戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 o receive the intervention before or after a standardized patient.
2  likely to contextualize care for individual standardized patients.
3 at contextual errors can be identified using standardized patients.
4 se of other performance assessments, such as standardized patients.
5 linical evaluation exercises, and the use of standardized patients.
6     Surgical residents were rated by trained Standardized Patients according to a behaviorally anchor
7             Subjective, multiple-choice, and standardized patient assessments, although reliable, und
8                                              Standardized patient cases in nutrition counseling for c
9 ithin 6 weeks of treatment as indicated by a standardized patient diary.
10                                        Eight standardized patient educators were trained in collabora
11  with a nutrition intervention session using standardized patient educators.
12 s were assessed using 4 previously validated standardized patient encounters performed by each partic
13 likely to probe for contextual issues in the standardized patient encounters than students who did no
14 ts (Mini-CEX [clinical evaluation exercise], standardized patient examinations) when ratings occur im
15  internal and family medicine along with the standardized patient experience receives excellent ratin
16 rkship included 4 nutrition sessions and the standardized patient experience, whereas the Family Medi
17 erkship included 1 nutrition session and the standardized patient experience.
18                                              Standardized patient information was collected by questi
19  individualized communication training using standardized patient instructors while patients received
20 (eg, the use of patient-centered counseling, standardized patient instructors, role playing, or a com
21 omen with acute asthma were evaluated with a standardized patient interview and medical record review
22                                        Using standardized patients ("mystery clients"), we assessed c
23 ased simulations as well as encounters with 'standardized' patients, nurses or physician colleagues.
24 comprehensive clinical examination using the standardized patient/objective structured clinical exami
25     Detection of the melanoma moulage on the standardized patient occurred more often by trained stud
26 ester Quality of Life Instrument (MMQL) is a standardized patient self-report instrument designed to
27 n Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), a standardized patient self-report of function.
28                                              Standardized patients (SPs) evaluated each resident's cl
29                          METHODS/Unannounced standardized patients (SPs) presenting with classic pulm
30 ata from vignette interviews and unannounced standardized patients (SPs).
31 essful way of involving patients; the use of standardized patients to teach breast examination improv
32  of these, 116 were randomly selected to see standardized patients, to complete vignettes, or both.
33  who received special training and acted as "standardized patients" visited a random sample of pharma
34 lity of clinical practice as measured by the standardized patients was 73% correct (95% CI, 72.1% to
35           Interactions between providers and standardized patients were assessed against internationa
36 to determine their preferred treatment for a standardized patient with large varices and examined the
37 y to develop appropriate treatment plans for standardized patients with contextual issues (69% [95% C
38 r developing appropriate treatment plans for standardized patients with medical issues (54% [95% CI,

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。