ライフサイエンスコーパス: spurious

1 ntroversy, but in our data, it appears to be spurious.

2 earch suggesting that these associations are spurious.

3 ainst the ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis is spurious.

4 or demonstrating Levy flight behaviour, were spurious.

5 ion in wild samples suggests that it was not spurious.

6 st that our "extra mortality" time series is spurious.

7 d endogenous DNA sequences were likely to be spurious.

8 e adaptive immune response to pathogens, and spurious activation can result in organ-specific autoimm

9 le high IKK-independent degradation prevents spurious activation in response to metabolic stress or l

10 ary structures may be a mechanism to repress spurious activation of a DNA damage response.

11 on of an upstream MAPKK and thereby prevents spurious activation of a second competing MAPK.

12 ponse genes following infection and prevents spurious activation of defensive responses in the absenc

13 sors IFI16 and cGAS cooperate to prevent the spurious activation of the type I interferon response.

14 ize the binding of GDP to Galpha to suppress spurious activation, and provide membrane contact points

15 Both spike-leaked, spurious activity and true fast oscillations couple to t

16 esting it can be applied with little risk of spurious adjustment.

17 intains mitochondrial integrity and prevents spurious AIM2 inflammasome activation.

18 ctivity, which is due to the accumulation of spurious amplification products.

19 em against five different DNA targets and 55 spurious analogues with energetically representative sin

20 and also performs competitively in terms of spurious ancestry proportions under a general multiway a

21 ts are added rather than removed, often give spurious and confusing results that bear little relevanc

22 ition of new protein-coding genes and exons, spurious and incorrect gene annotations, and numerous un

23 former and latter translate downstream into spurious and missing compounds and present significant l

24 However, the trends could be spurious and need to be confirmed in other populations.

25 adhesions to the substrate, which prevented spurious and prolonged adhesions.

26 higher total and plain water intakes may be spurious and requires further investigation.

27 oding transcripts from solo LTR elements and spurious antisense transcripts from cryptic promoters as

28 Previous positive results may have been spurious as a result of uncontrolled confounding.

29 e and sometimes necessary to protect against spurious association and to improve power.

30 population or pedigree structure can lead to spurious association as well as reduced power.

31 l ancestry successfully eliminated the known spurious association between SNPs in the LCT gene and he

32 his by showing that stratification induced a spurious association between the lactase gene (LCT) and

33 The gene expression barcode reduces spurious association driven by batch effects and probe e

34 ng structure for each individual to rule out spurious association due to population substructure.

35 VRN-H2 does not result in the high levels of spurious association expected to occur in highly structu

36 may both mask real associations and lead to spurious association findings.

37 Here, we introduce a general model of spurious association in structured populations, appropri

38 at the test SNP is sufficient to remove the spurious association regardless of the mechanism of popu

39 edigree and population structure can lead to spurious association.

40 sociation signal and ignoring it can lead to spurious association.

41 ional markers may be required to control for spurious association.

42 ders lie hidden in the data, leading to both spurious associations and missed associations if not pro

43 capsaicin content and fruit weight to reduce spurious associations because of confounding effects of

44 outbreak source 2 of 5 times and identified spurious associations between a number of exposures and

45 re inherent in expression data that leads to spurious associations between genetic loci and a large n

46 ng the genetic basis of a disease phenotype, spurious associations can arise if genetic structure is

47 r population substructure and admixture, and spurious associations can occur.

48 e a statistical method that corrects for the spurious associations caused by complex intersample corr

49 d the associated genes, 2) the potential for spurious associations due to confounding factors, and 3)

50 nd adult plant traits, while controlling for spurious associations due to population structure and ki

51 ing a linear mixed model that controlled for spurious associations due to population structure.

52 or researchers being the adequate control of spurious associations due to population structure.

53 se statistical inference process and reduces spurious associations from inaccurately estimated disper

54 er, mathematical theory of the production of spurious associations has largely been restricted to pop

55 Population stratification can cause spurious associations if not adjusted properly.

56 s exhibit complex structure that can lead to spurious associations if not properly handled.

57 clustering of results, to avoid reporting of spurious associations in future case-control studies.

58 of different founder populations can produce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies

59 can complicate eQTL analysis by causing many spurious associations including spurious regulatory hots

60 edish Arabidopsis thaliana, but give rise to spurious associations that seriously mislead genome-wide

61 lations also demonstrate clear potential for spurious associations to be generated by unequal related

62 ncy across ancestral populations, minimizing spurious associations while maximizing power to detect t

63 ion, implying that other factors can produce spurious associations with resistance, e.g., mutational

64 n structure because not doing so can lead to spurious associations.

65 for detecting weak associations and reduced spurious associations.

66 al inflation of test statistics and possibly spurious associations.

67 rlying population substructure could produce spurious associations.

68 d sufficient condition for the occurrence of spurious associations.

69 ructure, is necessary for protection against spurious associations.

70 to account in meta-analysis, they can induce spurious associations.

71 are variant association studies to eliminate spurious associations.

72 for population structure to remove potential spurious associations.

73 This deficit could lead to spurious assumptions about how and why disease dynamics

74 how that hybrid networks are prone to assume spurious attractors, which are emergent and sporadic net

75 results, in part, from the inappropriate or spurious attribution of salience to cues in the environm

76 ext dependency in relaxing selection against spurious binding in nearly half of all TF binding motifs

77 context to the strength of selection against spurious binding of various TF binding motifs in Sacchar

78 , it may also be expected that many supposed spurious binding sites could escape purifying selection

79 Spurious bioassay interference led to their designation

80 orrelation in the movement variables lead to spurious change points, while methods that do not accoun

81 e region measurement instability may lead to spurious changes in cortical regions of interest.

82 rom the Hall-effect, reveals the presence of spurious charges in the channel, while the two-terminal

83 Spurious chemical shift deviations due to solvent effect

84 LT expression and may serve to guard against spurious chromosomal translocations.

85 raffin-embedded (FFPE) DNA samples can yield spurious CNV calls in real-time qPCR assays, here we rep

86 ples complicates the analysis and can create spurious CNV calls.

87 ts in learning real associations better than spurious co-occurrences, providing definitive cognitive

88 and thus significantly reduce the number of spurious coexpressions observed.

89 ic cascades should be closely scrutinized as spurious conclusions may negatively influence conservati

90 ppear at higher diversity levels; or (iii) a spurious concordance in signal capture: an artifact wher

91 of MD-averaged chemical shifts can identify spurious conformations and motions observed in MD simula

92 yanuric acid hydrolases or barbiturases, and spurious connection of this family to another protein fa

93 elevant relationships are discriminated from spurious connections.

94 be-target signal from raw signal affected by spurious contributions (cross-hybridization, noise, back

95 icted and observed systematics arises from a spurious correlation between calculated arc location and

96 r alternative hypotheses that may generate a spurious correlation between grazing and coral recruitme

97 rgue that the age of the rocks is based on a spurious correlation between rocks that are probably not

98 he meaningful biological connection from the spurious correlation resulted from confounding covariate

99 r, the PAL values used may involve a risk of spurious correlations because they are often based on pr

100 nal artifacts in microarray data introducing spurious correlations between genes.

101 Coupled with the robustness to spurious correlations due to its high information conten

102 Spurious correlations in all-nucleotide-substitutions tr

103 these results are robust and not due to any spurious correlations.

104 in the expression measurements, resulting in spurious correlations.

105 ce are sensitive to spontaneous activity and spurious correlations.

106 al least-squares, and is less susceptible to spurious correlations.

107 ication models, often due to the presence of spurious correlations.

108 w particle counts (and mass concentrations), spurious counts attributed to salt particles, and Al-ric

109 phase shifts introduced by filtering lead to spurious coupling levels in both white noise and hippoca

110 effects of chromatographic misalignment and spurious covariance of the detected signal, enhancing th

111 identifying pleiotropic effects, sources of spurious cross-phenotype effects and study design consid

112 athways achieve specificity by filtering out spurious cross-talk through mutual inhibition.

113 By suppressing spurious cryptic transcripts from initiating within ORFs

114 in a variety of samples while filtering out spurious data.

115 fective filters to discriminate genuine from spurious de novo mutations remains an unsolved challenge

116 Pacemaker-induced gating error caused a spurious decrease in dyssynchrony magnitude.

117 ion of the underlying test statistic provide spurious detection of associations.

118 ed into 6 types (types 1, 3, 4, and 5 led to spurious diagnosis of block; types 2 and 6 led to errone

119 ove harmful if they propagate stereotypes or spurious differences.

120 ation, our data suggests that HHARI prevents spurious discharge of Ub from E2 to lysine residues by:

121 atistical data analysis is a common cause of spurious discoveries in scientific research.

122 Importantly, FunFrame reduced spurious diversity while retaining more sequences than a

123 y shielding ssDNA from damage and preventing spurious DNA annealing.

124 Some of these connections may be spurious due to partial correlation that is not causal.

125 Many biases and spurious effects are inherent in RNA-seq technology, res

126 Spurious effects can appear in the context of both univa

127 family-based method, is completely robust to spurious effects.

128 ich biomarker better identifies persons with spurious elevations in iron status markers.

129 tools such as cross-validation can lead to a spurious estimate of the error rate in the overoptimisti

130 model of somatic evolution generates strong spurious evidence for non-neutrality, because the patter

131 lly high for the yeast S98 microarray, where spurious excess correlations reach 0.1 at a distance of

132 viously undescribed systematic error causing spurious excess correlations that depend on the distance

133 Systematic effects like spurious exchange reactions with wall materials and othe

134 The resulting state is free from spurious excitations associated with the breakdown of ad

135 ppropriate treatment may result in reporting spurious expressed genes (false positives) and missing t

136 MB components through mutation cause similar spurious expression of genes, including the transposon r

137 in the expression profiles, which may create spurious false associations or mask real genetic associa

138 ssociation studies and to reduce the risk of spurious findings due to population structure.

139 ) using non-serum certified kits may lead to spurious findings.

140 ent models, statistical noise alone leads to spurious flagging of many adequately-performing transpla

141 reconstruction, type I errors come from the spurious fusion of two or more small sibships into a sin

142 pping read pairs without generating numerous spurious fusions from the many mapping locations.

143 lysis can be plagued by biases, resulting in spurious growth trends.

144 -times, and short read lengths can result in spurious hits to unrelated proteins (loss of specificity

145 ng the phenotypes, avoiding the detection of spurious hotspots due to nongenetic correlation induced

146 Immunological tolerance guards against spurious immune responses to body constituents.

147 and the NUMT sequences permits detection of spurious inclusion of pseudogene variants during mutatio

148 causing inflated estimates of diversity and spurious inferences of differences between populations.

149 lable to researchers, with the potential for spurious inferences.

150 ely robust to random noise and to missing or spurious information.

151 display a previously reported propensity for spurious initiation within open reading frames.

152 examined against experimental data to remove spurious interaction sites.

153 This method can generate spurious interactions (false discoveries), and true inte

154 lso includes a model reduction step to prune spurious interactions and mitigate overfitting.

155 r simulations and can produce artifacts from spurious interactions between simulation cell images.

156 e able to reliably identify both missing and spurious interactions in noisy network observations.

157 y to promote native folding while minimizing spurious interactions with stable, natively folded RNAs.

158 tein interactions and to remove indirect and spurious interactions.

159 3 to control alternative splicing or prevent spurious intragenic transcription in animals.

160 d isotope pattern are accounted for to avoid spurious isotope series.

161 FineSplice allows effective elimination of spurious junction hits arising from artefactual alignmen

162 inter-chromosomal contacts are the result of spurious ligation events formed during in-solution ligat

163 sex difference in the phenotype can lead to spurious linkage on the X chromosome.

164 the joint analysis of all traits, leading to spurious linkage results.

165 and multilocus interactions, associated with spurious linkages.

166 heta precession also increased the number of spurious loops during simplicial complex formation.

167 ene expression was primarily being driven by spurious mapping of short reads.

168 of finite size has the potential to produce spurious measures of coherence.

169 es by developing a methodology to circumvent spurious, metastable assemblies.

170 binding sites from a vast genomic excess of spurious motif occurrences; however, it is unclear wheth

171 natural selection against the occurrence of spurious motif throughout the genome.

172 s, thus causing a problem for the brain: the spurious, movement-related sensations must be discrimina

173 n databases that include a sizable number of spurious mutations, either sequencing errors or passenge

174 ndicate that the phenotype was not caused by spurious mutations.

175 neity, correct spelling errors and eliminate spurious names.

176 ce to be misleading due to their potentially spurious nature.

177 This results in spurious negative growth trends if growth rates are calc

178 or addresses four phenomena that can lead to spurious (noncausal) associations between apolipoprotein

179 nic strength of 150 mM NaCl to eliminate any spurious nonspecific associations not relevant under phy

180 ilitated discrimination between specific and spurious nonspecific sequences.

181 rationally designed seeds, while suppressing spurious nucleation.

182 can reduce noise-induced artifacts, such as spurious ODF peaks, and yield more coherent orientations

183 distinguishes predictive relationships from spurious ones when evidence about a relationship is ambi

184 ntiate legitimately identified peptides from spurious ones.

185 variables suggests that the findings are not spurious or attributable only to the effects of confound

186 a because they can translate downstream into spurious or missing compound identifications.

187 The spurious (or nonfunctional) binding of transcription fac

188 edict that, for reduced inhibition strength, spurious orientation selective activation could be gener

189 rker gene analyses and their contribution to spurious OTUs following clustering analysis using QIIME.

190 Long TAN pauses facilitated robustness to spurious outcomes by increasing divergence in synaptic w

191 Accumulation of spurious oxidative damage can cause cellular dysfunction

192 Simulations confirm this and further show spurious patterns, such as the displacement ratio dimini

193 ment scoring function that is insensitive to spurious peaks and background noise.

194 to single out periodic flow components from spurious peaks on the cross-correlation functions and to

195 otation history of each seed sequence in the spurious Pfam protein family (PF10695, 'Cw-hydrolase') u

196 we quantitatively evaluated the genuine and spurious phase synchronization strength (PSS) of EEG dur

197 ata is likely to produce values that lead to spurious phylogeographic inferences.

198 olysis of PhyR provides a mechanism to avoid spurious PhyR protein interactions that inappropriately

199 tered arbor points, and 53.5 and 55.5% fewer spurious points than existing vesselness and LoG-based m

200 We propose that spurious Pol II transcription throughout the intergenic

201 ot affect the integrity of the mitoribosome, spurious poly(A) additions to mt-tRNA led to reduced lev

202 The lack of PDE12 results in a spurious polyadenylation of the 3' ends of the mitochond

203 on of NaVCP in transgenic plants mediated by spurious polyadenylation signals, and demonstrate the ne

204 t could mediate aberrant mRNA processing via spurious polyadenylation signals.

205 poorly conserved genes that are likely to be spurious predictions, noncoding, or species-specific gen

206 nough to prompt curators at Pfam to create a spurious protein family.

207 d Tsp serve to protect full-length TcpP from spurious proteolysis by YaeL.

208 and protects the reactive intermediate from spurious protonation and thus contributes to the fidelit

209 Simultaneous measurement of both genuine and spurious PSS during general anesthesia is necessary in o

210 Genuine and spurious PSS showed characteristic temporal patterns for

211 G reference; the most influential factor for spurious PSS was the spectral content.

212 a method was used for evaluating genuine and spurious PSS.

213 As temperature (T) increases, spurious radiative transfer more than offsets contact lo

214 ors through thermal losses at interfaces and spurious radiative transfer.

215 l coexpression of linked genes might well be spurious rather than an indication of functional coordin

216 We discuss how ncRNAs inhibit spurious recombination among repetitive DNA elements, re

217 o sites of DNA damage, whereas Mec1 inhibits spurious recombination at stalled replication forks.

218 leofilaments of Rad51 recombinase to prevent spurious recombination events and unwind trinucleotide s

219 Gating errors cause a spurious reduction in SPECT assay of dyssynchrony magnit

220 e apparent protective effect of UTI might be spurious, reflect confounding due to untreated asymptoma

221 idence suggest that the original finding was spurious-reflecting bad luck for researchers rather than

222 i and a large number of transcripts inducing spurious regulatory hotspots.

223 causing many spurious associations including spurious regulatory hotspots.

224 The spurious relationship suspected by some is not supported

225 come and disease, in addition to potentially spurious relationships.

226 olute abundances of the microbes may lead to spurious results because the data only represent relativ

227 f technical artifacts is critical to prevent spurious results during downstream analysis.

228 Eight subjects showed spurious results for these reasons and were eliminated f

229 erived from GWAS findings in EA may generate spurious results in non-EA populations due to differenti

230 This could lead to spurious results in short-term clinical trials, and the

231 The occurrence of spurious results or misinterpretations of results from E

232 tical analysis is necessary to avoid finding spurious results that ultimately may lead to inadequate

233 However, the approach may produce spurious results, mainly because using the single best r

234 uccess rates have the potential to introduce spurious results.

235 with high-quality data, and may well produce spurious results.

236 fExpress substantially reduces the number of spurious results.

237 ess for generating diversity and can lead to spurious results.

238 tection of OTU-OTU relationships can lead to spurious results.

239 biased or of high variance, both leading to spurious results; (ii) even if estimated correctly, GG c

240 To suppress effectively the spurious retinal motion generated by the eye movements,

241 ylation at CG and CHG motifs is reduced, and spurious RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription occurs

242 ction of H-NS is to prevent transcription of spurious RNA.

243 g period, thereby suppressing the buildup of spurious semi-TROSY peaks arising from the different rel

244 Thus, SA might not only produce spurious sensory input to the afferent pathways but also

245 pt ends whereas undertrimming causes unclean spurious sequences retained in ESTs that exert deleterio

246 entified more real variants and output fewer spurious sequences than other methods.

247 ler." Second, the method yields little or no spurious signal even with highly abundant cytosolic prot

248 ffinity differences and to detect and filter spurious signal, permitting high-confidence genotyping a

249 a with the PCs does not introduce detectable spurious signal, yet improves signal-to-noise metrics, r

250 icity is spontaneous receptor activation and spurious signaling.

251 ithout specific tracer binding and devoid of spurious signals (in particular, blood pool and muscle).

252 g a rigorous dilution trend filter to reject spurious signals and background peaks that comprise the

253 ncluding cell culture), displaying a lack of spurious signals due to the presence of O2, NO, and othe

254 The characteristic signature of these spurious signals easily allows for their discrimination.

255 statistical formalisms that are sensitive to spurious signals in the data.

256 rity of the detector channels is affected by spurious signals inherent to this multiplexing concept.

257 ndard STRUCTURE algorithm with a bias toward spurious signals of admixture.

258 n between the two tissue types and introduce spurious signals of expression heterogeneity.

259 n extension by showing that selfing leads to spurious signals of population substructure using the st

260 ery high degree of rejection to uncorrelated spurious signals.

261 ation to centromeric DNA repeats and prevent spurious siRNA-mediated silencing at euchromatic loci.

262 Spurious slicing of miRNA targets is avoided through an

263 reases deconvolution accuracy by eliminating spurious solutions.

264 can be susceptible to localisation bias and spurious sources under these conditions.

265 ns in lymph node architecture might create a spurious spatial association.

266 ries of the explored environment, leading to spurious spatial information.

267 stimated that the standard approach yields 3 spurious species-species interactions for each true inte

268 n System using settings designed to minimize spurious spectra, followed by searching the NIST library

269 nce in the neural responses: the addition of spurious spikes occurring primarily during the silent ga

270 s useful for discriminating between real and spurious splice sites, and can improve the reliability o

271 bship, and type II errors originate from the spurious splitting of a large sibship into two or more s

272 by placing cells into normally inaccessible spurious states.

273 nal problem to be solved, often resulting in spurious suboptimal solutions.

274 pendent pruning necessary for elimination of spurious synapses.

275 of 1 pM with the ability to differentiate a spurious target containing a single-nucleotide substitut

276 Far from being spurious, temperature effects on this stock are clear, a

277 tes of additive genetic variance, and create spurious temporal trends in predicted breeding values in

278 (spring-dashpot) model; the latter predicts spurious time constants.

279 eversible ubiquitination of PCNA can prevent spurious TLS Pol recruitment and regulate replication fo

280 a simple and effective protocol for removing spurious tracks from tracking datasets, followed by anal

281 sor tractography, highlighting the fact that spurious tracts in the injured brain may not necessarily

282 s associations while eliminating most of the spurious trans associations.

283 n made in distinguishing functional RNA from spurious transcription events.

284 tions are also crucial for the inhibition of spurious transcription from within coding regions.

285 Furthermore, these effects are not due to spurious transcription initiation in the bodies of genes

286 erase II where they are required to suppress spurious transcription initiation within the body of the

287 this issue, Garcia-Bassets et al. show that spurious transcriptional activation by unliganded nuclea

288 s that CpG methylation functions to suppress spurious transcriptional initiation within infrequently

289 ur simulated study, GeneScissors can predict spurious transcriptome calls owing to misalignment with

290 y biological knowledge to detect and correct spurious transcriptome inference by existing RNA-seq ana

291 ction of splice variants might correspond to spurious transcripts and the question of the relative pr

292 ich provides a fail-safe mechanism to remove spurious transcripts that escaped degradation in the nuc

293 range of gene expression, the appearance of spurious transcripts, and inefficient de novo DNA methyl

294 of genes that rely on Set2-Rpd3S to suppress spurious transcripts.

295 ing the shock-resistibility and reducing the spurious trigger has been discussed.

296 verse acceleration, which does not cause the spurious trigger, is defined as the reverse acceleration

297 ice without constraint structure is prone to spurious trigger, while the designed constraint structur

298 nscription can switch between functional and spurious under different conditions.

299 These measures also reduce the inclusion of spurious variables in a multi-locus model.

300 impairment in African American patients are spurious when Caucasian faces are used as stimuli.