ライフサイエンスコーパス: stomatal

1 1 when upregulated act as key controllers of stomatal adaptation to elevated CO2 .

2 tosynthesis a plant will forego from opening stomatal an infinitesimal amount more to avoid a drop in

3 including that experimental measurements of stomatal and hydraulic conductances should be affected d

4 gulation, and the interpretation of measured stomatal and leaf hydraulic conductances.

5 ound that partially independent variation in stomatal and mesophyll conductance may allow a plant to

6 mitochondrial metabolism, while the overall stomatal and photosynthetic capacity were unaffected.

7 Integrating biophysical analysis of stomatal and vascular conductivity with geochemical anal

8 molecular approach, we show that elements of stomatal and vascular differentiation are coordinated wi

9 ss declines in response to drought depend on stomatal and xylem flow regulation.

10 stomata, anisohydric species maintain higher stomatal aperture and exhibit substantial reductions in

11 The effects of S-della on stomatal aperture and water loss were strongly suppresse

12 nse to drought stress through its control of stomatal aperture and water transpiration, and transgeni

13 of transpiration through the control of the stomatal aperture due to its cell wall-modifying enzyme

14 otein, as one of the key proteins regulating stomatal aperture during biotic and abiotic stress.

15 n addition, we did not observe any impact on stomatal aperture following incubation with abscisic aci

16 Both pathogens and plants regulate stomatal aperture for pathogen entry and defense, respec

17 y that regulate flowering time, also control stomatal aperture in a daylength-dependent manner.

18 oscillator and examined gene expression and stomatal aperture in several lines of plants with misexp

19 Stomatal aperture is one of the many processes under cir

20 lead to an improved response sensitivity of stomatal aperture movement with respect to change of tur

21 Not all plant proteins involved in stomatal aperture regulation have been identified.

22 ,72 module responsible for the regulation of stomatal aperture that is hijacked by bacterial COR to p

23 ations of a coordinated relationship between stomatal aperture variation and whole-system hydraulics

24 nergic signaling via DORN1 in the control of stomatal aperture with important implications for the co

25 ainly regulated by guard cell control of the stomatal aperture, but recent advancements have highligh

26 ation while limiting water loss by adjusting stomatal aperture.

27 to function effectively to maintain optimal stomatal aperture.

28 hat have previously been reported to control stomatal aperture.

29 utants lacking the hemicellulose xyloglucan, stomatal apertures, changes in guard cell length, and ce

30 eased sensitivity to ABA, and a reduction in stomatal apertures.

31 In addition, stomatal behavior and expression of ABA receptors, droug

32 e consequences of this lower accumulation on stomatal behavior and photosynthetic capacity as well as

33 pecies in which interspecific differences in stomatal behavior could be accounted for by fitting a si

34 The data indicate that the stomatal behavior of ferns is more complex than anticipa

35 e a 'supply-demand' theory for water-limited stomatal behavior that avoids the typical scaffold of em

36 y stable strategy (ESS)-species with the ESS stomatal behavior that will outcompete all others.

37 loped and coupled a hydromechanical model of stomatal behavior with a biochemical model of C4 photosy

38 and K(+) nutrition were impaired along with stomatal behaviour, membrane transport, and expression o

39 as to allow the CO2 partial pressure within stomatal cavities and their intrinsic water use efficien

40 In monocot leaves, stomatal cell files are positioned at the flanks of unde

41 gene to avoid potential silencing of OsSHR2, stomatal cell files were observed both in the normal pos

42 s are partially impaired in pathogen-induced stomatal closing and more susceptible to Pseudomonas.

43 se mutants caused impairments in CO2-induced stomatal closing.

44 of starch biosynthesis for high CO2-induced stomatal closing.

45 Stomatal closure (under drought conditions or exogenous

46 marize recent advances in the role of ROS in stomatal closure and discuss the importance of ROS in re

47 ning the ABA-dependent ROS burst that drives stomatal closure and facilitating stomatal opening to mo

48 AMFs, have long-lasting effects in promoting stomatal closure and inducing the expression of stress-r

49 y mediates Mal(2-) efflux during ABA-induced stomatal closure and its activity depends on phosphoryla

50 GA signaling, acts in guard cells to promote stomatal closure and reduce water loss in response to wa

51 Plants employ stomatal closure and reduced growth to avoid water defic

52 e find that ABA-increased ROS is followed by stomatal closure and that both responses are blocked by

53 that both the VPD-induced passive hydraulic stomatal closure and the stomatal VPD regulation of ABA-

54 The time scale of stomatal closure and xylem cavitation during plant dehyd

55 tance (Kleaf) declines, which contributes to stomatal closure and, eventually, to leaf death.

56 CAM is associated with stomatal closure during the day as atmospheric CO2 is as

57 Inspired by the stomatal closure feature of plant leaves at relatively h

58 risks associated with hydraulic failure and stomatal closure for 13 temperate and tropical forest bi

59 e role of abscisic acid (ABA) in VPD-induced stomatal closure has been studied using ABA-related muta

60 eal nodes that could be engineered to impact stomatal closure in a controlled fashion and also provid

61 min were previously shown to be optimal for stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana),

62 , and sitosterol, were confirmed to regulate stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana, B. napus or bo

63 ly compromise Pseudomonas syringae-triggered stomatal closure in both Phaseolus vulgaris and Arabidop

64 Sulfate application caused stomatal closure in excised leaves and peeled epidermis.

65 On the other hand, active stomatal closure in response to ABA and CO2 was found in

66 ost1, the ERA1 function was not required for stomatal closure in response to ABA and environmental fa

67 release from the vacuole and is required for stomatal closure in response to abscisic acid (ABA).

68 These mutant plants not only display slower stomatal closure in response to increased CO2 concentrat

69 Stomatal closure in response to increased VPD is driven

70 Knockout mutants showed impaired stomatal closure in response to the drought stress hormo

71 he active regulatory mechanisms that control stomatal closure in response to these stimuli are presen

72 s, ethylene treatments decreased ABA-induced stomatal closure in the wild type, but not Nr, with ethy

73 This result indicates that DELLA promotes stomatal closure independently of its effect on growth.

74 ABA signal transduction responses underlying stomatal closure into a network of 84 nodes and 156 edge

75 ling pathway for abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure involves perception of the hormone that

76 the reorganisation of actin filaments during stomatal closure is documented, the underlying mechanism

77 genes, as xylem loading depends on SKOR and stomatal closure on GORK in Arabidopsis, whereas both fu

78 The results showed that complete stomatal closure preceded the appearance of embolism in

79 While some argue that complete stomatal closure precedes the occurrence of embolism, ot

80 Water limitation of plants causes stomatal closure to prevent water loss by transpiration.

81 be a chemical signal of drought that induces stomatal closure via QUAC1/ALMT12 and/or guard cell ABA

82 function mutant, Atalmt12, sulfate-triggered stomatal closure was impaired.

83 ion is altered, loss of PGX3 prevents smooth stomatal closure, and overexpression of PGX3 accelerates

84 id (ABA) is the key signal in stress-induced stomatal closure, but ABA as an early xylem-delivered si

85 ation of guard cell H2O2 concentrations, and stomatal closure, expanding our understanding of the mec

86 ed stomatal opening or abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure, indicating that sufficient cellulose a

87 n of anion channels, osmotic water loss, and stomatal closure, over 70 additional components have bee

88 We synthesized the published data for stomatal closure, wilting, declines in hydraulic conduct

89 ed production of reactive oxygen species and stomatal closure.

90 ght, vascular land plants conserve water via stomatal closure.

91 t influences the osmotic stress response and stomatal closure.

92 voltage, drive the K(+) and anion efflux for stomatal closure.

93 from guard cells, is essential for efficient stomatal closure.

94 on dioxide (CO2 ) levels are known to induce stomatal closure.

95 in cytoskeleton is required for dark-induced stomatal closure.

96 BOHD eliminates the ability of ATP to induce stomatal closure.

97 ent responses such as callose deposition and stomatal closure.

98 hrough transpiration, and severe slowdown of stomatal closure.

99 and C4 photosynthesis) day/night pattern of stomatal closure/opening to shift CO2 uptake to the nigh

100 of Mal(2-) from the vacuole is required for stomatal closure; however, it is not clear how the anion

101 EMPERATURE1 (HT1), an essential regulator of stomatal CO2 responses, in an ozone sensitivity screen o

102 sed constitutively open stomata and impaired stomatal CO2 responses.

103 In parallel, we showed that stomatal CO2-insensitivity phenotypes of a mutant cis (C

104 reporter strategy) was observed in the whole stomatal complex (guard cells and subsidiary cells), roo

105 guard cell ends, which restricts increase of stomatal complex length during opening.

106 two key mechanisms: first, through decreased stomatal conductance (gs ) and increased soil water cont

107 Both photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (gs ) respond to changing irradianc

108 component parts, photosynthesis (Asat ) and stomatal conductance (gs )) for legumes Cicer arietinum,

109 their carbon-for-water balance by regulating stomatal conductance (gS).

110 g positive correlation between mesophyll and stomatal conductance among cultivars apparently impedes

111 evated foliar ABA concentrations and reduced stomatal conductance and assimilation rates in our eight

112 f water sources were associated with reduced stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, suggesting that

113 owever, rising atmospheric CO2 also modifies stomatal conductance and plant water use, processes that

114 s-of-function pro mutant exhibited increased stomatal conductance and rapid wilting under water defic

115 g grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in concert with stomatal conductance and stem and petiole hydraulic meas

116 y stimulating photosynthesis and by reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration.

117 delta(13) C, the response is via changes in stomatal conductance but is modified by carry-over effec

118 lowland rice varieties characterized by high-stomatal conductance can play a key role in enhancing pr

119 cum) flacca ABA-deficient mutants had higher stomatal conductance compared with wild-type plants.

120 Under drought, stomatal conductance decreased at similar levels in the

121 cy (Wi; the ratio of net CO2 assimilation to stomatal conductance for water vapor) of trees and C3 gr

122 Guard2 faithfully reproduces the kinetics of stomatal conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana and its dep

123 availability of CO2 in the event of reduced stomatal conductance in response to short-term water sho

124 Using an established stomatal conductance model, we explain the changes in in

125 Neither the stomatal conductance nor the kinetic responses to dark,

126 we show that while era1 suppressed the high stomatal conductance of abi1-1 and ost1, the ERA1 functi

127 ns in K(+) channel activities and changes in stomatal conductance of the slac1 Cl(-) channel and ost2

128 Stomatal conductance often closely correlates with A and

129 eties had higher net carbon assimilation and stomatal conductance relative to vegetable types.

130 a mesophyll-driven signal coordinates A and stomatal conductance responses to maintain this relation

131 obal scale, land plants have regulated their stomatal conductance so as to allow the CO2 partial pres

132 Takanari had 30%-40% higher stomatal conductance than Koshihikari; however, the pres

133 Sensitivity analyses determined that stomatal conductance was a significant physiological fac

134 at elevated [CO2 ] in both cultivars, while stomatal conductance was lower.

135 e, in situ variation of water potential, and stomatal conductance) of three Ranunculus species differ

136 nthetic capacity, (ii) variable decreases in stomatal conductance, and (iii) that increases in yield

137 nts allows photosynthetic operation at lower stomatal conductance, and as a consequence, transpiratio

138 ss to investigate xylem sap sulfate and ABA, stomatal conductance, and sulfate transporter (SULTR) ex

139 trongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for

140 ression showed lower rates of water loss and stomatal conductance, higher relative water content, and

141 Ecosystem modeling suggests that divergent stomatal conductance, leaf sizes and stem life span betw

142 hylogenetic nodes are associated with higher stomatal conductance, lower photosynthetic rate (when CO

143 ter conditions since the 1980s have enhanced stomatal conductance, photosynthetic assimilation rates

144 otosynthetic carbon flux and in turn adjusts stomatal conductance, photosynthetic CO2 and photorespir

145 n of network modules with dynamic changes in stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and photosyst

146 In both cases, the whole-plant stomatal conductance, stunted growth phenotype, and leaf

147 ophyll conductance with photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and leaf mas

148 ion, and both fluxes are controlled by plant stomatal conductance.

149 ere is simultaneous stabilizing selection on stomatal conductance.

150 y be conditional on the initial pretreatment stomatal conductance.

151 e increased without concomitantly increasing stomatal conductance.

152 Salinity reduced foliar area and stomatal conductance; while net photosynthetic rate and

153 model illuminates the processes underpinning stomatal control in C4 plants and suggests that the hydr

154 strongest coupling with the atmosphere while stomatal control of energy partitioning was strongest in

155 ability, and time is critical for simulating stomatal control of plant-atmospheric carbon and water e

156 Two metrics of stringency of stomatal control of psi, (1) a 'hydroscape' incorporatin

157 Stomatal control of transpiration is critical for mainta

158 ion of these genes in nonhost resistance and stomatal defense against bacterial pathogens, respective

159 ental condition, acts in part by suppressing stomatal defense and is linked to hormone signaling in g

160 The key components for the signaling of stomatal defense and nonhost resistance have not been fu

161 eaf size, epidermal cell size and number and stomatal density and index.

162 observed in eudicot leaves, the increase in stomatal density did not enhance photosynthetic capacity

163 ge, barley plants with significantly reduced stomatal density show no reductions in grain yield.

164 ces in gas exchange are also associated with stomatal density, epidermal thickness, numbers of palisa

165 lable plant genomes, we advance the story of stomatal development and patterning across land plant ev

166 ox has been identified that tightly controls stomatal development and patterning.

167 nd EPF components are also required for moss stomatal development and patterning.

168 hat PGX3-mediated pectin degradation affects stomatal development in cotyledons, promotes rosette exp

169 signaling peptides regulate the frequency of stomatal development in model dicot and basal land plant

170 wever, the core genetic machinery regulating stomatal development in non-vascular land plants is poor

171 orthologous to transcriptional regulators of stomatal development in the flowering plant Arabidopsis

172 croscopy techniques, we show that changes in stomatal development of the epidermal layer lead to coup

173 imits entry to, and progression through, the stomatal development pathway.

174 elix (bHLH) transcription factors regulating stomatal development were identified in Arabidopsis, but

175 required to activate transcription for moss stomatal development, as in A. thaliana(7).

176 the importance of several genes that control stomatal development.

177 intrinsic and extrinsic factors that control stomatal development.

178 Our findings reveal that proper stomatal dynamics are built on two key properties of the

179 ively expressed in guard cells and modulates stomatal dynamics during bacterial invasion We analyzed

180 re the links between guard cell homeostasis, stomatal dynamics, and foliar transpiration.

181 gs underline the significance of spacing for stomatal dynamics.

182 lux per unit leaf mass (r(2) = 0.56) than to stomatal flux per unit leaf area (r(2) = 0.42).

183 ass reductions were more strongly related to stomatal flux per unit leaf mass (r(2) = 0.56) than to s

184 ion-based to a more physiologically relevant stomatal flux-based index, large-scale ozone risk assess

185 This pattern suggests either that stomatal formation is inhibited in epidermal cells direc

186 FAMA, and ICE/SCREAMs (SCRMs), which promote stomatal formation.

187 ts demonstrate the potential of manipulating stomatal frequency for the protection and optimization o

188 at chc mutants have physiological defects in stomatal function and plant growth that have not been de

189 A-deficiency suppressor1 mutant, which has a stomatal function defect, as a clathrin heavy chain1 (CH

190 cell, and this spacing is thought to enhance stomatal function, although there are several genera tha

191 ll wall pectin methyl-esterification status, stomatal function, and plant growth.

192 ts provide new insight into the mechanics of stomatal function, both negating an established view of

193 cytosis and exocytosis and have an impact on stomatal function, gas exchange, and vegetative growth i

194 Stomatal guard cells are pairs of specialized epidermal

195 Stomatal guard cells are widely recognized as the premie

196 ntribute to the characteristic patterning of stomatal guard cells in the context of a growing leaf.

197 Stomatal guard cells surround pores in the epidermis of

198 ROS signaling is discussed in the context of stomatal immunity.

199 An unusual phenotype of increased stomatal index in spring but not control plants in eleva

200 porters and engineered mutants, we show that stomatal initiation in the grass Brachypodium distachyon

201 CO2 concentration through their influence on stomatal kinetics remains a subject of debate and inquir

202 of brassinosteroids (BRs) partly rescued the stomatal leaf phenotype of spch-5 Transcriptomic analysi

203 y dry woodland understory through changes in stomatal limitation to photosynthesis, not by the "water

204 reased leaf internal CO2 (Ci ) and decreased stomatal limitations (Slim ).

205 The BREAKING OF ASYMMETRY IN THE STOMATAL LINEAGE (BASL) protein exhibits a polarized loc

206 Using targeted genetic manipulations of the stomatal lineage and a combination of gas exchange and m

207 idual cell types in the Arabidopsis thaliana stomatal lineage and identify CSLD5, a member of the Cel

208 The asymmetric cell divisions necessary for stomatal lineage initiation and progression in Arabidops

209 nique system to study both processes because stomatal maturation involves limited separation between

210 simultaneously improves our understanding of stomatal mechanics and questions our long-standing belie

211 , but this dicot's developmental pattern and stomatal morphology represent only one of many possibili

212 ME34 mutation has a defect in the control of stomatal movement and greatly altered PME and polygalact

213 of genes involved in nocturnal CO2 fixation, stomatal movement, heat tolerance, circadian clock, and

214 vacuolar membranes of guard cells that drive stomatal movements and the signaling mechanisms that reg

215 Stomatal movements are controlled by complex signaling n

216 Foliar stomatal movements are critical for regulating plant wat

217 Stomatal movements depend on the transport and metabolis

218 potassium channels from the Shaker family in stomatal movements have been investigated by reverse gen

219 rphology and regulatory mechanisms governing stomatal movements to correspond to the needs of various

220 tform has helped to resolve the mechanics of stomatal movements, uncovering previously unexpected beh

221 metabolism and playing significant roles in stomatal movements.

222 propose that the two positive regulators of stomatal number (SCRM2) and CDKB1;1 when upregulated act

223 This process is critical for the rapidity of stomatal opening and biomass production.

224 the many processes under circadian control; stomatal opening and closing occurs under constant condi

225 Our results indicate a function for ERA1 in stomatal opening and pathogen immunity.

226 We validate these predictions with stomatal opening experiments in selected Arabidopsis cel

227 k-to-light changes and of circadian-mediated stomatal opening in constant light.

228 -oxidation, and we showed that light-induced stomatal opening is delayed in three TAG catabolism muta

229 Stomatal opening is mediated by the complex regulation o

230 tion were aberrant during fusicoccin-induced stomatal opening or abscisic acid-induced stomatal closu

231 hat drives stomatal closure and facilitating stomatal opening to modulate leaf gas exchange.

232 ce, such as photosynthesis, photoprotection, stomatal opening, and photoperiodic development, as well

233 icance of circadian-mediated anticipation in stomatal opening, we have generated SGC (specifically gu

234 dial stiffening plays a very limited role in stomatal opening.

235 tening and chloroplast accumulation, but not stomatal opening.

236 l beta-oxidation to produce ATP required for stomatal opening.

237 sure, and overexpression of PGX3 accelerates stomatal opening.

238 channel in almt4 mutants impaired growth and stomatal opening.

239 icated a role for ERA1 in blue light-induced stomatal opening.

240 existence of a broadly conserved pattern of stomatal optimization in woody angiosperms and gymnosper

241 ed CO2 correlated with altered expression of stomatal patterning genes between spring and control pla

242 In Arabidopsis, stomatal patterning is specified by the ERECTA family (E

243 de use of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) stomatal patterning mutants to explore the impact of clu

244 in monocot and eudicot leaves to coordinate stomatal patterning with the development of underlying m

245 en-activated kinase cascades enforces proper stomatal patterning, and an intrinsic polarity mechanism

246 and peptide signals [7] explains some local stomatal patterns emerging from the behavior of a few li

247 Improved stomatal performance via altered cell-wall-mediated mech

248 aped guard cells (GCs)-is linked to improved stomatal physiology.

249 on fluxes in the guard cells surrounding the stomatal pore [2].

250 nd less able to reduce the aperture of their stomatal pore in response to closure signals suggesting

251 to the cell wall and is enriched at sites of stomatal pore initiation in cotyledons.

252 the turgor-driven shape changes required for stomatal pore opening to occur [1-4].

253 r of the leaf and the atmosphere through the stomatal pore.

254 Instead the majority of stomatal pores are entirely covered over by a continuous

255 Stomatal pores are formed between a pair of guard cells

256 ranspiration through a better closure of the stomatal pores at the leaf surface.

257 Stomatal pores form a crucial interface between the leaf

258 However, the molecular mechanisms for how stomatal pores form and how guard cell walls facilitate

259 Plants lose water through stomatal pores in order to acquire CO2 (assimilation [A]

260 Guard cells form stomatal pores that optimize photosynthetic carbon dioxi

261 Guard cells shrink and close stomatal pores when air humidity decreases (i.e. when th

262 quires the influx of atmospheric CO2 through stomatal pores, and this carbon uptake for photosynthesi

263 orn and tomato displayed a relatively strict stomatal regime and/or mild NPQ responses and were, thus

264 les of Tre6P in abiotic stress tolerance and stomatal regulation are also discussed.

265 ABA and CO2 and that an active mechanism of stomatal regulation in response to reduced air humidity

266 complex than anticipated before, and active stomatal regulation is present in some ferns and has pos

267 ard cells versus vasculature for whole-plant stomatal regulation is unclear as well.

268 archers have proposed various strategies for stomatal regulation of leaf gas-exchange that include ma

269 Plants operate on a continuum of xylem and stomatal regulation strategies from very isohydric (stri

270 display a more isohydric response (increased stomatal regulation) during the dry season.

271 , the maintenance of mesophyll water status, stomatal regulation, and the interpretation of measured

272 se resistance was independent of its role in stomatal regulation.

273 s, indicating that clathrin is important for stomatal regulation.

274 e transcription factor is an ortholog of the stomatal regulator AtMUTE, which defines GC precursor fa

275 ss Brachypodium distachyon uses orthologs of stomatal regulators known from Arabidopsis but that the

276 Gain-of-function mutations in JAZ2 prevent stomatal reopening by COR and are highly resistant to ba

277 Our findings suggest that the stomatal response to darkness is mediated by reorganisat

278 0 min, a period of time most relevant to the stomatal response to VPD We found in angiosperm species

279 responses, partially from uncertainty in the stomatal response to water deficits in soil and atmosphe

280 ce (gs ) respond to changing irradiance, yet stomatal responses are an order of magnitude slower than

281 Proper stomatal responses are essential for plant function in a

282 Importantly, fern stomatal responses depend on growth conditions.

283 the hydraulic benefits associated with fast stomatal responses of C4 grasses may have supported the

284 and how guard cell walls facilitate dynamic stomatal responses remain poorly understood.

285 ed separation between sister guard cells and stomatal responses require reversible guard cell elongat

286 Stomatal responses to [CO2] shifts and CO2 assimilation

287 with previous studies demonstrating passive stomatal responses to changes in VPD in these lineages.

288 an important role in plant growth by driving stomatal responses to light.

289 ain insight into the evolution of land plant stomatal responses.

290 t classic hypotheses that SCs permit greater stomatal responsiveness and larger range of pore apertur

291 dopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) suggested that stomatal responsiveness is also controlled by an ABA act

292 specific promoter was sufficient to increase stomatal sensitivity to ABA and to reduce water loss und

293 culin B or cytochalasin D restored wild-type stomatal sensitivity to darkness in opal5.

294 is to leaf turgor corresponded with a higher stomatal sensitivity to VPD In contrast, representative

295 C data to calculate a measure of iWUE (G1 , "stomatal slope") at the ecosystem level at six sites com

296 PATTERNING FACTOR (EPF) peptides to enforce stomatal spacing.

297 rmis [5], polarized, asymmetric divisions of stomatal stem cells (meristemoid mother cells [MMCs]) ar

298 of these Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) stomatal toolbox genes, and manipulation in the model br

299 lometric relationships between morphological stomatal traits in relation to leaf gas exchange and the

300 d passive hydraulic stomatal closure and the stomatal VPD regulation of ABA-deficient mutants may be