ライフサイエンスコーパス: spontaneous breathing

1 n between MSNA and diastolic pressure during spontaneous breathing.

2 ng pattern changed little after 2 minutes of spontaneous breathing.

3 the fine-scale modulations that occur during spontaneous breathing.

4 ess during mechanical ventilation and during spontaneous breathing.

5 e lightly anesthetized with halothane during spontaneous breathing.

6 d retractor muscles could be measured during spontaneous breathing.

7 atients successfully completed the trials of spontaneous breathing.

8 decreasing end-expiratory lung volume during spontaneous breathing.

9 were not significantly different compared to spontaneous breathing.

10 more rapid titration from the ventilator to spontaneous breathing.

11 tween total activity and diastolic BP during spontaneous breathing.

12 st that under supine resting conditions with spontaneous breathing: (1) R-R variability at all measur

13 dal volume during both T-piece breathing and spontaneous breathing 15 mins after extubation (p < .05)

14 r driving pressure (and tidal volume) versus spontaneous breathing (28.0 +/- 0.5 vs. 10.3 +/- 0.6 cm

15 flow velocity were measured during 5 min of spontaneous breathing, 30 mmHg lower body suction to sim

16 hs min-1) and volumes (0.5-1.0 l) and during spontaneous breathing across the physiological range of

17 g HF-SCS is similar to that occurring during spontaneous breathing and (b) differential descending sy

18 tor-supported patients who failed a trial of spontaneous breathing and 11 patients who tolerated a tr

19 tor-supported patients who failed a trial of spontaneous breathing and 14 patients who tolerated such

20 nce (bias) ranging from -54 to 612 ms during spontaneous breathing and from -52 to 714 ms during mech

21 ventral portion of the 3rd interspace during spontaneous breathing and HF-SCS following C2 spinal sec

22 cal use of APRV has been shown to facilitate spontaneous breathing and is associated with decreased p

23 inspiratory lung conductance (G(Li)) during spontaneous breathing and quantitative radioisotope V/Q

24 intermittent mandatory ventilation, assisted spontaneous breathing, and biphasic positive airway pres

25 ty associated with loss of consciousness, of spontaneous breathing, and of circulation.

26 tion only; and h) NVSBA group, nonventilated spontaneous breathing animals.

27 After resuming of spontaneous breathing, animals were randomly assigned to

28 During loaded spontaneous breathing, arterial pH decreased from 7.42 +

29 overed from respiratory failure and achieved spontaneous breathing at the same rate as younger patien

30 who had normal lung compliance values during spontaneous breathing (C(Lspont)), C(W)/C(Lspont) was si

31 However, in severe lung injury, spontaneous breathing caused a significant increase in a

32 In all animals, spontaneous breathing caused pendelluft during early inf

33 groups: 1) acutely anesthetized control, 2) spontaneous breathing control, 3) spontaneously breathin

34 following ventilatory protocols for 4 hours: spontaneous breathing (control group), mechanical ventil

35 Blood flow groups were compared during spontaneous breathing, conventional mechanical ventilati

36 however, in animals with severe lung injury, spontaneous breathing could worsen lung injury, and musc

37 ansplantation, those supported via ECMO with spontaneous breathing demonstrated improved survival com

38 tor-supported patients who failed a trial of spontaneous breathing developed a progressive decrease i

39 eper understanding of the pathophysiology of spontaneous breathing during acute respiratory distress

40 t change in tidal volume) that was caused by spontaneous breathing during mechanical ventilation.

41 Spontaneous breathing effort during mechanical ventilati

42 d higher plateau pressure and more excessive spontaneous breathing effort, resulting in the highest t

43 nce on endogenous NK1 activation depended on spontaneous breathing frequency and the modulatory state

44 In mild lung injury, spontaneous breathing improved oxygenation and lung aera

45 In contrast, 6 hrs of spontaneous breathing in anesthetized animals did not al

46 echanical ventilation, followed by trials of spontaneous breathing in appropriate patients and notifi

47 ury; no one has yet evaluated the effects of spontaneous breathing in severe lung injury.

48 ul tests were followed by two-hour trials of spontaneous breathing in those who met the criteria.

49 We investigated the effects of spontaneous breathing in two different severities of lun

50 During spontaneous breathing, inspiratory loading was achieved

51 n endotracheal catheter during CPAP-assisted spontaneous breathing (intervention group) or after conv

52 ositive end-expiratory pressure and enhanced spontaneous breathing may increase the proportion of tid

53 After 15 mins of spontaneous breathing, mechanical ventilation was instit

54 by minimally invasive methods that allow for spontaneous breathing might be safer and more effective

55 We report that after spontaneous breathing movements are stopped by administr

56 During the trial of spontaneous breathing, O2 demand was similar in the two

57 Our findings imply that the spontaneous breathing of nucleosomal DNA together with t

58 ure spread to the amygdala may cause loss of spontaneous breathing of which patients are unaware, and

59 est that amygdala seizures may cause loss of spontaneous breathing of which patients are unaware-a co

60 ded after a weaning readiness test involving spontaneous breathing on a T-piece or low levels of vent

61 sure support ventilation, +2.3% (9.5) during spontaneous breathing or continuous positive airway pres

62 ntilation was categorized into four classes: spontaneous breathing or continuous positive airway pres

63 observed in the 7th interspace during either spontaneous breathing or HF-SCS.

64 s nonlinear P/V relationships present during spontaneous breathing or mechanical ventilation.

65 with 4-hr low tidal volume ventilation with spontaneous breathing or without spontaneous breathing (

66 The benefits of spontaneous breathing over muscle paralysis have been pr

67 Spontaneous breathing parameters showed significantly lo

68 noninvasive ventilation sessions than during spontaneous breathing periods (p < 0.05) as a result of

69 This approach was extended to the spontaneous breathing pre-extubation trial.

70 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure, spontaneous breathing, preextubation trial when associat

71 lation with spontaneous breathing or without spontaneous breathing (prevented by a neuromuscular bloc

72 l gradients of activity were observed during spontaneous breathing prior to C2 section.

73 adjusted such that inspired volumes matched spontaneous breathing (Protocol 1).

74 Under light anesthesia and spontaneous breathing, rats underwent UHS phase I of 75

75 We used the reduction in PET(CO2) below spontaneous breathing required to produce apnea (DeltaPE

76 without respiratory complications or without spontaneous breathing, resulting in rebreathing of gases

77 aphragm pacing and a 45-min period of loaded spontaneous breathing, separated by a 20-min recovery pe

78 es inserted near the phrenic nerves to mimic spontaneous breathing (STIM).

79 e movement greater during HF-SCS compared to spontaneous breathing, stimulus amplitude during HF-SCS

80 ction, ratings of effort were greater during spontaneous breathing than during mechanical ventilation

81 al carbon dioxide pressure (PET(CO2)) during spontaneous breathing, the apnea-hypopnea threshold for

82 During spontaneous breathing, these data were observed: minute

83 in; p = 0.0001) and the change in VO(2) from spontaneous breathing to mechanical ventilation was sign

84 ed shorter ventilation times until the first spontaneous breathing trial (1 [0-15] vs. 9 [1-51] h; P

85 tly shorter median times to first successful spontaneous breathing trial (1.0 vs. 4.0 d; P < 0.0001),

86 e rate ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.45-1.71) and a spontaneous breathing trial (incidence rate ratio, 1.24;

87 tion and an increased time to achieve a 2-hr spontaneous breathing trial (p < .0001).

88 nzodiazepine dose was associated with failed spontaneous breathing trial (p<.01) and delirium (p=.05)

89 management, and patient perception during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) might be related to ex

90 in 200 patients was analyzed in relation to spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) weaning.

91 ; p = 0.004) and decreased odds of passing a spontaneous breathing trial (soluble suppression of tumo

92 In patients undergoing a first spontaneous breathing trial after at least 24 hours of M

93 determined before and at the end of a 60-min spontaneous breathing trial and 4 hrs after extubation.

94 thing trial, a primary analysis included all spontaneous breathing trial and a secondary analysis inc

95 ose was independently associated with failed spontaneous breathing trial and extubation, and subseque

96 To assess whether lung derecruitment during spontaneous breathing trial assessed by lung ultrasound

97 t <or=25% of patients successfully completed spontaneous breathing trial but did not proceed to immed

98 ocol (n=154) underwent daily screening and a spontaneous breathing trial by respiratory and nursing s

99 Postextubation distress after a successful spontaneous breathing trial is associated with increased

100 End-spontaneous breathing trial lung ultrasound scores were

101 tion of aeration changes during a successful spontaneous breathing trial may accurately predict poste

102 a secondary analysis included only the first spontaneous breathing trial of each patient.

103 ot occurred despite successful completion of spontaneous breathing trial on >or=1 occasion, a rate th

104 oped acute respiratory failure (failure of a spontaneous breathing trial or successful breathing tria

105 d 1,122 (34%) patients had a full 30-120 min spontaneous breathing trial performed.

106 ty, and feasibility of protocols using daily spontaneous breathing trial plus pressure support ventil

107 Adoption and implementation of a common spontaneous breathing trial protocol across multiple int

108 oring of esophageal pressure swings during a spontaneous breathing trial provides additional guidance

109 ltrasound performed at the end of the failed spontaneous breathing trial showed a pattern consistent

110 er failed or were not yet ready to undergo a spontaneous breathing trial to automated or protocolized

111 Most respondents (96.1%) reported relying on spontaneous breathing trial to guide decision for extuba

112 The time for the first spontaneous breathing trial to occur was significantly s

113 ung ultrasound and echocardiography during a spontaneous breathing trial uncovered an unexpected caus

114 Loss of lung aeration during the successful spontaneous breathing trial was observed only in group 2

115 echanical ventilatory support before another spontaneous breathing trial was performed.

116 hen first meeting established criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial was significantly greater du

117 groups, and the median time to pass a 2-hour spontaneous breathing trial was similar between both the

118 Patients passing the spontaneous breathing trial were eligible for an extubat

119 The percentage of patients undergoing a spontaneous breathing trial when first meeting establish

120 ontaneous breathing trials were analyzed, 21 spontaneous breathing trial with weaning-induced pulmona

121 Implementation of a best practice (spontaneous breathing trial) may be necessary for, but b

122 Fourteen patients failed the spontaneous breathing trial, 86 were extubated, 57 were

123 Because some patients performed several spontaneous breathing trial, a primary analysis included

124 During spontaneous breathing trial, extravascular lung water in

125 After passing a spontaneous breathing trial, however, older patients req

126 Before and at the end of spontaneous breathing trial, we recorded pulmonary arter

127 for ideal body weight, 0.97 (0.93-1.01) for spontaneous breathing trial-induced changes in plasma pr

128 Spontaneous breathing trial-induced increases in extrava

129 determine whether a patient may advance to a spontaneous breathing trial.

130 Patients passing the screen received a 2-hr spontaneous breathing trial.

131 We performed a second 60-minute T-tube spontaneous breathing trial.

132 Twenty-one patients who failed a first spontaneous breathing trial.

133 ater than or equal to 18 mm Hg at the end of spontaneous breathing trial.

134 either failed or did not meet criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial.

135 ty-six patients were assessed at their first spontaneous breathing trial: 63% had diaphragm dysfuncti

136 ts had 3,486 safety screens for conducting a spontaneous breathing trial; 2072 (59%) patients failed

137 ress syndrome (47% vs 52%; p = 0.28) and for spontaneous breathing trials (55% vs 51%; p = 0.27).

138 eaning protocol incorporating daily screens, spontaneous breathing trials (SBT), and prompts to careg

139 at included a daily screen (DS) coupled with spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) and physician prompt

140 rding physicians for the completion of daily spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) in three academic ho

141 ated spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) and spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) might prevent VAEs.

142 Ts)-ie, daily interruption of sedatives-with spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs).

143 ng protocols should be in place that include spontaneous breathing trials and criteria for initiating

144 that daily sedation interruption paired with spontaneous breathing trials improved 1-year survival, w

145 Only 55% of passing spontaneous breathing trials resulted in liberation from

146 s (ie, interruption of sedatives) with daily spontaneous breathing trials results in better outcomes

147 ements were made before and 30 minutes after spontaneous breathing trials that lasted up to 60 minute

148 In primary analysis, 36 spontaneous breathing trials were analyzed, 21 spontaneo

149 akening trials (daily sedation vacation plus spontaneous breathing trials) as a quality improvement p

150 Despite protocols incorporating spontaneous breathing trials, 31% of ICU patients experi

151 trategies with spontaneous awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, and early mobility and sle

152 management to spontaneous awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, and ICU early mobility and

153 prophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, daily spontaneous breathing trials, and sedative interruptions

154 at night, a practice associated with failed spontaneous breathing trials, coma, and delirium.

155 le consists of spontaneous awakening trials, spontaneous breathing trials, coordination of awakening

156 , daily screens for weaning readiness, daily spontaneous breathing trials, early resuscitation in sep

157 ther evidence-based ICU practices, including spontaneous breathing trials, ICU early mobility program

158 Both groups used pressure support, included spontaneous breathing trials, used a common positive end

159 d weaning failure and presupposed the use of spontaneous breathing trials.

160 tolerated, coupled with daily assessment for spontaneous breathing trials.

161 nd echocardiography findings acquired during spontaneous breathing trials.

162 iochemistry exams, were collected during two spontaneous breathing trials.

163 olam, or propofol; daily sedation stops; and spontaneous breathing trials.

164 d into 3 groups and followed up for 6 hours: spontaneous breathing ventilation (SBV, n = 5), continuo

165 Effort of spontaneous breathing was assessed by the respiratory ra

166 Effort of spontaneous breathing was assessed by the respiratory ra

167 In animals with mild lung injury, spontaneous breathing was beneficial to lung recruitment

168 ndent lung inflation during paralysis versus spontaneous breathing was estimated.

169 te to tidal volume in spinally injured rats, spontaneous breathing was measured in anesthetized C2 he

170 chanical ventilation, expiratory time during spontaneous breathing was prolonged less than 20% of tha

171 Assisted spontaneous breathing was the most comfortable mode of v

172 at the level of support we imposed, assisted spontaneous breathing was the most comfortable mode of v

173 hout acute lung injury, and the influence of spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pr