1 either a 2-slice (n=23) or a 6-slice (n=
34)
spiral CT scanner.
2 3D spiral CT enabled highly accurate determination of the v
3 In addition,
3D spiral CT depicted calculi more sensitively than traditi
4 and magnitude of the rippling artifact at
3D spiral CT colonography.
5 With
3D spiral CT, calculus volumes were determined with a mean
6 hin an abdominal phantom were imaged with
3D spiral CT, radiography, and linear nephrotomography.
7 Abdominal spiral CT was performed after intravenous injection of c
8 mean age, 51 years) who underwent
abdominal spiral CT examinations.
9 canning, catheter pulmonary angiography,
and spiral CT.
10 cium scores between the electron-beam CT
and spiral CT images.
11 Quantitative perfusion
and spiral CT scans were performed for initial diagnosis and
12 Annual spiral CT screening can detect lung cancer that is curab
13 At spiral CT in 26 patients, motion artifact was reduced, c
14 tive graft angiography and 50 were patent
at spiral CT; accuracy rates were 97% (73 of 75) and 95% (7
15 had high probability for acute embolism,
but spiral CT scans showed only chronic PE; in one patients,
16 A positive result
by spiral CT imaging is useful for ruling in a diagnosis of
17 cutive outpatients referred for thoracic
CT,
spiral CT (120 kV, 292 mA) was performed with 1-second (
18 ed acquisition was comparable to higher-
dose spiral CT.
19 Dynamic spiral CT lung densitometry is a quick, simple method fo
20 indings of 309 intravenous contrast-
enhanced spiral CT examinations of the chest were retrospectively
21 mmediate surgery underwent contrast-
enhanced spiral CT followed by splenic arteriography.
22 Contrast-
enhanced spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamic
23 Contrast material-
enhanced spiral CT scans obtained in 92 patients clinically suspe
24 86 arterial phase contrast material-
enhanced spiral CT scans of the abdomen (5.0-mm section thickness
25 d in 10 pigs with contrast material-
enhanced spiral CT were displayed with six display window setting
26 V-P scanning and contrast material-
enhanced spiral CT.
27 he absence of lung cancer mortality data
for spiral CT, it is concluded that such activities should n
28 The average time
for spiral CT was 15.3 minutes compared with 37.2 minutes fo
29 n scores when a 90-HU threshold was used
for spiral CT images.
30 et of 30 colonic segments was developed
from spiral CT colonographic studies (12 with polyps and 18 w
31 ic (CT) fluoroscopy (n=196) and single-
image spiral CT fluoroscopy (n=175).
32 advanced radiographic techniques,
including spiral CT scanning and enhanced magnetic resonance imagi
33 In many
institutions,
spiral CT is becoming established as the first-line imag
34 ed to align paired (intra- and
intersession)
spiral CT data sets for each individual in a common coor
35 Multidetector spiral CT may permit assessment of remodeling of coronar
36 gate whether contrast-enhanced
multidetector spiral CT (MDCT) permits assessment of remodeling in cor
37 ave become available featuring
multidetector spiral CT scanners and high-performance PET devices.
38 or SPECT camera with a 6-slice
multidetector spiral CT scanner.
39 ulmonary embolism on the basis of a
negative spiral CT study.
40 hholding treatment in patients with
negative spiral CT results remains uncertain.
41 Remaining concerns about the accuracy
of spiral CT for pulmonary embolism detection may be overco
42 ement (SDNCE) measured from the beginning
of spiral CT scanning to the time when the enhancement decr
43 The direct technical cost
of spiral CT was $36.86 compared with $57.60 for combined U
44 in radiography was compared with the cost
of spiral CT.
45 far, have prevented the unanimous embrace
of spiral CT as the new standard of reference for imaging p
46 Use
of spiral CT for this application has been limited by cardi
47 mediastinal lymph nodes, as demonstrated
on spiral CT, can be useful in differentiating sarcoidosis
48 l distribution of mediastinal lymph nodes
on spiral CT was reviewed in 39 patients with sarcoidosis a
49 be offered in sites that have access to
only spiral CT.
50 chocardiogram, and coronary electron beam
or spiral CT will be performed serially.
51 venous phases of enhancement for dual-
phase spiral CT.
52 Dual-phase
renal spiral CT studies (5-mm collimation; pitch, 1.0) were re
53 most recent generation of multidetector-
row spiral CT scanners appears to outperform competing imagi
54 ome by the introduction of multidetector-
row spiral CT.
55 pulmonary images when compared with 1-
second spiral CT.
56 ted miss rate of up to 30% with single-
slice spiral CT so far, have prevented the unanimous embrace o
57 as a combination of a Siemens Somatom AR.
SP spiral CT and a partial-ring, rotating ECAT ART PET scan
58 99mTc-DMSA
SPECT,
spiral CT, and MR imaging appear to be equally sensitive
59 determine the diagnostic value of 131I
SPECT/
spiral CT (SPECT/CT) on nodal staging of patients with t
60 nte Carlo simulation methods, using
standard spiral CT protocols.
61 Subsecond spiral CT is associated with improved clarity and dimini
62 nderwent both electron-beam CT and
subsecond spiral CT.
63 btained with single-detector array
subsecond spiral CT and those obtained with electron-beam CT.
64 ectron-beam CT images and two scores for
the spiral CT images.
65 mproved arterial enhancement during
thoracic spiral CT.
66 (300 mg/mL iodine) while undergoing
thoracic spiral CT.
67 ain radiography cannot be cost equivalent
to spiral CT.
68 Two spiral CT scans were obtained at each of two different s
69 radiolucency on chest radiographs
underwent spiral CT (5-second acquisition time, fixed table positi
70 motion occurs and scan quality improves
when spiral CT is performed with nonionic contrast material.
71 With spiral CT, thrombus is directly visualized, and both med
72 Clinical outcome was consistent
with spiral CT results in all cases.
73 ergone ESWL were prospectively examined
with spiral CT, renal US, and plain abdominal radiography.
74 ith electron-beam CT and those obtained
with spiral CT (P <.05).
75 ntrolled trial of lung cancer screening
with spiral CT, also is described.
76 etected pathologically, 28 were visible
with spiral CT.