ライフサイエンスコーパス: subscale

1 State' subscale) and longitudinally ('Trait' subscale).

2 1.96 [95% CI 1.1-3.5], p = 0.02, Sequential subscale).

3 eneralized anxiety) and fear factors (phobia subscales).

4 examination or AD assessment scale-cognitive subscale.

5 One item was removed from the psychosocial subscale.

6 , -21.6 to -1.3; P=0.03) lower for the motor subscale.

7 tion" subscale, and 26% on the "achievement" subscale.

8 nt difference was not observed in any domain subscale.

9 ehavior Checklist Social Withdrawal/Lethargy subscale.

10 for Somatoform Symptoms Conversion Disorder subscale.

11 h having less severe burnout on at least one subscale.

12 ignificantly less apathetic on the Emotional subscale.

13 elated to Vision (performance-based measure) subscales.

14 clusters and Modified Glaucoma Symptom Scale subscales.

15 t validity were found to be good for the DAS subscales.

16 s PANSS Negative and General Psychopathology subscales.

17 .44 [11.45] vs 4.42 [8.94]; P < .05) SHPC-18 subscales.

18 correlated with a majority of the NEI VFQ-25 subscales.

19 ssed Assessment of Ability Related to Vision subscales.

20 le or any of the disease-specific or generic subscales.

21 alysis resulted in a 21-item scale with five subscales.

22 significant (P < .001) differences on all 11 subscales.

23 04) and the Emotional Well-being (P = 0.008) subscales.

24 mented Local Eye and Visual Function symptom subscales.

25 e scale and ranged from 0.77 to 0.88 for the subscales.

26 te Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ25) subscales.

27 with secondary analyses conducted on symptom subscales.

28 5 years; full scale IQ >70; ABC-Irritability subscale 13).

29 -15.5 to 0.9; P=0.08) lower on the cognitive subscale, 14.1 points (95% CI, -22.7 to -5.5; P=0.002) l

30 -2.91 logits, P < 0.001), and socioemotional subscale (-2.63 vs. -2.10 logits, P < 0.001).

31 ional subscales (P < 0.001), visual function subscale (-3.85 vs. -2.91 logits, P < 0.001), and socioe

32 idence of severe burnout on the "exhaustion" subscale, 44% on the "depersonalization" subscale, and 2

33 delinquency (premorbid adjustment adaptation subscale across childhood and adolescence), age at illne

34 Examination of subscales across the 3 indoor tanning groups also reveal

35 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Alzheimer's Disease Co-opera

36 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) at week 24.

37 ore and higher AD assessment scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score.

38 Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), verbal fluency, and Color Trails Te

39 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog; p=0.011) and Mini-Mental State Exami

40 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale [ADAS11] over time [p = 0.03, beta +/- standard

41 zheimer Disease Assessment Scale's cognitive subscale (ADAS_cog), the Mini-Mental Status Examination

42 distress scores but not on the NPI agitation subscale, ADLs, or in less use of rescue lorazepam.

43 ths and Difficulties Questionnaire prosocial subscale (AMD, 0.5; 95% CI, >0.0-0.9).

44 ation-level Independent Practice and Support subscale, an NP-PCOCQ subscale, had a significant positi

45 duced peak changes in PANSS positive symptom subscale and both subjective and objective CADSS scores.

46 nd Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale and cognition factor scores.

47 sociated with severe burnout on at least one subscale and higher burnout scores on each subscale and

48 e subscale and higher burnout scores on each subscale and the total inventory.

49 ronic pain syndrome (n = 24, 38%) had higher subscale and total (34.1 vs 14.4, P = .001) symptom scor

50 of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue subscale and Visual Analog Scales (VASs; Fatigue and Mus

51 tive correlation between 40 Hz ITC and PANSS subscales and total scores under the influence of Delta(

52 perienced around time of assessment ('State' subscale) and longitudinally ('Trait' subscale).

53 R 1.74 [95% CI 1.3-2.4], p < 0.001, Planning subscales) and creche attendance (aOR 1.96 [95% CI 1.1-3

54 2.7 to -5.5; P=0.002) lower for the language subscale, and 11.5 points (95% CI, -21.6 to -1.3; P=0.03

55 on" subscale, 44% on the "depersonalization" subscale, and 26% on the "achievement" subscale.

56 x TOI, items from the FACT-GOG-Neurotoxicity subscale, and a worst pain item from the Brief Pain Inve

57 re-Appearance Scales Body Areas Satisfaction subscale, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depre

58 ificant increase in apathy on the Initiation subscale, and were significantly less apathetic on the E

59 Global Impressions severity and improvement subscales, and patient-reported measures of depression a

60 ummary index, and activities of daily living subscale; and version 2 of the 12-item Short Form Health

61 reastfed for 2-5 mo versus </=1 mo (Learning subscale aOR 2.07 [95% CI 1.0-4.3], p = 0.05).

62 ly associated with the relationship problems subscale at 3 y [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.11; 95% c

63 condary outcomes included the CPG disability subscale at 6 mo and the following measured at 6 and 12

64 cutoff on the FCR Inventory (FCRI) severity subscale at screening.

65 in favor of the NRCA cohort on several KCCQ subscales at 1 month.

66 positively associated with emotional symptom subscales at both 3 and 5 y.

67 ificant differences in the following OHIP-14 subscales before and after treatment: physical pain (P =

68 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (beta = 0.0017, P = 0.01).

69 on portions of the FACT-C (colorectal cancer subscale: beta = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.26, 1.82) and the SF-12

70 essed by the Short Form-36 physical function subscale); both were self-rated by patients at 12 weeks

71 and the Clinical Global Impressions severity subscale (CGI-S), respectively, analyzed using a mixed-e

72 r Rehabilitation Evaluation System sexuality subscales, changes in vaginal atrophy using a validated

73 easured by the Checklist Individual Strength subscale (CIS-fatigue) at 4 weeks.

74 Effects on the MATRICS, other PANSS subscales, Clinical Global Impression, and Global Assess

75 (FKSI) -15 and FKSI-Disease Related Symptoms subscale compared with IFN/bevacizumab (indicating impro

76 ( P = .018), and from T0 to T1 on three FCRI subscales (coping, psychological distress, and triggers)

77 (6,150)=58.24, p=<.001), for the end of life subscale (country: F(2, 154)=28.23, p<.001; unit: F(6,15

78 0)=25.25, p=<.001), the family communication subscale (country: F(2,154)=15.04, p=<.001; unit: F(6,15

79 Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, covering pain, symptoms, activities of daily

80 ch's Alpha between .77 and .92), and for all subscales (Cronbach's Alpha between .79 and .91).

81 26; P = .026), the SF-MPQ-2 neuropathic pain subscale (d = 0.24; P = .036), and SF-MPQ-2 total scores

82 0.61; P = .002), the Present Pain Intensity subscale (d = 0.26; P = .026), the SF-MPQ-2 neuropathic

83 survey and its physical and mental component subscales, days unable to participate in social life, da

84 the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale declined 47.7% in parent training (from 23.7 to

85 5% CI: -4.4, -0.1, P = .04) and the vitality subscale decreased by 3.5 points (95% CI: -5.6, -1.4, P

86 ypically, when controlling for other anxiety subscales, depression symptoms were only associated with

87 Each item in the LLQ is designated to 1 of 6 subscales describing functional problems in low luminanc

88 CT-COG] perceived cognitive impairment [PCI] subscale): difference between groups after intervention

89 HD reported reduced scores on all NEI-VFQ-25 subscales (each P < 0.001) with the exception of color v

90 actor influencing depression and all anxiety subscales emerged, alongside a small significant genetic

91 ventory, a validated tool comprised of three subscales-emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a

92 le 4 in the Global Health and Motor Function subscales (EORTC QLQ-C30/BN20) as well as in overall sym

93 Cronbach's alpha >0.83 for all subscales established strong internal consistency, which

94 The EFA supported 6 subscales (eye pain intensity at 24 hours and 2 weeks, n

95 : F(6,150)=27.38, p=<.001), the family needs subscale (F(2,154)=22.33, p=<.001; unit: F(6,150)=42.45,

96 , p=<.001) but only for units on the process subscale (F(6,150)=8.98, p=<.001.

97 essed with the Checklist Individual Strength subscale Fatigue Severity.

98 us/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale and seven subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, physical

99 SF-36 subscales favored the LR group: physical function (P < 0

100 was a significant difference in all FACT-COG subscales, favoring the intervention.

101 the Sickness Insight in Coping Questionnaire-subscales (fighting spirit, toughness, redefinition, pos

102 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with a subscale for anxiety, >/= 8), and 254 (45%) symptoms of

103 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with a subscale for depression, >/= 8).

104 a subscale for symptoms of depression and a subscale for symptoms of anxiety, and the Impact of Even

105 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with a subscale for symptoms of depression and a subscale for s

106 nd the Profile of Mood States-Brief, Fatigue subscale for the short measure; and constructed two sing

107 pleted serial dry eye surveys using the same subscales (frequency, severity, bothersome) as the valid

108 d placebo groups in improvement on the Maier subscale from baseline to 12 weeks (treatment effect, 1.

109 factor analysis was applied to 49 phenotypic subscales from 10 measures.

110 f Chronic Illness Care (PACIC), and selected subscales from a cancer adaptation of the Picker Institu

111 ce between groups for the other prespecified subscales from ASPIRE.

112 culties on the FACT-Cog total score and four subscales from prechemotherapy to postchemotherapy compa

113 iveness (FR) and satiety responsiveness (SR) subscales from the Baby Eating Behaviour Questionnaire.

114 eem, Family functioning, and Social networks subscales from the KINDLR (Questionnaire for Measuring H

115 reviously published method of z-transforming subscales from the Memory Functioning Questionnaire, the

116 low-up: Peer problems and Emotional problems subscales from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionna

117 Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, global assessment and behavioural disturbance

118 ital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale, >/= 8) across all studies, using all instrumen

119 Resulting subscales had appropriate targeting.

120 Overall, the subscales had high sensitivity (>/=0.811) but a wide ran

121 t Practice and Support subscale, an NP-PCOCQ subscale, had a significant positive effect on NP role (

122 positive symptom and general psychopathology subscales, HAM-A, and HAM-D than for placebo.

123 The overall scale and subscales have good to excellent internal consistency (C

124 tion questionnaire; range, 0-100; includes 5 subscales, higher scores indicating better satisfaction;

125 comes Study Short Form 36 version 1 physical subscales improved significantly more in the invasive ve

126 Severe burnout was seen on at least one subscale in 55.6%-10% showed evidence of severe burnout

127 ly shared between depression and all anxiety subscales in agreement with DSM-5 conceptualization.

128 r = 0.14-0.16, respectively) and all anxiety subscales in young adulthood (r = 0.06-0.19).

129 Scores were computed for each subscale, in addition to a weighted total mean score.

130 Survey subscales included breast satisfaction, as well as psych

131 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale items, 2 Mini-Mental State Examination items, a

132 ovement on the QLQ-OV28 abdominal/GI symptom subscale (items 31-36) at week 8/9.

133 essment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Lung Cancer Subscale (LCS) in the high-dose RT arm at 3 months.

134 he Aberrant Behavior Checklist-hyperactivity subscale (least squares mean from 34.2 to 19.3) compared

135 e SHPC-18, and associations of the 2 symptom subscales (Local Eye and Visual Function) of the SHPC-18

136 e, and activity-related symptom interference subscales (MDASI-BT).

137 and placebo were observed in scores on most subscales measuring quality of life.

138 Score differences for each of these subscales met criteria for MCID.

139 on Function Questionnaire from each of the 4 subscales (mobility, activity limitation, psychosocial i

140 point Neurobehavioral Rating Scale agitation subscale (NBRS-A) and the modified Alzheimer Disease Coo

141 0002) and lower mean scores in the following subscales: near activities (77 vs. 86; P = 0.004), dista

142 Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index subscales (nursing foundations for quality of care, nurs

143 sion." The strongest association was the LLQ subscale of driving with RIT (r =-0.97, P < 0.001).

144 Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Trait Anxiety subscale of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

145 pain syndrome scored higher on every single subscale of the 12-item OSDI symptom questionnaire.

146 lity Index (R = 0.63) and the General Health subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (R = 0.

147 easures were scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (AD

148 he change in scores on the 14-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (AD

149 o week 80 in scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (AD

150 ividual differences on the motor impulsivity subscale of the Barratt Impulsivity Scale.

151 reward responsivity (the reward sensitivity subscale of the Behavioral Activation Scale) and resting

152 n in symptoms based on the psychotic symptom subscale of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, a Clinic

153 sed the presence of fatigue with the fatigue subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength questionna

154 uch or very much improved on the Improvement subscale of the Clinical Global Impression Scale.

155 ef was measured with three scales: the grief subscale of the Core Bereavement Items to assess normati

156 C QLQ-C30), EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), and Melanoma Subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-

157 mptoms were measured using the Psychological subscale of the Malaise Inventory; frequency of physical

158 = 10-point decrease in the physical function subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36-item ques

159 nsitivity (correlation r = -0.6 for the work subscale of the NoiseQ questionnaire, P < 0.05), experie

160 out pain was assessed through the rumination subscale of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

161 Using data from the borderline subscale of the Personality Assessment Inventory Borderl

162 nd had scores of at least 20 on the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PA

163 l function measured by the physical function subscale of the SF-36.

164 using a screening instrument (hyperactivity subscale of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire)

165 s were elevated in the synaesthetes, and one subscale of this measure (attention to detail) placed sy

166 Separate analyses of each of the component subscales of job control-decision authority and skill di

167 on-Making Dominance and Relationship Control subscales of SRPS were associated with depression sympto

168 Coping subscales of the BRIEF COPE, Illness Cognition Questionn

169 of fruit and vegetables and noncore foods by subscales of the Children's Dietary Questionnaire.

170 Distress/Depression and Anhedonic Depression subscales of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire

171 These trends also were found in relevant subscales of the NEI VFQ-25.

172 ancer module and chemotherapy and neuropathy subscales of the ovarian cancer module at baseline, afte

173 tability items compared with the other three subscales of the PAI-BOR (42.7% vs non-significant estim

174 s in genetic variance components in the four subscales of the PAI-BOR.

175 eneral (FACT-G) Quality of Life scale, three subscales of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness C

176 QOL was assessed using the 4 subscales of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the

177 re scores on externalising and internalising subscales of the SACAS.

178 We prospectively measured changes in 3 subscales of the SF-36v2 generic health questionnaire (r

179 Improvements in subscales of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, the A

180 Multivariable analysis for each of the LLQ subscale outcomes, adjusted for age, included RIT, with

181 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (P < 0.001) scores at clinical follow-up.

182 Nurses' ratings of the hospital-specific subscale (P = 0.002) and surgeons' ratings of the operat

183 eons' ratings of the operating room-specific subscale (P = 0.045) were also associated with rates of

184 ve NEI-VFQ scores for nearly all traditional subscales (P < 0.001), visual function subscale (-3.85 v

185 hs on the Accessing Information and Mobility subscales (P = 0.007 and P = 0.050, respectively).

186 cessing Information and Emotional Well-being subscales (P = 0.009 and P = 0.008, respectively).

187 Questionnaire social integration and support subscale), pain-related self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficac

188 son's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor subscale (part 3) in the practically defined off-medicat

189 y living, money matters, and self and others subscales, plus five single items.

190 item Profile of Mood States-Brief depression subscale (POMS-B depression subscale; short measure); a

191 ital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale prevalence (95% CI) of depressive symptoms at a

192 For the parent questionnaire, 3 subscales (psychosocial, function, and surgery) were evi

193 ed in a questionnaire with three domains (or subscales): QoL for Health & Lifestyle, QoL for Work, an

194 Q and Esterman score were stronger in 7 of 9 subscales (r = -0.14 to -0.25; P < 0.05 for all) than co

195 measured by the clinical scale (UHDRS Motor subscale; R = 0.903; P < .001), the molecular marker (BO

196 index collected every 3 months (Likert pain subscale range, 0 [no pain] to 20 [extreme pain]; minima

197 the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale (range, 0-45) and the Home Situations Questionn

198 Possible scores for each subscale ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most diff

199 One patient safety subscale, Recognising and responding to remove immediate

200 tems to form a measure comprising 2 distinct subscales reflecting "personal and social" and "physical

201 d 0.89 for the Local Eye and Visual Function subscales, respectively, and remained stable over time.

202 points; P = .02) and Anger/Irritability DRSP subscale score (1.22 [95% CI, 1.05-1.41] points; P < .01

203 ept p=0.006 at week 32), and FACT-M Melanoma Subscale score (3.62, 2.93, 2.45, 3.39, 2.85, 3.00, and

204 re) and Clinical Global Impressions severity subscale score (CGI-S; key secondary outcome measure) we

205 in 36-Item Short Form- physical functioning subscale score (SF-36), and the change in the Berg Balan

206 rrelation with the SCSQ theory of mind (ToM) subscale score even after controlling for working memory

207 n's Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) total Motor subscale score of less than 50.

208 fects of time were observed in the total and subscale score of QOL (Quality of Life) and the total sc

209 from baseline in the visual-related function subscale score of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (VR-O

210 Subscale score on the Indian Vision Function Questionnai

211 algorithms, correlations with AS-20 function subscale score ranged from -0.64 (best correlated) to -0

212 to reflect whether or not the QualCare Scale subscale score should indicate reportable elder abuse an

213 , whereas the externally orientated thinking subscale score was similar across the three groups.

214 ment from baseline in FACT-An score, anaemia subscale score, and the EQ-5D-5L were reported at all po

215 and physical functioning with short form-36 subscale score, assessed 1 year after randomisation.

216 of the follow-up periods in the noncore food subscale score.

217 aring each algorithm with the AS-20 function subscale score.

218 was that the staffing and resource adequacy subscale scored the lowest compared with all other Pract

219 to T1 on FCRI total ( P < .001) and severity subscale scores ( P = .001), which were maintained at T2

220 eatment options increased perception of care subscale scores (beta = 1.24, P = 0.001), whereas depres

221 Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores (beta = 2.30, P < .001); and faster whit

222 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores (beta [SE], 0.405 [0.190]; P = .03).

223 nce, adverse effects, and affective reaction subscale scores (beta range 1.06-1.55, all P < 0.05).

224 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale scores (longitudinally).

225 41 and r = -0.59, respectively) and with all subscale scores (P < .01).

226 WOMAC pain subscale scores (P = 0.126), physical performance, and d

227 rking Memory, Plan/Organize and Task Monitor subscale scores (p<.05), with decreases in scores signif

228 d 6-month follow-up NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores and the proportion of patients with a cl

229 ticipants' baseline NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores are significantly lower compared with 3

230 zheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale scores as a measure of cognitive dysfunction (A

231 .03, 1.20] and the hyperactivity-inattention subscale scores at 5 y (IRR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.14).

232 iated with significant anxiety or depression subscale scores but not with changes in posttraumatic st

233 The majority of study participants had subscale scores consistent with excellent function.

234 e group, the mean SF-36 physical functioning subscale scores decreased from 47.5 (95% CI, 44.3-50.8)

235 tive Appraisals About Genetic Testing stress subscale scores in the IG than UCG (P = .02), with signi

236 lated with baseline NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores of general vision, near activities, role

237 composite scale; and WOMAC function and pain subscale scores respectively.

238 Good reproducibility of MacCAT-CR total and subscale scores was observed (intraclass correlation coe

239 WOMAC function subscale scores were 3.3 points lower in the interventio

240 Subscale scores were compared with those of patients wit

241 e Nursing Work Index mean composite and four subscale scores were computed at the unit level.

242 FACT-C total and subscale scores were not statistically different by surg

243 (p = .090), and Emotional Control (p = .219) subscale scores were not statistically significant.

244 es in NEI VFQ-25 composite score and various subscale scores were observed in ocriplasmin-treated pat

245 Fruit and vegetable subscale scores were significantly higher, indicating gr

246 Anxiety and depression subscale scores were significantly lower in the interven

247 George Respiratory Questionnaire total and subscale scores) were dependent variables.

248 d linear trends of MSAS, PedsQL4.0 total and subscale scores, and Sickness scores during 20 weeks of

249 ociations between biological measures and IQ subscale scores, followed by multivariable regression mo

250 tal score from baseline) and change in PANSS subscale scores, mood, cognition, reproductive hormone l

251 ondary outcomes were WOMAC function and pain subscale scores, physical performance (Short Physical Pe

252 were associated with lower Full Scale IQ and subscale scores, with significant negative associations

253 Improvements were also noted in subscale scores, with the following respective mean chan

254 y demographic and psychosocial predictors of subscale scores.

255 ic color fundus photographs), and NEI-VFQ-25 subscale scores.

256 y of life as measured on SF-36 questionnaire subscale scores.

257 h significant improvement in PANSS total and subscale scores.

258 sures were baseline NEI VFQ-25 composite and subscale scores.

259 producing visual function and socioemotional subscale scores.

260 e 2 groups in their KCCQ overall summary and subscale scores.

261 rd of Severity of Problems (DRSP) (total and subscale scores; higher scores indicate most severe prob

262 and Depression Scale anxiety and depression subscales (scores >/= 8 indicating substantial symptoms)

263 All SF-36 subscale-scores were equal to or better than the Swedish

264 Q scores were calculated using a traditional subscale scoring algorithm and a Rasch-refined approach

265 t 12 mo (Chronic Pain Grade [CPG] disability subscale); secondary outcomes included the CPG disabilit

266 Brief depression subscale (POMS-B depression subscale; short measure); a single-item Likert measure;

267 5, revealed the "physical and environmental" subscale showed concurrent validity (0.88), whereas the

268 The short POMS-B depression subscale shows an acceptable balance between practical c

269 Scores on each subscale significantly correlated with the NEI-VFQ25 tot

270 ereas scores on the LLQ composite and 5 of 6 subscales significantly decreased (corresponding to less

271 Person-Environment Apathy Rating-Environment subscale (stimulation clarity, stimulation strength, sti

272 e same or worse on nearly all vision-related subscales than did patients with diabetic retinopathy, a

273 r VA (r = -0.07 to -0.21) were weaker in all subscales than those with better-eye, average-eye, and b

274 sed on eudaimonic aspects of well-being with subscales that address not only physical functioning but

275 ire 2 (SF-MPQ-2), the Present Pain Intensity subscale (the McGill Pain Questionnaire), and perceived

276 onnaire), pain intensity (CPG pain intensity subscale), the census global health question (2011 censu

277 1.06-5.13); with a one unit increase on this subscale, the incidence of the NPs serving as primary ca

278 econdary efficacy measures included the CAPS subscales, the Davidson Trauma Scale, the Positive and N

279 es demonstrated several outcome expectations subscales to be significantly associated with intention

280 ified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale [UPDRS part III]).

281 ); ES = 0.49, p < 0.001) and for the anxiety subscale was -3.01 x 10(-2) (95% CI, -5.09 x 10(-2) to -

282 The model estimate for the depression subscale was -5.36 x 10(-2) (95% CI, -8.27 x 10(-2) to -

283 The POMS-B depression subscale was comparable to the comprehensive CES-D scale

284 ty (0.88), whereas the "personal and social" subscale was demonstrated to have discriminative validit

285 ent in the Profile of Mood States depression subscale was greater at day 1 for the ketamine group com

286 ital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale was used most commonly (58%).

287 and specificity for each of the six QualCare subscales was determined.

288 mponent summary and the physical functioning subscale) was significantly worse at long-term than at m

289 median (interquartile) scores for these QoV subscales were 29 (15-37), 22 (13-27), and 14 (0-29) for

290 However, when all eight individual emotion subscales were combined into an overall ASR performance

291 is demonstrated that lower scores on all LLQ subscales were correlated with prolonged DA testing (lon

292 In childhood, anxiety subscales were influenced by a single genetic factor tha

293 Both DSM-IV ADHD symptom subscales were rated 4 times by participants' mothers.

294 These subscales were reliable (coefficient alpha range, 0.86-0

295 The composite NEI-VFQ-25 scale and its subscales were scored 0 to 100, corresponding to poor to

296 ary endpoint pain (P < 0.462), IPQ and SF-36 subscales were seen.

297 The trait anxiety subscales were thus analyzed.

298 Scores on the NEI VFQ-25 composite and its subscales were unchanged between baseline and 3-year fol

299 ating Scale (HAM-D 17-item version and Maier subscale, which focuses on core depression symptoms and

300 The 2 subscales with the largest differences across the groups