ライフサイエンスコーパス: surface potential

1 vapor-liquid interface is influenced by the surface potential.

2 evealed an underlying dependence on membrane surface potential.

3 embrane, reducing its negative electrostatic surface potential.

4 n, which has the most physiological membrane surface potential.

5 ntal band structure of atoms in a corrugated surface potential.

6 ifted activation via modification of a local surface potential.

7 ot directly contribute to the relevant local surface potential.

8 ne side by an area of strong electronegative surface potential.

9 not hH1, directly contributes to a negative surface potential.

10 d DNAs in solution was modified to include a surface potential.

11 F the Faraday constant, and phi the membrane surface potential.

12 tinct maxima with respect to pH and membrane surface potential.

13 iation of lipid headgroups and the monolayer surface potential.

14 oire-structure with locally strongly varying surface potential.

15 Langmuir adsorption type model and creates a surface potential.

16 lar surface and the calculated electrostatic surface potential.

17 f movement is governed by cell stiffness and surface potentials.

18 hod which allows direct sampling of cortical surface potentials.

19 valent but have very different electrostatic surface potentials.

20 l electrophysiological information from body surface potentials.

21 onstruct epicardial EP information from body surface potentials.

22 acing reveals the presence of dual-wavefront surface potentials.

23 ward models were compared with measured body surface potentials.

24 dial potentials are computed from known body surface potentials.

25 utation of epicardial electrograms from body surface potentials.

26 Body surface potentials (384 electrodes) were used to compute

27 is a tool for measuring local variations in surface potential across a substrate of interest.

28 head groups significantly contribute to the surface potential across the interface.

29 that of CLaNP-5 (+3), reducing the change in surface potential after probe attachment.

30 optimized geometries and ionic electrostatic surface potential analysis, the small but measurable mob

31 ystems, in turn, can be differentiated using surface potential analysis.

32 tified a similar helical motif in GC through surface potential analysis.

33 um channel modified its gating by a combined surface potential and a cooperative subunit interaction

34 These reactions reduced the surface potential and colloidal stability of COOH-MWCNTs

35 work, we demonstrated a relationship between surface potential and EDLC by chemically modifying surfa

36 ols Ca (2+) binding by lowering the electric surface potential and elevating cation concentration at

37 aracterizations including hydrodynamic size, surface potential and entrapment efficacies of CyLiPns w

38 Conversely, Ca(2+) raises surface potential and increases the size and aggregation

39 - and helix F that has a basic electrostatic surface potential and is densely populated with lysines

40 We investigate the local surface potential and Raman characteristics of as-grown

41 Electrostatic surface potential and residue conservation analyses in c

42 pectra provide a direct measure of the local surface potentials and a basis for calculating local ove

43 Furthermore, complementary electrostatic surface potentials and inherent helical content of each

44 This effect is linearly correlated with the surface potentials and wetting properties of these SAMs.

45 Surface properties including wettability, surface potential, and surface charge density were compa

46 s: the transmembrane potential, the membrane surface potential, and the membrane dipole potential.

47 the Ca(+2)-binding pocket, the electrostatic surface potential, and the stoichiometry of bound divale

48 s the THz generation directly relates to the surface potential arising from the surface states, we ca

49 We observed plasmoelectric surface potentials as large as 100 millivolts under illu

50 We find that surface potentials as large as 473 mV are induced under

51 A depolarized inner surface potential, as the membrane loses negative charge

52 sampled by CzrA and causes the electrostatic surface potential at the DNA binding interface to become

53 r, these results highlight the extracellular surface potential at the voltage sensor as an important

54 dipole potential, and the difference in the surface potentials at both sides of the membrane.

55 he calculated values for their electrostatic surface potentials at the center of the rings.

56 This approach is quantitative for surface potentials below 25 mV, and does not require pri

57 used, showing that a positive electrostatic surface potential between the active sites of the fusion

58 iscrepancy between experimental and computed surface potentials, both methods demonstrate that the ve

59 n about spatio-temporal dynamics of the body surface potential (BSP) during atrial excitation.

60 DeltaG(obs) also varied linearly with surface potential, but the slope was smaller than the ex

61 nd that the probe only perturbs the membrane surface potential by <2%.

62 idues of the JMD influence the electrostatic surface potential by controlling the position of neighbo

63 teractions, limiting modulation of the local surface potential by the gate electrode and resulting in

64 The electrostatic surface potential calculated from the model is typical f

65 Electrostatic surface potential calculations identify a nearly continu

66 tern of conserved residues and electrostatic surface potential calculations suggest that the OB and/o

67 erfacial reactivity and transport, while the surface potential can be used to determine the "chemical

68 egion was linearly related to changes in the surface potential caused by anion adsorption.

69 at the microscopic level, and heterogeneous surface potential caused by radioactivity is reported.

70 fundamental difference in the electrostatic surface potentials, cavity polarities, and shapes of the

71 The voltage dependence of the extra surface potential change and charge movement were found

72 n of both charge movement and the non-linear surface potential change at voltages above -40 mV, and s

73 action (E-C) coupling altered the non-linear surface potential change in a parallel manner.

74 These results suggest that the non-linear surface potential change is closely associated with move

75 the Ag layer, the magnitude and sign of the surface potential change on the SiNW depends on the flow

76 The non-linear surface potential change remained after the sarcoplasmic

77 ly, the potentiometric dye reports a dynamic surface potential change that occurs on the myoplasmic f

78 e of both charge movement and the non-linear surface potential change.

79 was added to the liposome solution the POPC surface potential changed from 0 mV to +37 mV, and for P

80 As UV irradiation occurs, the positive surface potential changes and shifts the depth of the de

81 n and demonstrate that SEBS has a repeatable surface potential comparable to glass.

82 finity for F-actin, we identified a positive surface potential conserved among headpiece domains that

83 tion because of the unavoidable decay of the surface potential contrast between oppositely polarized

84 be force microscopy, we demonstrate that the surface potential contrast of BiFeO3 films can be recove

85 strength, the internal energy (excluding the surface potential) decreases substantially as the DNA is

86 The relationship between epicardial and body surface potentials defines the forward problem of electr

87 int potential represent the overall/averaged surface potential difference across the nanopore.

88 oximately 8.5 mV hyperpolarization in ocular surface potential difference.

89 n the proposed architecture, the variance of surface-potential difference can be determined by electr

90 we proposed a planar nano-gap structure for surface-potential difference monitoring.

91 provides a complete and detailed map of the surface potential distribution of graphene domains of di

92 e compared the structural rearrangements and surface potential distributions within each protein doma

93 variance between simulated and measured body surface potential distributions.

94 atively explained by the changes in membrane surface potential due to exclusion of kosmotropes from (

95 substrate, we detected negative and positive surface potentials during monochromatic irradiation at w

96 K for the sites that contribute to the local surface potential effect is near pH 7.

97 he pheromones to synthetic vesicles of known surface potential, effective charges and intrinsic parti

98 K) in SVHP, which creates a similar positive surface potential, endowed SVHP with specific affinity f

99 eloped helium spin-echo technique to measure surface potential energy landscapes.

100 Calculating the electrostatic surface potential (ESP) of a biomolecule is critical tow

101 Differences between the body surface potential extrema predicted with homogeneous for

102 A continuous tract of positive surface potential flanking the active site suggests an R

103 The electrostatic surface potential for a calculated model of chicken deox

104 has allowed calculation of the electrostatic surface potential for it and two other comparably modele

105 cally, we observed that a chemically induced surface potential gradient across hematite (alpha-Fe2O3)

106 non-destructive information readout method, surface potential has never been paid enough attention b

107 Indirect determinations of the surface potential have been experimentally attempted man

108 The ITO/SAM/SHSAM surface potential imposed by the dipolar SAMs causes ban

109 Calculations of electrostatic surface potential in the active site further suggest tha

110 y at least partly due to the higher positive surface potential in the DNA-binding region of the A dom

111 ing the presence of a negative electrostatic surface potential in the vicinity of the binding site.

112 These changes alter the electrostatic surface potential in two regions and likely confer speci

113 We measured electrocorticographic cortical surface potentials in eight human subjects during overt

114 lex relationship between epicardial and body-surface potentials in the context of regionally abnormal

115 Electrostatic surface potentials in the vestibule of the nicotinic ace

116 area to determine their contribution to the surface potential indexing maintenance.

117 Hence, surface potential is a good indicator for surface modifi

118 ect transistor (MOSFET) takes place when the surface potential is approximately twice the bulk potent

119 kely due to pi-pi interactions) and that the surface potential is better compensated when counterion

120 The calculated sign of the surface potential is in agreement with that from experim

121 We propose that the surface potential is modulated by direct charge donation

122 nd electrostatic balance, a noncomplementary surface potential is not a barrier to binding.

123 Surface potential is one of the most important propertie

124 anoporous conducting polymer electrode whose surface potential is probed via electrochemical impedanc

125 on of an ultrashort pulse after which the DC surface potential is screened with a second optical pump

126 This suggests that one reason the membrane surface potential is tuned in vivo is to facilitate prot

127 The electrostatic surface potential is variable, so that the surface of P.

128 By spatially resolving this variation in surface potential it is possible to measure the presence

129 based nanoscale imaging to resolve the local surface potential landscapes of Bi2Te3 nanowires (NWs) a

130 We propose that the PS surface potential leads to an accumulation of hydronium

131 he influence of pH, ionic strength, membrane surface potential, lipid saturation, and urea on each.

132 ctopic activation, together with pseudo-body surface potential map ECGs in 2 of them.

133 In comparing the electrostatic surface potential map of SVHP to that of other villin-ty

134 alculation of the inverse solution from body surface potential mapping (sometimes known as ECG imagin

135 Bipolar EGMs and body surface potential mapping do require HDF filtering to de

136 Repolarization was measured by ECG and body surface potential mapping during sinus rhythm, exercise,

137 In body surface potential mapping maps, HDF filtering increased

138 characterization in electrogram (EGM), body surface potential mapping, and electrocardiographic imag

139 METHODS AND EGM, body surface potential mapping, and electrocardiographic imag

140 er mapping and ablation of VT, 120-lead body surface potential mappings were obtained during implanta

141 pig hearts, estimating activation from body surface potential maps during sinus rhythm and localizin

142 rals and QTd in 12-lead ECG and 64-lead body-surface potential maps were evaluated for their ability

143 From 4 other anesthetized pigs, 64-lead body surface potential maps were recorded during sinus rhythm

144 ocardial and epicardial activation from body surface potential maps.

145 in the D-E loop structure and electrostatic surface potentials may be important for determining bind

146 Electrostatic surface potentials measured by EPR of IMTSL-PTE show a r

147 Body surface potential measurements (384 electrodes) were use

148 urements, surface reconstruction studies and surface potential measurements indicates that zwitterion

149 between channels and were consistent with a surface potential mechanism, but those on deactivation p

150 mperature-programmed desorption and scanning surface potential microscopy, supported by first-princip

151 This variation in the substrate surface potential modifies the interface charge doping t

152 n EHD1 EH create a region of strong positive surface potential near the NPF binding pocket.

153 atio) are consistent with the changes in the surface potentials near the junction, and the current-vo

154 sing ab initio molecular dynamics and find a surface potential of -18 mV with a maximum interfacial e

155 ine) that reverse the negative electrostatic surface potential of a bilayer reverse membrane binding

156 s correlates with the negative electrostatic surface potential of a carbonyl/carbamate oxygen atom pr

157 troduce a method for diagnosing the electric surface potential of a semiconductor based on THz surfac

158 The surface potential of all three polymers remained zero up

159 The surface potential of CPe liposomes remains negative acro

160 Comparison between the electrostatic surface potential of CRABP-I and II revealed the presenc

161 ute at least partly to the observed negative surface potential of fullerene aggregates and, combined

162 PR) approach for assessing the electrostatic surface potential of lipid bilayers that is based on a r

163 ned by the planar lipid bilayer method), the surface potential of lipid monolayers (determined by the

164 o 1,000 mV from ion translocation rates, the surface potential of lipid monolayers, and molecular dyn

165 The size, shape, and surface potential of MfpA mimics duplex DNA.

166 s that in the presence of the DNA layer, the surface potential of PCBDR has a greater change in respo

167 1) and E1K (L-FR1) altered the electrostatic surface potential of the antigen binding site, allowing

168 ring plastoquinone and close to the positive surface potential of the complex, can function in cyclic

169 Furthermore, the electrostatic surface potential of the hGX interfacial-binding surface

170 hatidylglycerol ([L-]max) corresponding to a surface potential of the lipid bilayer in the absence of

171 ns and cations indicates that overcoming the surface potential of the membrane/protein PSII complex m

172 he partitioning was enhanced by the negative surface potential of the membranes and was well describe

173 ronment of Eu(3+) in these nanodrops and the surface potential of the nandrops are comparable to thos

174 in changes of both the electron affinity and surface potential of the semiconductor.

175 Analysis of the electrostatic surface potential of the Siah1 dimer reveals that the be

176 oduces an increase in the surface charge and surface potential of the substrates, which is reflected

177 This suggests that the electrostatic surface potential of the two proteins is very different

178 The surface potential of the vapor-liquid interface of pure

179 We present the first computation of the surface potential of water using ab initio molecular dyn

180 Liposomes had surface potentials of -42.4 to -46.1mV with no significa

181 The electrostatic surface potentials of CB[6], CB[7], and CB[8] and their

182 ferent pH-neutral NaCl solutions and applied surface potentials of nickel (vs. Ag|AgCl electrode in s

183 ) receptor was affected by negative electric surface potentials of proteoliposomes controlled by the

184 water electrolysis on ceria, the increase in surface potentials of the adsorbed OH(-) and incorporate

185 Comparing the electrostatic surface potentials of the ECDs suggests a charge compati

186 The electrostatic surface potentials of the human GART domain and Escheric

187 lly, the presence of a stabilizing, negative surface potential on colloidal aggregates of C60 in wate

188 the relationship between surface charge and surface potential on edge surfaces cannot be described u

189 zmann equation yielded the dependence of the surface potential on the density of adsorbed TAT.

190 lectrons, which we can relate to the average surface potential on the gold core.

191 litatively correlates with the electrostatic surface potentials on the interacting proteins.

192 VP26 and VP28 reveals opposite electrostatic surface potential properties of them.

193 , I=0.12 M, and anionic lipid content = 40% (surface potential, psi o =-30 mV), conditions for which

194 are three kinds of membrane potentials: the surface potentials, resulting from the accumulation of c

195 Analysis of surface potentials revealed a basic platform underneath

196 We found that the surface potential reverses its sign when water is replac

197 n effects on GluR6 receptors did not reflect surface potential screening or ion-agonist competition a

198 Kv1.l gating properties both by altering the surface potential sensed by the channel's activation gat

199 Kv1.1 gating properties both by altering the surface potential sensed by the channel's activation gat

200 We have used the method of surface potential sensitive second harmonic generation (

201 Body surface potentials showed a single minimum for both sing

202 icate very high structural and electrostatic surface potential similarities between the two yeast iso

203 The surface potential (SP) of graphene is directly measured

204 to surface band bending effects, whereas the surface potential step exhibits properties analogous to

205 Raman spectroscopy and mapping corroborate surface potential studies.

206 logy and gradients of negative electrostatic surface potential support a mechanism by which PEP-19 in

207 is a ring of intense positive electrostatic surface potential surrounding the primarily hydrophobic

208 di-4-ANEPPS are consistent with a change in surface potential that can be modeled with the Gouy-Chap

209 DNA surface arising from the large negative surface potential; the surface concentration increases s

210 ell as 29 viral proteins present at the cell surface, potential therapeutic targets.

211 ated ion binding constants, the Gouy-Chapman surface potential (theta) is calculated.

212 the Gouy-Chapman expression for the charged surface potential to obtain equilibria of protons and ca

213 fect Ni2+ blockade indicating the absence of surface potential under physiological ionic conditions.

214 The resulting surface charge density and surface potential values are in quantitative agreement w

215 The model could also fit pH-dependent surface potential values that are consistent with measur

216 The CD portals and cavities exhibit low surface potential values, whereas the regions around the

217 biomolecular detection through monitoring of surface-potential variation.

218 is to trace chemical- and location-specified surface potential variations as shifts of the XPS Cd 3d(

219 licin structure and dynamics on the membrane surface potential, we have used solid-state NMR to inves

220 that length and van der Waals electrostatic surface potential were the most influential features on

221 adsorbent separation distances or of protein surface potentials were found to yield reasonable semiqu

222 Body-surface potentials were generated from these epicardial

223 Body surface potentials were generated from these epicardial

224 ng that amelogenin aggregation occurred when surface potentials were minimal.

225 Body surface potentials were simulated from epicardial record

226 Measured body surface potentials were used to noninvasively compute ep

227 rises an area with a different electrostatic surface potential when comparing isozymes.

228 c I-V measurements reflected a slow shift in surface potential () which was dependent on extracellula

229 is quantitatively explained by the membrane surface potential, which becomes more negative with incr

230 surrounded by a substantial electropositive surface potential, which is likely to stabilize the inte

231 cin E1 channel domain depend on the membrane surface potential, which is regulated by the anionic lip

232 the anthracene faces bear a strong negative surface potential, which may be the cause for this cyclo

233 kines reveal only minor areas of correlating surface potential, which must be reconciled with promisc

234 Mapping surface potential with time-resolved Kelvin probe force

235 conserved but also exhibit strongly opposing surface potentials, with the helicase surface being posi