ライフサイエンスコーパス: surface coverage

1 -phase properties (polymerization method and surface coverage).

2 ature (e.g., a tube of diameter 20 nm at 16% surface coverage).

3 NR density being high enough to provide full surface coverage.

4 uman CF sputum, likely due to inadequate PEG surface coverage.

5 ulted in higher relative retention and lower surface coverage.

6 led to lower relative retention and greater surface coverage.

7 ite (HOPG) that vary in step-edge height and surface coverage.

8 the deformation of adsorbed particles at low surface coverage.

9 d become more ordered, on average, at higher surface coverage.

10 ordering of the alkyl tails with increasing surface coverage.

11 not alter the computed threshold of antibody surface coverage.

12 nds once they are bound at their equilibrium surface coverage.

13 of the tether constructs and the particles' surface coverage.

14 t lower particle concentration, and at lower surface coverage.

15 n strongly dependent on the extent of silica surface coverage.

16 riable alkylazide loading representing 2-50% surface coverage.

17 gle or multilayer organization and determine surface coverage.

18 leaders displaying an enhanced capacity for surface coverage.

19 on was determined to be first-order in Ta(V) surface coverage.

20 perature, nanoparticle diameter, and large T surface coverage.

21 obing attachment level or percentage of root surface coverage.

22 peptide and Fn increases with increasing Fn surface coverage.

23 surface coverage to full monolayers at high surface coverage.

24 the conformation of adsorbed Fn depended on surface coverage.

25 In general, alkyl chain order increases with surface coverage.

26 that diminishes to zero at approximately 25% surface coverage.

27 the thicknesses become less with decreasing surface coverage.

28 s when polyelectrolytes adsorb at incomplete surface coverage.

29 t could be followed as a function of the dye surface coverage.

30 rticularly important at high grafted polymer surface coverage.

31 es with grafted polymer molecular weight and surface coverage.

32 face, and thereby, the resulting alkylsilane surface coverage.

33 than the minimum achievable, indicating high surface coverage.

34 were cultured up to 17 days to determine the surface coverage.

35 F) mass transfer model for adsorption at low surface coverage.

36 the stationary phase, all of which depend on surface coverage.

37 Conformational order increases with surface coverage.

38 the contamination zone even at low bacterial surface coverage.

39 (0) and -64 kJ mol(-1) for Au(delta+) at 33% surface coverage.

40 owering of surface tension, even for partial surface coverage.

41 or the calculation of nonspecific adsorption surface coverage.

42 s at an air-water interface as a function of surface coverage.

43 ypertonic) vehicles led to non-uniform, poor surface coverage.

44 ay result in an extreme nonuniformity of the surface coverage.

45 ed liposome deformation at both low and high surface coverages.

46 st-order Langmuir adsorption kinetics at low surface coverages.

47 velop significant yield stress at even lower surface coverages.

48 ion, FTIR, NMR, and quantitative analysis of surface coverages.

49 1 monolayers increase from 10 to 50 s at low surface coverage (1-5 x 10(-11) mol.cm(-2)) to near 200

50 er the surface confinement or the density of surface coverage (50 vs 100%).

51 ltaic applications should provide an optimal surface coverage, a uniform current density into and/or

52 one single 2.5 nm AuNP by fine-tuning of the surface coverage; a ratiometric pH response was then obs

53 or the nature of the electrode, temperature, surface coverage, added buffer base, pH, solvent, and so

54 label, we were able to measure the relative surface coverage after each monomer addition via Rutherf

55 The mean surface coverage after only retrograde 3D endoluminal fl

56 nd self-assembly to pack nanotubes into full surface-coverage aligned arrays.

57 lkyl chain order is shown to be dependent on surface coverage, alkyl chain length, and polymerization

58 XPS showed a clear gradient in surface coverage along the length of the column for the

59 pleted cells, with a 2-fold increase in cell surface coverage and a 3-fold increase in their number o

60 face and PS sputter deposit as a function of surface coverage and Ar(+) ion fluence are addressed.

61 adsorbates exhibit relative disorder at low surface coverage and become more ordered, on average, at

62 e origin of LSPR signals strongly depends on surface coverage and can be specified by simultaneously

63 For systems with surface coverage and concentrations of model mucins mimi

64 ts present rate due to changes in impervious surface coverage and current management practices, many

65 he rate of lithium growth to provide uniform surface coverage and dendrite suppression, respectively,

66 a dependence of SOA numbers on nonanoic acid surface coverage and dissolved organic matter concentrat

67 erformance were assessed through microscopic surface coverage and flux recovery analysis.

68 The studied monolayers were evaluated by DNA surface coverage and further information was obtained by

69 ption isotherms indicate nearly quantitative surface coverage and Kd = 310 nM for the peptide-surface

70 at monodentate complexes are dominant at low surface coverage and pH >/= 6.5 and that bidentate compl

71 .5 and that bidentate complexes form at high surface coverage and pH < 6.

72 alpy for H 2 adsorption over a wide range of surface coverage and quantum effects influence diffusion

73 luorophore-labeled, which may affect the DNA surface coverage and reactivity of the nanoparticle and/

74 ic acid on TiO(2), including measurements of surface coverage and speciation, and its impact on nanop

75 On the other hand, the electroactive surface coverage and stability of microsomal films were

76 approximately 1.5-1.1 eV) demonstrating high surface coverage and superior optoelectronic properties

77 the surface but did not perturb the maximal surface coverage and the adsorption enthalpy.

78 both the diminution in rates with increased surface coverage and the contrasting behavior with the a

79 on of uniform perovskite films with complete surface coverage and the demonstration of efficient, sta

80 Surface coverage and the kinetics of biofilm formation w

81 T electrodes, as a consequence of the sparse surface coverage and the low intrinsic capacitance of th

82 Information about the surface coverage and the nature, if any, of organosiloxa

83 lization, which consequently diminishes cell surface coverage and toxicity of amylin oligomers.

84 sulfide or thioacetate precursors have lower surface coverages and are more defective than SAMs deriv

85 polymeric stationary phases with alkylsilane surface coverages and bonding chemistries typical of act

86 of imaging, we directly measure DNA and drug surface coverages and kinetics simultaneously for multip

87 en-bonded citrate chains, bilayer formation, surface coverage, and chirality.

88 ed both indirectly by changes in the peptide surface coverage, and directly, probably, due to changes

89 s to ultraporous dendritic structures, large surface coverage, and small particle size.

90 ycle, the bead concentration, the particles' surface coverage, and the DNA construct.

91 nificantly with increased biofilm thickness, surface coverage, and total biomass, as well as with a d

92 he quantitation of IR intensities to extract surface coverages, and the use of probe molecules to ide

93 ) alkyl chain order increases with increased surface coverage; and (2) monomeric and polymeric phases

94 at room temperature revealed that as the CO surface coverage approaches 100%, the originally flat te

95 Inferred maximum protein surface coverages ( approximately 0.025 nm(-2)) from mea

96 and lateral mobility of biotin, and the SAv surface coverage are all found to influence the average

97 heory for the description of the equilibrium surface coverage as a function of the bulk (analyte) con

98 the semi-2D perovskites display an ultrahigh surface coverage as a result of the unusual film self-as

99 ent of upd Cu with Pt(IV) yielded incomplete surface coverage, as expected, the use of multiple (up t

100 ments of vibrational spectra at submonolayer surface coverage, as low as a few percent of a monolayer

101 ed to other types of magnetic particle-based surface coverage assays, our strategy was found to offer

102 dy was to assess prospectively the degree of surface coverage at 3-dimensional (3D) endoluminal compu

103 trated proliferation that led to substantial surface coverage at day 17.

104 stals on granular limestone with the maximum surface coverage at lower pH and in the presence of mult

105 The magnetic particle surface coverage at the limit of detection was determine

106 taxane on Au (111) surfaces as a function of surface coverage based on atomistic molecular dynamics (

107 ween 250 and 350 K for the three phases with surface coverages between 3.61 and 4.89 mumol/m(2).

108 and are relatively insensitive to changes in surface coverage, bonding chemistry, and temperature.

109 efficiency of initial adhesion and bacterial surface coverage by >85%.

110 Direct gravimetric analysis shows surface coverage by alpha-quarterthiophene-2-phosphonate

111 uilibrium constant by 5-fold and the maximal surface coverage by nearly 2-fold.

112 number of granules per cell and the granule surface coverage by proteins.

113 ption energies of reactive intermediates and surface coverage by spectator (blocking) species.

114 the source of the identified ROO(*), because surface coverage by surfactant or proteins could inhibit

115 surface, leading to a quantifiable change in surface coverage by the antibody.

116 ng full microkinetic models to determine the surface coverages by adsorbed species and the degrees of

117 the first report of an improved equation for surface coverage calculation using column breakthrough d

118 A set of equations for surface coverage calculation was developed and applied t

119 to nanoparticles, absolute quantification of surface coverage can be inaccurate at times because of l

120 -Planck equations, the SCD and therefore the surface coverage can be noninvasively quantified.

121 H2)3)(CH3NH3)3Pb3I10 compound with excellent surface coverage can be obtained from the antisolvent dr

122 ct of chain length of the alkanethiol on the surface coverage, charge-transfer resistance, and double

123 PtCr displayed higher degrees of endothelial surface coverage compared with PVDF-HFP surfaces.

124 rge transfer coefficient (alpha) of 0.5, and surface coverage concentration (Gamma) of 3.45x10(-)(1)(

125 The high yield and molecular surface coverage confirm the efficacy of Schiff base che

126 d attachment efficiencies using the measured surface coverages corroborate these findings.

127 e underlying catechol content, the final DNA surface coverage could be specified.

128 Surface coverage efficiency was evaluated in vitro by al

129 model incorporates various phenomena such as surface coverage, external and internal sorption, surfac

130 roscopic enhancements in spray retention and surface coverage for natural and synthetic non-wetting s

131 ostructuring in which the CMs provide higher surface coverage for the immobilization of antibodies pr

132 In addition, we estimated the SAM surface coverage fraction from the surface tension measu

133 octadecylsilane stationary phases ranging in surface coverage from 3.09 to 6.45 micromol/m2 are exami

134 octadecylsilane stationary phases ranging in surface coverage from 3.09 to 6.45 micromol/m2.

135 octadecylsilane stationary phases ranging in surface coverage from 3.09 to 6.45 micromol/m2.

136 Octadecylsilane stationary phases ranging in surface coverage from approximately 3.5 to 6.0 micromol/

137 sfer coefficient alpha, and the redox-active surface coverage Gamma*.

138 The nanoparticle surface coverage (Gamma(NP)) and the stability of the ad

139 by cyclic voltammetry (CV) to determine the surface coverage (Gamma) by CoPc.

140 The value of surface coverage (Gamma) was calculated that indicated i

141 thodes, i.e. electrocatalytically active BOD surface coverage (Gamma), heterogeneous electron transfe

142 The high value of surface coverage GOx-GQD|CCE (1.8x10(-9) mol/cm(2)) and

143 Low primer surface coverage, greater particle-primer separation, an

144 HEMA amplification for CT detection based on surface coverage has been obtained that displays a corre

145 the adsorption free energy for extremely low surface coverages (Henry limit) requires the use of a te

146 Mo(110) are presented with respect to metal-surface coverage, heteroatom incorporation, and temperat

147 network) resulted in (i) increased bacterial surface coverage, (ii) effective degradation of matrix-b

148 oad size distribution of the exosomes on the surface coverage, (ii) the fact that their size is compa

149 py and was found to increase with increasing surface coverage in a manner similar to stationary phase

150 r which it decreased rapidly with increasing surface coverage in the AgNC monolayer.

151 onformational order decrease with decreasing surface coverage in these aromatic compounds, which is c

152 nformational order decreases with decreasing surface coverage in these polar solvents, consistent wit

153 sity decreases quadratically with decreasing surface coverage, in HD-SFG, the scaling is linear, and

154 leucine) amino acids varied with changing Fn surface coverage, indicating that the conformation of ad

155 Endothelial cationic ferritin surface coverage, investigated using large-scale digital

156 The results show that surface coverage is a function of pH and decreases with

157 exciting light intensity as the nanoparticle surface coverage is increased.

158 At a protein concentration of ca. 20 nM, the surface coverage is only 3% of that achieved at apparent

159 erved persistence of the dangling OD at full surface coverage is related to hydrophobicity-induced dr

160 Aptness of surface coverage is vital to biosensor studies in the se

161 s and the length of the intermediate chain), surface coverage, laser excitation wavelength.

162 nm emission, whereas a low Au-S CN and a low surface coverage led to weak charge transfer, an achiral

163 n, increasing polymer chain length, at fixed surface coverage, makes the desorption process faster.

164 For homogeneously distributed, high surface coverage materials, these polar solvents induce

165 nal order of homogeneously distributed, high-surface-coverage materials; and basic aromatic compounds

166 However, protein surface coverage measurements show that this strong bind

167 he library were evaluated with regard to the surface coverage, midpeak potential, and voltammetric pe

168 used to examine the effects of temperature, surface coverage, nature of the alkylsilane precursor (o

169 struction of guidelines for molecular weight/surface coverage necessary for kinetic prevention of pro

170 bility, local surface diffusion coefficient, surface coverage/occupancy) that are directly associated

171 ave been fabricated lithographically, with a surface coverage of <1% of the underlying insulating sur

172 compound, on average, from a nominal initial surface coverage of 0.1 g/m(2) per analyte.

173 packing density of the SAM corresponds to a surface coverage of 115 A(2)/molecule (one molecule per

174 isochore giving isosteric enthalpies at zero surface coverage of 12.29 +/- 0.53 and 12.44 +/- 0.50 kJ

175 on that a single monolayer corresponded to a surface coverage of 13 pmol cm(-2).

176 f 13.3 +/- 0.3 mug/cm(2) (corresponding to a surface coverage of 18.5% by the nanoparticles).

177 Desorption experiments show a surface coverage of 2.26 x 10(-10) mol/cm(2).

178 surface concentration was tuned to obtain a surface coverage of 3.1 x 10(12) molecules cm(-2).

179 on transfer rate constant of 6.5 s(-)(1) and surface coverage of 3.1x10(-)(1)(1) mol cm(-)(2).

180 d longer adsorption times, a HEWL multilayer surface coverage of 550 pmol cm(-2) was formed, on the b

181 tron spectroscopy were used to determine the surface coverage of adsorbed Fn from isolated molecules

182 on the highly hydrophilic surface where the surface coverage of adsorbed peptides is negligible or o

183 he polymer first increased until a threshold surface coverage of AgNC was reached, after which it dec

184 link the genesis of Bronsted acidity to the surface coverage of aluminum and silicon on silica and a

185 A surface coverage of antibisphenol A aptamer of 1.84 x 10

186 etection limit is equivalent to a fractional surface coverage of approximately 2%, thus making eLoaD

187 g time, laser intensity, size of Au-NPs, and surface coverage of Au-NPs.

188 The surface coverage of benzenethiol as a function of time w

189 -OEC is progressive and reaches a saturation surface coverage of ca. 70% on highly oriented pyrolytic

190 for the first time on a SAM to calculate the surface coverage of carbon atoms after each stepwise add

191 cacy was evaluated by nonspecific adsorption surface coverage of crude bovine serum proteins.

192 ies, and with substantial improvement on the surface coverage of crystals, this method might be suita

193 e was measured to be 75 mV vs. NHE, (ii) the surface coverage of CtCDH was found to be 0.65 pmol cm(-

194 verse group of polymer coatings, homogeneous surface coverage of different microgeometries featuring

195 al-time PCR-based method for determining the surface coverage of dithiol-capped oligonucleotides boun

196 obtained in a 46% overall yield, have a high surface coverage of DNA (64.8 +/- 6.4 pmol/cm2), and as

197 The surface coverage of DNA molecules can be conveniently co

198 oughout the chemical transformation, and the surface coverage of DNA was quantified.

199 Maximum surface coverage of DNA-mediated assembly was determined

200 The surface coverage of functionalized electrodes was estima

201 We quantitatively determine the surface coverage of hydrogen atoms during nanowire growt

202 Quantifying the surface coverage of immobilized oligonucleotides on meta

203 ows the noninvasive determination of SCD and surface coverage of individual conical nanopores.

204 okinetic model allows for predictions of (i) surface coverage of intermediates, (ii) WGSR apparent ac

205 of the NP structures were controlled by the surface coverage of landed silver ions.

206 has been used to determine the thickness and surface coverage of monolayers of two 14-residue beta-ha

207 The surface coverage of NeutrAvidin is affected by the space

208 give equivalent results for determining the surface coverage of oligonucleotides bound onto 13 or 30

209 The surface coverage of protein G increased with pore size,

210 ms were measured to determine the saturation surface coverage of pyrene relative to C18 chains and to

211 Monolayer immobilization chemistry and surface coverage of reactive ssDNA probes were studied b

212 SWNT suspensions is directly related to the surface coverage of SDS on the SWNT surface that simulta

213 en-fold coordination within a typically high surface coverage of square pyramidal TiO5 units.

214 The control of the surface coverage of ssDNA as well as the achieved speed

215 s particularly striking since the fractional surface coverage of SWNTs is only approximately 1% and S

216 The surface coverage of the FLAG peptide was precisely contr

217 Moreover, the surface coverage of the intermediate enzyme-substrate co

218 dsorption constants increase with increasing surface coverage of the monomeric columns.

219 the CNT surface and suggests nearly complete surface coverage of the nanotubes with DNA.

220 High surface coverage of the nonafluorohexylsilane enhanced t

221 f the probes could be controlled through the surface coverage of the nonfluorescent Raman tags (RTags

222 These changes are assigned to the surface coverage of the NP by the ssDNA aptamers and sub

223 Depending on the surface coverage of the P3HT nanoribbons by AuNRs, these

224 Depending on surface coverage of the Pd catalyst, the reaction is con

225 as successfully corrected for the fractional surface coverage of the pillars and the transmittance of

226 We study the effect of the surface coverage of the stainless steel surface by NPs o

227 a limiting factor, especially since the low surface coverage of the SWNT network results in large fl

228 achment, apoptosis, proliferation, and final surface coverage of the transplanted RPE cells.

229 on quartz substrates and in system II on the surface coverage of the underlying AgNC monolayers.

230 f different capping agents and the extent of surface coverage of these capping agents on the CdSe QD

231 ouble-layer structure induced by a saturated surface coverage of underpotential deposited H (H(upd)).

232 Our results suggest that the increased surface coverage of VR-SIM could also provide added valu

233 dsorption in the CNT/Hb network with average surface coverage of were found to be 0.19 mM and 4.8x10(

234 rate of ~1 Hz with a sensitivity in terms of surface coverage of ~1 ng/cm(2).

235 e and rapid assembly with an effective SWCNT surface coverage of ~99% as characterized by capacitance

236 adsorption isotherms on Au colloid revealing surface coverages of 1.0 x 10(14) molecules cm(-2) for S

237 lms in their carboxylate forms with limiting surface coverages of 8 (+/- 2) x 10(-8) mol/cm2.

238 o effective adlayer thicknesses and absolute surface coverages of adsorbed species is presented.

239 the cytoplasmic surface of myelin at various surface coverages of myelin basic protein (MBP) indicate

240 Low surface coverages of oxygen lead to the highest selectiv

241 The relative surface coverages of the different aptamers were determi

242 phate backbone increases (decreases) the DNA surface coverage on an areal basis at high (low) ionic s

243 V was used for each case to estimate polymer surface coverage on an areal basis using a linear dielec

244 The influence of the surface coverage on the kinetics of metal-catalyzed reac

245 opt helical conformations, exhibited ordered surface coverage on the nanotubes and allowed systematic

246 n be collected for adsorbed species with low surface coverages on microelectrodes with a geometric ar

247 bilayers due to the increment of the enzyme surface coverage onto the channel.

248 ed selectively, either by decreasing the dye surface coverage or by changing the electrolyte environm

249 studying structures of molecules with a low surface coverage or less ordered molecular moieties.

250 eutic applications requires determination of surface coverage (or density) of DNA on nanomaterials.

251 nd increased affinity for the sorbent at low surface coverage; parallel cation exchange and cooperati

252 d to investigate the effects of temperature, surface coverage, polymerization method (surface or solu

253 s of high-density C22 stationary phases with surface coverage ranging from 3.61 to 6.97 micromol/m2 a

254 ity docosylsilane (C22) stationary phases at surface coverages ranging from 3.61 to 6.97 mumol/m(2).

255 nding-site model through the analysis of the surface coverage ratio of the short peptide on the senso

256 In the binding-site models, the surface coverage ratio of the short peptide on the senso

257 on optimizing other experimental conditions (surface coverage ratio, pH, and flow rate), the electroc

258 e success of the modification process with a surface coverage reaching 92% for the antibody layer.

259 balance (QCM) technique, focused on the high surface coverage regime and modeled the adsorbed particl

260 igh Au-S coordination number (CN) and a high surface coverage resulted in strong Au(I) -ligand charge

261 a simple, universal method for forming high surface coverage SAMs on ferromagnetic thin (< or =100 n

262 The results show that high surface coverage SAMs with low surface-oxide content can

263 The effect of antibody surface coverage (sigma(s)) of NC on binding simulations

264 molecular composition of the monolayer and a surface coverage similar to that expected from literatur

265 ale void- or cave-like pockets, high-exposed surface coverage sites, and positive charge streams in s

266 ycrystalline perovskite thin films with full surface coverage, small surface roughness, and grain siz

267 atures for device performance including high surface coverage, small surface roughness, as well as co

268 Thus, HS-ssDNA surface coverage steadily decreased with MCU exposure ti

269 bI3 film with micrometer grain size and high surface coverage that enables photovoltaic devices with

270 Upon increasing the monolayer surface coverage, the dangling OD stretching mode showed

271 angle of the ring decreases with decreasing surface coverage, the tilt angle of the rotaxane has a m

272 ics and direct measurements of the molecular surface coverage, the tip radius, tip-SAM adhesion force

273 ain length but are strongly dependent on the surface coverage; these observations are contrary to wha

274 gs of 0.03-0.7 mmol g(-1) (~2-50% of maximal surface coverage) through a direct synthesis, co-condens

275 stationary phases of systematically varying surface coverage to be prepared from a single reaction m

276 f adsorbed Fn from isolated molecules at low surface coverage to full monolayers at high surface cove

277 Comparison of the Ni surface coverage to the concentration of free (uncomplex

278 ngmuir adsorption model and allowed measured surface coverages to be used for determining Cl- solutio

279 At a low antibody surface coverage, up to 4% of the immobilized antibodies

280 agreement with that derived from 100% lipid surface coverage using conventional SFG.

281 Overall ~55% decrease in relative biofilm surface coverage was achieved for both species.

282 l crosslinker, was used and greater than 90% surface coverage was achieved for protein immobilization

283 Once surface coverage was almost complete, biofilm developmen

284 The surface coverage was found to depend on the length and f

285 at DODA C18 chains were more ordered as DODA surface coverage was increased.

286 The impact of nanoparticle shape and surface coverage was investigated alongside the choice o

287 analysis, optimized by adjusting the aptamer surface coverage, was 67 +/- 1 nA muM(-1) cm(-2), and th

288 1/2 values and their trends as a function of surface coverage were determined to be similar to those

289 redox potential, electron transfer rate, and surface coverage were determined.

290 Furthermore, maximum observed surface coverages were far below those predicted by geom

291 uniform two-dimensional layer with complete surface coverage whereas gel-phase bilayers induce a net

292 ed both the overall attached biomass and the surface coverage, whereas the maximum thickness of the b

293 isosteric enthalpies of adsorption (at small surface coverage), which in turn depend on the identity

294 By modifying the nanoparticle surface coverage, which can be controlled experimentally

295 and surrounding fluid in the limit of a low surface coverage, which can be used to extract shape inf

296 se of the relative SERS intensity versus the surface coverage, which has not been achieved by convent

297 nent SAM shows remarkable differences in the surface coverage, which strongly depends on the surface

298 optimization, we proved that tuning the NSs surface coverage with DNA linked to nanoparticles is cru

299 The EC-STM imaging revealed uniform surface coverage with sufficient stability to undergo re

300 monomeric and polymeric phases with similar surface coverages yield similar alkyl chain order (altho