ライフサイエンスコーパス: sprayer

1 n the commercially available and a lab-built sprayer.

2 y than when it was delivered intranasally by sprayer.

3 ample sprayer is a conventional Z-spray type sprayer.

4 llows switching between reference and sample sprayer.

5 rate of 20-40 nl/min using an ultra-low flow sprayer.

6 g for the slight variation in signal between sprayers.

7 ously moving the sample relative to the DESI sprayer and the inlet of the mass spectrometer.

8 ystem that is physically located between the sprayer and the orifice of a mass spectrometer can serve

9 ranges from 80.7 to 94.5% between the three sprayers and is 86.5% overall.

10 ability ranges from 1 to 224% for individual sprayers and peaks of different spectral abundance.

11 Airbrush, automatic sprayer, and sublimation matrix application methods were

12 a sections are analyzed with three lab-built sprayers, and classification accuracy for adenocarcinoma

13 The ions produced by the analyte sprayer are continuously sampled, as opposed to time-sha

14 nce neither the voltage nor positions of the sprayers are changed, the nanospray has greater spray st

15 The sprayers are independently controlled and do not exhibit

16 eal-time the extracted ion current from each sprayer channel.

17 ncluded changing the electrospray ionization sprayer configuration, increasing the sample injection v

18 Small differences in sprayer construction influence the operating conditions

19 A multiple sprayer DESI source capable of analyzing a larger sample

20 In this study, the impact of sprayer design and geometry on performance in desorption

21 A miniaturized ion sprayer device is described which is suitable for coupli

22 The results demonstrated that the dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-inlet design provides reference peaks on e

23 al-ESI-sprayer, Y-shaped inlet; and dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-inlet.

24 son between the mass accuracy using dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-nozzle TOF-MS and that obtained using a do

25 r molecular-formula confirmation, a dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-nozzle version of this design was used.

26 r cone (in-spray supercharging) using a dual-sprayer ESI microchip.

27 itivity porous electrospray ionization (ESI) sprayer for the proteomic analysis of a moderately compl

28 ity to lower noise levels with the porous CE sprayer, illustrated by better signal-to-noise ratios of

29 to maximize the conduction of ions from the sprayer into the mass spectrometer.

30 With the dual-sprayer ion source, both sprays are orthogonal to each o

31 mized for low flow rates, whereas the sample sprayer is a conventional Z-spray type sprayer.

32 The reference sprayer is optimized for low flow rates, whereas the sam

33 s spectrometry (DESI-MS) is assessed, as the sprayer is thought to be a major source of variability.

34 ass spectrometry (CE-MS), using a porous tip sprayer, is proposed for the first time for highly sensi

35 A new electrospray dual sprayer, LockSpray, was developed for accurate mass meas

36 The automatic sprayer method also showed more reproducible results and

37 When using CHCA, the optimized automatic sprayer method and humidified sublimation method resulte

38 ng existing delivery systems (drenches, line sprayers, on-line dips) can significantly reduce fruit d

39 Between sprayers, repeatability is 16%, 9%, 23%, and 34% for hig

40 The presented results confirm that the sprayer setup needs to be closely controlled to obtain r

41 ontrolled to obtain reliable data, and a new sprayer setup with a fixed solvent capillary geometry sh

42 were compared with those obtained using dual-sprayer, single-nozzle TOF-MS.

43 le-design combinations, including single-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle;

44 single-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, Y-shaped inlet

45 with fixed spatial relationships between the sprayer, surface, and sampling capillary.

46 ed method developed for the automatic matrix sprayer system resulted in approximately double the numb

47 e of 100 gai/ha in 200 L water using a track sprayer system, residues of these fungicides on the leaf

48 Typically, the sprayer tip must be very close to the entrance orifice o

49 hat was centered on a point on-axis from the sprayer tip to the surface.

50 repeatability is compared for five lab-built sprayers using pork liver sections.

51 To assess the impact of sprayer variability on tissue classification using multi

52 When an electronic sprayer was used for matrix coating and with a high-pH (

53 ly reported proteomic application of the ESI sprayer, we evaluated preconcentration with SPME and mul

54 Experiments with a sprayer with a fixed solvent capillary position show tha

55 e; dual-ESI-sprayer, single-nozzle; dual-ESI-sprayer, Y-shaped inlet; and dual-ESI-sprayer, dual-inle