ライフサイエンスコーパス: surgical intensive care

1 tality in many patients receiving medical or surgical intensive care.

2 aged to major stroke centers with high-level surgical,intensive care, and endovascular capabilities?

3 A 35-bed medico-surgical intensive care department in which antibiotic s

4 A total of 159 medical and surgical intensive care patients with Acute Physiology a

5 eal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and surgical intensive care stay was 3.5 hours shorter.

6 tients who developed decubitus ulcers in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of New York Weill Cor

7 ys of mechanical ventilation (MV) in medical/surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients are unknown

8 ospective observational study in medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a stay

9 spiratory failure or shock in the medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU), evaluated them for i

10 lled trial in a single-center, tertiary care surgical intensive care unit (ICU).

11 m for patients with infections admitted to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU).

12 more likely to have received fentanyl in the surgical intensive care unit (odds ratio, 31; P<0.001),

13 (P<.001), and an 87.5% reduction within the surgical intensive care unit (P<.001).

14 estigate the causes of potentially avoidable surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admissions and dispo

15 atients to the telemetry unit instead of the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after esophagectomy.

16 a "mandatory consultation" to a "semiclosed" surgical intensive care unit (SICU) model will impact nu

17 of patients with suspected infections in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) until objective evid

18 after initiation of CRRT among patients in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

19 re and surgical practice often occurs in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

20 predicts adverse outcomes in patients in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

21 o for prevention of fungal infections in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

22 apy to strictly control blood glucose in non-surgical intensive care unit (SICU)/medical intensive ca

23 ty rates and length of stay; those who had a surgical intensive care unit admission and traveled grea

24 Referral and community patients who had a surgical intensive care unit admission had similar sever

25 hospital stays (beta = 0.27; P = 0.02), and surgical intensive care unit admissions (OR = 4.30; P =

26 A surgical intensive care unit and a medical intensive car

27 Mortality, length of stay (LOS): overall, surgical intensive care unit and PCU, readmission rates,

28 and hypercarbia predicts hospital mortality, surgical intensive care unit and total hospital length o

29 From the 27-month surgical intensive care unit database of admissions, 869

30 marcescens bacteremia in any patient in the surgical intensive care unit during the period of the ep

31 d on blood specimens obtained in the cardiac surgical intensive care unit for complete blood count an

32 ents were 442 adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for trauma, a critical illn

33 Adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for trauma, postoperative m

34 acted hospital length of stay and comparable surgical intensive care unit free days, they demonstrate

35 Conversion of a tertiary care surgical intensive care unit from an open to closed envi

36 42 severely injured patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit from days 1 to 15 after inj

37 ale (AIS), >or=3] receiving ESA while in the surgical intensive care unit from January 1, 1996 to Dec

38 was performed in a 17-bed medical and 56-bed surgical intensive care unit in a 1,900-bed referral hos

39 dults (>/=18 years old) admitted to a 20-bed surgical intensive care unit in a large tertiary care ac

40 The study was carried out at a surgical intensive care unit in a large tertiary care ho

41 large academic health centers and a medical-surgical intensive care unit in a medium-sized community

42 Aggressive, goal-directed management in the surgical intensive care unit is beneficial for the geria

43 Each case's controls were chosen to have surgical intensive care unit length of stay more than or

44 significant difference in either overall or surgical intensive care unit length of stay.

45 with S. marcescens bacteremia stayed in the surgical intensive care unit longer than controls (13.5

46 ving continuously infused medications in our surgical intensive care unit occurred at a rate of 105.9

47 ough March 21, 1999, several patients in the surgical intensive care unit of a hospital acquired Serr

48 II data were collected prospectively at the surgical intensive care unit of the University of Vermon

49 ensive care unit length of stay, whereas the surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score and

50 We tested the hypotheses that the surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score inde

51 sting impairment of functional mobility, the surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score is a

52 patients' mobilization capacity by using the surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score the

53 The surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score was

54 Multivariate analysis revealed that the surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score was

55 Surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score, hyp

56 was effective in preventing IC in high-risk surgical intensive care unit patients with intra-abdomin

57 diagnostic tests may improve the outcome of surgical intensive care unit patients with invasive fung

58 The records of 171 surgical intensive care unit patients with sinus tachyca

59 n shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in surgical intensive care unit patients.

60 A cohort of medical and surgical intensive care unit patients.

61 In our surgical intensive care unit population, the estimation

62 have been described, their applicability in surgical intensive care unit settings has not been fully

63 delirium previously demonstrated in numerous surgical intensive care unit studies was not observed, w

64 ilot, randomized trial of 21 general medical/surgical intensive care unit survivors (8 controls and 1

65 ATIENTS: A prospective cohort of medical and surgical intensive care unit survivors with respiratory

66 mily satisfaction with communication for all surgical intensive care unit team members, with physicia

67 full-time family support coordinator to the surgical intensive care unit team on family satisfaction

68 eir family members by various members of the surgical intensive care unit team.

69 role, the family support coordinator, to the surgical intensive care unit team.

70 The prevalence of obesity in the surgical intensive care unit was 26.7%; extreme obesity

71 S. marcescens and E. cloacae bacteremia in a surgical intensive care unit was traced to extrinsic con

72 All continuous infusions in the surgical intensive care unit were evaluated at least onc

73 improvement protocol, adults admitted to the surgical intensive care unit were screened for hearing l

74 in the blood of individuals admitted to the surgical intensive care unit with hemorrhagic shock.

75 Surgical intensive care unit, PCU, and total hospital pa

76 critical care service spent less time in the surgical intensive care unit, used fewer resources, had

77 disciplinary model of palliative care in the surgical intensive care unit, which addresses communicat

78 ns for integration of palliative care in the surgical intensive care unit.

79 to better integrate palliative care into the surgical intensive care unit.

80 atisfaction, length-of-stay, and cost in the surgical intensive care unit.

81 1 trial that shows decreased mortality in a surgical intensive care unit.

82 was performed in a 16-bed pediatric medical-surgical intensive care unit.

83 e determined within 24 hrs of admission to a surgical intensive care unit.

84 d from patients hospitalized in the medical, surgical, intensive care unit (ICU) and dermatology serv

85 atients who were admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) at the University o

86 stant gram-negative bacilli (CAZ-RGN) in two surgical intensive care units (SICU) during a nonoutbrea

87 Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Units at Massachusetts General H

88 we provide a description of the medical and surgical intensive care units at Walter Reed, their hist

89 cal ventilation in the medical, coronary, or surgical intensive care units in a university-based tert

90 Surgical intensive care units of a trauma center and flo

91 o, 2.96 [1.51, 5.77]) but not the medical or surgical intensive care units or in patients with diabet

92 the concept that, when possible, patients in surgical intensive care units should be managed by board

93 rol in patients admitted to coronary care or surgical intensive care units showed a reduction in mort

94 her etiologies of hypotension in medical and surgical intensive care units, appropriate treatment can

95 tions increased threefold in the medical and surgical intensive care units, reaching rates in FY 1993

96 rhexidine "scrub-the-hub" and daily baths in surgical intensive care units, suggesting effectiveness

97 ction took place in Geriatric, Emergency and Surgical intensive care units.

98 malignant neoplasms admitted to medical and surgical intensive care units.

99 tis, is the cause of 50-80% of all deaths in surgical intensive care units.

100 leading cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical intensive care units.