1 Statistical analyses were adjusted for age, sex, randomized t
2 Statistical analyses were applied to evaluate the clinicopath
3 serologically diagnosed cases, and appropriate descriptive
statistical analyses were applied.
4 Statistical analyses were based on historical controls; there
5 Statistical analyses were based on repeated-measures analysis
6 The responses used in the
statistical analyses were body mass index (BMI), waist circum
7 Statistical analyses were by intention-to-treat, stratified b
8 Statistical analyses were carried out in STATA using the biva
9 Assessors were not blinded to group status, but
statistical analyses were conducted blind.
10 Main
statistical analyses were conducted on the basis of intention
11 Statistical analyses were conducted to assess the performance
12 Statistical analyses were conducted using linear regression.
13 Statistical analyses were performed (P </=0.05).
14 The
statistical analyses were performed between January and Novem
15 Statistical analyses were performed by factorial ANOVA.
16 Statistical analyses were performed by Pearson's chi-squared
17 All
statistical analyses were performed by SPSS statistical softw
18 All
statistical analyses were performed by univariable and adjust
19 Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad softwar
20 Statistical analyses were performed by using nonparametric te
21 Statistical analyses were performed by using t tests, one-way
22 Statistical analyses were performed by using the chi(2) test
23 Statistical analyses were performed controlling for both TSPO
24 Standard
statistical analyses were performed for categorical and conti
25 Univariate
statistical analyses were performed for qualitative and quant
26 Statistical analyses were performed from December 1, 2015, to
27 Statistical analyses were performed in 124 patients with comp
28 Statistical analyses were performed in October 2016.
29 Statistical analyses were performed to estimate genetic param
30 Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate risk of morta
31 Descriptive
statistical analyses were performed to report correlation coe
32 Statistical analyses were performed using a 2-tailed Student
33 Statistical analyses were performed using a software program,
34 Statistical analyses were performed using Minitab V16.0 softw
35 Statistical analyses were performed using the Pearson correla
36 Statistical analyses were performed with a receiver operating
37 Statistical analyses were performed with Cox regression and a
38 Statistical analyses were performed with statistical software
39 Statistical analyses were performed with statistical software
40 Statistical analyses were performed with the Wilcoxon rank te
41 High-dimensional
statistical analyses were performed, all models were adjusted
42 Univariate
statistical analyses were performed, and each significant par
43 Two
statistical analyses were performed: a categorical analysis w
44 levels of 9 PFAS in maternal plasma extracted midpregnancy;
statistical analyses were restricted to 7 PFAS that were quan
45 Statistical analyses were run on NMR spectra to discriminate
46 Statistical analyses were then performed to establish the ass
47 Statistical analyses were undertaken with standard log-rank-t
48 Paired and independent t test
statistical analyses were used to compare the responses betwe
49 Multivariate
statistical analyses were used to identify a combination of S
50 children aged 9-11 years from 12 countries, and multilevel
statistical analyses were used, including both child- and sch