ライフサイエンスコーパス: sunlight exposure

1 were positively correlated to the increased sunlight exposure.

2 relate with underlying iris pigmentation and sunlight exposure.

3 vitamin D supplementation, and insufficient sunlight exposure.

4 urinary tract symptoms, stress, and reduced sunlight exposure.

5 ly addressed by adequate vitamin D intake or sunlight exposure.

6 protective measures of overall reduction of sunlight exposure.

7 cal composition of each DOM source following sunlight exposure.

8 After 5 h of simulated sunlight exposure (5100 J/m(2) UVB and 1.2 x 10(5) J/m(2

9 n the mtDNA ones; increasing temperature and sunlight exposure accelerated significantly the decay of

10 manifested clinically by hypersensitivity to sunlight exposure and an increased predisposition to ski

11 Is) for the associations between measures of sunlight exposure and BCC/SCC, stratified by genus-speci

12 vidence suggests a negative relation between sunlight exposure and breast cancer risk.

13 g transplantation; and, perhaps, by reducing sunlight exposure and by early excision of suspicious dy

14 After a moderate UV dose that approximates sunlight exposure and is lethal to fission yeast checkpo

15 y be directly under the influence of ambient sunlight exposure and may have important implications fo

16 in human skin correlated well with putative sunlight exposure and resembled that observed in ultravi

17 until approximately 30,000 hours of lifetime sunlight exposure and then plateaus.

18 Future studies could determine if additional sunlight exposure and vitamin D supplementation might re

19 ity to the beneficial and harmful effects of sunlight exposure and when determining optimal photother

20 viewed to determine smoking and alcohol use, sunlight exposure, and diet; underwent fundus photograph

21 steroid use, smoking status, alcohol status, sunlight exposure, and history of hypertension and diabe

22 nd severity decrease sharply with increasing sunlight exposure, and sunlight supports vitamin D(3) sy

23 harm and long-term health risks of excessive sunlight exposure are affecting the lives of nearly all

24 unavoidable in living creatures, because of sunlight exposure as well as environmental chemicals pre

25 the peer-reviewed literature in relation to sunlight exposure assessment and the validity of using s

26 following general recommendations on summer sunlight exposure at northerly latitudes, and increased

27 2) Adequate sunlight exposure cannot be determined exactly for every

28 ce and support the hypothesis that extensive sunlight exposure contributes to the induction of lympho

29 ulation from a lifetime of repeated low-dose sunlight exposure could cause premature skin ageing (pho

30 Targeted guidance on sunlight exposure could usefully enhance vitamin D statu

31 rrelation of Lisch nodule burden to lifetime sunlight exposure "dose" or NF1 neurocutaneous severity.

32 Among these, sunlight exposure emerges as being the most likely candi

33 etiology is supported by ecologic studies of sunlight exposure, experimental mechanism studies, and s

34 d in non-carbonated waters, we conclude that sunlight exposure has no effect.

35 Here we show how and why sunlight exposure impacts microbial respiration of DOC d

36 of mtDNA damage as a biomarker of cumulative sunlight exposure in human skin is a relatively new fiel

37 acetaldehyde and Sb migration increased with sunlight exposure in ultrapure water.

38 efficacy of a dose range of simulated summer sunlight exposures in raising vitamin D status in UK adu

39 his study demonstrates that, under simulated sunlight exposure, ionic Ag is photoreduced in river wat

40 Sunlight exposure is a major risk factor for melanoma.

41 Sunlight exposure is strongly implicated in the etiology

42 plemental intakes of vitamin D and long-term sunlight exposure may be the most logistically feasible

43 of seasonality suggests that reduced winter sunlight exposure may not be a strong contributor to tub

44 These studies suggest that UVR (sunlight exposure) may be an effective means of suppress

45 The influence of sunlight exposure of grape clusters on juice and wine co

46 The effect of sunlight exposure on chemical migration into PET-bottled

47 The generalized effect of sunlight exposure on subsequent microbial activity, medi

48 e to inadequate vitamin D supply either from sunlight exposure or diet is the main cause.

49 Sunburn due to cutaneous sensitivity to sunlight exposure (P = .006) and poor tanning ability (P

50 Although there is growing agreement that sunlight exposure, particularly the ultraviolet waveleng

51 Sunlight exposure produces a variety of adverse cutaneou

52 In summary, sunlight exposure questionnaires currently provide impre

53 ported dietary and supplemental intakes, and sunlight exposure questionnaires or diaries.

54 xposure assessment and the validity of using sunlight exposure questionnaires to quantify vitamin D s

55 comparable to a quarter of the median summer sunlight exposure received locally.

56 This study supports the hypothesis that sunlight exposure reduces risk of advanced breast cancer

57 aware about its aggravation with smoking and sunlight exposure, respectively.

58 dicate that GO phototransforms rapidly under sunlight exposure, resulting in chemically reduced and p

59 such as the diurnal cycles of light and day, sunlight exposure, seasons, and geographic characteristi

60 ; directly associated with time outdoors and sunlight exposure), serum vitamin D concentrations, and

61 in natural biofilm samples decreased during sunlight exposure similar to well-defined bacterial phos

62 3.5 degrees N) received a simulated summer's sunlight exposures, specifically 1.3 standard erythemal

63 us sites, including those receiving sporadic sunlight exposure, suggesting that these cells may play

64 MS prevalence decreases with increasing sunlight exposure, supporting our hypothesis that the su

65 Much uncertainty remains about the type of sunlight exposure that most increases risk of cutaneous

66 resulting device, after 15 min of artificial sunlight exposure, the change in color of the patch was

67 tions were explained by vitamin D intake and sunlight exposure, the former being more important in wo

68 Recommendations on limitation of summer sunlight exposure to prevent skin cancer may conflict wi

69 ve, nonintrusive, and economical measures of sunlight exposure to quantify personal vitamin D status.

70 attained after a summer's short (13 minutes) sunlight exposures to 35% skin surface area; these findi

71 g, oral intake of vitamin D and estimates of sunlight exposure), with and without consideration of ot