ライフサイエンスコーパス: startle response

1 tremor, and seizures (1 case with prominent startle response).

2 as measured using the prepulse inhibition of startle response.

3 d stimuli and the prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

4 rtle at doses that had no effect on baseline startle response.

5 to antipsychotics, and an abnormal acoustic-startle response.

6 onset and throughout the development of the startle response.

7 ion in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of acoustic startle response.

8 or prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

9 ic reduction of the norepinephrine-dependent startle response.

10 in prepulse inhibition (PPI) in the acoustic startle response.

11 ts prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

12 modification and reduction of the excitatory startle response.

13 g, difficulty concentrating, and exaggerated startle response.

14 0 suppression and prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

15 ng as assessed by prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

16 ydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) on the acoustic startle response.

17 nd prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

18 rpuff, but cannot elicit the full behavioral startle response.

19 nditioned inhibition of the fear-potentiated startle response.

20 tion of predators and facilitate an acoustic startle response.

21 atory behavior characteristic of an acoustic startle response.

22 udied using prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response.

23 ed interference of positive emotion with the startle response.

24 closely apposed to neurons that initiate the startle response.

25 maze and open field tests, and increased the startle response.

26 ide), on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response.

27 d tasks and recording of emotion-potentiated startle response.

28 normalize, along with partial rescue of the startle response.

29 t and deficits in prepulse inhibition of the startle response.

30 the afferent neurons (S-cells) mediating the startle response.

31 is prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

32 rited disease associated with an exaggerated startle response.

33 and elevated zero maze, but not in the shock-startle response.

34 in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response.

35 decreased the precision and amplitude of the startle response.

36 encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses.

37 10 mg/kg) on prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle responses.

38 infarcted rats relative to their pre-surgery startle responses.

39 An accelerometer measured startle responses.

40 impaired learning and memory and exaggerated startle responses.

41 ow significant differences in their acoustic startle responses.

42 encoding for rapid and precise initiation of startle responses.

43 lfactory-driven chemotaxis and touch-induced startle responses.

44 ise acts as a cue that attenuates subsequent startle responses.

45 he elevated zero maze and an increased shock-startle response 30 and 60 min post-injection.

46 ay an increase in prepulse inhibition of the startle response, a manifestation of sensorimotor gating

47 Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response-a measure of sensorimotor gating-is hig

48 other motor activities, as well as acoustic startle responses all reveal a more slowly developing ph

49 ffecting the magnitude or habituation of the startle response (all p > 0.13).

50 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho

51 cs and field potential parameters of C-start startle responses allowed for discrimination between sho

52 erekplexia is a syndrome of readily provoked startle responses, alongside episodic and generalized hy

53 ma ACTH, locus coeruleus neuronal firing and startle response amplitude.

54 prepulse inhibition (PPI), as well as higher startle response amplitudes.

55 The startle response and adaptability of the startle respons

56 morphisms may predispose to PD by increasing startle response and agoraphobic cognitions.

57 ld activity, prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response and contextual fear conditioning when c

58 at measured prepulse inhibition of the human startle response and habituation of startle magnitude, m

59 ic brain lesions enhance the strength of the startle response and impair PPI.

60 out (KO) mice evident as abnormal audiogenic startle response and increased audiogenic seizure suscep

61 gical disorder characterized by an excessive startle response and is typically caused by missense and

62 the histamine H1 antagonist meclizine on the startle response and PPI were investigated in healthy ma

63 he pwi phenotype includes a reduced auditory startle response and reduced visual evoked potentials, s

64 Adult mice showed a diminished acoustic startle response and required higher acoustic stimuli to

65 The cortical silent period, the startle response and the second and third phases of RI w

66 the safety signal to reduce the potentiated-startle response and to extinguish the fear response whe

67 e placebo group, as demonstrated by acoustic startle response and US expectancy ratings.

68 in healthy male subjects with high baseline startle responses and low PPI levels.

69 Implanted cats exhibited acoustic startle responses and were trained to approach their foo

70 e burying task, elevated zero maze, acoustic startle response, and forced swim test.

71 expression recognition, emotion-potentiated startle response, and memory for affect-laden words were

72 ts prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, and patients with schizophrenia exhibi

73 bituation of an olfactory-mediated locomotor startle response, and we isolated a mutation in the glyc

74 s; investigator ratings; PPI of the acoustic startle response; and autonomic, endocrine, and adverse

75 conditioning and prepulse inhibition of the startle response are also disrupted in cdf/cdf mice.

76 as prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, are playing an increasingly important

77 ic surge accompanied by an inhibition of the startle response as predicted by the animal model.

78 Behavioral abnormalities included diminished startle response, as measured by prepulse inhibition, an

79 The magnitude of the first startle response, as well as the magnitude of startle re

80 ng protocol was used to measure the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) in

81 ef, daily sucrose access on PPI and acoustic startle response (ASR) in OLETF rat and age-matched non-

82 index of fear) were measured in an acoustic startle response (ASR) paradigm in rats.

83 tion of the zebrafish (Danio Rerio) acoustic startle response (ASR).

84 ted reactivity to startling sounds (acoustic startle response; ASR).

85 tartle response, as well as the magnitude of startle response averaged across blocks of testing, was

86 as measured by the amplitude of the acoustic startle response before and after noise exposure in a se

87 The startle response (body twitch) was evoked by an abrupt d

88 , 20 kHz) produced an initial characteristic startle response (brisk running) in the hooded Lister ra

89 T1 KO mice display no difference in acoustic startle response but exhibit a deficiency in prepulse in

90 tion has been shown to affect human eyeblink startle responses, but whether these results depend on m

91 The prepulse inhibition of startle responses by a weaker preceding tone, the inhibi

92 fearful faces, intact modulation of acoustic startle responses by fear-eliciting scenes, and a normal

93 ted in the hindbrain to initiate C-type fast startle responses (C-starts).

94 vapor, Drosophila show an olfactory-mediated startle response characterized by a transient increase i

95 last growth factor 8 (Fgf8): an inconsistent startle response, circular swimming, fused otoliths, and

96 e exhibit reduced initiation of the acoustic startle response consistent with hearing impairment, sug

97 On emotional picture trials, startle responses decreased as a function of cue in the

98 antagonist reduced the exaggerated acoustic startle responses, deficits in prepulse inhibition of ac

99 Fmrp is dispensable at the initial steps of startle response development, it is necessary for the fu

100 the lowest cortisol reactivity and smallest startle response during virtual reality scenes.

101 e disease is characterized by an exaggerated startle response, evoked by tactile or auditory stimuli,

102 e disease is characterized by an exaggerated startle response, evoked by tactile or auditory stimuli,

103 measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response, exhibited nonfocal preservative patter

104 The magnitude of the startle response (eye blink) to the first stimulus was a

105 er (1 cm deep, 1 min) had an initial phasic (startle) response (first 5 s) that varied considerably b

106 The significantly greater startle responses for the left eye compared with the rig

107 Citalopram also abolished the increased startle response found in the context of negative affect

108 For speed of initiation of startle responses, FSL would be the more advantageous me

109 r gating is prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response, impairments in which have been demonst

110 male and female mice and decreased acoustic startle response in a sex-dependent manner.

111 The acoustic startle response in B6 mice was also enhanced at 14 days

112 by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response in C57Bl6 mice.

113 CVS did not enhance the startle response in cycling females.

114 enhanced prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response in DBA/2J mice, a strain with low basal

115 ted to one basic motor output and the C-type startle response in fish.

116 n contrast, MA similarly increased the shock-startle response in Hdc(-)/(-) and Hdc+/+ mice, compared

117 timulus reduces the amplitude of the ensuing startle response in humans and other vertebrates.

118 aired with footshock potentiate the acoustic startle response in rats.

119 and is supported by the findings of greater startle response in the patients with recent-onset PTSD.

120 There was a differential asymmetry of startle response in the two subgroups of patients (recen

121 estigation provides evidence for exaggerated startle response in this disorder.

122 tigation was designed to assess the acoustic startle response in treatment-seeking women with sexual

123 with some clinical studies investigating the startle response in Vietnam veterans with PTSD, this inv

124 we show for the first time that the acoustic startle response in zebrafish larvae is modulated by wea

125 response magnitude and levels of exaggerated startle responses in daily life in PTSD participants (t

126 lasticity may be key to the evolution of the startle responses in mammals, which use larger populatio

127 iciency and exaggerated acoustic and tactile startle responses in mice bearing point mutations in alp

128 on the magnitude and plasticity of defensive startle responses in mice.

129 measured by inhibitory avoidance, increased startle responses in prepulse inhibition tasks, and incr

130 Latencies of startle responses in sternocleidomastoid and tibialis an

131 onsistent with the physiological defense and startle responses in terrestrial mammals and birds.

132 ents in the open field test, higher baseline startle responses in the course of the prepulse inhibiti

133 han 90 ms) and the frequent co-expression of startle responses in the neck and eye muscles, it has be

134 subcellular astrocyte calcium imaging during startle responses in vivo.

135 This startle response, in which the first movement creates an

136 iated with micro-environmental plasticity of startle response, including Drosophila Hsp90, setting th

137 orphants had no FM1-43 dye uptake and lacked startle response, indicating hair cell dysfunction and g

138 d whether either determines the precision of startle response initiation is not known.

139 The startle response is a useful way to examine the precise

140 The startle response is an attractive behavioral model for s

141 sensorimotor gating, occurs when an auditory startle response is markedly inhibited by a preceding su

142 The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is reliably enhanced when elicited in t

143 Therefore, the startle response is the most likely evolutionary origin

144 dependent changes in timing and precision of startle response latencies.

145 primary SLCs and less frequent, long-latency startle responses (LLCs).

146 connection between the telencephalon and the startle response, mediated by reticulospinal neurons.

147 e been proposed as evolutionary ancestors of startle response neurons of the mammalian reticular form

148 observed; however, neither enhanced acoustic startle responses nor limb clenching were seen.

149 Neither the 2 startle responses nor the 2 forms of PPI were significan

150 open field and elevated zero maze and shock-startle response of 12-month-old wild-type mice injected

151 The giant fiber system (GFS) mediates the startle response of Drosophila.

152 n PPI without affecting the magnitude of the startle response or other physiological variables.

153 uency discrimination, prepulse inhibition of startle responses, or fear conditioning with pure tones.

154 In the current study, a startle response paradigm was used to investigate gap de

155 Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) is a cross-species measure of sen

156 sing the prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) model, in which an acoustic prepu

157 to be involved in prepulse inhibition of the startle response (PPI), a measure of sensorimotor inhibi

158 disrupts prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI), paradigms frequently used to stu

159 Startle response, PPI, heart rate response, galvanic ski

160 The startle response and adaptability of the startle response (prepulse inhibition and habituation) h

161 comotor activity, the rotarod test, acoustic startle response, prepulse inhibition, elevated plus-maz

162 tivity, respiration, tremors, body tone, and startle response, revealed normal responses for Chrna2-n

163 e response suggest that the higher levels of startle response seen in the PTSD subjects may reflect a

164 The amplitude of startle response showed a substantial increase until the

165 tipsychotics and causes a deficient acoustic startle response similar to that observed in schizophren

166 Here, we examined short-latency startle responses (SLCs) in larval zebrafish and tested

167 midlatency auditory evoked potential and the startle response (SR) have been used as measures of sens

168 A decrease in initial startle response (SR) was also observed in all PPD rats

169 lant-naive control subjects, PPI of acoustic startle response, startle reactivity, habituation, ADHD

170 and applied it to three quantitative traits (startle response, starvation resistance, and chill coma

171 inical studies of shock sensitization of the startle response suggest that the higher levels of start

172 impairs prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response suggesting an important behavioural rol

173 ve neuromodulation, manifest in a diminished startle response suppression by hedonic stimuli.

174 smaller prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response than goal trackers, suggesting a reduce

175 e reflexes and shorter latencies to onset of startle response than the comparison subjects over the e

176 his patient developed a profound accentuated startle response that did not have a corresponding elect

177 the mutant mice display an impaired acoustic startle response that is not due to an obvious hearing d

178 Although we observed startle responses, the quickening effect was not conting

179 rekplexia, a motor disorder characterized by startle responses, the zebrafish beo mutant should be a

180 e immediately before the main pulse inhibits startle responses, though the mechanism for this remains

181 Ucn may modulate the acoustic startle response through the Ucn-expressing neuron proje

182 ng but not when measured by fear-potentiated startle response to a loud noise.

183 nhibition (PPI) refers to a reduction in the startle response to a strong sensory stimulus when this

184 In prepulse inhibition (PPI), the startle response to a strong, unexpected stimulus is dim

185 impairments in motor coordination, increased startle response to acoustic stimuli and hypersociabilit

186 s ('prepulse') inhibits the amplitude of the startle response to an intense stimulus ('pulse').

187 on in which a weak prestimulus decreases the startle response to an intense stimulus, provides an ope

188 Although the early startle response to cold water stress elicited a pressor

189 y related to the Lebinthini show an acoustic startle response to high-frequency sounds that generates

190 C6A5 present with hypertonia, an exaggerated startle response to tactile or acoustic stimuli, and lif

191 alysis of behavioral data confirmed that the startle response to the airpuff was diminished following

192 The present study examined the eyeblink startle responses to acoustic stimuli of 59 healthy hete

193 Intranasal OXT potentiated acoustic startle responses to negative stimuli, without affecting

194 In prepulse inhibition (PPI), startle responses to sudden, unexpected stimuli are mark

195 s showed stronger and more reliable acoustic startle responses (uncued trials) during all acoustic st

196 Measures included acoustic startle response, US expectancy, blood glucose levels, a

197 We evoked startle responses via activation of Channelrhodopsin (Ch

198 The eye-blink component of the startle response was assessed bilaterally by using elect

199 The startle response was first detectable at the end of the

200 The subjects' eyeblink startle response was measured in reaction to startle-eli

201 s study, dramatic sensitization of the probe-startle response was observed after shock exposure but n

202 A profound increase in the acoustic startle response was observed in knock-in mice as well a

203 ative valence (Study1); 3 seconds later, the startle response was slightly less potentiated and the r

204 Although the onset and amplitude of the startle response were not altered in fmr1 KO mice until

205 dB SPL) was stronger, and baseline acoustic startle responses were larger, compared with results for

206 Enhanced acoustic startle responses were observed among injected compared

207 acilitation vs. attenuation) of the acoustic startle response, were examined.

208 is defined as a reduction in magnitude of a startle response when a startling stimulus is preceded b

209 chanism that can serve to precisely initiate startle responses when speed is critical for survival.

210 The control group had larger startle responses when viewing negative, aversive pictur

211 gical disorder characterized by an excessive startle response which can be caused by mutations in the

212 this compound tended to reduce the acoustic startle response, which is consistent with an anxiolytic

213 nxiety-like behaviors, and impaired acoustic startle response, which is distinct from the phenotype o

214 roduce persistent elevations in the acoustic startle response, which may reflect anxiety-like signs i

215 reactivity was strongly associated with the startle response, which was also associated with hypervi

216 elevations could be evoked when inducing the startle response with unexpected air puffs.