1 cell cultures on the two substrates with no
statistical difference.
2 average transplant payments demonstrated no
statistical differences ($
28,483 vs. $28,447, P = 0.858)
3 To evaluate
statistical differences,
a targeted approach was applied
4 g into language, infants must discern subtle
statistical differences about people and voices in order
5 There was no
statistical difference among 1, 5, 10, and 20 ppm with r
6 Since no
statistical difference among PI scores was noted for any
7 and recipient survival also demonstrated no
statistical difference among split-liver, living donor,
8 , 41.2% for MAB, and 8.5% for LAB, without a
statistical difference among the AD, MCI, and control gr
9 gurgitation [MR] > or =moderate) we found no
statistical difference among the groups, but when all de
10 .6 and 76.6, respectively), but there was no
statistical difference among the standard deviation of d
11 d with only a single exception, there was no
statistical difference among them.
12 lds of many sensory neurons are sensitive to
statistical differences among classes of complex stimuli
13 nce and Fisher tests were used to define the
statistical differences among groups (P <0.05).
14 rformed on post-basal serum samples revealed
statistical differences among individuals based on break
15 Statistical differences among techniques for each observ
16 on's Q-test were applied in order to examine
statistical differences and outlier values.
17 although, the clinical significance of these
statistical differences appears to be limited.
18 ds for demonstrating superiority, and, if no
statistical differences are found, the treatments are as
19 cells/microL, P =.01 [of note, there was no
statistical difference at 48 weeks [P =.15], although a
20 er definition (>/= 5-point improvement) with
statistical differences at cycle 12 (KRd v Rd patients,
21 There was no
statistical difference between accuracy of protein-creat
22 ept for rough-surface implants, for which no
statistical difference between augmented and non-augment
23 These results illustrate a distinct
statistical difference between each calcination temperat
24 There was no
statistical difference between group 1 or group 2.
25 deal body weight on admission did not show a
statistical difference between groups A and B (p = .883)
26 There was no
statistical difference between groups for conversions to
27 There was no
statistical difference between groups in plasma levels o
28 Univariate analysis failed to show a
statistical difference between groups in regard to cereb
29 culating C. pneumoniae DNA by PCR, without a
statistical difference between groups.
30 There was no
statistical difference between methylation index and APC
31 There was no
statistical difference between normal subjects and LAgP
32 ee survival was 71% (95% CI 58, 84%) with no
statistical difference between patients with IPI 0 to 1
33 There was no
statistical difference between probe uptake of the 6 blo
34 Statistical difference between protein production and cy
35 There was no
statistical difference between survival in hospital-base
36 We found no
statistical difference between the 18 (50%) patients wit
37 Life tables revealed no
statistical difference between the 2 H. pylori-positive
38 There was no
statistical difference between the arms in terms of fail
39 There was no
statistical difference between the carve-out and integra
40 Salivary IgA level showed no
statistical difference between the cases and controls.
41 d of the 3rd month, the VA and CMT showed no
statistical difference between the groups but the patien
42 -censored graft survival model, there was no
statistical difference between the groups.
43 ) duplex pairs to discover that there was no
statistical difference between the kinetics of the PM an
44 n lean livers, by most measures there was no
statistical difference between the level of IRI to steat
45 There was no
statistical difference between the levels of lipid oxida
46 For external validation report data, no
statistical difference between the performance of the CN
47 tes were combined and analyzed, there was no
statistical difference between the performance of the tw
48 There was no
statistical difference between the proportion cured or c
49 No
statistical difference between the proportions of inputs
50 The results demonstrate no
statistical difference between the respective means with
51 There was no
statistical difference between the two groups in terms o
52 ed showed minimal ridge alterations, with no
statistical difference between the two treatment modalit
53 f we use the model presented here, we see no
statistical difference between the values of the Young's
54 ad so many HPC counts of 0 that a meaningful
statistical difference between them was not calculated.
55 igmentation occurred in both groups, with no
statistical difference between them.
56 There was no
statistical difference between these 2 groups (p = 0.60)
57 Nonparametric analysis showed no
statistical difference between VA+ and orange (P = 0.34)
58 There was no
statistical difference between vaccine and placebo group
59 There was no
statistical difference between xanthine oxidase inhibiti
60 in the central nucleus of the IC revealed no
statistical differences between ablated and control anim
61 ear measurements for all defects revealed no
statistical differences between bone sounding, radiograp
62 tenoids and ascorbic acid were analyzed, not
statistical differences between both crops were found.
63 It turns out that the
statistical differences between coding and non-coding se
64 n groups (P = .70 and P = .78).There were no
statistical differences between groups postoperatively a
65 Statistical differences between groups were determined u
66 Statistical differences between groups were determined u
67 to sue (P < 0.01); otherwise, there were no
statistical differences between groups.
68 and a P value of 0.05 were use for assessing
statistical differences between measurements.
69 of settled dust with floor dust revealed no
statistical differences between median concentrations of
70 y ANOVA pointed successfully on the existing
statistical differences between metal concentrations.
71 There were no
statistical differences between observed and predicted p
72 Statistical differences between the areas under the ROC
73 ltivariate analysis confirmed the absence of
statistical differences between the AZA and the ICT grou
74 ia trapped in individual nanoholes revealing
statistical differences between the behavior of polarize
75 eveloped a method to quantitate and localize
statistical differences between the correlation maps for
76 There were no
statistical differences between the groups for corneal t
77 No
statistical differences between the groups in mean count
78 There were no
statistical differences between the groups in the preval
79 There were no
statistical differences between the OSA and the control
80 plied to analyze the diagnostic accuracy and
statistical differences between the three imaging modali
81 No
statistical differences between the two cell types were
82 There were no
statistical differences between treatment groups.
83 There were no
statistical differences between work per liter of ventil
84 those without THI exposure (P < .001 by the
statistical difference brain map) in the left dorsolater
85 and ketamine-xylazine-treated mice, with no
statistical difference compared with late, early, or ver
86 spectively; when PP and MU were compared, no
statistical differences could be detected (P = 0.80).
87 rameters were balanced in both groups and no
statistical differences could be detected.
88 vertical and horizontal osseous fill, but no
statistical difference emerged between the groups.
89 There were small
statistical differences favoring diclofenac for 2 of the
90 Although no
statistical difference (
Fisher's exact test) was detecte
91 alone in sclerosing reticular veins, with no
statistical difference for complications.
92 espectively, with all but the latter showing
statistical difference from chance.
93 hylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA), and had no
statistical difference from poly lactic acid (PLA) and p
94 eased mobility with frozen storage time, and
statistical difference from the fresh sample was seen la
95 re-culture SBB-treated groups do not exhibit
statistical difference from the non-treated groups.
96 of MRSASelect and MRSASelect II revealed no
statistical differences;
however, the latter exhibited e
97 No
statistical difference in affinity between the higher ab
98 ions in young animals, although it showed no
statistical difference in aged animals.
99 No
statistical difference in baseline characteristics was o
100 There was no
statistical difference in bleeding risk between patients
101 d vaccine group at 6 weeks, but there was no
statistical difference in cell-mediated immune responses
102 There was no
statistical difference in conception failures (defined a
103 There was no
statistical difference in CRF axonal staining in the dor
104 There was no
statistical difference in dehiscence between NPWT and dr
105 propensity case-match analysis, there is no
statistical difference in disease-free survival between
106 At 19 months pi, a similar
statistical difference in epithelial parameters was note
107 e identified a panel of 25 microRNAs showing
statistical difference in expression between AR and APN.
108 eAg status, or race; similarly, there was no
statistical difference in HBeAg seroconversion rates bet
109 g this method to conventional HPLC-ICPMS, no
statistical difference in iAs concentration was found an
110 and global nonlinear regression revealed no
statistical difference in lactate reduction between the
111 Although there was no
statistical difference in lipid concentrations between d
112 There was no
statistical difference in local control between patients
113 of patients by treatment groups confirmed no
statistical difference in locoregional control regardles
114 he left CST, but there was only a borderline
statistical difference in mean connectivity.
115 patients undergoing LLR, while there was no
statistical difference in mortality.
116 trichotomized analysis found no significant
statistical difference in neurologic outcome between the
117 We found no
statistical difference in neuronal cell body size betwee
118 There was no
statistical difference in odds by sex, wealth, education
119 However, there was no
statistical difference in OS after correction for sex, a
120 ard ratio, 1.35; P = .019), and there was no
statistical difference in OS between the sequencing grou
121 (all AHG-CDC IgG-XM negative), there was no
statistical difference in overall graft survival.
122 paring study participant characteristics, no
statistical difference in overall prevalence was noted w
123 No
statistical difference in overall survival at 1 year was
124 No
statistical difference in performance was observed betwe
125 However, there was no
statistical difference in PRA values among these sera (9
126 ted from 2004 to 2008 found that there was a
statistical difference in radioactive iodine use between
127 For potential pathogens overall, there was a
statistical difference in recovery that favored the Isol
128 A k-fold validation test revealed no
statistical difference in RMSE for predicting nitrate co
129 irm." Patient satisfaction was high, with no
statistical difference in satisfaction between therapies
130 There is no
statistical difference in survival according to diagnosi
131 There was no
statistical difference in survival or in objective bone
132 Furthermore, there was no
statistical difference in survival rate for patients who
133 No
statistical difference in symptomatic intracerebral hemo
134 No
statistical difference in terms of angiogenesis, lymphan
135 icantly lower energy threshold, there was no
statistical difference in terms of leading-edge voltage
136 There was no
statistical difference in the age-adjusted or multivaria
137 We observed no
statistical difference in the ages of Stratum 2 and Stra
138 There was no
statistical difference in the choroidal thickness betwee
139 There was
statistical difference in the CRP (P = 0.0413) and DMFT
140 There was no
statistical difference in the cumulative rate according
141 However, there was no
statistical difference in the distribution of PSA, clini
142 n both tidal volume groups, and there was no
statistical difference in the extent of decrease between
143 nonucleosis (FIM) was excluded, there was no
statistical difference in the frequency of EBV infectivi
144 There was no
statistical difference in the frequency of polymorphisms
145 There was
statistical difference in the level of extracellular DA
146 e identified for 18 months, but there was no
statistical difference in the likelihood of being in one
147 hilic response and lung injury, there was no
statistical difference in the lung cytokine concentratio
148 There was no
statistical difference in the measurement of PDs between
149 When normalized for length, there was no
statistical difference in the median number of variants
150 There was no
statistical difference in the number of positive scans b
151 the cumulative density function indicates a
statistical difference in the sham and OVX D-spacing dis
152 There was no
statistical difference in the speed of immune reconstitu
153 We found no
statistical difference in the thickness of the combined
154 However, whereas there was no
statistical difference in these values for the Pl(A1) ho
155 There was no
statistical difference in tumor volumes for the groups a
156 There was no
statistical difference in VAS for nausea, but it was num
157 We conclude that the reported
statistical differences in annotations between pairs of
158 nmodified enzyme prior to polymerization; no
statistical differences in bioactivity were observed.
159 No significant
statistical differences in complication occurrence and p
160 There were no
statistical differences in GABA or glutamine, although G
161 We recorded no
statistical differences in grade 3 or worse toxic effect
162 There were no
statistical differences in graft or patient survival bet
163 more regional changes in tissue proportions,
statistical differences in gray matter and CSF were comp
164 changeable, as the devices have clinical and
statistical differences in measurements.
165 Conversely, there were no
statistical differences in MMP-2 or MMP-9 mRNA expressio
166 No
statistical differences in mortality rates or major morb
167 We also show
statistical differences in orientation preference patche
168 imates at 7 years post-treatment revealed no
statistical differences in outcomes of local recurrence
169 Although no
statistical differences in overall survival rates among
170 cross-sections, we found that there were no
statistical differences in perfusion recovery, arterioge
171 There were no
statistical differences in rates of progression or survi
172 No
statistical differences in sensitivities and specificiti
173 Statistical differences in sensitivities were evaluated
174 There were no
statistical differences in surgical site infections, ser
175 No
statistical differences in the allele, genotype, or hapl
176 No overall
statistical differences in the annual seasonal distribut
177 There were no
statistical differences in the claims-based quality meas
178 There were no
statistical differences in the efficacy analyses.
179 No
statistical differences in the expression were observed
180 There were no
statistical differences in the ipsilateral CSP.
181 racteristic (ROC) curve analyses revealed no
statistical differences in the overall assay performance
182 There were no
statistical differences in the pH, PO2, or hematocrit.
183 olymerase chain reaction method, we found no
statistical differences in the prevalence of HPV (16% fo
184 In vivo data were analyzed for
statistical differences in the uptake of yttrium in bone
185 of 8 weeks was higher for DOX (44.37%), and
statistical differences in this period were observed bet
186 ilaterally in all cadavers and there were no
statistical differences in vascular pedicle caliber or l
187 Because of the large sample size, some
statistical differences lacked clinical significance.
188 at a 95% level of confidence, there were not
statistical differences observed among the 9 NTs tested.
189 re applied to the RCs in order to identify a
statistical difference of AD with respect to baseline sc
190 %/99%, respectively (where [*] indicates the
statistical difference of P = x/x between the two result
191 to the same emissions standard, there is no
statistical difference of regulated gas-phase pollutant
192 rs per article, and chi(2) test assessed the
statistical difference of the variables over years 1995
193 is study and multivariate analysis to reveal
statistical differences of normalised eicosanoids concen
194 ifications (seven of seven, P > .99) without
statistical differences only (nine of 29 plaques with li
195 Although there was no
statistical difference (
P = 0.34) in SI between meals in
196 dry eye and control groups did not show any
statistical difference (
p = 0.84).
197 3 years (58.6% vs. 70.2%), but there was no
statistical difference (
P=0.082).
198 Statistical differences (
P<0.001) were observed in the o
199 Statistical differences (
p<0.05) between summer and wint
200 There was no
statistical difference regarding age, sex, status, redo,
201 Statistical difference was analyzed using the Mann-Whitn
202 No
statistical difference was detected in the percentage of
203 No
statistical difference was found between fresh and froze
204 No
statistical difference was found between measuring 4 sur
205 No
statistical difference was found between the reliable an
206 No
statistical difference was found between the two methods
207 No
statistical difference was found between the two treatme
208 However, no
statistical difference was found between the various nic
209 No
statistical difference was found in OS after 52 weeks (P
210 No
statistical difference was found when comparing bioactiv
211 and 84 (26.8%) eyes with no signs of AMD (no
statistical difference was found; P = 0.3384).
212 No
statistical difference was noted between the 2 groups fo
213 deviation was below 8% for all soils and no
statistical difference was observed for results by pyroh
214 However, no
statistical difference was observed in the assay perform
215 No
statistical difference was observed when the overall spa
216 No
statistical difference was seen between the prevalence i
217 Statistical differences were analyzed by means of a pair
218 Statistical differences were analyzed using two-sample a
219 Statistical differences were assessed using a one-way an
220 oefficient of variation were calculated, and
statistical differences were assessed with one-way ANOVA
221 ted, inhibited, or unresponsive to movement)
statistical differences were demonstrated - most signifi
222 onal spectrophotometric White method, and no
statistical differences were found (alpha=0.05).
223 However, no
statistical differences were found between 1 and 2a (P >
224 Significant
statistical differences were found between novice and ex
225 No
statistical differences were found in PD and RW between
226 Statistical differences were identified between the grou
227 To visualize regional changes,
statistical differences were mapped at each cortical sur
228 lso had the highest mean bone formation, and
statistical differences were observed between DOX and NA
229 Few
statistical differences were observed between SSDs of an
230 Statistical differences were observed by race, sex, and
231 s as early as 6 weeks of age, a time when no
statistical differences were observed electrophysiologic
232 No
statistical differences were observed for drug-related s
233 No
statistical differences were observed in relation to sex
234 Statistical differences were revealed when IL-1beta rele
235 In no AF patients, no
statistical differences were seen between antithrombotic
236 No
statistical differences were seen in quality of life mea
237 Statistical differences were tested using non-parametric
238 meet (57.5 +/- 23.20) the standard showed no
statistical difference,
Wilcoxon rank-sum test = -1.99,
239 There was no
statistical difference with respect to sputum conversion
240 There was no
statistical difference with respect to stage, performanc