ライフサイエンスコーパス: surgical outcome

1 generalization and less-favorable long-term surgical outcome).

2 not resected in one patient (Class III post-surgical outcome).

3 lly change the evaluation and likely improve surgical outcome.

4 but also aid in margin assessment to improve surgical outcome.

5 he severity of myelopathy and for subsequent surgical outcome.

6 ere compared with histopathology results and surgical outcome.

7 Ostium size was not predictive of overall surgical outcome.

8 scalp EEGs were associated with an excellent surgical outcome.

9 did not significantly influence clinical and surgical outcome.

10 mbolism (VTE), and this has implications for surgical outcome.

11 ts do not affect other parameters of cardiac surgical outcome.

12 han half of patients can expect a successful surgical outcome.

13 ectively reviewed by radiologists blinded to surgical outcome.

14 calizing ability, and association with later surgical outcome.

15 emphasis on the impact each modality has on surgical outcome.

16 ablation does not appear to adversely affect surgical outcome.

17 d against ICEEG alone or in combination with surgical outcome.

18 ssessment of factors that may be relevant to surgical outcome.

19 d to define factors relating to a successful surgical outcome.

20 the seizure onset pattern, as well as in the surgical outcome.

21 le patients more likely to have a favourable surgical outcome.

22 n of antibiotic therapy, hospital costs, and surgical outcome.

23 tructures were performed and correlated with surgical outcome.

24 index <0.08 had a lower chance of successful surgical outcome.

25 1 and 2 were considered good, and 3-6 poor, surgical outcome.

26 n between age, sex, and suture material with surgical outcome.

27 ion of the clinically reported difference in surgical outcomes.

28 ur hundred four patients were assessable for surgical outcomes.

29 mpromising efforts to understand and improve surgical outcomes.

30 comes alone may not be sufficient to improve surgical outcomes.

31 e size of the GDI may not be associated with surgical outcomes.

32 al data are increasingly used to investigate surgical outcomes.

33 care and improved quality of cancer care and surgical outcomes.

34 ssociated with more severe disease and worse surgical outcomes.

35 sts that ward-based care plays a key role in surgical outcomes.

36 acteristics, process measure compliance, and surgical outcomes.

37 spitals contributes to racial disparities in surgical outcomes.

38 ic conditions may be associated with adverse surgical outcomes.

39 be related to progression of CV disease and surgical outcomes.

40 us better document patient's complaints and surgical outcomes.

41 and intraoperative MRI has further improved surgical outcomes.

42 transfusion practices may result in improved surgical outcomes.

43 vestigate the correlation of ostium size and surgical outcomes.

44 n on preoperative imaging will have inferior surgical outcomes.

45 or minimizing risk to the IAN and optimizing surgical outcomes.

46 formed, and there are little data describing surgical outcomes.

47 cluded demographics, BMI, comorbidities, and surgical outcomes.

48 echnique should be considered when reporting surgical outcomes.

49 perative experience has been shown to effect surgical outcomes.

50 nce, and postoperative management to improve surgical outcomes.

51 ution of technique translating into improved surgical outcomes.

52 main factors that contributed to successful surgical outcomes.

53 on preoperative cross-sectional images, and surgical outcomes.

54 ppendicitis resulted in significantly better surgical outcomes.

55 Neoadjuvant AI treatment markedly improved surgical outcomes.

56 f improved operative efficiency and improved surgical outcomes.

57 nd potential benefit of smoking cessation on surgical outcomes.

58 the risk of current versus prior smoking on surgical outcomes.

59 res has been the primary focus for improving surgical outcomes.

60 hise more patients for treatment and improve surgical outcomes.

61 of surgical quality is essential to improve surgical outcomes.

62 he effectiveness of medical team training on surgical outcomes.

63 sion, no standard criteria exist to classify surgical outcomes.

64 iagnostic and surgical approaches to improve surgical outcomes.

65 d be highly beneficial for the assessment of surgical outcomes.

66 f improved operative efficiency and improved surgical outcomes.

67 oped to decrease volume-based variability in surgical outcomes.

68 nt technique that has also yielded promising surgical outcomes.

69 ness, shortage of trained personnel and poor surgical outcomes.

70 ing may suggest new approaches for improving surgical outcomes.

71 -bag stabilization can significantly improve surgical outcomes.

72 the safety, efficacy, and predictability of surgical outcomes.

73 nder treatment is a major factor influencing surgical outcomes.

74 shift of TSA to high volume centers improves surgical outcomes.

75 ld be determined on the basis of clinical or surgical outcomes.

76 review of the recent literature in regard to surgical outcomes.

77 performed at high-volume centers may improve surgical outcomes.

78 ns; and to provide a deeper understanding of surgical outcomes.

79 ogram is feasible and effective in improving surgical outcomes.

80 m-level initiatives aimed at improving their surgical outcomes.

81 sociated with an overall increase in adverse surgical outcomes.

82 perative experience has been shown to effect surgical outcomes.

83 derlying pathophysiology related to distinct surgical outcomes.

84 ealth system's teamwork level and its 60-day surgical outcomes.

85 derstand how preoperative opioid use impacts surgical outcomes.

86 t groups during CABG episodes realize better surgical outcomes.

87 has demonstrated an inverse association with surgical outcomes.

88 Addressing these will improve TT surgical outcomes.

89 ed the impact of functional health status on surgical outcomes.

90 To describe the variation in surgical outcomes across bariatric centers of excellence

91 to examine the effect of dialysis on 30-day surgical outcomes adjusted for age, race, sex, work rela

92 used to examine the impact of ESRD on 30-day surgical outcomes adjusted for age, race, sex, work rela

93 hepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVT), with surgical outcome after Meso-Rex bypass (MRB).

94 rophies have recently been correlated to the surgical outcome after PTK.

95 Optimization of surgical outcomes after colectomy continues to be active

96 cteristics of an EFVW may be able to predict surgical outcomes after Trabectome surgery.

97 received incentives to document independent surgical outcomes after training.

98 This investigation is the largest study of surgical outcomes among AIs to date and the first to foc

99 intervention did not affect rates of adverse surgical outcomes among patients undergoing general surg

100 Surgical outcomes among recent graduates are an importan

101 HFOs show promise for improving surgical outcome and accelerating intracranial EEG inves

102 has emerged as the leading publicly reported surgical outcome and is tied to payment determinations.

103 pertinence of MAP(+) areas was confirmed by surgical outcome and pathology.

104 rtinence of MAP+ areas was confirmed by MSI, surgical outcome and pathology.

105 r major surgery, thus directly affecting the surgical outcome and patient recovery.

106 ve cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts surgical outcome and should therefore be included in the

107 created an unadjusted model between age and surgical outcome and then developed two adjusted models

108 her age truly is an independent predictor of surgical outcome and to provide evidence to guide practi

109 surgeon's strong sense of responsibility for surgical outcomes and can lead to surgeon unwillingness

110 of these regions in the model, we predicted surgical outcomes and compared these to actual patient o

111 The purpose of this study was to examine surgical outcomes and complication rates of dacryocystor

112 Review of CMVR characteristics, surgical outcomes and complications in 19 eyes with CMVR

113 ve reported the procedure to be feasible but surgical outcomes and impact on short and long-term morb

114 ies of safety-net hospitals lead to inferior surgical outcomes and increased cost across 9 elective s

115 measured at gross pathology, correlates with surgical outcomes and is an independent predictor of poo

116 ng appropriate measures may result in better surgical outcomes and less recurrence.

117 approach with the overall goal of optimizing surgical outcomes and minimizing complications.

118 Surgical outcomes and operative mortality (1.4% versus 1

119 veness of the training program in regards to surgical outcomes and protocol compliance.

120 ly collected can make future improvements to surgical outcomes and quality analyses.

121 The main outcome measures were postoperative surgical outcomes and recurrence rates.

122 In the authors' experience, the surgical outcomes and safety of LCS improved significant

123 he WHO checklist has been linked to improved surgical outcomes and teamwork, yet we know little about

124 nificant impact of postoperative delirium on surgical outcomes and the long-term prognosis of older p

125 sed on wound modulation to enhance long-term surgical outcomes and the search for a small incision su

126 ed using this technology in order to improve surgical outcomes and wound healing.

127 ee patients undergoing surgery (Class I post-surgical outcome) and was not resected in one patient (C

128 th clinical features, tumor characteristics, surgical outcome, and long-term survival.

129 y eye, ocular demodicosis, follow-up period, surgical outcome, and tear levels of IL-17 measured by e

130 tion of lung cancer surgery among hospitals, surgical outcomes, and health services use.

131 Indications for retinal surgery, surgical outcomes, and intraoperative and postoperative

132 The concept of frailty, its effect on surgical outcomes, and its assessment and management wer

133 surveys, we conclude that factors outside of surgical outcomes appear to influence patients' percepti

134 with seizure-onset zone, resected tissue and surgical outcome are required to determine the true pred

135 The best early postoperative surgical outcomes are achieved in centers where there ar

136 The best early postoperative surgical outcomes are achieved in centers where there ar

137 Surgical outcomes are an important component of quality

138 Surgical outcomes are associated with patient and surgeo

139 ent billing practices and mandates to report surgical outcomes are disincentives to surgical treatmen

140 variety of surgical procedures, but current surgical outcomes are inadequately characterized.

141 We now understand that surgical outcomes are poor for patients with rapidly gro

142 omplications (PPCs), a leading cause of poor surgical outcomes, are heterogeneous in their pathophysi

143 he technique has been shown to yield similar surgical outcomes as phacoemulsification.

144 With clinical or surgical outcomes as the reference standard, the sensiti

145 al characteristics, risk factors, visual and surgical outcomes as well as the microbiological profile

146 nes including visual speech recognition, for surgical outcome assessment in patients with cleft lip a

147 We report on long-term improvement in surgical outcomes associated with participation in ACS N

148 structures, the Premier HQID did not improve surgical outcomes at participating hospitals.

149 w these outcomes are achieved to improve all surgical outcomes at underresourced hospitals.

150 States were examined using the Breast Cancer Surgical Outcomes (BRCASO) database.

151 Adding oxaliplatin did not improve surgical outcomes but added significant toxicity.

152 ith time, hospitals had progressively better surgical outcomes but enrollment in a national quality r

153 charges have been used for RS of medical and surgical outcomes, but results generally have been viewe

154 egression was used to identify prediction of surgical outcome by imaging test.

155 he eyelid crease incision to further improve surgical outcomes by decreasing wound size and increasin

156 ve highlighting has the potential to improve surgical outcomes by facilitating intraoperative nerve i

157 Our early results suggest that surgical outcome can be improved by centralisation of ca

158 tients can be anticipated and addressed, and surgical outcomes can be improved.

159 actors for dry eye, patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes can be maximized.

160 Ilomastat significantly improved surgical outcome compared with vehicle (P < 0.0163) and

161 ral surgeons has raised concerns about their surgical outcomes compared with specialist pediatric sur

162 ity, the effects of excessive body weight on surgical outcomes constitute a relevant quality of care

163 volution follows the natural availability of surgical outcome data and a national call for improved h

164 ncephalography, neuroimaging, pathology, and surgical outcome data were reviewed.

165 Retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes data from 1999 to 2004 on 55,408 patie

166 The database provides high-quality surgical outcomes data from more than 80 participating U

167 laucoma from the Veterans Affairs Ophthalmic Surgical Outcomes Data Project were compared.

168 d criteria for analyses of correlations with surgical outcome: detection of interictal ripples (Rs),

169 ion and offer a local example of world-class surgical outcomes, diminishing surgeons' most frequently

170 Variability in surgical outcomes does not relate to surgical skill alon

171 ters was not associated with improvements in surgical outcomes during the study period.

172 an identify epileptogenic cortex and predict surgical outcome, especially when a frontal or temporal

173 is thought to be an important determinant of surgical outcomes, few studies have examined this empiri

174 red with standard preoperative assessment on surgical outcomes, focusing on studies that used a contr

175 implementation was associated with improved surgical outcomes following general surgery procedures,

176 To evaluate the surgical outcome for management of giant retinal tear (G

177 pose of the current study is to evaluate the surgical outcome for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (

178 Cataract surgical outcomes for all operations performed by surgeo

179 elation between hospital teaching status and surgical outcomes for both emergency and elective genera

180 Although surgical outcomes for congenital heart disease have impr

181 ans is of critical importance for optimizing surgical outcomes for elderly patients undergoing ambula

182 Compare surgical outcomes for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-hepatocell

183 sk estimation is essential when benchmarking surgical outcomes for reimbursement and engaging in shar

184 Contemporary surgical outcomes for the entire population of newborns

185 In an effort to improve the surgical outcomes for this population, it is necessary t

186 ted issues that could be targeted to improve surgical outcomes for US Patients.

187 ical entity that the greatest improvement in surgical outcomes for various emergent surgical problems

188 g-term risk and predisposing factors and the surgical outcomes for, retinal detachment (RD) after ped

189 All patients with an excellent surgical outcome had at least 10 years of follow-up.

190 the impact of portal hypertension in general surgical outcomes has been limited.

191 Research into surgical outcomes has primarily focused on the role of p

192 Surgical outcomes have been comparable with laparoscopic

193 Wide variations in vascular surgical outcomes have been demonstrated in England.

194 However, as surgical outcomes have increasingly become the target of

195 %) with a low complication rate (1%-6%), but surgical outcomes have not been reported previously spec

196 rtebra (P = .035) enabled prediction of good surgical outcome; however, preoperative mJOA (P = .927),

197 ACS-NSQIP indicates that surgical outcomes improve across all participating hospi

198 ical applicability of administrative data in surgical outcomes improvement.

199 combined pre- and postresection ECoG predict surgical outcome in different tailoring approaches.

200 rather than mortality, is the most important surgical outcome in economic terms.

201 ve clinical value in predicting seizure-free surgical outcome in epilepsy surgery candidates who typi

202 SF-36 seems well suited for assessing surgical outcome in patients after incisional hernia rep

203 substrate seems to be a better predictor for surgical outcome in patients with focal cortical dysplas

204 tron emission tomography (PET) predicts post-surgical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung ca

205 A retrospective longitudinal study examined surgical outcomes in 64,891 Michigan patients in 29 hosp

206 Retrospective comparison of surgical outcomes in an academic pediatric ophthalmology

207 tive study evaluating patient management and surgical outcomes in children and young adults with AAOC

208 Data on management and surgical outcomes in older patients with EA are limited.

209 VR devices demonstrated at least parity with surgical outcomes in patients of similar risk.

210 We further compared the surgical outcomes in patients with and without mesial te

211 urthermore, new studies revise our notion of surgical outcomes in pediatric inflammatory bowel diseas

212 Given the potential for poorer surgical outcomes in the setting of indiscriminate proph

213 predictors of radiotherapeutic, and possibly surgical, outcome in several cancers.

214 Factors predicting an excellent surgical outcome include the presence of a discrete zone

215 The mFI is associated with poor surgical outcomes, including readmission, primarily due

216 ion, four trauma radiologists unaware of the surgical outcome independently reviewed all CT studies a

217 forming surgical valve centers with the best surgical outcomes is challenging.

218 that the apparent adverse effect of race on surgical outcomes is due to confounding by comorbidity,

219 lly, continued investigation into optimizing surgical outcomes is essential in this population of inf

220 safe hospital systems to improve value-based surgical outcomes is predicated on workflow redesign for

221 n nonsurgical populations, but its effect on surgical outcomes is unclear.

222 significant difference for several secondary surgical outcomes, it was associated with higher prostag

223 ecklists results in striking improvements in surgical outcomes led to the rapid adoption of such chec

224 pike frequency measures to predict long-term surgical outcome may be modest in the presence of ictal

225 d, the role of intraoperative performance in surgical outcomes may be considered.

226 al more than surgeon experience, and overall surgical outcomes may be improved by standardized techni

227 that poorer knowledge and expectations about surgical outcomes may be responsible for low rates of to

228 ble to open appendectomy in terms of several surgical outcome measures for both uncomplicated and com

229 Data on several surgical outcome measures such as observed mortality, ov

230 erall, except in highly specialized centers, surgical outcomes might be static, and there is abundant

231 The electroclinical presentation and surgical outcome of lesional anterior cingulate epilepsy

232 g a logistic regression model to predict the surgical outcome of patients with CSM.

233 y was to ascertain the clinical features and surgical outcome of patients with FMNS with infantile un

234 us as to whether urodynamic testing enhances surgical outcome of stress urinary incontinence treatmen

235 This study aims to compare surgical outcome of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomos

236 omen, but whether this was due to the poorer surgical outcome of women or better TAVR outcome, compar

237 mortality and complications by comparing the surgical outcomes of a cohort of surgical patients treat

238 This study reports the surgical outcomes of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

239 o analyze the demographics, indications, and surgical outcomes of anophthalmic surgery (enucleation a

240 : There have been few studies evaluating the surgical outcomes of cornea fellows during training.

241 The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes of international medical graduates (IM

242 ce, associated cardiovascular anomalies, and surgical outcomes of left pulmonary artery sling (LPAS)

243 to provide up-to-date information regarding surgical outcomes of midurethral slings and to discuss m

244 To compare the surgical outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (

245 of our retrospective study was to assess the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy, 180 degrees

246 that examined the effects of malnutrition on surgical outcomes, optimizing metabolic function and nut

247 seline reported more anxiety about patients' surgical outcomes or events following disclosure (odds r

248 But TtD was not associated with metastasis, surgical outcome, or survival.

249 e only significant clinical factor affecting surgical outcome (P = 0.0003).

250 BOLD maps were independently related to good surgical outcome (p=0.007).

251 Other surgical outcome parameters were similar in patients wit

252 is an important instrument to ensure optimal surgical outcomes, particularly during the adoption of n

253 The Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) study was an international proje

254 According to surgical outcome, patients were classified as seizure-fr

255 estigation; however, no other differences in surgical outcome, PEPI score, or Ki67 suppression were d

256 ancer before surgery and (b) investigate the surgical outcome (positive margin rates and mastectomy r

257 pared with that of conventional imaging, and surgical outcomes (positive margin and mastectomy rates)

258 diversity and composition are predictors of surgical outcome, promoting the concept of community eco

259 tinel lymph node mapping promises to improve surgical outcomes, reduce rates of repeat surgery, and i

260 patient-reported outcomes often omitted from surgical outcomes registries is essential to improving q

261 Patient and donor demographics, surgical outcomes, rejection, and patient or graft survi

262 rpose of this review is to assess the latest surgical outcomes related to hand and wrist surgery in t

263 uration before transfusion) on perioperative surgical outcomes remains poorly defined.

264 uration before transfusion) on perioperative surgical outcomes remains poorly defined.

265 atients' perspectives of care correlate with surgical outcomes remains unclear.

266 en gastrectomy (OG) have been planned, their surgical outcomes reported but their oncologic outcomes

267 These findings suggest that a surgical outcomes reporting system does not provide a cl

268 Improving surgical outcomes requires a re-examination of why patie

269 Surgical outcomes studies have shown parathyroidectomy t

270 The European Surgical Outcomes Study was an international study desig

271 tudy of patients enrolled in the Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study, using data of Medicare claims e

272 However, poor surgical outcome suggests a complex relationship between

273 ts have significantly lower expectations for surgical outcomes than white patients.

274 and supervision, cornea fellows can achieve surgical outcomes that are comparable to experienced sur

275 t are only 2 of many factors associated with surgical outcomes that should be incorporated into surgi

276 how these lipids affect key factors defining surgical outcomes-that is, I/R, LR, and liver malignancy

277 mferential trabeculotomy achieved comparable surgical outcomes to mitomycin C-augmented combined trab

278 ch study documented better pediatric patient surgical outcomes under the care of a pediatric subspeci

279 reporting of programmatic congenital cardiac surgical outcomes using a new risk model that includes b

280 A good or excellent anatomic surgical outcome was achieved in 95.8% of patients at th

281 ied) had negative imaging studies, and their surgical outcome was compared with 117 patients with pos

282 Surgical outcome was monitored with serial optical coher

283 Surgical outcome was significantly better when areas wit

284 The proportion of patients with good surgical outcome was significantly higher (13/16; 81%) i

285 ) among these physicians is a determinant of surgical outcomes, we examined national Medicare data fr

286 -fMRI results to identify patients with good surgical outcome were 81% and 79%, respectively, and pos

287 as postoperative improvement in symptoms and surgical outcome were compared.

288 iables potentially associated with excellent surgical outcome were examined in patients with a minimu

289 reening-detected AAAs, AAAs operated on, and surgical outcome were retrieved from all 21 Swedish coun

290 ostdiagnosis imaging, biopsy, and short-term surgical outcomes were also evaluated between those who

291 gs, associated cardiovascular anomalies, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.

292 Surgical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier life

293 th the exception of low mortality, favorable surgical outcomes were not consistently associated with

294 Similar surgical outcomes were observed after additional glaucom

295 Clinical response and surgical outcomes were similar in luminal A (LumA) versu

296 Patients anticipate favorable surgical outcomes when having cataract surgery.

297 ively reviewed and compared with clinical or surgical outcomes, which were used as the reference stan

298 There remains variability in surgical outcomes with or without dose adjustment in str

299 niques with a view to maintaining equivalent surgical outcomes with the added benefits of shorter hos

300 eme severity patients showed vastly improved surgical outcomes with the laparoscopic approach.