ライフサイエンスコーパス: statistically

1 The TER statistically aggregates all misclassification error rat

2 pendent selection could not be distinguished statistically, although overall the results favoured the

3 All extracted data were statistically analyzed and the results were further vali

4 The results were statistically analyzed.

5 ivers and coasts of China were retrieved and statistically analyzed.

6 res and full trajectories have been analyzed statistically and compared to standard replica exchange

7 ng on the training set (n = 1551) identified statistically appropriate cutoffs for tumor size (<2.2 c

8 in a nonepisodic control task did not differ statistically as a function of TMS site (i.e., number of

9 ly more improvement in hsCRP (P <0.05) and a statistically comparable reduction in HOMA (P >0.05) was

10 -loaded DART mass spectrometry (pDART-MS) is statistically comparable with that obtained by using com

11 Both sets of data were statistically comparable.

12 ation visit was determined in each group and statistically compared using analysis of variance.

13 ity), thus this confounding relationship was statistically controlled using principal components deri

14 Sensitization profiles were assessed and statistically coordinated with reported allergies.

15 zed uptake value ratio) was calculated for a statistically defined neocortical volume of interest.

16 ixaban therapy and warfarin therapy were not statistically different (difference, -$60; 95% CI, -$272

17 eated biofilms under flow condition were not statistically different (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05).

18 epressurization time (39%, p=0.145) were not statistically different between groups.

19 ed visual acuity at fluid resolution was not statistically different from baseline; and no eye lost m

20 0.1% of ICU meter results did, which was not statistically different from non-ICU results.

21 It is only when the real data are statistically different from the expectations under the

22 fourth examination, the diagnosis was still statistically different from the reference diagnosis bas

23 . 6.9%), and, although associations were not statistically different, people in lower-education count

24 and biomass growth rates at each scale were statistically different.

25 ate of male and female investigators was not statistically different.

26 d H2O adsorption on ZnO could be utilized to statistically discriminate between the two analytes.

27 hat communities in mineral soil samples were statistically distinct from communities in organic micro

28 hat older restorations harboured communities statistically distinct from newer restorations.

29 es and non-parasites interact in networks in statistically distinct ways, and that these differences

30 ents and rationalized with a simple model of statistically distributed "constrictions" and "bridges"

31 The coarse resolution AOGCMs outputs were statistically downscaled using an asynchronous regional

32 7) M) under physiological conditions that is statistically equal to the constants reported in the lit

33 In addition, 2 statistically equivalent datasets were generated by coun

34 ing 36 esters and 6 alcohols compounds, were statistically evaluated by cluster and PCA analysis.

35 ning region (SDR) in a unified framework, we statistically evaluated evolutionary hypotheses concerni

36 Here, we develop a statistically founded non-coding driver-detection method

37 tensive palynological dataset, that has been statistically grouped into palaeo-biomes, we show a more

38 s result in sparse feature matrices that are statistically hard to handle.

39 The PreICP-RMS and PosICP-RMS were statistically higher (P < 0.01) in KC than normal eyes.

40 tection of PCa patients, deep learning had a statistically higher area under the receiver operating c

41 la, P. micra, C. rectus, and E. nodatum show statistically higher detection frequencies with MT4.

42 ponent Analysis (PCA) to determine variables statistically important to sensory traits.

43 F and, whilst its addition to current scores statistically improves prediction for some endpoints, ab

44 We examined two statistically independent phenotypes reflecting subjects

45 SA; stem surface area to dry mass ratio) was statistically indistinguishable from the leaf economics

46 corrected porewater concentrations that were statistically indistinguishable from the true equilibriu

47 creased firm profits by 30%, compared with a statistically insignificant 11% for traditional training

48 Community divided statistically into three groups: freshwater (salinity <

49 We statistically link early systemic inflammation with late

50 These disease-associated contigs were statistically linked to specific components of the bacte

51 higher dual-staining of CA19-9 and sTRA had statistically longer time-to-progression after surgery.

52 group compared with the Ctrl in all PKs and statistically lower at PKs 1 and 3.

53 In group B, the mean PCO score was statistically lower in the SE-PMMA IOL eyes compared wit

54 The primary outcome was not statistically lower with bleach (n=101; 41.6 cases per 1

55 correlation of the high-risk genotype at the statistically most strongly associated variant with decr

56 administered according to a T&E regimen was statistically noninferior and clinically comparable with

57 Global extracellular volume fraction was statistically not different between patients and control

58 ombine sensory and category information in a statistically optimal manner.

59 participant behavior to the predictions of a statistically optimal observer that ideally combines all

60 nt dynamics, regarded as a hallmark of life, statistically out-performs other candidate mechanisms, a

61 he EOS calculator period) and did not differ statistically (P = .70).

62 diagnosis from glass slides using TM in this statistically powerful study of 499 dermatopathology cas

63 Here we establish the feasibility of statistically proving the connection between binary blac

64 of cognitive impairment were reported for a statistically reliable analysis (31 [0.20% per annum] vs

65 d to measure depressive severity can produce statistically reliable clusters of symptoms.

66 based mini-metagenomic method which offers a statistically rigorous approach to extract novel microbi

67 ze that spatial replication is essential for statistically robust fluxes if a wider ecosystem is bein

68 The lack of statistically robust relationships between IEPOX (isopre

69 The tool resulted to be statistically satisfactory, showing excellent internal c

70 here was a small non-clinically relevant but statistically significant (0.2 [SD 1.1] vs 0.1 [1.1], p=

71 actors to the cross-disorder overlap was not statistically significant (11%, shared environmental cor

72 shelf waters, though the difference was not statistically significant (19.4 +/- 4.8 versus 12.0 +/-

73 mpared with placebo, this difference was not statistically significant (31.3 vs 37.6, respectively; p

74 Our results suggest a statistically significant (alpha = 0.05) decrease in eva

75 myocardium, and absolute blood flow was not statistically significant (areas under the receiver-oper

76 CS patients, although the difference was not statistically significant (compared with 20/20 or better

77 42 in control patients; this difference was statistically significant (P < .001).

78 emale absolute risk compared with male, both statistically significant (p < 0.001).

79 ndpoints, the between-group differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001).

80 between XG-102 90 mug and dexamethasone was statistically significant (P = .013).

81 [reference]), although this finding was not statistically significant (P = .07).

82 tients with complete clearance, although not statistically significant (P = .25).

83 rior outer and temporal outer subfields were statistically significant (p = 0.038, p = 0.004, 0.033 a

84 en compliance and peri-implant condition was statistically significant (P = 0.04).

85 Statistically significant (P<0.05) treatment-related imp

86 However, a statistically significant (P=0.01) interaction analysis

87 ent association across the quartiles was not statistically significant (Ptrend=0.16).

88 There was no statistically significant additive interaction between C

89 first trimester, but the association was not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple c

90 The associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for weight, h

91 breastfed, but these findings did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple

92 ose correlated with midregional proANP had a statistically significant albeit weak impact on blood pr

93 ession patterns, to automatically detect all statistically significant alterations in mutants, and to

94 There was a statistically significant association between change in

95 There was a statistically significant association between glaucoma a

96 We observed no statistically significant association between red or pro

97 Pooled-data revealed a statistically significant association between single nuc

98 y, the cumulative MTX dose corresponded to a statistically significant association of a higher NASH F

99 A statistically significant association was observed betwe

100 ced moderate-quality evidence that SMT has a statistically significant association with improvements

101 Our findings indicated no statistically significant associations between either su

102 , and population density, we did not observe statistically significant associations between exposure

103 There were no statistically significant associations between low IOP a

104 Large numbers of statistically significant associations between sentinel

105 We observed statistically significant associations between SJS/TEN a

106 Statistically significant associations with perforated a

107 Delayed Recall, between-group score was not statistically significant at 4 years (mean difference, 0

108 or educational interventions had a small but statistically significant benefit for anxiety prevention

109 nalysis suggests that the RT boost confers a statistically significant benefit in decreasing IBTR acr

110 one half of the trials (n = 23, 45%) showed statistically significant benefits for PFS but not for O

111 appear to fade with increasing age, with no statistically significant benefits in octogenarians exce

112 No statistically significant between-group differences were

113 There was evidence of small, statistically significant between-group mean differences

114 ostoperative radiation was associated with a statistically significant but modest absolute improvemen

115 have small effects on the Z scores that are statistically significant but not clinically important.

116 augmentation with aripiprazole resulted in a statistically significant but only modestly increased li

117 95% confidence interval, 23-151; P = 0.008); statistically significant but smaller effects were obser

118 There was no statistically significant change in survival before and

119 There was no statistically significant change in survival trends befo

120 e have identified 28 metabolites that showed statistically significant changes between pallid and wil

121 Expression of three genes showed statistically significant changes during cervical diseas

122 titative CT percentage emphysema also showed statistically significant correlation with percentage pr

123 There were statistically significant correlations between PM10 and

124 A radiogenomic map was created with 32 statistically significant correlations between semantic

125 There were statistically significant correlations between the lens

126 No statistically significant correlations were found betwee

127 Results Statistically significant correlations were observed for

128 2.30; P = 0.024), adjusted for age, sex, and statistically significant covariates.

129 articipants treated with girentuximab had no statistically significant DFS (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% C

130 The white to white distance showed a statistically significant difference (MD -0.14 mm; 95% C

131 -406 to +1 mum/hour) during interruptions, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001).

132 Student paired t-test confirmed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between

133 0% to 69.6%) for the updated one, reaching a statistically significant difference (P <0.05).

134 There was a statistically significant difference between arms 1 and

135 rplastic polyps in the baseline CC, showed a statistically significant difference between both groups

136 diet of </=600 mg Ca/d.We failed to detect a statistically significant difference between groups in p

137 However the WTW distance indicated a statistically significant difference between the two dev

138 also benefit from bridging therapy, with no statistically significant difference compared with those

139 lifestyle intervention trials did not show a statistically significant difference in change in BMD be

140 % confidence interval: 1.30 to 18.26) but no statistically significant difference in major bleeding i

141 There was a statistically significant difference in membrane thickne

142 ose hydrocortisone was not associated with a statistically significant difference in neurodevelopment

143 e pancreatitis, limited evidence revealed no statistically significant difference in outcomes between

144 No statistically significant difference in overall survival

145 There was a statistically significant difference in residual alveola

146 5% confidence interval: 1.07 to 4.46) but no statistically significant difference in stroke (3 NOACs

147 cy of the cell stiffness is investigated and statistically significant difference in the cell stiffne

148 onducted in SPS patients and demonstrates no statistically significant difference in the efficacy mea

149 dence review done for the guideline found no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of

150 n MYC transcription, but did not result in a statistically significant difference in tumor burden or

151 No statistically significant difference was found between t

152 e) There was not a statistically significant difference when comparing Fab'

153 3) increased the risk for diabetes without a statistically significant difference.

154 P < .05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference; 95% confidence int

155 Furthermore, no statistically significant differences at the 0.05 signif

156 optic disc during the acute phase showed no statistically significant differences between the two gr

157 mpared in multiple ways to determine whether statistically significant differences existed.

158 No statistically significant differences in early discharge

159 xidase-were associated with small but highly statistically significant differences in future statural

160 ect observation checklist is demonstrated by statistically significant differences in mean scores bet

161 ciences from 53 US institutions, we found no statistically significant differences in outcomes betwee

162 No statistically significant differences in postoperative H

163 No statistically significant differences in proteins profil

164 Statistically significant differences in quantifiable bi

165 No statistically significant differences in soft-tissue abs

166 No statistically significant differences in surgical compli

167 in (18)F-FDG SUVmax Log-rank analysis showed statistically significant differences in survival for pa

168 Vessel-based analysis revealed statistically significant differences in the binarized f

169 Comprehensive organic speciation revealed no statistically significant differences in the composition

170 There were no statistically significant differences in the effects of

171 coupled to mass spectrometry, we identified statistically significant differences in the metabolic p

172 No statistically significant differences in the survival of

173 for both the factors "laser" and "graphite", statistically significant differences were observed (p <

174 No statistically significant differences were observed in O

175 No statistically significant differences were seen for any

176 lysis of variance with post hoc analysis for statistically significant differences.

177 row cells of Dnmt3a+/- mice had a subtle but statistically significant DNA hypomethylation phenotype

178 Conclusion A small but statistically significant dose-dependent T1-weighted sig

179 m N-fertilized Syrah grapes in 2011 showed a statistically significant effect of irrigation and ferti

180 of the genes adjacent to SNP hotspots showed statistically significant enrichment in immunological pr

181 Using this aggregate data, we identified a statistically significant enrichment of ADP-ribosylated

182 All associations were statistically significant except for the association of

183 With statistically significant experimental data from cryogen

184 nerally underpowered; however, the number of statistically significant findings was larger than expec

185 en for those age >/= 70 years but these were statistically significant for adjuvant and neoadjuvant t

186 e reduction of corneal light backscatter was statistically significant for all follow-up time points

187 Variants at 10q24 were statistically significant for all percent arsenic specie

188 (based on the distribution in controls) were statistically significant for average daily intake mg/d

189 The treatment-by-biomarker interaction was statistically significant for three approvals and missin

190 SAM, and Empirical Bayes often searches for statistically significant genes without considering the

191 ion), we identified more than 170 pairs with statistically significant genetic covariance.

192 A statistically significant higher percentage of at least

193 F) in the first months" (DBF/BM/FF) showed a statistically significant higher risk of eczema/skin all

194 HLA matching had a statistically significant impact on graft survival of pe

195 CRT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall surviva

196 A statistically significant improvement in PDT mediated ef

197 t, the combined approach did not result in a statistically significant improvement.

198 ees completing the tele-education system had statistically significant improvements (P < 0.01) in the

199 lumacaftor and ivacaftor was associated with statistically significant improvements in lung function,

200 e also experienced clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in symptom burden

201 Affairs medical center, this study found no statistically significant improvements in the osteoarthr

202 cts of prior vaccination were pronounced and statistically significant in 2014-2015 when v1 identical

203 TB treatment, although the findings were not statistically significant in all buffers.

204 ite Canadians, and this association remained statistically significant in multivariable adjusted mode

205 analyses, diabetic nephropathy class was not statistically significant in predicting time to ESRD.

206 nse manner but the association was no longer statistically significant in the sibling comparison mode

207 arms, and legs), the umbrella group showed a statistically significant increase in clinical sunburn s

208 exposure to CT of the head are excluded, no statistically significant increase in risk of meningioma

209 o 9.63, and only 1 of the 23 hospitals had a statistically significant increase in their late TTA gro

210 monotherapy was associated with a small but statistically significant increased risk of lymphoma com

211 Twenty of 30 studies reported statistically significant indirect protection effectiven

212 tively, with an estimated IC50 of 160 nM; no statistically significant inhibition of SULT activity wa

213 mary and secondary outcomes were computed.No statistically significant intervention effect was observ

214 -based untargeted metabolomics often detects statistically significant metabolites that cannot be rea

215 e repeated using freshly prepared pools, and statistically significant metabolites were quantified in

216 A statistically significant negative trend in survival was

217 Lipid profile levels were statistically significant on comparison between the heal

218 ED with acute extremity pain, there were no statistically significant or clinically important differ

219 Evaluation of the robustness of statistically significant outcomes adds a crucial elemen

220 We found statistically significant performance differences for mo

221 Both, any DR and VTDR showed statistically significant positive associations with T2D

222 RMR was a statistically significant positive predictor of the erro

223 s between anterior corneal measurements were statistically significant post-LASIK compared to preoper

224 icopathologic variables, Decipher remained a statistically significant predictor of metastasis (HR, 1

225 ed a slight (mean difference, 0.24-0.30) but statistically significant reduction in labeling of PD-L1

226 with netarsudil q.d. produced clinically and statistically significant reductions from baseline intra

227 We show a statistically significant relationship between fire and

228 We did not observe a statistically significant relationship between gestation

229 Our functional analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between rs3217869

230 tiguity, circularity, and vegetation) have a statistically significant relationship with urban NO2; t

231 will produce more precise, reproducible and statistically significant results required for publicati

232 Statistically significant shape difference between the t

233 No statistically significant vaccine efficacy was found aga

234 Implementation of the statistically significant variables in a predictive nomo

235 groups, clinical parameters did not show any statistically significant variations.

236 Across the entire cohort, there were no statistically significant volumetric associations with s

237 ZVIN elicited a statistically significant VZV-specific immune response a

238 We identified 63 miRNAs deregulated in a statistically significant way.

239 Increase in HbA1c over time was statistically significant when severe periodontitis was

240 n the propensity score analysis but remained statistically significant with adjusted odds ratio of 0.

241 in inferences based on whether a P value is "statistically significant"; 2) nullism, the tendency to

242 layer), the odds of resistance (although not statistically significant) to all antimicrobials except

243 ar regression analyses indicated modest, but statistically significant, average annual percent increa

244 /min/1.73 m in the CNI/MMF group and was not statistically significant, but there is a clinically mea

245 s patients, but within individual patients a statistically significant, but weak, voxel-by-voxel corr

246 Finally, we detect minor, but statistically significant, changes in expression of hair

247 conclusion, tenapanor treatment resulted in statistically significant, dose-dependent reductions in

248 e chemoradiotherapy showed a modest, but not statistically significant, increase in dysphagia relief

249 Although not statistically significant, rates of BPAR were 2-fold hig

250 Volumetric bone changes were minimal but statistically significant, with more bone loss when memb

251 nonexudative (P = 0.0207) and lower, but not statistically significant, with respect to eyes with no

252 ted events between lithium and valproate was statistically significant.

253 direction as the original study, it was not statistically significant.

254 graft failures; however, this result was not statistically significant.

255 comprehension and processing speed were not statistically significant.

256 measurements, although differences were not statistically significant.

257 However, the difference was not statistically significant.

258 other mutations, but the difference was not statistically significant.

259 h active drugs, although the trends were not statistically significant.

260 young adulthood, the disparity was no longer statistically significant.

261 mortality, although these estimates were not statistically significant.

262 (beta = -0.21, P = .01) in the CN subsample statistically significant.

263 P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

264 ion OS was higher with MAC, but this was not statistically significant.

265 r every HPV type across all age groups, many statistically significant.

266 P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

267 up to 90 days before the index date remained statistically significant.

268 in eight of nine regions, four of which were statistically significant.

269 90), whereas the following variants were not statistically significant: rs1947274 LPHN3 (odds ratio:

270 bolic activity of the cells, larger and more statistically-significant differences as a function of m

271 Prior depression was a statistically-significant predictor of incident back pai

272 gression showed larger intruding angles were statistically significantly associated with a greater re

273 PCB congeners were statistically significantly associated with greater tota

274 ts with EMD, with or without BC, resulted in statistically significantly better results after 12 mont

275 By state, relative Google search volume statistically significantly correlated with cancer incid

276 There was a statistically significantly decrease from 17 (11.8%) bli

277 each year but the percentage change was not statistically significantly different (5.1% in 2004-2005

278 Lithium exposure was statistically significantly different between patients w

279 nts with incident central adiposity gain had statistically significantly higher blood erythritol [P <

280 CBL (P <0.05) was statistically significantly higher in smokers compared w

281 Risks were statistically significantly increased, per 10000 person-

282 Pooled data showed statistically significantly less MFR and better PH maint

283 apy, including two patient domains achieving statistically significantly lower adverse effects (chang

284 e highest quartile of coffee consumption had statistically significantly lower all-cause mortality (m

285 e prevalence of prediabetes and diabetes was statistically significantly lower among participants wit

286 use of 3 arterial grafts was associated with statistically significantly lower hazard for late death

287 us hypotony (aHR, 0.43) were associated with statistically significantly lower risk of OHT.

288 he assay for antibody 22c3 showed slight yet statistically significantly lower staining than either 2

289 n and diabetes in the adult-parent dyads was statistically significantly negative (aOR = 0.62; 95% CI

290 or insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor was statistically significantly related to a shorter surviva

291 all of the evaluated WGS strategies yielded statistically similar results for S. aureus typing.

292 However, there remains a lack of statistically sound frameworks to model the underlying t

293 ncoming and outgoing DIN concentrations were statistically the same for both sites.

294 ntrolling for age, eyes with SDD presented a statistically thinner mean CT (ss = -21.9, P = .006) and

295 arge radiocarbon datasets have been analysed statistically to identify, on the one hand, the dynamics

296 of seven olive varieties, were recorded and statistically treated for varietal authentication purpos

297 We partition the species in a community statistically using the group model, and we test whether

298 (ONA) subjects could recognize specific and statistically validated biomarkers for a separate "asthm

299 antihypertensive medication also correlated statistically with stage 3b-5 CKD.

300 , many research questions cannot be answered statistically without strong assumptions.