ライフサイエンスコーパス: standard deviation

1 ncertainty level (where sigma represents the standard deviation).

2 Mean patient age was 62.7 years +/- 9.6 (standard deviation).

3 mal subjects was set as 45 mum (mean minus 2 standard deviations).

4 eatability and precision showed <9% relative standard deviation.

5 ated less than 4.5% reproducibility relative standard deviation.

6 ne had lower precision manifesting in higher standard deviations.

7 ease in cognitive score of -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1) standard deviations.

8 nge lepton universality at the level of four standard deviations.

9 (47.2% women; mean age, 56.1 years +/- 17.7 [standard deviation]).

10 with CF than for control subjects (mean +/- standard deviation, 0.09 mL/mL +/- 0.03 vs 0.11 mL/mL +/

11 iber helix angle, mean diffusivity (mean +/- standard deviation, [0.89 +/- 0.09] x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec v

12 te, and the mean comorbidity count was 2.38 (standard deviation 1.22).

13 higher risk of CHD (pooled relative risk per standard deviation, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-

14 Mean age at menarche was 12.9 years (standard deviation, 1.4).

15 esponse reproducibility was observed (pooled standard deviation, 1.7%-9.4%).

16 A composite index (standard deviation 10, minimally clinically significant

17 l of 571 participants (mean age, 64.2 years; standard deviation, 10.9) were followed for a mean of 6.

18 ed in all 5529 patients (mean age, 57 years [standard deviation, +/- 10.9 years]; women, n = 2071; me

19 Mean age for the cohort was 62.4 years (standard deviation, 11.4 years).

20 ere evaluated (mean age, 55.0 years +/- 8.7 [standard deviation]; 14 men).

21 were female and the mean age was 55.8 years (standard deviation, 15.6 years).

22 Fields Easy test was 3 minutes, 18 seconds (standard deviation = 16.88 seconds).

23 ee natural water samples with </=4% relative standard deviation (1sigma).

24 owed a mean time of recurrence of 3.7 years (standard deviation = 2.94 years, ranging from 1 to 12 ye

25 ts Among adolescents (mean age, 16.49 years; standard deviation, 2.02 years), 53.4% (78 of 146) made

26 ring the first year after diagnosis was 2.8 (standard deviation, 2.5) (median, 2.0; interquartile ran

27 During a mean follow-up period of 5.1 (standard deviation, 2.7) years, 13% of men and 21% of wo

28 10.9) were followed for a mean of 6.5 years (standard deviation, 2.8).

29 30 women with anorexia nervosa (mean age +/- standard deviation, 26 years +/- 6) and 30 normal-weight

30 ted molecular pattern (PAMP), comprised 52% (standard deviation, 28%) of the HCV RNA in the livers of

31 artial responders or nonresponders (mean +/- standard deviation, 3.23 dB +/- 1.41 vs -0.88 dB +/- 1.4

32 ease (CHD), CVD, and cancer over a mean 8.9 (standard deviation, 3.5) years of follow-up, stratifying

33 ompared to conventional techniques (mean +/- standard deviation, 30.7 +/- 27.6 versus 77.0 +/- 35.3 h

34 young healthy control subjects (mean age +/- standard deviation, 31 years +/- 5), 34 older healthy co

35 participants (mean age, 62.9 years +/- 9.1 [standard deviation]; 398 women) who were overweight or o

36 ults Patients underwent a mean of 23.03 +/- (standard deviation) 4.20 GBCA administrations (mean accu

37 Mean RPE-BM thickness was 26.3 mum (standard deviation, 4.8 mum) at central subfield.

38 d, which provided accurate results (relative standard deviation; 4.03%).

39 the SVC and all-plexus retinal VD (mean +/- standard deviation: 47.2%+/-7.1% and 73.5%+/-6.6%) were

40 he 1669 participants was 67.4 years +/- 8.7 (standard deviation); 49.8% were women.

41 The mean age of participants was 73.2 years (standard deviation, 5.6), and 55% were women.

42 In the follow-up (mean 79 months, standard deviation = 55), 16 local tumor recurrences (5.

43 olemia (FH) (six men, 18 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 58 years +/- 9) were compared with 2

44 y proven serous ovarian cancer (mean age +/- standard deviation, 59 years +/- 10.7; range 19-93 years

45 Women were aged 79.2 (standard deviation, 6.7) years, on average.

46 In 4347 patients (51.8% women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 60.4 years +/- 8.2), core laboratory

47 R imaging examinations (63 men; mean age +/- standard deviation, 61.4 years +/- 11.8) performed for s

48 Twenty-three women (mean age +/- standard deviation, 61.7 years +/- 13.8) were recruited

49 Mean follow-up duration was 70.2 months (standard deviation, 61.8 months; median, 52 months; rang

50 fifty-six patients (143 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 63 years +/- 17) with newly diagnose

51 more stable than CPPopt_PRx (within patient standard deviation 7.05 +/- 3.78 versus 8.45 +/- 2.90; p

52 een 1993 and 2011 in 587 elderly (mean = 70 (standard deviation, 7) years of age) male participants i

53 The women had an average age of 66.6 (standard deviation, 7.6) years, were depression-free in

54 59 patients (129 men, 30 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 74.9 years +/- 8.2) who underwent 82

55 They were also 0.5 standard deviations (95% CI: 0.2, 0.8) closer to adult h

56 triglycerides (odds ratio [OR] = 4.86 per 1 standard deviation, 95% confidence interval 3.48-6.78),

57 0.03-0.38) and possibly triglycerides (0.19 standard deviations, 95% CI -0.1-0.48), but was unlikely

58 58, 95% CI 1.06-2.35), LDL-cholesterol (0.21 standard deviations, 95% CI 0.01-0.4), total cholesterol

59 s, 95% CI 0.01-0.4), total cholesterol (0.21 standard deviations, 95% CI 0.03-0.38) and possibly trig

60 who perform Mohs surgery were greater than 2 standard deviations above the mean (2 standard deviation

61 than 2 standard deviations above the mean (2 standard deviations above the mean = 2.41 stages per cas

62 a sequencing depth threshold of two or three standard deviations above the mean, 96.9% or 96.7% of po

63 al DNL an average of 30.9 +/- 6.7% (mean +/- standard deviation) above fasting DNL values in placebo-

64 The relative standard deviations, accuracy, LOD, and LOQ show that th

65 Three-month mean (+/- standard deviation) acuity: AT Lisa, binocular uncorrect

66 Under optimum conditions, the relative standard deviation, adsorption capacity and limit of det

67 derwent MR imaging a mean 12.6 days +/- 5.6 (standard deviation) after CA.

68 Mean (+/- standard deviation) age at diagnosis was 40.9+/-16.9 yea

69 ostly African Americans (94.9%) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 64.3 (9.9) years.

70 9,518 with SVR; 2982 without SVR), the mean (standard deviation) age was 61.6 (6.1) years, and 39.0%

71 , there were 58 women (65.9%); the mean (+/- standard deviation) age was 77.5 +/- 8 years.

72 Results Mean (+/- standard deviation) age, and body mass index were 57.5 (

73 lts Mean patient age was 14.7 years +/- 5.2 (standard deviation; age range, 0.7-20.5 years), and 55.2

74 ient admissions (male patients, 51.6%; mean [standard deviation] age, 44.5 [27.3] years) in the US ow

75 A total of 95 eyes (66 patients, mean [standard deviation] aged 49 [12.5] years, 31 [47%] of wh

76 s limit of detection, linear range, relative standard deviation and affinity constant.

77 The relative standard deviations and relative recovery of Pb (II) was

78 l, respectively, were 0.317 mug/g +/- 0.060 (standard deviation) and 0.048 mug/g +/- 0.004 in the cor

79 sease (MELD) at transplant, DSA-average MELD standard deviation, and average organ transport distance

80 a prevalence and the mean, maximum, minimum, standard deviation, and range of monthly UV dose exposur

81 ian, and entropy, fractal dimension mean and standard deviation, and second-order entropy, homogeneit

82 95% CI, 0.69-0.88; P = .03), and SAP pattern standard deviation (area under the curve, 0.77; 95% CI,

83 at developed dysplasia (mean, 0.58 +/- 0.09 [standard deviation]) as compared with sites that did not

84 icated that ABV was strongly correlated with standard deviation at the reaction time (RT) level and w

85 multivariate-adjusted mean logMAR VA change (standard deviation) at 1 year among treatment groups (-0

86 The mean number of injections (standard deviation) at 1 year was higher in the ranibizu

87 The mean+/-standard deviation baseline age and eGFR of HF patients

88 was considered abnormal when values were two standard deviations below controls' mean uptake.

89 ized by a head circumference less than three standard deviations below the mean for age and sex and r

90 s between ages 6 and 24 years performed 0.29 standard deviations better (p = 0.006) on this cognitive

91 in six swine (mean weight, 37.3 kg +/- 7.5 [standard deviation]) between April 2015 and October 2016

92 score composed of these 11 variants (-0.010 standard deviations BMI per allele, P = 5 x 10- 4), whic

93 Among 1239 infants (mean [standard deviation] BW = 864 [212] g; gestational age [G

94 at neighborhoods reduce the DSA-average MELD standard deviation by 29% and save about 65 lives annual

95 ditional lives, and reduced DSA-average MELD standard deviation by an additional 17%.

96 =2.5 [95% confidence interval, 0.8-4.1] per standard deviation change in cystatin C).

97 The MR odds ratio per standard deviation decrease in log-transformed 25OHD was

98 ard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval per standard deviation decrease, 1.07-1.61), similar for Alz

99 -pons ratio in case mean, 1.0083 +/- 0.0373 [standard deviation]; DN-to-pons ratio in control mean, 1

100 Average (+/- standard deviation) floors were 105 mum (+/- 15.9 mum) f

101 Results During a mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 4.3 (3.6) years, 799 pa

102 At 10mugmL(-1) the standard deviation for 7 replicate measurements was foun

103 alibration curves (r(2)=0.995), and relative standard deviation for replicate injections lower than 5

104 mug L(-1), while precision (as the relative standard deviation for the repeated measurements) was wi

105 not associated with IHD (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation for TSH 1.05, 95% confidence interval

106 trend for the mean initial presenting VA (+/-standard deviation) for decade 1 eyes to be worse (2.05+

107 [BMI]; BMI z score, measuring the number of standard deviations from the median BMI for age and sex)

108 with hemodynamically significant PDA (mean [standard deviation] gestational age 25.7 [1.2] weeks and

109 se whose mean number of stages for MMS was 2 standard deviations greater than the mean number for all

110 One standard deviation higher body mass index, waist circumf

111 ds ratio of AD per genetically predicted one standard deviation higher isoleucine levels was 1.35 (95

112 One standard deviation higher weight change gave an RR of 1.

113 Results Mean ADCs +/- standard deviation in patients with MM for the normal, f

114 was associated with a decrease of 5%-8% of a standard deviation in self-reported mental health.

115 ectric field of the membrane, estimating the standard deviation in these fluctuations as approximatel

116 The standard deviation in W, sigma w , varies widely over th

117 Typical standard deviations in size and refractive index of the

118 zes (SES) associated with an increase of two standard deviations in the PTCC at each time point were

119 tion for T12-L4 vertebrae was 146 HU +/- 29 (standard deviation) in case patients and 173 HU +/- 42 i

120 ing scanning was 83 beats per minute +/- 21 (standard deviation) in the AF group and 63 beats per min

121 Mean age was 11.1 years +/- 4.7 [standard deviation] in boys with microlithiasis and 9.1

122 % confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.44) per 1 standard deviation increase in HDL-cholesterol.

123 ment of type 2 diabetes (relative risk per 1 standard deviation increase in methylation risk score: 2

124 brain volume (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, -0.021;

125 atter volume (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, -0.037;

126 l anisotropy (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, -0.048;

127 diffusivity (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, 0.054; 9

128 esion volume (mean difference in z score per standard deviation increase in NT-proBNP level, 0.090; 9

129 A one-standard deviation increase in safety climate score was

130 lic factors, and CRP and interleukin-6, each standard deviation increase in sCD14 was associated with

131 We found 1 standard deviation increase in the overall EQI (worse en

132 -4.4, -1.3) in Verbal Comprehension for each standard deviation increase in toxicity-weighted use of

133 imilar decrements in Full-Scale IQ with each standard deviation increase of use for two organophospha

134 of body mass index and AF (hazard ratio per standard deviation increase, 1.18; 95% confidence interv

135 For example, a 1-standard-deviation increase in "likes clicked" (clicking

136 levels of B12 and preterm birth (per each 1-standard-deviation increase in B12, adjusted risk ratio

137 ace, and state foreclosure laws with time, a standard-deviation increase in neighborhood foreclosures

138 In fully adjusted models, a 1-standard-deviation increase in the healthy food environm

139 A 1-standard-deviation increase in the physical activity env

140 he adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs for each standard deviation increment of the percentage of densit

141 hat the mean intermediate precision relative standard deviation is 14% for biological samples, 6% for

142 l tendency (mean, median) and heterogeneity (standard deviation, kurtosis, skewness) MRI parameters]

143 Image noise (pixel standard deviation), lesion contrast (after reconstructi

144 vast majority of the analytes, with relative standard deviations less than 20% being observed.

145 with the standard methods with in analytical standard deviation limits.

146 mean limit of detection of 50 ng/L, relative standard deviation lower than 20% and overall recoveries

147 l% of the TAGs were quantified with relative standard deviation <17%.

148 s were within the 64-97% range with relative standard deviations <20% for all HPH in all commodities.

149 e in the range of 83.3-103.7%, with relative standard deviations <5.4%.

150 We calculated a coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for each regional model.

151 Mean, median, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum values were det

152 questions about personal beliefs, the mean (standard deviation) number of items where intimate partn

153 A standard deviation of <+/-1% over a 200 s period is achi

154 inium were detected in the brain, a mean +/- standard deviation of 2.49 nmol per gram of brain tissue

155 s in solutions have been determined with the standard deviation of 3.1%, when the ions were cooled in

156 limit of detection of 0.05nM and a relative standard deviation of 4.9%.

157 t for an eye-related problem over a mean +/- standard deviation of 5.4+/-3.3 years' follow-up.

158 ys variations, suggested an overall relative standard deviation of 6.3-11.0%.

159 cribes the relationship between the mean and standard deviation of a set of measurements.

160 Image noise was defined as the standard deviation of attenuation measured in 14 circula

161 onnectivity and variability (measured as the standard deviation of BOLD signal amplitude) in resting

162 More specifically, roughness (i.e., the standard deviation of cortical thickness) of the right i

163 al conditions the K(+)-SCISEs had a very low standard deviation of E(0) of only 501.0 +/- 0.7 mV that

164 ts measurements of glucose variability using standard deviation of glucose (SD glucose) from CGM and

165 Mean and standard deviation of horizontal and vertical NBSL were

166 d for time and concentration gave a relative standard deviation of less than 5%, which was deemed acc

167 The recovery was 82.24%, with a relative standard deviation of less than 5%.

168 heterogeneity index (ratio between the mean standard deviation of luminal signal intensity and the m

169 en, we build feature vectors of homogeneity, standard deviation of pixel values, and mean of the pixe

170 0% greater, and there was a 72% reduction in standard deviation of ratio measurements when using fibe

171 Compared with using the standard deviation of shear wave speed (SWSSD) alone, SW

172 The mean +/- standard deviation of short-axis diameter, long-axis dia

173 and reproducibility, calculated as relative standard deviation of sixty measurements across three da

174 The average site energy and standard deviation of the distribution were determined a

175 The relative standard deviation of the individual calibration data po

176 ing the fit residual of noisy spectra to the standard deviation of the measured FRET efficiency.

177 o 0.7 mumol kg(-1), which is well within the standard deviation of the measurements (1.9 mumol kg(-1)

178 For the SN60WF, the standard deviation of the prediction error, in order of

179 absolute detection limits, calculated as 3 x standard deviation of the process blanks, were typically

180 noninferiority margin was set at 20% of the standard deviation of the score in the placebo group.

181 ed in log10 IU per milliliter) were within 1 standard deviation of the target value for all but one s

182 multiple testing procedures, defined as the standard deviation of total number of discoveries, can b

183 Repeatability, calculated as relative standard deviation of twenty measurements within a day,

184 ent nodes have different values of w, higher standard deviation of w increases the critical fraction

185 mensional number defined by the ratio of the standard deviation of wetting velocity to the characteri

186 The 2-hour interval standard deviation of wPRx (0.19 +/- 0.07) was smaller t

187 ime 70 ms, 2 most abundant ions) resulted in standard deviations of 0.2 per thousand (CHCl3) and 0.4

188 were in the range of 1041-1063 kg m(-3) with standard deviations of 0.6-1.1%.

189 The relative standard deviations of 2.9% and 5.8% (n=6) were obtained

190 of 1.24-4.32 ng muL(-1) and relative process standard deviations of 9.0-14%, respectively.

191 The largest standard deviations of age-standardised DALYs between th

192 s of below 13% from true values and relative standard deviations of below 11% from the mean values in

193 of disease resolution, as well as means and standard deviations of clinical parameters and DeltaL, D

194 veries ranged from 87% to 103% with relative standard deviations of repeatability of less than 5%.

195 ld be retained in both systems with relative standard deviations of retention times (RT; n = 6) typic

196 Similarly, standard deviations of the pore-to-pore time distributio

197 revealed multifold inaccuracies and relative standard deviations of up to 70% in crude cell lysate.

198 The linear relation between the mean and standard-deviation of the intervals produced by monkeys

199 tes the linear relation between the mean and standard-deviation of the intervals produced by monkeys

200 plot data showing a mean difference (+/-1.96 standard deviation) of 0.03 +/- 0.44 log10 IU/ml.

201 On average, errors occurred a mean (+/- standard deviation) of 8.97 hours +/- 2.28 into the shif

202 Results The mean overall difference (+/-standard deviation) of PET with ATAC compared with PET w

203 The average age (+/- standard deviation) of the study participants was 28 +/-

204 s (mean follow-up interval, 144 days +/- 35 [standard deviation]); of these 40 patients, 18 underwent

205 The use of six-sample matrices provided a standard deviation on the results, and this information

206 d cell count in women (differences 0.03-0.06 standard deviations, P < 0.05 between individuals with a

207 hange pooled across cohorts a moderate -0.26 standard deviations per decade (SD/decade) (95% confiden

208 nd visuospatial associative learning (-0.140 standard deviations per risk factor, p < 0.0001) and rem

209 found in joints with osteonecrosis, mean +/- standard deviation PF was 18.9 mL/100 mL per minute +/-

210 deviation (MD) -0.96 (+/-1.2) dB and pattern standard deviation (PSD) 1.6 (+/-0.3) dB (group I), and

211 were extracted: mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field index (VFI).

212 cated by the mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD), were analyzed with multivariab

213 with mean deviation (MD, r = 0.79), pattern standard deviation (PSD, r = 0.60), and number of locati

214 CF were included (mean age, 20 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]; range, 6-53 years): 18 patients wit

215 o oat products was 95-113%, and the relative standard deviations ranged from 5% to 9%.

216 imit of agreement (LOA; mean difference +/-2 standard deviation) ranged from -43.950 to 67.951 cm(2),

217 iking levels of 0.5-100muM, and the relative standard deviation remained below 13%, which provided a

218 between-run precision (<8% and <10% relative standard deviation, respectively) and accuracy (<9% and

219 The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for intra-day (repeatability)

220 on of 0.3 pM, good reproducibility (Relative Standard deviation (RSD) =3.3%) and high selectivity ove

221 The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the seven analyses was 6.8%

222 ed field CCS method performs with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.29% for all ion species ac

223 ented better reproducibility with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3+/-1 and 7+/-4 (all in perc

224 l/L for nitrite and nitrate, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of repeated measurements of <1%

225 The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.1% for a 1microgL(-1) alu

226 The recovery rate (RR) and the relative standard deviation (RSD) were calculated to express the

227 location, number (East: 44 +/- 20% relative standard deviation (RSD), N = 7; West: 37 +/- 30% RSD, N

228 -1) and the precision, evaluated as relative standard deviation (RSD), was 2.47% (n=10) for a sample

229 (n=10) was 2.86microgL(-1) and the relative standard deviation (RSD, n=8) was 1.8%.

230 with recoveries of 98.3-101.2% and Relative Standard Deviations (RSD) of <2%.

231 Detection limits and relative standard deviations (RSD) were 0.012-0.032ngmL(-1) and 2

232 ducibility, expressed as percentage relative standard deviation (% RSD) was below 9% for all the amin

233 The relative standard deviation (%RSD) for 6 replicate measurements o

234 Precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD), was of 5.8 and 4.1% (n=10) fo

235 The precision, expressed as relative standard deviation (%, RSD) was below 11.3%.

236 The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for ASA, ROX and NIT determin

237 00 nm radius toroids with a 'precision' - or standard deviation (s.d. or 1sigma) - of +/- approximate

238 Average baseline daily step-count was 7,479 (standard deviation [s.d.] 2,671), and average time in MV

239 ed with forced vital capacity (difference in standard deviation score -0.07 [-0.13 to -0.01]).

240 ncrease in growth (mean difference in height standard deviation score [SDS], 0.18; 95% confidence int

241 risk (odds ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64 per standard deviation score in body mass index [SDS-BMI]).

242 Each one standard deviation (SD) higher WHRadjBMI (1 SD approxima

243 A 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in VO2Max was associate

244 The precision for the 1-ml assay showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.14 log10 copies/ml or less

245 Precision for all sites showed a standard deviation (SD) of 0.22 log10 IU/ml or lower for

246 Among post-LSG patients, mean BMI +/- standard deviation (SD) was 41.5 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2) at init

247 examined during 2009-2011 (mean age = 12.5 (standard deviation (SD), 0.4) years; n = 378).

248 Mean 24-hour sodium excretion was 3,926 (standard deviation (SD), 1,623) mg for white men, 2,480

249 The mean age of participants was 70 (standard deviation (SD), 10) years; 66% were women, and

250 ipants (n = 1,055; mean baseline age = 74.6 (standard deviation (SD), 4.7) years) had repeated ActiGr

251 Mean, standard deviation (SD), fifth percentiles, and 95th per

252 The mean [standard deviation (SD)] maternal RBC lead level was 1.2

253 sted multivariable regression in ALSPAC, a 1 standard deviation (SD, equivalent of 3.7 kg/m2) increas

254 Mean age of the patients was 60.7 years (standard deviation [SD] 13.2 years).

255 63.2, both P < .0001; SE -6.86 diopters (D) (standard deviation [SD] 6.38), followed by cone-dominate

256 participants from the 3C Study (mean age +/- standard deviation [SD] 73.8 +/- 5.3 y, 61.0% women) who

257 rative visual acuity of 20/125 (logMAR 0.81, standard deviation [SD] = 0.36) improved by nearly 4 lin

258 ranged from 5.6 to 33.4 dB (mean = 27.2 dB, standard deviation [SD] = 4.0 dB).

259 value of 1 indicating performance that was 1 standard deviation [SD] above the hospital mean) and 30-

260 Mean age was 70.4 years (+/-9.6 standard deviation [SD]).

261 7 oncologists per 100,000 residents and 4.9 (standard deviation [SD], 2.8) networks covering a mean o

262 n 2 to 16 years of age (mean age, 9.4 years; standard deviation [SD], 4.56 years) with glaucoma and t

263 cotyl was 164 +/- 78 nm min(-1) (error gives standard deviation [SD], n = 1451 particles).

264 The average EVAN-G score was 84.3 (standard deviation, SD, 6.4) after VR, and 64.3 (SD, 11.

265 to 3 groups: 403 eyes of 364 patients (mean [standard deviation; SD] age 77.8 [8.0] years) affected b

266 I was mild to moderate, and the average (+/- standard deviation) severity score was 2.61 +/- 1.01.

267 The standard deviations (sigma) of the pulse amplitude distr

268 with a reduction of about a third in the two-standard-deviation spread (-1.2 degrees Celsius) relativ

269 a0], 0%; strain 1 [delta1/2], 19.8% +/- 4.6 [standard deviation]; strain 2 [delta1], 39.5% +/- 9.3) b

270 eatability was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (SW), coefficient of variation (CV),

271 s included the calculation of within-subject standard deviation (Sw), intrasubject precision (1.96xSw

272 (mean, 1.19 mug Gd/g bone mineral +/- 0.73 [standard deviation]) than in control subjects (mean, -1.

273 al software, ETB was measured as more than 2 standard deviations the signal intensity of a region of

274 10(-14) +/- 1 x 10(-13) m(2) s(-1), with the standard deviation thought to be related to the large ra

275 severity score increased from 10.1 +/- 9.1 (standard deviation) to 13.3 +/- 11.9 after implementatio

276 examination (mean interval, 17 months +/- 4 [standard deviation]) to assess IPH change.

277 52.8%] female; mean age, 67.1 years +/- 8.7 [standard deviation]) underwent FD and Ecc measurement, a

278 icipants (52% men; mean age, 55 years +/- 6 [standard deviation]) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) s

279 The standard deviation universally increased with the uncali

280 anium oxide at a precision of <0.5% relative standard deviation using relatively broadband lasers to

281 exhibited adequate linearity, with relative standard deviation values between 0.74 and 2.16% (n=10)

282 The lower (<2%) relative standard deviation values obtained from the data suggest

283 tivity in PD + VH vs PD - VH, 0.12 +/- 0.01 [standard deviation] vs 0.14 +/- 0.03, respectively; cont

284 1)) and featured the lowest relative process standard deviation (Vx0%) of 7.2% compared to MS and AIF

285 The relative standard deviation was 4.5% for a tin solution of 0.50mi

286 The relative standard deviation was 4.87% and the sample throughput f

287 The relative standard deviation was 7.3% and the pre-concentration fa

288 Blanks were low, relative standard deviation was below 8% for all soils and no sta

289 The precision (relative standard deviation) was in the range of 1.3-4.5%.

290 ean measured coronary attenuation values +/- standard deviation were comparable between the iodixanol

291 traclass correlation coefficient, and pooled standard deviation were used to assess the reliability o

292 Relative standard deviations were 3.67% and 2.89% for the five re

293 ean recoveries were between 96% and 102% and standard deviations were found in the range of 1-6%.

294 Relative standard deviations were less than 20%.

295 The relative standard deviations were<8%.

296 Results Liver stiffness values (means +/- standard deviations) were significantly lower in childre

297 (34 women [63%]; mean age, 36 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]) were included.

298 Mean temperature +/- standard deviation with PTA in the anti-MG1-coated HNP,

299 and patient experience (measured in units of standard deviations, with a value of 1 indicating perfor

300 15 men, 14 women; mean age, 63 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]) with 43 primary (n = 8) or secondar