ライフサイエンスコーパス: sternal

1 s among patients who expressed a preference (sternal = 75.6%, leg = 74.6%).

2 the other half with intradermal sutures (484 sternal and 516 leg segments).

3 The sternal and clavicular heads were torn in 10 patients, o

4 Sternal and leg wounds were studied prospectively, each

5 nd sacral levels of the skeleton, and showed sternal and pelvic malformations not previously observed

6 Two hundred forty-two patients with sternal and saphenous vein harvest wounds had half of ea

7 rax (n = 2), pericarditis (n = 2), dislodged sternal bar (n = 3), and mildly hypertrophic scar (n = 1

8 The sternal bar was removed from 101 patients 6 months after

9 ound infection (involving the sternal wires, sternal bone, and/or mediastinum), and (3) score for add

10 stolic murmur was detected at the left upper sternal border.

11 B (mouth-to-mouth ventilation), and step C (sternal (cardiac) compressions) into basic life support.

12 Their development overlaps with that of sternal cartilage development in chicks and mice.

13 of a cyanogen bromide (CNBr) (CB) digest of sternal cartilage revealed an alpha1(II)CB11 peptide dou

14 polymerase chain reaction in embryonic skin, sternal cartilage, and tendon, but is barely detectable

15 Transient transfections of chick sternal chondrocytes and fibroblasts with reporter plasm

16 Transient transfections of chick sternal chondrocytes and fibroblasts with reporter plasm

17 r cartilage and perichondrium; articular and sternal chondrocytes expressed p38 isoforms alpha, beta,

18 that Ctgf mRNA was down-regulated in primary sternal chondrocytes from Sox9(flox/flox) mice infected

19 rom engineered cartilage, generated by chick sternal chondrocytes grown in a hollow fiber bioreactor,

20 pase 3/7 activities were examined in primary sternal chondrocytes isolated from 3-day-old neonatal Co

21 Transgenic sternal chondrocytes showed reduced TGFbeta signaling as

22 Smurf2 overexpression in mouse sternal chondrocytes was confirmed by reverse transcript

23 1 transcription following treatment of chick sternal chondrocytes with growth factors was accompanied

24 Primary embryonic chick sternal chondrocytes, which express abundant type II col

25 the Qp/Qs (1/36 v/s 8/20; P=0.001), delayed sternal closure (6/36 v/s 7/20; P=0.001), and extracorpo

26 ediate increase in ventilation after delayed sternal closure (n = 3) or removal of pericardial blood

27 sociated with increased incidence of delayed sternal closure (p = 0.003) and longer duration of mecha

28 ry function may be compromised after delayed sternal closure and that ventilatory support should be i

29 nuously for 30 mins before and after delayed sternal closure in paralyzed ventilated infants.

30 Delayed sternal closure is an effective approach to the manageme

31 study was to establish the impact of delayed sternal closure on expired tidal volume, respiratory sys

32 Studies examining the effect of sternal closure on respiratory function have not been pu

33 rnal closure to assess clinical responses to sternal closure or changes in ventilatory support.

34 lied in monitoring blood gases after delayed sternal closure to assess clinical responses to sternal

35 4 (11%) died before sternal closure; delayed sternal closure was performed in the remaining 114.

36 res for managing open sternotomy and delayed sternal closure were analyzed retrospectively.

37 ac surgery, chromosomal anomaly, and delayed sternal closure were independently associated with incre

38 amics and respiratory variables occur during sternal closure, often requiring adjustment of inotropic

39 rculatory arrest; and postoperative--delayed sternal closure, sepsis, renal failure, pulmonary hypert

40 During sternal closure, significant increases were noted in pul

41 e leak increased by > or = 10% after delayed sternal closure, thereby invalidating recorded changes i

42 y a mean of 17% and 29%, respectively, after sternal closure.

43 Of the 128 patients, 14 (11%) died before sternal closure; delayed sternal closure was performed i

44 In animal models, sternal compressions alone can produce some ventilation

45 l tube, showed essentially no ventilation by sternal compressions alone.

46 ors began treating these wounds with radical sternal debridement followed by closure using muscle or

47 er of an omphalocele, ectopia cordis, distal sternal defect, pericardial defect, anterior diaphragmat

48 netrance and the expressivity of the rib and sternal defects are increased, suggesting synergistic in

49 The sternal defects seen in hoxb-2 mutant mice are similar t

50 While a majority of these mice had severe sternal defects that compromised their ability to breath

51 thoracic skeleton, including rib fusions and sternal defects.

52 coarctation of the aorta, eye anomalies, and sternal defects.

53 al outline of the lower sternum indicating a sternal deficiency.

54 ting room for bleeding, and mediastinitis or sternal dehiscence requiring surgery were also less in t

55 ing injury to or embolism from prior grafts, sternal dehiscence, phrenic nerve injury, excessive hemo

56 ons, two transient ischemic attacks, and one sternal dehiscence.

57 tasis (12), pleural effusion (13), recurrent sternal depression (5), and pericarditis (3).

58 e of death is likely due to abnormal rib and sternal development, leading to an inability to breathe.

59 Causes included puncture or erosion by a sternal edge in three and tearing at the myocardial-ster

60 he first evolutionary appearance of ossified sternal elements.

61 , although cell mixing may occur at the most sternal extremities.

62 ubcutaneous tissue but not extending down to sternal fixation wires), (2) deep wound infection (invol

63 prophylactic systemic antibiotics and rigid sternal fixation.

64 2 or more rib fractures, ruptured diaphragm, sternal fracture, and pulmonary contusion or laceration

65 nal synostosis, ocular proptosis, precocious sternal fusion, and abnormalities in secondary branching

66 These mice exhibit cranial suture and sternal fusions that are exacerbated when the BAC copy n

67 is sex pheromone in the sixth intersegmental sternal glands of their abdomens.

68 ges (total gentamicin of 260 mg) between the sternal halves at surgical closure (n = 753) vs no inter

69 head was torn in two patients, and only the sternal head was torn in three patients.

70 ifferences among the groups in occurrence of sternal infection (1.3%, 2.6%, and 1.4%, respectively; P

71 .2%, reoperation for bleeding 3.8%, and deep sternal infection 0.8%.

72 d ventilation, prolonged postoperative stay, sternal infection, and bleeding) after adjustment for co

73 y and morbidities (stroke, reoperation, deep sternal infection, ventilation >48 hours, postoperative

74 s, one Q wave myocardial infarction, and one sternal infection.

75 Mediastinitis and sternal infections were not observed among patients unde

76 ocardial infarction, neurologic events, deep sternal infections, and atrial fibrillation), the level

77 he primary outcome was a composite of death, sternal infections, prolonged ventilation, cardiac arrhy

78 Preservation of sternal integrity allows patients to recover earlier, re

79 edge in three and tearing at the myocardial-sternal interface in four.

80 he shoulder mobility at the pivotal clavicle-sternal joint in marsupial and placental gliders.

81 or maintenance of intervertebral, carpal and sternal joints, and the joint fusion process commences a

82 e primary sites of persistence being tonsil, sternal lymph node, and inguinal lymph node.

83 Thus, we suggest that in turtles, the sternal morphogenesis is prevented in the ventral mesenc

84 er extremity (n = 4), intrathoracic (n = 3), sternal (n = 34), breast (n = 3), chest wall (n = 18), a

85 al edema, adenopathy, pleural effusion, or a sternal or lung abnormality).

86 p (P <.05) between age or sex and pattern of sternal ossification (normal vs asynchronous).

87 e of asynchronous ossification of one of the sternal ossification centers 1-4 (P >.003) and of occurr

88 Missing sternal ossification centers occur most commonly at segm

89 midline and bifid sternum as well as delayed sternal ossification.

90 .7 years) were retrospectively evaluated for sternal ossification.

91 wound infections (29%), mediastinitis (16%), sternal osteomyelitis (6%), and pericarditis (6%).

92 bypass surgery that had been complicated by sternal osteomyelitis caused by the Staphylococcus aureu

93 A transverse anterior sternal osteotomy was used on most patients.

94 n either side; however, unlike the ribs, the sternal precursors do not originate from the somites.

95 tein levels and signaling in murine neonatal sternal primary chondrocytes.

96 The patient was examined with ultrasound, sternal radiographs, CT and MRI.

97 ntial for injury to previous bypass graft on sternal re-entry.

98 ingle-graft group (P=0.005), and the rate of sternal reconstruction was 1.9% versus 0.6% (P=0.002).

99 heral vascular access may be compromised and sternal reentry is more likely to result in cardiac inju

100 ollar incision aided by a specially designed sternal retractor.

101 f occurrence of asynchronous ossification at sternal segment 2 (P <.018).

102 Asynchronous ossification of inferior sternal segment 5 was recorded separately.

103 Of the 916 superior four sternal segments (four segments in each of 229 patients)

104 Four superior sternal segments were considered normal if they were oss

105 ossification, as compared with the remaining sternal segments, was demonstrated or if ossification wa

106 6.9% vs. leg sutured = 32.6%; p = 0.001, and sternal stapled = 14.9% vs. sternal sutured = 3.7%; p =

107 9%; p = 0.99, and sternal sutured = 0.4% vs. sternal stapled = 2.5%; p = 0.128).

108 = 9.3% vs. leg stapled = 8.9%; p = 0.99, and sternal sutured = 0.4% vs. sternal stapled = 2.5%; p = 0

109 ; p = 0.001, and sternal stapled = 14.9% vs. sternal sutured = 3.7%; p = 0.00005).

110 cting injury, (4) chest wall tenderness, (5) sternal tenderness, (6) thoracic spine tenderness, and (

111 202 consecutive patients who underwent trans-sternal thymectomy for symptomatic myasthenia gravis fro

112 improvement, compared to conventional trans-sternal thymectomy, neither the pathologic diagnosis (pr

113 es), (2) deep wound infection (involving the sternal wires, sternal bone, and/or mediastinum), and (3

114 tricular tachycardia (20%); leg wound (15%); sternal wound (5%); pneumonia (5%); gastrointestinal com

115 d for a debridement procedure of an infected sternal wound after a cardiac surgery.

116 nd have reduced the mean hospital stay after sternal wound closure of these critically ill patients.

117 elation to flap choices, hospital days after sternal wound closure, and incidence rates of morbidity

118 The rate of sternal wound complication was 3.5% in the bilateral-gra

119 There were more sternal wound complications with bilateral internal-thor

120 in diabetic patients despite higher risk of sternal wound complications.

121 d be considered in patients at high risk for sternal wound complications.

122 Using the principles of sternal wound debridement and early flap coverage, the a

123 /753 [6.5%] vs 46/749 [6.1%]; P = .77), deep sternal wound infection (14/753 [1.9%] vs 19/749 [2.5%];

124 .0 [7.2]; P = .67), or rehospitalization for sternal wound infection (23/753 [3.1%] vs 24/749 [3.2%];

125 control group, respectively, in superficial sternal wound infection (49/753 [6.5%] vs 46/749 [6.1%];

126 2 cardiac surgical patients at high risk for sternal wound infection (diabetes, body mass index >30,

127 evention of S. aureus bacteremia and/or deep sternal wound infection (including mediastinitis) throug

128 esity was a risk factor only for superficial sternal wound infection (P < .001; odds ratio, 2.3), leg

129 rd increased pulmonary complications or deep sternal wound infection (P = .65).

130 Management of deep sternal wound infection (SWI), a serious complication af

131 d a significant reduction in mortality after sternal wound infection and have reduced the mean hospit

132 e the first reported case of a postoperative sternal wound infection and pneumonia caused by in a hea

133 at higher risk for postoperative superficial sternal wound infection and renal failure.

134 in-hospital stays as well as the absence of sternal wound infection are the main advantages of this

135 al infarction, repeat revascularization, and sternal wound infection between propensity score-matched

136 Acute cholecystitis and sternal wound infection caused an inordinate risk of com

137 We describe a case of sternal wound infection caused by Trichosporon inkin wit

138 between race and the risk of stroke or deep sternal wound infection for either AVR or MVR.

139 rnotomy (p = 0.008) and patients treated for sternal wound infection from 1988 to 1992 (p = 0.024).

140 The mortality of sternal wound infection has dropped to < 10%.

141 However, concerns about sternal wound infection have discouraged the use of BIMA

142 upport in 73%; shock occurred in 8% and deep sternal wound infection in 1.3%.

143 ysis, there was no significant difference in sternal wound infection in 63 of 753 patients randomized

144 f these difficult cases, a classification of sternal wound infection is presented.

145 arction (new Q wave) rate was 0.6%, and deep sternal wound infection occurred in 1%.

146 Sternal wound infection occurred in one patient.

147 The primary end point was sternal wound infection occurring through 90 days postop

148 th no intervention did not reduce the 90-day sternal wound infection rate.

149 urgical technique with no additional risk of sternal wound infection related to age.

150 ne use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, sternal wound infection still occurs in 5% or more of ca

151 ks of cardiovascular events, but the risk of sternal wound infection was increased (risk difference,

152 Of these, only sternal wound infection was significantly more frequent

153 Additional procedures for recurrent sternal wound infection were necessary in 5.1% of patien

154 ve CVA (adjusted OR, 1.06; P=.765), risks of sternal wound infection were substantially increased in

155 epsis/septicemia, 0.5% [n=99]; isolated deep sternal wound infection, 0.5% [n=96]; isolated harvest/c

156 414 [2.4%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 41

157 y, deep sternal wound infection, superficial sternal wound infection, infection at the saphenous vein

158 tes of flap closure complications, recurrent sternal wound infection, or death.

159 re was no difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between

160 analyzed included operative mortality, deep sternal wound infection, superficial sternal wound infec

161 With the exception of sternal wound infection, the perception among clinicians

162 accident (CVA), postoperative bleeding, and sternal wound infection, were defined prospectively.

163 ngestive heart failure, arrhythmias, or deep sternal wound infection.

164 of a radial artery, but did increase risk of sternal wound infection.

165 ut not for renal replacement therapy or deep sternal wound infection.

166 ications with the possible exception of deep sternal wound infections (11 [1.3%] vs. 3 [0.4%], p = 0.

167 The small increase in the risk of deep sternal wound infections does not affect the majority of

168 ate modeling BITA increased the risk of deep sternal wound infections only in emergent cases and in o

169 Flap advancements for sternal wound infections were performed in five patients

170 Three patients had sternal wound infections with organisms different from t

171 Disease outbreaks usually involve sternal wound infections, plastic surgery wound infectio

172 Mean hospital stay after sternal wound reconstruction declined from 18.6 days (19

173 and surgical site infections, including deep sternal wound, thoracotomy, and harvest/cannulation site

174 Neither leg nor sternal wounds had a statistically significant differenc