ライフサイエンスコーパス: speech production

1 ns of the link between speech perception and speech production.

2 ct provide a rich source of sensory input in speech production.

3 in deformation that would normally accompany speech production.

4 modulation of activity in SII during normal speech production.

5 d to minimize artifact associated with overt speech production.

6 tion of motor sequences necessary for fluent speech production.

7 motor areas associated with articulation and speech production.

8 ntary spasms in the laryngeal muscles during speech production.

9 h perception for the motor system underlying speech production.

10 al procedures typically lead to worsening of speech production.

11 tal role in the construction of syllables in speech production.

12 ated a frontal-temporal system implicated in speech production.

13 eedback, and modulation of learned voice for speech production.

14 Human frontal cortex plays a crucial role in speech production.

15 ced neural activation in the left IFG during speech production.

16 aoperative cortical cooling in humans during speech production.

17 t of finer vocal motor control necessary for speech production.

18 ch is commonly seen as a neural correlate of speech production.

19 LMC functionality for finer motor control of speech production.

20 highly learned and uniquely human behavior: speech production.

21 and is activated by auditory feedback during speech production.

22 s of speech perception and motor programs of speech production.

23 al roles, only one of which was activated in speech production.

24 ar-striatal network previously implicated in speech production.

25 mpensate for loss of the left putamen during speech production.

26 r sensory target and state maps during overt speech production.

27 ly overlapping networks that are involved in speech production.

28 e during complex voluntary behavior, such as speech production.

29 ntary spasms in the laryngeal muscles during speech production.

30 r different underlying impairments affecting speech production.

31 nt phase using speech entrainment to improve speech production.

32 orrelated with somatosensory feedback during speech production.

33 ing periods of auditory perception and overt speech production.

34 ferior frontal gyrus, a region implicated in speech production.

35 pecific components of the neural network for speech production.

36 the increased motor demands associated with speech production?

37 The mechanisms underlying the acquisition of speech-production ability in human infancy are not well

38 positively with the longitudinal recovery of speech production across the two time points (as measure

39 uggested that variability in the recovery of speech production after aphasic stroke may relate in par

40 We hypothesized that the recovery of speech production after left hemisphere stroke not only

41 communication is a joint activity; however, speech production and comprehension have primarily been

42 February 2005, we discuss imaging studies of speech production and comprehension in patients with aph

43 In language, semantic prediction speeds speech production and comprehension.

44 n this important brain area involved in both speech production and domain-general cognitive processin

45 tudy examined the spontaneous rhythmicity in speech production and its relationship to cortex-muscle

46 ortex and parts of the striatum that control speech production and learning.

47 the temporal lobe are crucially involved in speech production and perception, respectively.

48 rlap between altered dopamine release during speech production and reduced 11C-raclopride binding to

49 he auditory system is critically involved in speech production and that the motor system is criticall

50 ft supramarginal gyrus, over and above overt speech production and working memory.

51 es of speech, the motor commands involved in speech production, and a Direct Realist approach that em

52 empirical data between the resting state and speech production, and dopaminergic neurotransmission ev

53 occurring among brain areas associated with speech production, and white matter tracts that intercon

54 , which we distinguished from a more ventral speech production area centered in area 4p.

55 lose relationship between (left-lateralized) speech production areas and the implementation of top-do

56 pecially involving occipital association and speech production areas.

57 brain circuits subserving self-regulation of speech production, attention, and emotion.

58 During speech production, auditory processing of self-generated

59 al right hemispheric (RH) lateralization for speech production, based on a previous large-scale scree

60 ansformations between speech-perception- and speech-production-based representations.

61 the human brain and is a critical region for speech production, being larger in the left hemisphere t

62 Noticeable differences in speech production between depressed and nondepressed pat

63 support a modular view of word retrieval in speech production but rather support substantial overlap

64 he left putamen is known to be important for speech production, but some patients with left putamen d

65 findings demonstrate that the development of speech production capacity relies on changes in selectiv

66 evel of activation within this region during speech production correlated positively with the longitu

67 A speech production deficit was observed in three members

68 ility to articulate our thoughts by means of speech production depends critically on the integrity of

69 liminary evidence suggests that treatment of speech production difficulties, even years after stroke,

70 n have greater difficulty with variations in speech production encountered in everyday listening.

71 the relation between hearing loss and human speech production especially where there is consideratio

72 es of syntactic complexity, lexical content, speech production, fluency and semantic content.

73 Within the human motor repertoire, speech production has a uniquely high level of spatiotem

74 ic lateralization of neural processes during speech production has been known since the times of Broc

75 Studies of the neural basis for song or speech production have focused almost exclusively on the

76 heard speech sounds with motor programs for speech production; imitation and self-imitation mechanis

77 ons to left frontal cortex in humans produce speech production impairments (nonfluent aphasia).

78 at training with speech entrainment improves speech production in Broca's aphasia providing a potenti

79 as explore its usefulness as a treatment for speech production in Broca's aphasia.

80 neural activation during natural, connected speech production in children who stutter demonstrates t

81 een few neurophysiological investigations of speech production in children who stutter.

82 to improve the characterization of connected speech production in each variant of primary progressive

83 promise for the use of fNIRS during natural speech production in future research with typical and at

84 studies showing cerebellar activation during speech production in healthy individuals.

85 brain regions and may thus facilitate fluent speech production in individuals who stutter.

86 o explore auditory-motor interactions during speech production in other human populations, particular

87 al magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate speech production in pre-surgical epilepsy patients and

88 ed semantic matching, perceptual matching or speech production in response to familiar or unfamiliar

89 nguage changes may be reflected in connected speech production in the earliest stages of typical Alzh

90 sensorimotor interaction primarily supports speech production, in the form of a state feedback contr

91 onses over neural regions integral to fluent speech production including inferior frontal gyrus, prem

92 dioxide levels is among the prerequisites to speech production insofar as speech often induces hypoca

93 During speech production, irrespective of fluency or auditory f

94 e ability to express thoughts through fluent speech production is a most human faculty, one that is o

95 multidimensional quantification of connected speech production is necessary to characterize the diffe

96 cite in favor of positing forward models in speech production is not compelling.

97 This response of cortical regions related to speech production is not predicted by the classical mode

98 tering, atypical functional organization for speech production is present and suggests promise for th

99 ed the crucial role of the frontal cortex in speech production, it has remained uncertain whether the

100 dopaminergic transmission during symptomatic speech production may represent a disorder-specific path

101 al premotor cortex that largely overlapped a speech production motor area centered just posteriorly o

102 ected regions comprised nodes of the Bohland speech-production (motor activity regulation), default-m

103 y shows that left WM pathways connecting the speech production network are selectively damaged in nfv

104 ossing white matter (WM) tracts within this "speech production network" is complex and has rarely bee

105 right hemisphere regions outside the classic speech production network.

106 nd drives left-hemispheric lateralization of speech production network.

107 rmined functional and structural large-scale speech production networks.

108 and quantitative differences in the impaired speech production observed in aphasic stroke patients.

109 The influence of speech production on speech perception is well establish

110 ed also reflected significant differences in speech production patterns.

111 th the inferior parietal lobe, was linked to speech production rather than perception.

112 isphere activations predict chronic aphasia; speech production recovery appears to depend on left fro

113 of auditory speech comprehension, but unlike speech production, recovery of speech comprehension appe

114 how this premotor activity influenced other speech production regions and whether the same neural pa

115 Speech production relies on fine voluntary motor control

116 Speech production requires the precise control of vocal

117 ontrol of movement: From grasping objects to speech production, sensing guides action.

118 ested that other regions also play a role in speech production, some of which are medial to the area

119 ted to language production (sentential overt speech production-Speech task) and activation related to

120 Studies of speech production suggest that recovery depends on slowl

121 stem to accurately predict less prototypical speech productions suggests that the efferent-driven sup

122 underactivations and the deactivation of the speech production system.

123 owledged and explained as part of the mature speech production system.

124 Alternative theories target the auditory and speech production systems.

125 ubject to subject and performance on certain speech production tasks can be relatively preserved in s

126 release during sequential finger tapping and speech production tasks in 15 patients with writer's cra

127 es in SII/OP1 activity during three familiar speech production tasks: object naming, reading and repe

128 aptation to altered auditory feedback led to speech production that fell into the phonetic range of t

129 -filter model describes the mechanics behind speech production: the identity of the speaker is carrie

130 hat were correlated positively were those of speech production: the mouth representation in the prima

131 y Synthesis) invoked listeners' knowledge of speech production to explain speech perception.

132 rforming sensory-motor tasks involving overt speech production to show that sensory-motor transformat

133 has been suggested that, analogous to human speech production, tongue movements observed in parrot v

134 te selective cognitive impairments affecting speech production, visual recall memory and executive fu

135 networks controlling two tasks necessary for speech production: voluntary voice as repetition of two

136 Specifically, compared to other tasks, speech production was characterized by the formation of

137 o account for temporal irregularities during speech production, we introduced a non-linear time align

138 substrates for left-hemisphere dominance in speech production were evident at least five million yea

139 tory cortical responses to less prototypical speech productions were less suppressed, resembling resp

140 g impairs the normally effortless process of speech production, which requires precise coordination o

141 ogical retrieval) is an essential process in speech production whose neural localization is not clear