ライフサイエンスコーパス: sturgeon

1 greater sensitivity in vivo relative to lake sturgeon.

2 cells transfected with AhR1 or AhR2 of white sturgeon.

3 the range-wide marine distribution of green sturgeon.

4 iours were consistent and persistent in lake sturgeon.

5 ations evidenced in its sister lineage, i.e. sturgeons.

6 in other fishes, including other species of sturgeons.

7 ose sturgeon and indicate a restricted Dm in sturgeons.

8 ization of both OC and MGP from the Adriatic sturgeon, a ray-finned fish characterized by a slow evol

9 the FA signatures of the tissues, where the sturgeons accumulated particular highly-unsaturated FA (

10 t and diverse tissues of the farmed Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) were analyzed in detail to a

11 sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) and lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) to DLCs.

12 udy investigated the spatial ecology of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) within the barrier free

13 Three animal models, sea lamprey, lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens), and rainbow trout (Onco

14 and behavior of young-of-the-year (YOY) lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens).

15 The green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris), which is found in the

16 ming in the anadromous Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi).

17 ve responses of two endangered fishes, white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) and lake sturgeon (Ac

18 study investigated the sensitivity of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) to DLCs in vitro via

19 ene, in livers of a nonmodel fish, the white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus).

20 with segmental paleotetraploidy revealed in sturgeons (Acipenseridae).

21 at position 388 in the LBD of AhR2 of white sturgeon (Ala-388) and lake sturgeon (Thr-388).

22 Loss of function at another locus, sturgeon, also yields joint losses, but only mild reduct

23 earlier experimental study on the shovelnose sturgeon and indicate a restricted Dm in sturgeons.

24 no differences in sensitivity between white sturgeon and lake sturgeon based on activation of AhR1.

25 ges, and the commonality of habitats between sturgeon and lamprey ammocoetes, suggests that there may

26 For example, sturgeon and whitefish exhibited congener patterns consi

27 Furthermore, a distinct PCB signature in sturgeon and whitefish, collected at Hanford study areas

28 cerebellum, unlike the case in the Siberian sturgeon and zebrafish, whereas the absence of Gly-ir ne

29 Sturgeons and paddlefishes with their high propensity fo

30 ned fishes and comprise 27 extant species of sturgeons and paddlefishes.

31 those reported for the sea lamprey, Siberian sturgeon, and zebrafish revealed some shared features bu

32 aluable species, such as large land mammals, sturgeons, and bluefin tunas.

33 Green sturgeon are likely influenced by countervailing pressur

34 This indicates that white sturgeon are likely to have greater sensitivity in vivo

35 determine the oceanic distribution of green sturgeon are unclear, but broad-scale physical condition

36 Worldwide, populations of sturgeons are endangered, and it is hypothesized that an

37 Sturgeons are evolutionarily distinct from salmonids, an

38 D-EQs) via the use of RePs for AhR2 of white sturgeon as determined by transfected COS-7 cells.

39 sensitivity between white sturgeon and lake sturgeon based on activation of AhR1.

40 With regard to PV, the sturgeon brain showed a rather limited distribution of P

41 nt neuron subsets distributed throughout the sturgeon brain.

42 anding of the anatomical organization of the sturgeon brain.

43 We estimated the distribution of green sturgeon by modeling species-environment relationships u

44 In addition, sea lamprey and sturgeon cytosolic extracts showed concentrations of aTF

45 ily distinct from salmonids, and the AhRs of sturgeons differ from those of salmonids.

46 We show that sturgeon encodes one of two orthologs of Furin present i

47 Sturgeon exposed to TFM also showed a reduced attraction

48 It was demonstrated that white sturgeon expresses AhR1s and AhR2s that are both activat

49 However, other fractions of lake sturgeon extracts tend to show aTFM concentrations simil

50 ntrations of select DLCs in tissues of white sturgeon from British Columbia, Canada, were used to cal

51 y Bay, though there are few records of green sturgeon from this region.

52 of edn1-dependent genes is downregulated in sturgeon (furinA) mutants.

53 ific rivers or lakes by acoustic-tagged lake sturgeon further subdivided individuals into 14 "conting

54 Both AhRs of white sturgeon had RePs for polychlorinated dibenzofurans more

55 gelatin hydrolysates from the skin of beluga sturgeon (Huso huso) on freshwater crayfish (Astacus lep

56 y the WHO might not adequately protect white sturgeon, illuminating the need for additional investiga

57 n the other river, which confirmed that lake sturgeon in the Detroit and St. Clair represent two semi

58 r 6 years (2011-2016), movements of 268 lake sturgeon in the HEC were continuously monitored across t

59 Lake sturgeon in the HEC were found to contain a high level o

60 neral feature of the spatial ecology of lake sturgeon in unfragmented landscapes.

61 Telencephalic organization in sturgeons is thus critical to our understanding of ray-f

62 Sturgeon MGP shows a primary structure, post-translation

63 of heteroplasmy and length variation in Gulf sturgeon mtDNA, indicates that the molecular mechanisms

64 The sturgeon muscle tissue contained HUFA in proportions com

65 in a context of a reduced rate of evolution, sturgeon OC has retained structural features of the ance

66 In contrast, sturgeon OC was found to present a hybrid structure.

67 Impacts of human activities on green sturgeon or their habitat in coastal waters, such as bot

68 The unique receptor binding profile of sturgeon orphanin not only provides insight into the evo

69 We confirmed that while Lake Sturgeon otoliths are primarily composed of vaterite, th

70 We characterized the structure of Lake Sturgeon otoliths using thermal analysis and neutron pow

71 Sturgeon otoliths, in contrast, have been characterized

72 centrations of which were relatively high at Sturgeon Point, and PBEB, the concentrations of which we

73 Michigan, whereas that of HBB was highest at Sturgeon Point, approximately 25 km southwest of Buffalo

74 reasing with doubling times of 5-10 years at Sturgeon Point, Sleeping Bear Dunes, and Eagle Harbor, b

75 orts have been proposed worldwide to restore sturgeon populations through the use of hatcheries to su

76 The sturgeon proorphanin cDNA encodes a precursor protein of

77 The elucidation of the cDNA sequence for sturgeon proorphanin provides a unique window for interp

78 en possible Gla residues that would make the sturgeon protein the most gamma-carboxylated among known

79 ochemical study in the brain of the Siberian sturgeon reports the neuronal distribution of three cyto

80 NA) were used to identify haplotypes of Gulf sturgeon specimens obtained from eight drainages spannin

81 of AhR2 of white sturgeon (Ala-388) and lake sturgeon (Thr-388).

82 were 3- to 30-fold more sensitive than lake sturgeon to exposure to 5 different DLCs based on activa

83 is a lack of knowledge of the sensitivity of sturgeons to DLCs, and it is uncertain whether TEFs deve

84 complexity from polypteriform fishes through sturgeons to teleosts.

85 The primary concentration of green sturgeon was estimated from approximately 41-51.5 degree

86 White sturgeon were 3- to 30-fold more sensitive than lake stu

87 lculated for endangered populations of white sturgeon were approximately 10-fold greater than TEQs an

88 repeats in the mtDNA control region of Gulf sturgeon were not perfectly conserved.

89 Olfactory projections in the white sturgeon were therefore examined by using the carbocyani

90 ment natural reproduction and to reintroduce sturgeon where they have become extinct.