ライフサイエンスコーパス: stool culture

1 osthesis sonicate fluid was positive, as was stool culture.

2 that is not readily recovered in traditional stool culture.

3 non-O157 STEC was also included in a routine stool culture.

4 sidence were associated with higher rates of stool culture.

5 %), 89.4% of which were not accompanied by a stool culture.

6 clinical review and collection of blood and stool cultures.

7 st bacillus culture, 275, $1,662, and 124 h; stool cultures, 320, $2,991, and 98 h; ovum and parasite

8 d with findings from colonoscopy and biopsy, stool culture analysis, surgery, and cutaneous biopsy, a

9 n place and that fewer laboratories (24% for stool culture and 19% for O&P examinations) rejected spe

10 wed that a minority of laboratories (40% for stool culture and 45% for ova and parasite [O&P] examina

11 mArray GI Panel and tested with conventional stool culture and molecular methods for comparison.

12 There is substantial evidence that stool culture and parasitological examinations are of mi

13 9 to April 17, 2009, specimens for blood and stool cultures and serology were collected from suspecte

14 al reduction in the number of evaluations of stool cultures and the number of parasitological examina

15 nosed cholera after ordering the appropriate stool culture, and the patient improved on an oral antib

16 frequent clinical checks and daily blood and stool cultures, and they were monitored for six addition

17 dults who had stools submitted for bacterial stool culture (BSC) between February to May to Northwest

18 Stool cultures can be important in guiding antimicrobial

19 The average length of time from stool culture collection to discharge was 3.4 days in th

20 One volunteer had a late positive stool culture during outpatient follow-up.

21 We found that stool cultures every 3 months markedly underestimated th

22 From the routine stool culture, five E. coli-like colonies were selected

23 From routine stool cultures, five E. coli-like colonies were screened

24 s, lactoferrin, or calprotectin, or positive stool culture for an invasive or inflammatory bacterial

25 teers experienced purging and had a positive stool culture for V. cholerae.

26 Stool cultures from 4 patrons yielded type AC. botulinum

27 laboratory procedures to do rapid tests and stool cultures from study cases.

28 Perirectal surveillance cultures and a stool culture grew Aeromonas species from three patients

29 under contact precautions if their positive stool cultures had not resulted in their being isolated.

30 mmatory diarrhea selects specimens for which stool culture is fivefold more likely to yield an invasi

31 se of its low yield in unselected specimens, stool culture is often cost ineffective.

32 t use of antimicrobials for diarrhea without stool culture may indicate inappropriate antimicrobial u

33 Stool culture, measurement of serum vibriocidal antibody

34 Swabs of growth from conventionally plated stool culture media were subjected to the OIA SHIGATOX,

35 from suspicious colonies grown on selective stool culture media.

36 tinations are limited by the need to perform stool cultures on site in a timely manner.

37 ell count are normal; not performing routine stool culture or ovum and parasite examination on specim

38 arrhea on or after October 28 and a positive stool culture or temperature greater than 37.8 degrees C

39 A stool culture, oropharyngeal culture, blood viral cultur

40 Stools of 16 children who had recently had stool cultures positive for this pathogen (population A)

41 olidated laboratory workflow, and simplified stool culture practices, thus reducing the overall cost

42 We report a survey of laboratory stool culturing practices for Vibrio among randomly sele

43 contact precautions based on their positive stool cultures prevented an estimated 35 episodes of MRS

44 subjects had at least 1 positive culture (2 stool culture samples were contaminated by fungus and we

45 ccurate tests of diarrheal etiology, such as stool culture (SCx) or toxin assays for Clostridium diff

46 Standard stool culture should be performed in patients with infec

47 dence interval, 1.1 to 1.5), evaluation with stool culture soon after the onset of illness (relative

48 (CDST) to decrease the number of unnecessary stool cultures (STCUL), ova/parasite (O&P) examinations,

49 Patients with stool cultures submitted were tested on the GI panel (n

50 ysis demonstrated 59% of the cost of routine stool culture to be attributable to the identification o

51 e prevalence of O. formigenes, determined by stool culture, was 17% among case patients and 38% among

52 raditionally difficult to recover in routine stool cultures, was detected in two of these culture-neg

53 Stool cultures were performed for only 15,820 episodes (

54 We examined the incremental yield of stool culture (with toxin testing on isolates) versus ou

55 STEC were isolated from 30 (43%) of 70 whose stool cultures yielded bacterial growth (25 E. coli O157

56 defined either by clinical criteria or by a stool culture yielding S Typhimurium.