception (Motor Theory and Analysis by Synthesi

137 ate or frequency, plays an important role in speech perception, music perception, and listening in co

138 A computer simulation of a speech perception neural network was developed.

139 Although recent evidence indicates that speech perception occurs bilaterally, prevailing models

140 we will demonstrate how our understanding of speech perception, one important facet of language, has

141 culatory phonological production rather than speech perception or lexical-semantic processes.

142 conversation (lipreading) markedly improves speech perception, particularly in noisy conditions.

143 y, a considerable reduction of the spread of speech perception performance from 40% to 93% for advanc

144 operties that have shown to be important for speech perception performance, and needs to be considere

145 ment" in articulator movement can compromise speech perception performance, raising the question of w

146 latory configurations can influence infants' speech perception performance.

147 the latter, the interaction directly impacts speech perception performance.

148 ing important spectral and temporal cues for speech perception, performance on speech tests is variab

149 Theories about the neural foundations of speech perception postulate that the left and right audi

150 Speech-perception problems associated with noise overexp

151 nvolvement of specific motor circuits in the speech-perception process, we used event-related functio

152 sed with reference to their implications for speech perception processes.

153 imuli and a silence baseline; (ii) mid-level speech perception processing abilities were assessed by

154 ich sensorimotor integration plays a role in speech perception remains highly controversial, however.

155 Speech perception requires the rapid and effortless extr

156 Speech perception requires the successful interpretation

157 rin Hearing in Noise Test than with Mandarin speech perception sentences at the normal rate.

158 ral evidence for a phonological loop linking speech perception, short-term memory and production rema

159 essing in humans, including implications for speech perception, spatial auditory processing and audit

160 ation in precentral gyrus shows that, during speech perception, specific motor circuits are recruited

161 in different cortical areas along the dorsal speech perception stream are distributed on different sp

162 versial, however, to what extent the brain's speech perception system actively uses articulatory (mot

163 pmental milestones bidirectionally on infant speech perception tasks.

164 me measures were audibility, scores from the speech perception tests, and scores from a questionnaire

165 r the HINT results, the E+P group had poorer speech perception than the E and control groups across a

166 It is well established that in human speech perception the left hemisphere (LH) of the brain

167 During speech perception, the electric cortical activity of the

168 peech motor system (SMS) is activated during speech perception, the functional role of this activatio

169 For speech perception, this learning is selective: initially

170 disruption of human premotor cortex impairs speech perception, thus demonstrating an essential role

171 motor activation contributes to categorical speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

172 d the cortical regions mediating categorical speech perception using an advanced brain-mapping techni

173 In contrast, this study shows that speech perception via a cochlear implant is unaffected b

174 f communication, and socioeconomic group) on speech perception was analysed.

175 Narrative speech perception was assessed through use of a masked s

176 To examine the role of motor areas in speech perception, we carried out a functional magnetic

177 But in addition to speech perception, we routinely extract from voices a we

178 s at these characteristic time scales during speech perception, we studied the spatial and dynamic pr

179 Specifically, we obtained changes in speech perception when adaptation to altered auditory fe

180 y judgments about speech sounds (rather than speech perception, which involves decoding of sounds).

181 ogy of mirror neurons to the Motor Theory of speech perception, which posits that perception and prod

182 concerns whether humans are specialized for speech perception, which some researchers argue is demon

183 ion will improve phoneme recognition and (b) speech perception will improve when channels with high t

184 sory detail and prior expectations influence speech perception with computational modelling, we provi

185 hat Broca's area participates in categorical speech perception, with a possible role of translating s

186 uperior temporal gyrus (STG) is critical for speech perception, yet the organization of spectrotempor