戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 on (CID), a time-integrated trait measure of stomatal conductance.
2 iod of oscillations are likely determined by stomatal conductance.
3 ration specifically and solely for differing stomatal conductance.
4 ion, and both fluxes are controlled by plant stomatal conductance.
5 ere is simultaneous stabilizing selection on stomatal conductance.
6 y be conditional on the initial pretreatment stomatal conductance.
7  rate (Vcmax ) or leaf nitrogen (Narea ) vs. stomatal conductance.
8 e increased without concomitantly increasing stomatal conductance.
9  high CO(2) assimilation rates despite lower stomatal conductances.
10 ween 15% and 60% deeper rooting, 78% greater stomatal conductance, 36% greater leaf CO2 assimilation,
11 is located in the soil profile), 50% greater stomatal conductance, 59% greater leaf CO2 assimilation,
12  to elevated CO2 evolved lower rates of leaf stomatal conductance; a physiological adaptation known t
13                                              Stomatal conductance allows maximum transpiration rates
14 etween 2.0 and 7.4 mumol m(-2) s(-1) higher, stomatal conductance almost double, and transpiration 60
15 g positive correlation between mesophyll and stomatal conductance among cultivars apparently impedes
16 hat plants from line TS4T8An displayed lower stomatal conductance and a higher proline content.
17 evated foliar ABA concentrations and reduced stomatal conductance and assimilation rates in our eight
18 e determined by respiration, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and atmospheric [CO2 ].
19  gas-exchange analyses showed a reduction in stomatal conductance and CO2 -assimilation rates of the
20 e gas exchange measurements revealed reduced stomatal conductance and enhanced water use efficiency c
21 haracteristics on the velocity of changes in stomatal conductance and explore the potential for manip
22 lization effect operating through restricted stomatal conductance and improved water-use efficiency.
23  which was largely attributed to declines in stomatal conductance and intercellular [CO2] and led in
24 leaf abscisic acid content and a decrease in stomatal conductance and leaf gas exchange.
25 otypes produced F2 progeny cosegregating for stomatal conductance and leaf temperature.
26 tion on sensitivities of xylem conductivity, stomatal conductance and leaf turgor to water potential.
27 CK mutant plants show both increased overall stomatal conductance and less responsiveness of the stom
28     Together, these differences cause higher stomatal conductance and lower WUE compared with the com
29  provide a direct measure of ecosystem-scale stomatal conductance and mesophyll function, without rel
30        We found that trees experienced lower stomatal conductance and photosynthesis and higher isopr
31 f water sources were associated with reduced stomatal conductance and photosynthesis, suggesting that
32 re, delayed senescence, and greatly enhanced stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, especially
33 owever, rising atmospheric CO2 also modifies stomatal conductance and plant water use, processes that
34 s-of-function pro mutant exhibited increased stomatal conductance and rapid wilting under water defic
35 g grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in concert with stomatal conductance and stem and petiole hydraulic meas
36               The influence of foliar ABA on stomatal conductance and stomatal aperture was highly pr
37 rough PYR/RCARs for whole-plant steady-state stomatal conductance and stomatal closure induced by env
38  constrained owing to large uncertainties in stomatal conductance and the lack of catchment-scale mea
39 f photosynthesis happens in the shade, where stomatal conductance and thus [O3 ] deposition is lower
40 orum, wild-type fungus causes an increase in stomatal conductance and transpiration as well as a decr
41 nd physiological factors (assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration) were measured fr
42 y stimulating photosynthesis and by reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration.
43 han C4 species, coincident with decreases in stomatal conductance and transpiration.
44 educed drought tolerance, and show increased stomatal conductance and wider stomatal apertures compar
45 ults indicate that most plant taxa decreased stomatal conductance and/or maximum photosynthetic capac
46 pecific mass and, during drought, have lower stomatal conductances and higher water-use efficiencies.
47 nthetic capacity, (ii) variable decreases in stomatal conductance, and (iii) that increases in yield
48 nts allows photosynthetic operation at lower stomatal conductance, and as a consequence, transpiratio
49 lays circadian rhythms in stomatal aperture, stomatal conductance, and CO(2) assimilation, each of wh
50 rease in total open stomatal area, increased stomatal conductance, and increased transpiration were o
51                           Measurements of A, stomatal conductance, and intercellular [CO2] were colle
52 EPC capacity were tracked by net CO2 uptake, stomatal conductance, and online delta13C signal; all de
53 ined strongly in leaf hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, and photosynthetic rate, whereas p
54 immediate effects of O(3) on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and photosynthetic transcript abun
55 ss to investigate xylem sap sulfate and ABA, stomatal conductance, and sulfate transporter (SULTR) ex
56  WUE increased in drought, primarily because stomatal conductance, and thus water loss, declined more
57                        The effects of cry on stomatal conductance are largely indirect and involve th
58 gnaling genes, coinciding with a decrease in stomatal conductance as an early avoidance response to d
59 nstantaneous measures of photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance as well as with a long-term proxy (
60 nspiration efficiency because of their lower stomatal conductance, as demonstrated by increases in de
61                     We also established that stomatal conductance at night was on average 5 times gre
62     There were no significant differences in stomatal conductance between leaves from wild-type and t
63 attributable to ~25% lower transpiration and stomatal conductance but equivalent CO(2) assimilation.
64  delta(13) C, the response is via changes in stomatal conductance but is modified by carry-over effec
65 800 mg/kg reduced net photosynthesis by 12%, stomatal conductance by 15%, and relative chlorophyll co
66 lowland rice varieties characterized by high-stomatal conductance can play a key role in enhancing pr
67  concentration responses but exhibit reduced stomatal conductance compared with ecotype Columbia at a
68 cum) flacca ABA-deficient mutants had higher stomatal conductance compared with wild-type plants.
69 nts were more tolerant to drought with lower stomatal conductance, consistent with its function as an
70                             Due to nocturnal stomatal conductance, COS uptake by vegetation continued
71                               Under drought, stomatal conductance decreased at similar levels in the
72 ct in 1970, indicating a gradual increase in stomatal conductance (despite rising levels of atmospher
73 te the dynamics of water potential, ABA, and stomatal conductance during the imposition of water stre
74 trongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for
75 cy (Wi; the ratio of net CO2 assimilation to stomatal conductance for water vapor) of trees and C3 gr
76                                   Night-time stomatal conductance (g(night)) occurs in many ecosystem
77 revious studies showed that heterogeneity in stomatal conductance (g(s)) across a leaf could affect t
78  CO(2) ([CO(2)]) have been shown to decrease stomatal conductance (g(s)) for a wide range of species
79                                            * Stomatal conductance (g(s)) is constrained by the size a
80                                              Stomatal conductance (g(s)) is constrained by the size a
81 -1) (enveloping atmospheric levels) enhanced stomatal conductance (g(s)) to a variable extent in most
82    Here, we conducted a Bayesian analysis of stomatal conductance (g) (N=5013) from 16 species in the
83 ective of this study was to determine if low stomatal conductance (g) increases growth, nitrate (NO3
84  conditions, transgenic plants showed higher stomatal conductance, gas exchange, and shoot growth.
85 logical traits including maximum theoretical stomatal conductance (gmax ) and leaf vein density (Dv )
86 iological measurements including operational stomatal conductance (gop ), saturated (Asat ) and maxim
87 two key mechanisms: first, through decreased stomatal conductance (gs ) and increased soil water cont
88  periods of high moisture availability, when stomatal conductance (gs ) and photosynthesis can increa
89 and is a major constraint on light-saturated stomatal conductance (gs ) and photosynthetic rate (Amax
90 s examined diel changes in assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs ) and transpiration (E) on matu
91           A strong correlation between A and stomatal conductance (gs ) is well documented and often
92                               Daytime canopy stomatal conductance (gs ) per unit leaf area was 12% hi
93                  Both photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (gs ) respond to changing irradianc
94               Here, we measured responses of stomatal conductance (gs ) to irradiance, CO2 , and vapo
95  component parts, photosynthesis (Asat ) and stomatal conductance (gs )) for legumes Cicer arietinum,
96 nse of maize to elevated [CO2 ] is decreased stomatal conductance (gs ).
97 including measures of water potential (Psi), stomatal conductance (gs) and frond stipe hydraulic cond
98 ic conductance (Kleaf ), photosynthesis (A), stomatal conductance (gs) and nonstructural carbohydrate
99 carbon fixation by photosynthesis (Asat) and stomatal conductance (gs) are not related to Narea-in di
100                                              Stomatal conductance (gs) typically declines in response
101 lant dry mass, net photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 (Ci), chlor
102 ause, or compensate for, reduced mean canopy stomatal conductance (GS), keeping transpiration (EC) an
103  distinguishes species that rapidly decrease stomatal conductance (gs), thereby maintaining high wate
104 their carbon-for-water balance by regulating stomatal conductance (gS).
105 that selection for higher anatomical maximum stomatal conductance (gsmax ) involves a trade-off to mi
106                                Whole-rosette stomatal conductance (Gst) measurements revealed that le
107 of EPF2 reduced stomatal density and maximum stomatal conductance (gw(max) ) sufficiently to increase
108 with lower hydraulic conductivity and higher stomatal conductance, had a LER declining more rapidly t
109 ression showed lower rates of water loss and stomatal conductance, higher relative water content, and
110 Guard2 faithfully reproduces the kinetics of stomatal conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana and its dep
111 ximately half is attributed to a decrease in stomatal conductance in order to conserve water in respo
112                       Elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance in P. smithii, contributing to high
113  control percent loss of conductance through stomatal conductance in response to drought, because the
114  availability of CO2 in the event of reduced stomatal conductance in response to short-term water sho
115 t was shown that they also exhibited reduced stomatal conductance, increased NCED mRNA and elevated s
116                                   Given that stomatal conductance increases under subambient concentr
117   Ecosystem modeling suggests that divergent stomatal conductance, leaf sizes and stem life span betw
118 d parameters, including chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, leaf temperature, reduced wilting,
119 hylogenetic nodes are associated with higher stomatal conductance, lower photosynthetic rate (when CO
120 ing strategies targeting high yield and high stomatal conductance may have inadvertently selected for
121                         Using an established stomatal conductance model, we explain the changes in in
122                                  Neither the stomatal conductance nor the kinetic responses to dark,
123 lue light specific, cry1 cry2 showed reduced stomatal conductance not only in response to blue light,
124  we show that while era1 suppressed the high stomatal conductance of abi1-1 and ost1, the ERA1 functi
125  assimilation rates will reach a maximum and stomatal conductance of each species should be constrain
126      The increased TE and reduced whole leaf stomatal conductance of gpa1 can be primarily attributed
127 sition over much of the 20th century reduced stomatal conductance of leaves, thereby increasing intri
128 ns in K(+) channel activities and changes in stomatal conductance of the slac1 Cl(-) channel and ost2
129 ensity (D) determine maximum leaf diffusive (stomatal) conductance of CO(2) (g(c(max))) to sites of a
130 e, in situ variation of water potential, and stomatal conductance) of three Ranunculus species differ
131                                              Stomatal conductance often closely correlates with A and
132  high photosynthesis in combination with low stomatal conductance or leaf nitrogen, and selection on
133 d, but little is known of genetic effects on stomatal conductance or their consequences.
134 mer conserved soil water by limiting maximum stomatal conductance per unit leaf area, but also, at le
135                                    While the stomatal conductance phenotype of phot1 phot2 was blue l
136 ter conditions since the 1980s have enhanced stomatal conductance, photosynthetic assimilation rates
137 otosynthetic carbon flux and in turn adjusts stomatal conductance, photosynthetic CO2 and photorespir
138 n of network modules with dynamic changes in stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate, and photosyst
139                          Finally, a delay in stomatal conductance recovery during the period of stres
140 eties had higher net carbon assimilation and stomatal conductance relative to vegetable types.
141     The role of guard cell photosynthesis in stomatal conductance responses is a matter of debate, an
142  a mesophyll-driven signal coordinates A and stomatal conductance responses to maintain this relation
143                                              Stomatal conductance rhythms were similarly approximatel
144 obal scale, land plants have regulated their stomatal conductance so as to allow the CO2 partial pres
145 grees of complexity and varying time scales: stomatal conductance, soil respiration, ecosystem produc
146 metrics such as leaf area, senescence state, stomatal conductance, soil texture, soil moisture, and w
147               In both cases, the whole-plant stomatal conductance, stunted growth phenotype, and leaf
148             Targeted genetic modification of stomatal conductance, such as in EPF2OE, is a viable app
149                  Takanari had 30%-40% higher stomatal conductance than Koshihikari; however, the pres
150 es resulted in hysteresis in the recovery of stomatal conductance; this was most pronounced in herbac
151 te, M conductance to CO(2) diffusion (g(m)), stomatal conductance to gas diffusion (g(s)), and the g(
152  These mutants show compromised responses of stomatal conductance to irradiance.
153 sensitive to Psi(l) and that the response of stomatal conductance to Psi(l) is closely correlated wit
154 n xylem ABA concentration and a reduction in stomatal conductance to the same final levels as the wil
155  basis of interspecific variation in maximum stomatal conductance to water (g(max) ), as defined by s
156 categorize the genotypes and predict maximum stomatal conductance to water vapor (Anatomical g(smax))
157 tio of photosynthetic carbon assimilation to stomatal conductance to water, is a dynamic trait with t
158 icient and under water-deficient conditions, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, plant hydrauli
159  both phot1 phot2 and cry1 cry2 have reduced stomatal conductance, transpiration, and photosynthesis,
160  and in contribution to a plant's control of stomatal conductance under water stress.
161                                          The stomatal conductance values varied severalfold among the
162 rigated production in very hot environments, stomatal conductance varies genetically over a wide rang
163                  Notably, photosynthesis and stomatal conductance vary diurnally, and the circadian c
164 mperature, because of endogenous controls on stomatal conductance via circadian regulation.
165         Sensitivity analyses determined that stomatal conductance was a significant physiological fac
166                                              Stomatal conductance was lower (-34%) and soil moisture
167  at elevated [CO2 ] in both cultivars, while stomatal conductance was lower.
168                                Surprisingly, stomatal conductance was typically lower in the C3 than
169 ophyll conductance with photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and leaf mas
170        Leaf photosynthesis, respiration, and stomatal conductance were measured at 90 and 120 d after
171      As expected, elevated [CO2] reduced the stomatal conductance, which preserved soil moisture and
172             Salinity reduced foliar area and stomatal conductance; while net photosynthetic rate and
173 gy, water and carbon cycles assume decreased stomatal conductance with elevated atmospheric CO2 conce
174 to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and sea

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top