ライフサイエンスコーパス: sunscreen

1 he most (86.4% of all visits associated with sunscreen).

2 protected by either a physical barrier or a sunscreen.

3 inoids, which have significant toxicity, and sunscreen.

4 ion against cumulative erythema than the UVB sunscreen.

5 likely to be biosynthetic precursors of the sunscreen.

6 s soy isoflavones, and even moisturizers and sunscreen.

7 ildren, especially the use of broad-spectrum sunscreen.

8 inoids, which have significant toxicity, and sunscreen.

9 (UV) radiation, including the proper use of sunscreens.

10 ly lower than that achieved by using topical sunscreens.

11 me, air fresheners, and dryer sheets) and in sunscreens.

12 posure is the biosynthesis of small-molecule sunscreens.

13 elanoma and use of the newer formulations of sunscreens.

14 ting step in the synthesis of sinapate ester sunscreens.

15 found in nature and those used in commercial sunscreens.

16 otective clothing and eyeware in addition to sunscreens.

17 cation of an immune protection factor to all sunscreens.

18 pectrum, SPF >/=30, and water resistant) for sunscreens.

19 ) is one of the UV filters commonly found in sunscreens.

20 ation and using photoprotective clothing and sunscreens.

21 sed by younger children are moisturizers and sunscreens.

22 such as sediment pore water, wastewater, and sunscreens.

23 rds for broad-spectrum coverage to be met by sunscreens.

24 n and older individuals reported less use of sunscreen (32.7% vs 35.5%; F = 5.36; P = .02) and hats (

25 thema dose, on gluteal skin, with or without sunscreen, 48 h prior to sensitization with dinitrochlor

26 otection practices, including regular use of sunscreen (53.3%, 45.1%, and 38.1%, respectively) and we

27 y assist in explaining discrepancies between sunscreens' abilities to protect against erythema and ph

28 atural product scytonemin (1) functions as a sunscreen, absorbing harmful UV-A radiation.

29 study reveals why human NAT1 acetylates the sunscreen additive p-aminobenzoic acid and tobacco smoke

30 Following sunscreen administration, mice received a single psorale

31 e properties of T-Lite SF, a TiO2-NC used as sunscreen, after weathering in water and under light.

32 Benzophenone-3 (BP-3) is a sunscreen agent used in a variety of personal care produ

33 hese compounds, which are used in commercial sunscreen agents due to a high absorption in the ultravi

34 e first study to investigate the presence of sunscreen agents in tissue liver of Franciscana dolphin

35 Modulators of the UV-tanning pathway include sunscreen agents, melanocortin 1 receptor activators, ad

36 Neither umbrella nor sunscreen alone completely prevented sunburn.

37 scytonemin is the most common and widespread sunscreen among cyanobacteria.

38 MAAs are widely used as sunscreens, among other uses, but sea hares modify their

39 sunscreen and placebo, discretionary use of sunscreen and 30 mg of beta-carotene, and discretionary

40 t into 4 groups: daily use of broad-spectrum sunscreen and 30 mg of beta-carotene, daily use of sunsc

41 ering yeast to efficiently produce a natural sunscreen and antioxidant presents an avenue for its lar

42 microtopography between 1992 and 1996 in the sunscreen and beta-carotene groups compared with control

43 of sunburn) and alerts (to apply or reapply sunscreen and get out of the sun), hourly UV Index, and

44 ncluding dimethicone, a common ingredient in sunscreen and other cosmetics.

45 t (UV) radiation filters, given their use in sunscreen and personal-care products and their reported

46 een and 30 mg of beta-carotene, daily use of sunscreen and placebo, discretionary use of sunscreen an

47 g of beta-carotene, and discretionary use of sunscreen and placebo.

48 ol-containing emollient or patch, as well as sunscreen and skin-care products for prevention of skin

49 er butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane, the SPF 15 sunscreen and the UVA filter together, and the lotion ve

50 rn) and alerted users to apply or to reapply sunscreen and to get out of the sun.

51 , the UVA filter, and the combination SPF 15 sunscreen and UVA filter, resulting in increasing degree

52 g paid to prevention through the use of both sunscreens and after sun treatments, many of which conta

53 amin E is included as an antioxidant in many sunscreens and lotions currently on the market.

54 e Sulisobenzone (BP-4) is widely employed in sunscreens and other personal care products.

55 t users of seawater swimming pools may apply sunscreens and other personal-care products containing o

56 Organic ultraviolet (UV) filters are used in sunscreens and other personal-care products to protect a

57 tion of ultraviolet-induced p53 mutations by sunscreens and protection against skin cancer using an e

58 nly used in other consumer products, such as sunscreens and soaps.

59 e review the interplay between UV radiation, sunscreens and the skin, highlighting current controvers

60 lf century, initially as a putative "natural sunscreen" and later as a mediator of photoimmunosuppres

61 automotive lubricants, clothing, deodorants, sunscreens, and cosmetics and can potentially accumulate

62 n consumer products, for example, cosmetics, sunscreens, and electrical devices, has increased tremen

63 ated pigmentary disorders, the proper use of sunscreens, and the treatment of depigmented lesions.

64 cosmetics, personal care products, cleaners, sunscreens, and vinyl products.

65 Although sunscreen application is the most common modality for su

66 oidance, regular cover-up with clothing, and sunscreen application.

67 indoors were more likely to rarely/never use sunscreen (aPR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.62), protective clo

68 inoins, hydroxy acids, bleaching agents, and sunscreens are discussed herein.

69 Sunscreens are employed to mitigate the adverse effects

70 against immunosuppression may be improved if sunscreens are formulated to offer equivalent protection

71 Sunscreens are not quite as effective as physical barrie

72 r is ultraviolet radiation from the sun, but sunscreens are often used in a suboptimal manner, compro

73 Sunscreens are widely advocated to protect against skin

74 her genistein nor n-acetyl cysteine acted as sunscreens as they had no effect on ultraviolet-induced

75 UV filter, which is used in the majority of sunscreens as well as other personal care products (PCP)

76 RA did not function as a sunscreen, as determined by quantitating the increase in

77 Physicians mentioned sunscreen at approximately 12.83 million visits (0.07%).

78 However, dermatologists reported mentioning sunscreen at only 1.6% of all dermatology visits.

79 the rate at which physicians are mentioning sunscreen at patient visits is quite low, even for patie

80 ng teachers allow time for students to apply sunscreen at school (47.6%; 95% CI, 42.4%-52.9%).

81 ad teachers allow time for students to apply sunscreen at school, and 11.8% of high schools (95% CI,

82 Few schools made sunscreen available for students to use (13.3%; 95% CI,

83 PF is much more reliable with broad-spectrum sunscreens because SPF with primarily UVB sunscreens is

84 sked parents to ensure that students applied sunscreen before school (16.4%; 95% CI, 12.9%-20.6%).

85 Each sunscreen behaved similarly: at recommended application

86 vestigated the genetic basis for mycosporine sunscreen biosynthesis by the cyanobacterium Nostoc punc

87 with self-reported use of liquid soap (TCS), sunscreen (BP-3), lotion (BP-3 and parabens), and cosmet

88 Moreover, use of SPF >/= 15 sunscreen by all women age 40 to 75 years could potentia

89 People may "compensate" for the use of sunscreen by increasing their time in the sun, which can

90 ble fraction) with general use of SPF >/= 15 sunscreens by women age 40 to 75 years was 18% (95% CI,

91 a novel method to establish the efficacy of sunscreens, by measuring ultraviolet-A-induced free-radi

92 Both physical barriers and sunscreens can partially prevent UV-B effects on nevi.

93 nal care products (PCPs) such as lotions and sunscreens can serve as precursors to form additional HB

94 rall "safe sun strategy" in which the use of sunscreens certainly must be accompanied by other protec

95 UV radiation, some cyanobacteria synthesize sunscreen compounds.

96 rsonal care products, toothpastes and select sunscreens contained 1% to >10% titanium by weight.

97 Pretreatment with a photostable UVA/UVB sunscreen containing an antioxidant combination signific

98 filter had no protective effect, whereas, a sunscreen containing both ultraviolet A and ultraviolet

99 skin of our transgenic mice that included: a sunscreen containing octyl methoxycinnamate and benzophe

100 Sunscreens continue to be a major method of photoprotect

101 All sunscreens decreased chloramphenicol acetyl transferase

102 s, and the outgassed vapors from lipstick or sunscreen do not quench polymer fluorescence.

103 e light-induced ROS, suggesting that UVA/UVB sunscreens do not protect the skin from visible light-in

104 lth policy makers facing decisions regarding sunscreen education campaigns and sets the stage for fut

105 at resveratrol-mediated responses may not be sunscreen effects.

106 ential risks; however, optimizing the use of sunscreens, especially among children and adolescents, r

107 ch for evaluating the efficacy of commercial sunscreens even under environmental conditions.

108 ng the summer if they do not diligently wear sunscreens except during beach vacations.

109 These complex natural products may act as sunscreens for the producing organism, thus offering pro

110 d DNA breaks when compared with a commercial sunscreen formulation.

111 for optimal protection against skin damage, sunscreen formulations should filter all UV wavelengths,

112 id the design of new and improved commercial sunscreen formulations.

113 The broad-spectrum sunscreen gave much better protection against cumulative

114 d higher postexposure global scores than the sunscreen group (0.75 vs 0.05; P < .001).

115 es vs 10 of the 40 participants (25%) in the sunscreen group (P < .001).

116 ly sunscreen group than in the discretionary sunscreen group (relative odds, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.

117 The daily sunscreen group showed no detectable increase in skin ag

118 e end of the trial was 24% less in the daily sunscreen group than in the discretionary sunscreen grou

119 ic activation and regression features in the sunscreen group.

120 ncidences in the umbrella group vs 17 in the sunscreen group.

121 reas the low ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 15, which w

122 hat the high ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 50, more th

123 inally developed to protect against sunburn, sunscreen has been assumed to prevent skin cancer.

124 The protective effect of sunscreens has been extensively evaluated in vivo as a m

125 Sunscreens have been shown to give the most effective pr

126 assembly of scytonemin (1), a cyanobacterial sunscreen, have identified beta-ketoacid 2 as an importa

127 Chemicals from sunscreens (i.e., UV filters) accumulate in the sea and

128 th body exposure or the number of days using sunscreen in the second and third years of follow-up.

129 sponse were generated either with or without sunscreen in vivo and protection factors were derived fo

130 sting the immunologic protection afforded by sunscreens in human skin.

131 t melanoma and the possible effectiveness of sunscreens in preventing those effects.

132 e high- with low-sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens in relation to sunbathing habits in a large c

133 There were 6500 products categorized as sunscreens in the Amazon.com, online catalog.

134 titanium dioxide nanoparticles stemming from sunscreens in the suspended matter of the lake using ele

135 protection efficacy conferred by commercial sunscreens, in terms of induction of DNA lesions and cel

136 ver, conflicting reports include claims that sunscreen increases risk for melanoma.

137 The lack of difference between the sunscreens indicates similar action spectra for erythema

138 Sunscreen is an important part of sun protection to prev

139 ing prospect that nature's selection of UV-B sunscreen is based in part on the inherent quantum mecha

140 um sunscreens because SPF with primarily UVB sunscreens is dependent on time of day and latitude.

141 A clearer picture of the impact of sunscreens is emerging from randomized trials that have

142 ine testing of immune protection afforded by sunscreens is not performed by industry.

143 ion, the time of day or year, and the use of sunscreens, is not understood.

144 protection from cumulative sunburn with two sunscreens labeled SPF 6, but with different UVR-absorbi

145 ng/g) were found in skin lotions (including sunscreen lotions), followed by makeup products (284; 22

146 Commonly referred to as "nature's sunscreens," MAAs are usually employed for UV photoprote

147 ultraviolet waveband and whether the use of sunscreens may be useful in preventing melanoma.

148 ng of the photophysics and photochemistry of sunscreen molecules selected by nature could aid the des

149 crop protectant validamycin, and the natural sunscreens mycosporine-like amino acids.

150 alyses, however, are not able to distinguish sunscreen nanoparticles from natural Ti-bearing nanopart

151 ven wild species as a biomonitoring tool for sunscreens occurrence.

152 Because many sunscreens offer protection from ultraviolet (UV) B but

153 Sunscreens partially filter UVB and, therefore, could pa

154 lso known as BP-3 or oxybenzone) is added to sunscreens, plastics, and some coatings to filter UV rad

155 development in all the mice treated with the sunscreens plus 1000 kJ ultraviolet B per m2 was 2% and

156 violet B per m2 was 2% and mice treated with sunscreens plus 1500 kJ ultraviolet B per m2 was 15%.

157 Five test sunscreens plus a vehicle control were tested in a "blin

158 ively, but less than 5% of mice treated with sunscreens plus ultraviolet showed evidence of p53 mutat

159 A better understanding of consumer sunscreen preferences would inform dermatologists in the

160 ed immunoprotection afforded by a commercial sunscreen preparation (labeled sun protection factor 15)

161 Sunscreens prevent sunburn and may also prevent skin can

162 de nanoparticle content in 1 g of commercial sunscreen produces rates of H2O2 in seawater of up to 46

163 AVB), a simple boron complex of a commercial sunscreen product, exhibits morphology-dependent emissio

164 titanium dioxide nanomaterials released from sunscreen products into the Old Danube Lake (Vienna, Aus

165 The top 1 percentile of sunscreen products on Amazon.com as of December 2015 was

166 In this cohort of highly rated sunscreen products, a significant proportion did not adh

167 ic contact reactions to UV filters, personal sunscreen products, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory d

168 The sunscreen protected against both end-points, which suppo

169 consistently demonstrated that all the test sunscreens protected beyond their designated sun protect

170 Both physical barrier- and sunscreen-protected areas showed some degree of these ch

171 lidates public health campaigns that promote sunscreen protection for individuals at risk of melanoma

172 ry methods for investigating the efficacy of sunscreen protection of epidermal immune function use th

173 port the current trend toward broad-spectrum sunscreen protection.

174 ain Outcomes and Measures: Rare/never use of sunscreen, protective clothing, shade; multiple sunburns

175 Rare/never use of sunscreen, protective clothing, shade; multiple sunburns

176 as the most common diagnosis associated with sunscreen recommendation.

177 usion Use of SPF >/= 15 rather than SPF < 15 sunscreens reduces melanoma risk.

178 times the minimal erythema dose, with either sunscreen, resulted in comparable levels of thymine dime

179 ies of a secondary metabolite, the microbial sunscreen scytonemin, produced by a group of late-succes

180 have suggested a lack of correlation between sunscreen sun protection factor and protection of the sk

181 the protection afforded by three high factor sunscreens (sun protection factor 20+) that claim ultrav

182 onmentally relevant light source, we applied sunscreens (sun protection factors 15-22) on to the shav

183 t complied with European recommendations for sunscreen testing.

184 pression was the observation that applying a sunscreen that contained an ultraviolet B only filter ha

185 Like sunscreens that function by light absorption, the bases

186 ow that the metabolites serve as Lysobacter "sunscreens" that are important for the survival of these

187 Dermatologists recorded the mention of sunscreen the most (86.4% of all visits associated with

188 Scytonemin is a heterocyclic indole-alkaloid sunscreen, the synthesis of which is induced upon exposu

189 acetyl transferase activity with the SPF 15 sunscreen, the UVA filter, and the combination SPF 15 su

190 Failure of the sunscreen to afford comparable protection against both e

191 s and that applying sun protection factor 15 sunscreens to mouse skin before each Kodacel-filtered FS

192 Application of SPF-15 sunscreens to mouse skin before each UV irradiation near

193 nce, there is ever growing use of commercial sunscreens to pre-empt overexposure to UVR.

194 ectrum can be used to predict the ability of sunscreens to protect against UVR-induced cis-UCA format

195 t both end-points, which supports the use of sunscreens to reduce immunosuppression but protection ag

196 as a means of covalently binding UVA and UVB sunscreens to the outer layer of skin to provide long-la

197 regarding the efficacy and photostability of sunscreens to UVA.

198 treatment included use of skin moisturizers, sunscreen, topical steroid, and doxycycline.

199 Thus, we exposed sunscreen-treated sites to four times the minimal erythe

200 Vehicles, AAD, and sunscreen type predicted a higher price per ounce.

201 the shade, 41.0% vs 33.7%; P = .03) but less sunscreen use (mean days, 28.6% vs 34.5%; P = .048) than

202 was used to estimate the association between sunscreen use (never, SPF < 15, SPF >/= 15) and melanoma

203 Sunscreen use and dietary antioxidants are advocated as

204 ence does not support an association between sunscreen use and melanoma, systemic toxicity or vitamin

205 relationship between ultraviolet exposure or sunscreen use and skin cancer.

206 ement to provide patient education regarding sunscreen use and sun-protective behaviors, the rate at

207 rpose To assess melanoma risk in relation to sunscreen use and to compare high- with low-sun protecti

208 n the basis of 1 fair-quality trial, regular sunscreen use can prevent squamous cell carcinoma, but i

209 Regular sunscreen use during childhood and adolescence can signi

210 sun sensitivity and childhood exposures, and sunscreen use has been promoted for prevention of skin c

211 Epidemiologic studies of sunscreen use have suffered from important methodologic

212 tors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and more sunscreen use in the week, but not the 6 months, before

213 Sunscreen use is a modifiable behavior that can help red

214 Regular sunscreen use retards skin aging in healthy, middle-aged

215 aluating the cost-effectiveness of promoting sunscreen use to prevent actinic keratoses and nonmelano

216 SPF >/= 15 sunscreen use was associated with significantly decrease

217 lation attributable fraction associated with sunscreen use was estimated.

218 tude, time of day, skin pigmentation, aging, sunscreen use, and glass all influence the cutaneous pro

219 Heavy smoking, sunscreen use, and green eye color were associated with

220 lexity of measuring ultraviolet exposure and sunscreen use, and inadequate adjustment for important c

221 Except for regular sunscreen use, the quest for chemoprevention of NMSC in

222 ontroversies and recommendations surrounding sunscreen use.

223 Acculturation was not associated with sunscreen use.

224 an decrease midday sun exposure and increase sunscreen use.

225 of positive associations linking melanoma to sunscreen use.

226 No association was seen between melanoma and sunscreen use.

227 support an association between melanoma and sunscreen use.

228 These results demonstrate that the sunscreens used in this study not only protect mice agai

229 Results Sunscreen users reported significantly more sunburns and

230 hade and wearing sun-protective clothing and sunscreen) using a 5-point Likert scale, duration of out

231 e (39 [17.0%]), educational aid (20 [8.7%]), sunscreen/UV recommendation (19 [8.3%]), calculator (12

232 Here we show that sunscreen (UVA superior, UVB sun protection factor (SPF)

233 Sunscreen was mentioned most frequently to white patient

234 by eye and objectively, and the SPF of each sunscreen was modeled with changes in solar UVR with tim

235 were determined in vitro and showed that the sunscreen was primarily an ultraviolet B absorber, with

236 uary 1, 1989-December 26, 2010) during which sunscreen was recommended.

237 Mention of sunscreen was reported by physicians at 0.9% of patient

238 let radiation wavelengths transmitted by the sunscreen were determined in vitro and showed that the s

239 Commercially available sunscreens were found to have minimal effects on reducin

240 each umbrella compared with that provided by sunscreen with a high sun protection factor under actual

241 y a beach umbrella, and the other using only sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 100.

242 y a beach umbrella or protection provided by sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 100.

243 The sunscreen with high ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviole

244 immune suppression and that a broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet A filtering capacity res

245 We lack comparative data on sunscreens with comparable sun protection factors (SPFs)

246 utdoor exposures even if they diligently use sunscreens with sun protection factor (SPF) 15.

247 We assessed the ability of two sunscreens, with different spectral profiles, to inhibit

248 entrations for three individuals having used sunscreen within 5 days prior to sample collection.

249 then increased ultraviolet A filtration by a sunscreen would better protect the immune system during