ライフサイエンスコーパス: surgical time

1 tates spontaneous unfolding, thus minimizing surgical time.

2 of discomfort, which may account for longer surgical times.

3 fect cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp, or surgical times.

4 aids in risk stratification and helps decide surgical timing.

5 pective data suggest equivalent outcomes for surgical timing.

6 study supports the concept of using PFT for surgical timing.

7 Surgical time (211 vs. 256 minutes, p < 0.005), blood lo

8 /- 9 years vs. 72 +/- 6 years; mean +/- SD), surgical time (235 +/- 95 minutes vs. 219 +/- 84 minutes

9 icant variations in complication rate and in surgical time among the surgeons.

10 and safe technique associated with a shorter surgical time and a lower early readmission rate.

11 In addition, surgical time and hospital stay were both significantly

12 aoperative techniques significantly increase surgical time and, consequently, cost.

13 ned residents during actual surgery for both surgical times and numbers of errors.

14 were compared prospectively with respect to surgical times and perioperative outcomes.

15 ase in the population, research into optimal surgical timing and patient selection is critical.

16 shed predictors and could potentially aid in surgical timing and risk stratification.

17 spects of visual rehabilitation, appropriate surgical timing and technique, and the type and material

18 Preoperative data, surgical time, and postoperative morbidity were similar.

19 fy the surgery with reproducibility, reduced surgical time, and reduced tissue wastage, cost, and log

20 fluenced by the surgical technique used, the surgical time, and the use of antibiotics.

21 re efficient phacoemulsifiers, and decreased surgical times are a few of the changes that have helped

22 knowledge on genetics, pre-natal diagnosis, surgical timing, balloon atrial septostomy, prostaglandi

23 significantly reduces resource utilization (surgical time, blood replacement, intensive care unit an

24 Surgical time decreased by 1.4 minutes per eye in a line

25 Functional MR imaging resulted in reduced surgical time (estimated reduction, 15-60 minutes) in 22

26 imaging results and estimated the effect on surgical time, extent of resection, and surgical approac

27 imated influence of functional MR imaging on surgical time, extent of resection, and surgical approac

28 In the 2 studies that compared surgical time, fibrin glue required 1 to 5 minutes less

29 ing role of exercise echocardiography in the surgical timing for aortic regurgitation remains a matte

30 ry hypertension in decision making regarding surgical timing for asymptomatic chronic mitral regurgit

31 Guideline emphasis on stent type and surgical timing for both DES and BMS should be reevaluat

32 The mean surgical time in our series was 115.8 min, with a mean e

33 is needed to confirm its promise in guiding surgical timing in patients who have discontinued therap

34 Previous studies of surgical timing in patients with hip fracture have yield

35 to its early detection, decision making for surgical time, managing preoperative risk factors, and p

36 In certain patients, surgical time may be shortened, the extent of resection

37 The authors compared the surgical time of each technique.

38 This study sought to examine the impact of surgical timing on major morbidity and hospital reimburs

39 ignificant differences between the groups in surgical time or total hospital charges; however, the ch

40 tribute to greater flap strength at any post-surgical time point, nor was it associated with any hist

41 fect of PRP on flap strength at various post-surgical time points in a minipig animal model.

42 Decreased surgical times, reduced postoperative inflammation, and

43 changing when OR time was released, reducing surgical times, reducing turnover times, reducing OR tim

44 s, this procedure has manifest advantages in surgical time, technical complexity, patient morbidity,

45 Repositioning had a longer mean surgical time than exchange (P < 0.001).

46 15) or portal vein thrombosis (n = 14).Mean surgical time was 11.33 +/- 0.28 hours.

47 Mean surgical time was 161 minutes and was greater in the fir

48 Surgical time was 196 minutes +/- 67 (mean +/- SD), bloo

49 Mean surgical time was 235.0 +/- 66.7 minutes, with a mean bl

50 Surgical time was higher in the laparoscopy group (252 +

51 Varying approaches to surgical timing were applied as the series matured.

52 were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical timing within 48 hours (early) or after 48 hour

53 ithout VGF, although VGF patients had longer surgical times, worse target artery quality, longer graf