ライフサイエンスコーパス: standard error of the mean

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 0.82(1) (the digit in parentheses shows the standard error of the mean).

2 on time without CAD was 118 seconds +/- 4.2 (standard error of the mean).

3 was 35% of left ventricular (LV) mass +/- 2 (standard error of the mean).

4 ion of missed injury was 16.8 hours +/- 4.3 (standard error of the mean).

5 /- 1.3) numbers of fimbrial types (means +/- standard errors of the means).

6 10 versus 215 +/- 115; P = 0.027) (means +/- standard errors of the means).

7 ty of 0.76(3), where the uncertainty denotes standard error of the mean.

8 Results are reported as mean +/- standard error of the mean.

9 Data are means +/- standard errors of the mean.

10 obtained on the first study day was 5.75 +/- standard error of the mean 0.09 log PFU equivalents (PFU

11 t of DNA radiation damage (mean increase +/- standard error of the mean, 0.056 foci per cell +/- 0.00

12 ement than did control fibroblasts (mean +/- standard error of the mean, 0.09 +/- 0.003 micro(m)/s [n

13 dings was nearly perfect (mean kappa, 0.983; standard error of the mean, 0.128).

14 from baseline with both krill oil (mean +/- standard error of the mean: -18.6+/-4.5 mOsmol/l; n = 18

15 an, 4.8 mo) in the SURG group and 43 months (standard error of the mean, 2.8 mo) in the ENDO group.

16 The mean follow-up period was 64 months (standard error of the mean, 4.8 mo) in the SURG group an

17 neovascular AMD were 90.8 +/- 2.9 pg/mL (+/- standard error of the mean), 88.2 +/- 2.6 pg/mL, and 79.

18 ratio of the magnetic field strength B (+/- standard error of the mean) across the shock is B2/B1 =

19 a, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates (+/-standard error of the mean) after two chemoembolization

20 had normalized mean LV SWA of 0.67 +/- 0.04 (standard error of the mean) and 0.56 +/- 0.04 (P = .18,

21 mean mass conspicuities were 1.39 +/- 0.15 (standard error of the mean) and 1.46 +/- 0.22 for a 4-cm

22 l myocardium measured before (0.98 +/- 0.01 [standard error of the mean]) and after (1.34 +/- 0.04) i

23 ec TE, both supratentorially (93.0% +/- 8.6 [standard error of the mean]) and infratentorially (87.4%

24 gher in PSC samples (2.53 +/- 0.80, mean +/- standard error of the mean) compared to PBC samples (1.1

25 greatest at CTAP (127.3 HU +/- 5.3 [mean +/- standard error of the mean]), followed by dual-contrast-

26 e proportions, and CIs were derived from the standard error of the mean for continuous variables.

27 om effects analysis of variance and mean and standard error of the mean for the difference between se

28 ithin the dentate nucleus (mean SI ratio +/- standard error of the mean for two-group comparison: 1.0

29 Mean PVG score was 2.4 +/- 0.4 (standard error of the mean) for combined therapy and 0.9

30 Operative time (mean +/- standard error of the mean) for OPGV was shorter compare

31 on; a mean of 50 days after occlusion +/- 3 [standard error of the mean] for assessment of chronic in

32 Sensitivity analysis showed that the standard error of the mean in the absolute calibrated va

33 n acute (3 days) and chronic (50 days +/- 3 [standard error of the mean]) infarction.

34 A mean +/- standard error of the mean intracellular uptake of (4.19

35 In smokers, mean (standard error of the mean) marginal bone loss at 5 year

36 The mean +/- standard error of the mean MICs of fluconazole, itracona

37 assay reproducibility, expressed as relative standard error of the mean (n = 30), was 1.1%.

38 poration and expressed as mean plus or minus standard error of the mean (n = 4).

39 ich lesions revealed that 50+/-7% (average+/-standard error of the mean, n=14 subjects) of total foam

40 concentration of 22 +/- 5.1 microM (mean +/- standard error of the mean; n = 15) and in OFF-ganglion

41 c meters per kilogram second squared, with a standard error of the mean of +/-0.027 x 10(-11) and a s

42 2 Omega cm(2)+/-1.3 Omega cm(2) (average +/- standard error of the mean of 4 chips), comparable to ot

43 ial thickness revealed a mean thickness (+/- standard error of the mean) of approximately ~41.7 +/- 1

44 DH+) cells comprised 5.8% +/- 1.4% (mean +/- standard error of the mean) of cells from 19 patient sam

45 significantly from control levels (means +/- standard errors of the means) of 11.5% +/- 1.1% to 44.2%

46 tein G genes, with means of 2,902 +/- 1,082 (standard error of the mean) or 109 genomes/10(5) cells,

47 educed in vitro cell viability by 22% +/- 5 (standard error of the mean) (P < .001) and 28% +/- 5 (P

48 ment of 5.9 arbitrary units (AU) + or - 1.8 (standard error of the mean) (P < .002) at 0.2 hour after

49 146 +/- 74 vs. 15 +/- 8 micromol/L, mean +/- standard error of the mean, P = .018).

50 values expressed as mean nmol/g protein +/- standard error of the mean, p = 0.040 by ANOVA).

51 - 0.004, low-Hct = 0.457 +/- 0.007, mean +/- standard error of the mean; p < 0.01 low-Hct vs. other g

52 uced at week 1 (mean, 664.1 pg/mL +/- 103.1 [standard error of the mean], P < .02), week 2 (mean, 618

53 with full-field visual stimulation (mean +/- standard error of the mean percentage change from baseli

54 Statistics such as the SD and standard error of the mean (SEM) are commonly used in ra

55 (t(1/2) = 44 +/- 3.4 days; error represents standard error of the mean (SEM)) compared to 4 degrees

56 is contant Km of 15.3 muM +/- 1.02 (mean +/- standard error of the mean (SEM), n = 16) and an inhibit

57 -type sequence (wild-type mean 0.78 +/- 0.07 standard error of the mean [SEM] and variant mean 0.63 +

58 n ADC ratio of lymphomas was 1.15 (SD, 0.33; standard error of the mean [SEM], 0.10), and that of hig

59 ng/ml versus 1.51 +/- 0.44 ng/ml [means +/- standard errors of the means {SEM}; P = 0.0001).

60 ized with CT alone had 36% +/- 10% (mean +/- standard error of the mean) survival, while mice born to

61 tion of 54.7 degrees (21.8 msec +/- 2.8 [+/- standard error of the mean]) than at 0 degrees (10.0 mse

62 ng a mean follow-up of 5.0 years +/- 0.0086 (standard error of the mean), the death rate was 2.4%.

63 tion decreased from 71.3% +/- 1.4% (mean +/- standard error of the mean) to 60.7% +/- 1.4% after 1 we

64 jection fraction after 8 weeks (40.3%+/-0.9 [standard error of the mean] vs 41.0%+/-0.7) in contrast

65 guidance under MR imaging (37 seconds +/- 6 [standard error of the mean] vs 55 seconds +/- 3, P < .00

66 ion scores in all segments (mean, 4.7+/-0.1 [standard error of the mean]; vs 3.0+/-0.3 for arterial i

67 ng level, mean enhancement of 19.6% +/- 1.7 (standard error of the mean) was achieved without inducin

68 f 29.6% injected dose (ID) per gram +/- 2.2 (standard error of the mean) was significantly greater th

69 The mean EPC levels (+/- standard error of the mean) were 1.4 +/- 0.5 cells/muL i

70 o an ESP II result of susceptible (means +/- standard errors of the means) were 8.47 +/- 0.12 days (r

71 ator7PCB was estimated to 182 +/- 40 t (+/-1 standard error of the mean), with sediments (144 +/- 40

72 (4.44 +/- 0.18 log(10) copies/mul [mean +/- standard error of the mean]), with normalization based o

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。