ライフサイエンスコーパス: sternotomy

1 y bypass, circulatory arrest, and non-median sternotomy).

2 air which demanded urgent lung isolation and sternotomy.

3 ot identify any predictors for conversion to sternotomy.

4 parotomy, 2 (1.1%) thoracotomy, and 1 (0.6%) sternotomy.

5 operation group; n=15 571; 59.8%) a previous sternotomy.

6 small incisions with complete avoidance of a sternotomy.

7 and effective procedure compared with total sternotomy.

8 e managed thoracoscopically, and 1 underwent sternotomy.

9 Twenty-three percent had prior sternotomy.

10 he aorta underwent CoA bypass through median sternotomy.

11 ports activities, breast implants, or median sternotomy.

12 ss invasive fashion than conventional median sternotomy.

13 st 3 mo after bilateral LVRS done via median sternotomy.

14 same operation through a conventional median sternotomy.

15 ients who underwent either OPCAB with median sternotomy (13 889 patients) or on-pump CABG surgery (35

16 d echocardiographic measurements: robotic vs sternotomy (198 pairs) vs partial sternotomy (293 pairs)

17 After midline sternotomy, 2.3-mm CT fiducial markers were attached to

18 robotic vs sternotomy (198 pairs) vs partial sternotomy (293 pairs) vs thoracotomy (224 pairs).

19 ry bypass was used (7.6%), 17 conversions to sternotomy (3.8%), and 10 reinterventions for bleeding (

20 y invasive surgery vs. 1.6% for conventional sternotomy; =.4).

21 d surgery, 49 (21 and 109) days for complete sternotomy, 56 (30 and 119) days for partial sternotomy,

22 surgery, 97%, 89%, 93%; and for conventional sternotomy, 93%, 94%, 90%.

23 In comparison with CABG, median sternotomy (98.5% for CABG, 61.1% for staged HCR, and 52

24 ange 22-86) years, with 71% men and 13% redo sternotomy after a previous cardiac procedure.

25 Fifty-five patients were randomized to sternotomy and 56 to pericardial drainage and wash-out o

26 rrent international practice is to perform a sternotomy and cardiac repair if a hemopericardium is de

27 - Neonatal piglets (3 kg) underwent a median sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, followed by aorti

28 As an alternative to high-risk repeated sternotomy and conventional bypass surgery or catheter-b

29 Procedures for managing open sternotomy and delayed sternal closure were analyzed ret

30 In part 1, median sternotomy and its complications, palliative procedures,

31 internal mammary artery bypass grafting via sternotomy and minithoracotomy to completely endoscopic

32 Sternotomy and pleuro-pericardotomy negated all effects

33 leased; b) group 2 (n = 3) animals underwent sternotomy and pleuropericardotomy to prevent an increas

34 valent to those achievable with conventional sternotomy and posterior leaflet repair.

35 patients underwent bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy and stapling resection by the same cardiothor

36 ents had bilateral LVRS performed via median sternotomy and stapling, and 1 patient had unilateral LV

37 The two surgical approaches are median sternotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery.

38 clamping, cardioplegia, and a thoracotomy or sternotomy and, therefore, is associated with significan

39 sternotomy, 56 (30 and 119) days for partial sternotomy, and 42 (18 and 90) days for anterolateral th

40 ations (1824 laparotomy, 100 thoracotomy, 30 sternotomy, and 97 combined).

41 and 48.4%) for complete sternotomy, partial sternotomy, and anterolateral thoracotomy, respectively.

42 s allow the avoidance of general anesthesia, sternotomy, and cardiopulmonary bypass, CBIs-including t

43 Four hours later, donor animals underwent sternotomy, and the lungs were flushed with cold modifie

44 (OR=3.5,P=0.001), CHF (OR=2.2, P=0.004), and sternotomy approach (OR=2.3,P=0.002) by multivariate ana

45 Mitral valve (MV) surgery is dominated by a sternotomy approach, with MV repair rates which average

46 een proposed as an alternative to a standard sternotomy approach.

47 h an operative mortality similar to standard sternotomy approach.

48 uperior results than the conventional median sternotomy approach.

49 , with morbidity and mortality comparable to sternotomy approach.

50 ave matched the outcomes of major trials for sternotomy-based procedures.

51 n 11 (0.5%) patients (81.8%laparotomy, 18.2% sternotomy) before cavitary closure.

52 r confounders (t = -2.15; P = 0.04), whereas sternotomy CABG increased MACCE (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-7.

53 ng were compared with a matched group of 100 sternotomy CABG patients using IMA and saphenous veins,

54 ses in-hospital morbidity versus traditional sternotomy CABG.

55 CoA bypass via median sternotomy can be performed with low morbidity and morta

56 tional coronary artery bypass grafting (full sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and cardioplegic arr

57 Mechanical ventilation, sternotomy, continuous cardiac output (pulmonary artery

58 nts and should be considered whenever repeat sternotomy could prove hazardous.

59 CVA, albumin, re-HTx, renal dysfunction, and sternotomies]) derived from these factors stratified sur

60 Surgical incisions have varied from full sternotomy down to percutaneous access only, with less i

61 ized dogs whose chests had been closed after sternotomy for instrumentation.

62 my is a safe, feasible alternative to median sternotomy for selected reoperative mitral valve patient

63 Anesthetized dogs underwent laparotomy and sternotomy for vascular isolation.

64 mp CABG surgery (59044 patients) with median sternotomy from 1997 to 2000 in the state of New York.

65 the 111 patients (0.9%) and this was in the sternotomy group.

66 y-one of the 55 patients (93%) randomized to sternotomy had either no cardiac injury or a tangential

67 MVR via conventional sternotomy has been an established treatment for mitral

68 Reoperative median sternotomy has known risks, including injury to or embol

69 gery was performed in 473 patients, complete sternotomy in 227, partial sternotomy in 349, and antero

70 atients, complete sternotomy in 227, partial sternotomy in 349, and anterolateral thoracotomy in 241.

71 own, South Africa, on performing a mandatory sternotomy in hemodynamically stable patients was that a

72 as implanted through a thoracotomy or median sternotomy incision with the aid of partial cardiopulmon

73 ry and danger to viable grafts from repeated sternotomy is minimized, and manipulation of the disease

74 th on the day of intervention, conversion to sternotomy, low cardiac output that required mechanical

75 Surgeons (STS) algorithm for standard median sternotomy mitral valve surgery.

76 hrombin generation rate did not change after sternotomy or administration of heparin, then rapidly in

77 thoracic disorders that previously required sternotomy or open thoracotomy.

78 rdiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, sternotomy or thoracotomy, and cardioplegic cardiac arre

79 g a reliable ASD repair but wishing to avoid sternotomy or thoracotomy.

80 for early mortality were history of previous sternotomy (P = .0003), nonidentical blood type donor (P

81 ted with recurrent infection were history of sternotomy (p = 0.008) and patients treated for sternal

82 %), and 20.7% (-2.4% and 48.4%) for complete sternotomy, partial sternotomy, and anterolateral thorac

83 The pigs were anesthetized, a medial sternotomy performed and miniature sensors for wall-thic

84 After median sternotomy, pressure transducers were placed in the righ

85 After median sternotomy, pressure transducers were placed in the righ

86 en heart surgery patients without subsequent sternotomy site infections (n=50) identified as risk fac

87 une 1993, 5 patients contracted N. farcinica sternotomy site infections following open heart surgery

88 dies have compared its results to a standard sternotomy (SS) approach.

89 ndergoing cardiothoracic surgery with median sternotomy, the use of a vaccine against S. aureus compa

90 igh-risk patients and in patients with prior sternotomy, this approach would yield superior results c

91 After a median sternotomy, two pulmonary artery catheters were inserted

92 atients who experienced SVCs or who required sternotomy underlines the need for heart team-led indica

93 repair vs. replacement), operative approach (sternotomy vs. port access), left atrial size or degree

94 he mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay for a sternotomy was 2.04 days (range, 0-25 days) compared wit

95 In Yorkshire pigs (n=13), a sternotomy was performed and the heart and bilateral ste

96 va thrombosis; in 2 patients, a simultaneous sternotomy was performed for resection of bilateral lung

97 An emergency sternotomy was performed in 1.3% of the patients; howeve

98 n hemodynamically stable patients was that a sternotomy was unnecessary and the cardiac injury, if pr

99 In the MV group lower sternotomy was used in 260/474 (55%), right parasternal

100 Conventional sternotomy was used in 843 patients, minimally invasive

101 ar filtration rate <40 mL/min), and >2 prior sternotomies were associated with poor survival after HT

102 lly suspected mediastinitis following median sternotomy were retrospectively identified.

103 , all without prior myocardial infarction or sternotomy, were studied using gated MPS.

104 t anterior descending artery (LAD) through a sternotomy with conventional coronary artery bypass graf

105 ary artery ligation (n =22) underwent median sternotomy with placement of a perivascular flow probe a

106 Infection of the median sternotomy wound after open heart surgery is a devastati

107 tribute to morbidity and mortality of median sternotomy wound infection and the results of treatment