ライフサイエンスコーパス: survivorship

1 ecundity and high, early mortality (type-III survivorship).

2 terest in accessing the quality of long-term survivorship.

3 on health-related quality of life (HR-QL) in survivorship.

4 s, which are evident during treatment and in survivorship.

5 ial biobehavioral pathway relevant to cancer survivorship.

6 nterventions across the entire trajectory of survivorship.

7 late-life, and this pattern associated with survivorship.

8 -Related Fatigue and the NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship.

9 urdles, which will ultimately improve cancer survivorship.

10 severity of psychological morbidity in early survivorship.

11 duced parasitoid success and increased aphid survivorship.

12 al orientation on cancer, from prevention to survivorship.

13 t registries that can track lifetime implant survivorship.

14 e diagnosis and is based on the condition of survivorship.

15 ing focus on the quality of long-term cancer survivorship.

16 s reproduction and another that reduces tree survivorship.

17 hers working in the area of long-term cancer survivorship.

18 te replicative lifespan of mother cells, and survivorship.

19 likely causes of zoo elephants' compromised survivorship.

20 cost-effective way to improve transition to survivorship.

21 l strategies to improve transition to cancer survivorship.

22 essing end-of-life care in cancer and cancer survivorship.

23 epair capacity, and decline overall cellular survivorship.

24 recurrence, palliative care, and quality of survivorship.

25 Neutropenia did not significantly affect survivorship.

26 g population may have influenced tyrannosaur survivorship.

27 ne profiling could help understand long-term survivorship.

28 status and health-related quality of life in survivorship.

29 operative complications, and is prevalent in survivorship.

30 s influence species ranges due to effects on survivorship.

31 omes and similar lung cancer-specific 5-year survivorship.

32 o reduce a negative impact on the quality of survivorship.

33 ubstantial subgroup, CIPN persists long into survivorship.

34 can be favorably altered to promote healthy survivorship.

35 et breast cancer treatment and breast cancer survivorship.

36 avigation during breast cancer treatment and survivorship.

37 sed on improving breast cancer treatment and survivorship.

38 n and reducing coral recruitment, growth and survivorship.

39 of focus from relapse detection to improved survivorship.

40 ern California cohort study of breast cancer survivorship (2006-2009).

41 in conjunction with prevention (3) or cancer survivorship (4), and no grant addressed emotional seque

42 interactions with brood experienced greater survivorship, a trend not present in queenright subcolon

43 ian embryology, life history strategies, and survivorship across the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinc

44 the relationship of MRI assessment of CRM to survivorship after adjusting for preoperative covariates

45 reds of thousands of women now have enhanced survivorship after their diagnosis of ER-positive breast

46 in the presence of granulocytes yielded 90% survivorship; all neutropenic mice died after the termin

47 Survivorship among octogenarians is favorable, with more

48 mitant CABG surgery does not diminish median survivorship among patients >80 years of age.

49 the annual excess economic burden of cancer survivorship among recently diagnosed cancer survivors w

50 nation results in a drastically reduced host survivorship and a diminished capacity to degrade pectin

51 esophageal cancer have resulted in increased survivorship and a focus on health-related quality of li

52 aortic dissection (AD) has led to increased survivorship and a population of individuals at risk for

53 Purpose The prevalence of cancer survivorship and chronic health conditions is increasing

54 n QOL from time of BC diagnosis to long-term survivorship and compared QOL in long-term survivors to

55 minary data support the concept that microbe survivorship and diversity are partially dependent upon

56 We tracked C. ohlone survivorship and estimated fecundity for three years.

57 tes" enhance lifetime fitness by trading off survivorship and fecundity at different life stages.

58 In addition to difference in survivorship and fecundity, an asynchrony of adult emerg

59 ance and thereby bestows fitness benefits in survivorship and fecundity.

60 f the issues surrounding provision of cancer survivorship and follow-up care in the USA and discuss p

61 from such repositories, and 3) the design of survivorship and genetics studies.

62 eness except for a positive relation between survivorship and geographic range at the clade level (co

63 valid estimates of parameters such as vector survivorship and host feeding rates.

64 entiating PCPs' level of expertise in cancer survivorship and how such expertise could be used.

65 he areas of prevention, early detection, and survivorship and how the partnership of behavioral and b

66 - and wind-dispersed species reduced Artemia survivorship and hyphal growth of Fusarium during the im

67 As cancer survivorship and life expectancy for cancer patients imp

68 ctive patient management plan that maximizes survivorship and quality of life.

69 patients and families on the complexities of survivorship and recovery.

70 n play an integral role in colony behaviour, survivorship and their relationship.

71 tment, after treatment with curative intent (survivorship), and after diagnosis with metastatic disea

72 ity declines are consistent with declines in survivorship, and healthy females maintain high birth ra

73 om diagnosis through curative treatment into survivorship, and metastatic disease and end-of-life car

74 e compared daily activity (feeding) rhythms, survivorship, and reproduction in six replicate populati

75 se factors and colorectal or prostate cancer survivorship are getting more compelling.

76 t the group level--certain ratios yield high survivorship at some sites but not others.

77 This review will also address cancer survivorship because it closely relates to PROs.

78 Interestingly, the Cardinium survivorship benefit was not evident when Wolbachia was

79 To address potential survivorship bias, we fitted Markov models to the distri

80 Antibiotic exposure resulted in decreased survivorship, both in the hive and in laboratory experim

81 rgeted therapies is projected to enhance CLL survivorship but can impose a substantial financial burd

82 y have the potential to improve outcomes and survivorship, but findings from prospective trials are n

83 We evaluated the economic burden of cancer survivorship by estimating excess costs among cancer sur

84 This aspect promotes high survivorship by limiting exposure to predation and envir

85 ounding of the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship by representatives from 20 organisations wh

86 even-item self-reported measure on perceived survivorship care (Cronbach's alpha = .89).

87 d with higher perceived level of PCP-related survivorship care (P = .001 for both).

88 Training and knowledge specific to survivorship care and coordinated care between PCPs and

89 e review some of the challenges to providing survivorship care and discuss efforts to prioritize the

90 Overall, BCSs rated PCP-related survivorship care as 65 out of 100 (standard deviation =

91 Ten physician-perceived cancer survivorship care barriers/concerns were compared betwee

92 (MOs) regarding breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care beyond 5 years after treatment.

93 n Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline is to provide recommendation

94 The American Cancer Society (ACS) HNC Survivorship Care Guideline was reviewed for development

95 ASCO endorsed the ACS HNC Survivorship Care Guideline, adding qualifying statement

96 SCO Expert Panel determined that the ACS HNC Survivorship Care Guideline, published in 2016, is clear

97 d and tasked with drafting the Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline.

98 mendations from the 2014 ACS Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines are clear, thorough, and re

99 merican Cancer Society (ACS) Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines were reviewed for developme

100 ASCO endorses the ACS Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines, with a number of qualifyin

101 implementation of recommended breast cancer survivorship care in the intervention group, compared wi

102 High-quality, well-coordinated cancer survivorship care is needed yet barriers remain owing to

103 ychosocial support, and preferred models for survivorship care may improve psychosocial care delivery

104 les County public hospitals into an RCT of a survivorship care nurse counseling session coupled with

105 ess the impact of an automatically generated survivorship care plan (SCP) on patient-reported outcome

106 ive research was carried out to assess how a survivorship care plan created by oncologists could impr

107 can implement a cancer treatment summary and survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors, with

108 ding the breast cancer treatment summary and survivorship care plan is being recognized as a key comp

109 ation between healthcare providers through a survivorship care plan, developing an evidence base to b

110 iencies in care, supporting the need to make survivorship care planning a standard component in cance

111 Survivorship care planning is viewed favorably by consum

112 Survivorship care planning should involve discussions be

113 OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.44) and discuss survivorship care planning with survivors (OR, 2.02; 95%

114 ians' (PCPs) reports of provision of written survivorship care plans (SCPs) and discussion of survivo

115 By implementing survivorship care plans and directing their patients to

116 olled trial (RCT) of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans coupled with a nurse counseling

117 These results support the need for survivorship care plans that explicitly outline the role

118 on of individualized treatment summaries and survivorship care plans to patients and their health car

119 n To our knowledge, this is the first RCT of survivorship care plans to show benefits in clinical out

120 of information from oncology-based care (eg, survivorship care plans), and not as active members of t

121 ding oncology care acknowledged the value of survivorship care plans, but were not inclined to comple

122 ntinuing education, explicit guidelines, and survivorship care plans.

123 ve function must be included in clinical and survivorship care plans.

124 ncologists and 1,020 PCPs was surveyed about survivorship care practices with survivors.

125 Survivorship care recommendations and provider responsib

126 4%) reported always/almost always discussing survivorship care recommendations with survivors, fewer

127 ivorship care plans (SCPs) and discussion of survivorship care recommendations with survivors.

128 Guidelines and models for general survivorship care routinely address psychosocial needs,

129 y of programmes to increase access to needed survivorship care services and health equity.

130 Efforts to clarify provider roles in survivorship care to patients may be effective in improv

131 is also an important component of long-term survivorship care with older patients.

132 ondarily on patient adherence to recommended survivorship care, among a low-income population of brea

133 ntion and diagnosis, in shared follow-up and survivorship care, and in end-of-life care.

134 implementation of recommended breast cancer survivorship care, for example, treatment of depression

135 s contribute to this underprovided aspect of survivorship care, including lack of provider training a

136 ltidisciplinary, collaborative head and neck survivorship care.

137 nternet-based virtual visit as components of survivorship care.

138 M) laid out its bold vision of comprehensive survivorship care.

139 tigate them may substantially improve cancer survivorship care.

140 hould be more effectively managed as part of survivorship care.

141 the roles of PCPs and oncologists in cancer survivorship care.

142 ication and PCP knowledge of cancer-specific survivorship care.

143 eir PCPs' ability to deliver cancer-specific survivorship care.

144 survivors' (BCS) perceptions of PCP-related survivorship care.

145 range, 3.0 to 6.9 years) as part of clinical survivorship care.

146 uidelines, and assessing different models of survivorship care.

147 by oncologists could improve the quality of survivorship care.

148 he integration of psychosocial services into survivorship care.

149 rs, improve outcomes, and prove the value of survivorship care.

150 tion of and patient adherence to recommended survivorship care.

151 = 170), recruited during visits to a cancer survivorship clinic and primary care, completed self-rep

152 The NP-led survivorship clinic model, with increased guidance for P

153 Risk-based education in a survivorship clinic significantly increases awareness of

154 r therapy-related complications at T0 (first survivorship clinic visit) and at T1 to T5 (subsequent v

155 The impact of education provided in survivorship clinics on survivors' understanding of thei

156 The MoM THR had slightly shorter survivorship compared with the MoP THR (adjusted hazard

157 tment, and impact of this largely unexamined survivorship concern.

158 , such as AIs, should be high of the list of survivorship concerns for clinicians that treat HL.

159 ooled data from the California Breast Cancer Survivorship Consortium for 3 population-based case-cont

160 ed impairment in VO(2peak) across the entire survivorship continuum.

161 Previous studies to explain variation in survivorship curves have been based on the proposition t

162 inconsistent with empirical observations of survivorship curves in human and animal populations.

163 onary explanations of the large variation in survivorship curves observed in natural populations.

164 esis reflects the general trajectory of host survivorship curves: as a host cohort ages, availability

165 Field survivorship data, combined with estimates of selection

166 of cancer prevention, followed by diagnosis, survivorship, detection, and cancer treatment.

167 O2 ], and semidiurnal pH fluctuations on the survivorship, development, and size of early life stages

168 ore likely (95% CI, 5.74 to 14.82) to report survivorship discussions with survivors.

169 d oncologists were associated with increased survivorship discussions with survivors.

170 ome of the most complex challenges of cancer survivorship due to many late effects (eg, second malign

171 The prospects for better survivorship during future contacts are good provided mo

172 information is available at www.asco.org/HNC-Survivorship-endorsement and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki

173 f parent distress may improve overall family survivorship experiences following childhood cancer.

174 To characterize patients' treatment and survivorship experiences, we reported the tumor features

175 perturbation without jeopardising their own survivorship, female leopards apparently "hedge their be

176 ects of oil on marsh periwinkle movement and survivorship following exposure to oil.

177 Median survivorship for patients undergoing isolated AVR was 11

178 significantly and positively associated with survivorship for the great majority of Phanerozoic time.

179 n programs, thereby improving the quality of survivorship for the pediatric medulloblastoma populatio

180 We describe the short- and long-term survivorship for this cohort.

181 LTP-inducing stimuli increased the long-term survivorship (>14 h) of individual new spines.

182 his guideline adaptation is part of a larger survivorship guideline series.

183 The current state of cancer survivorship guidelines is also discussed.

184 Survivorship guidelines should address cardiovascular co

185 al information is available at: www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki

186 was used to evaluate the effect that cancer survivorship had on the risk of developing CVD, adjusted

187 ors living in the US and consequently cancer survivorship has become a major health priority.

188 The specialty of cancer survivorship has been developing and growing since the m

189 With this increase in rates of survivorship has come the recognition that survivors are

190 Furthermore, as survivorship has improved with current radiation and che

191 Significantly, we also found that embryo survivorship in a current pregnancy was negatively relat

192 ositive control mice (levofloxacin) had 100% survivorship in both neutropenic and nonneutropenic grou

193 th large femoral heads, and inferior implant survivorship in other patients, particularly women.

194 igher antibody response in mice and enhanced survivorship in PEP settings compared to rRABV.

195 current pregnancy was negatively related to survivorship in the prior pregnancy, clearly demonstrati

196 ct of dietary intake and dietary patterns on survivorship in those with frailty is yet to be examined

197 ttention should be given to long-term cancer survivorship in young adults with colon cancer because t

198 eing imported from the wild, with poor adult survivorship in zoo-born Asians apparently being conferr

199 seen in Burmese timber camps), and its adult survivorship in zoos has not improved significantly in r

200 was chosen to compare fitness (fecundity and survivorship) in the presence and absence of parasitism.

201 Likewise, addressing the challenges of survivorship, including secondary prevention of long-ter

202 se women transition from active treatment to survivorship is a challenge that involves both oncologis

203 Conclusion HL survivorship is associated with a substantive risk of a

204 mplete, national study demonstrates that ICU survivorship is associated with higher 5-year mortality

205 The economic impact of cancer survivorship is considerable and is also high years afte

206 sceptible to climate change stress, as their survivorship is often limited by the most vulnerable par

207 al settlement, and postsettlement growth and survivorship, is critical to the persistence and resilie

208 Efforts to address this important survivorship issue have been encouraged by reports of th

209 nvisioned an organisation that would address survivorship issues and include friends, family, and car

210 Long-term survivorship issues are also being evaluated in this pat

211 icles focusing on PROs, quality of life, and survivorship issues in oncology trials are highlighted,

212 that served as covariables were Knowledge of Survivorship Issues, Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physi

213 ully automated weekly modules covering early survivorship issues.

214 Prosthetic survivorship may depend on characteristics of the implan

215 The Cox proportional hazards survivorship model was used to evaluate the independent

216 In this Series paper, we assessed survivorship models that have been described in the lite

217 Regardless of how one defines survivorship, more than 10 million individuals in the Un

218 gave a new and powerful voice to the cancer survivorship movement that demanded a call to action.

219 s with colon cancer because they likely face survivorship needs that are distinct from those of their

220 nces between urban and rural frogs in larval survivorship, nor in microsatellite and MHC diversities.

221 We monitored the survivorship of bees following antibiotic treatment in o

222 ens, Phoma sp. and Fusarium sp., and reduced survivorship of brine shrimp, Artemia franciscana, acros

223 p with gene expression and may be related to survivorship of duplicated genes.

224 absorption and malnutrition are prevalent in survivorship of esophageal and stomach cancer.

225 Survivorship of larvae was unaffected by low pH, low [O2

226 For gentamicin, survivorship of mice receiving drug every 24, 12, and 6

227 redirected to increasing female fertility or survivorship of offspring.

228 etaining leaves underlie the performance and survivorship of seedlings in deeply shaded tropical fore

229 in (1) the number, (2) the size, and (3) the survivorship of the offspring.

230 model to explore the effect of differential survivorship on the stability of a reproductive queue.

231 om diagnosis through treatment and long-term survivorship or end of life.

232 atient navigation in improving treatment and survivorship outcomes in women with breast cancer.

233 ns about systemic therapy and assessments of survivorship outcomes.

234 P < .001) and significantly worse event-free survivorship (P < .0001).

235 g issues of health promotion and prevention, survivorship, palliation, and bereavement.' Supportive c

236 Worry in the long-term survivorship period was higher among those with unmet ne

237 ent for cancer and can persist well into the survivorship period.

238 tient counseling during the surveillance and survivorship phases of care.

239 ive role in creating and implementing cancer survivorship plans.

240 for follow-up would help them improve their survivorship practices.

241 ants and mothers are projected forward using survivorship probabilities to estimate survivors at the

242 uroblastoma, patients in a thoracic oncology survivorship program, and participants in a lung cancer

243 ent could be incorporated into breast cancer survivorship programmes and delivered by trained breast

244 sures to facilitate broad comparisons across survivorship programmes and thorough and systematic eval

245 omprehensive and high-quality evaluations of survivorship programmes are needed, including assessment

246 e base regarding the effectiveness of cancer survivorship programmes is inadequate.

247 Survivorship programmes tend to evaluate their effective

248 es of assessment measures for currently used survivorship programmes, discuss the rationale for and p

249 ation to prevention, screening, therapy, and survivorship programs.

250 ce points toward a potential shift in marine survivorship, rather than local, river-specific factors.

251 ecific prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship recommendations.

252 from behavioural observations and for pupal survivorship (related to performance), showing that both

253 blood feeding significantly increased adult survivorship relative to nontransgenic sibling controls.

254 active Akt, had no significant difference in survivorship relative to nontransgenic siblings.

255 e inquilines and their descendants had lower survivorship, relative to more diffuse lineages.

256 ant association between geographic range and survivorship remains after controlling for differences i

257 at the evidence overrepresents breast cancer survivorship research and is sparse for prostate and col

258 Survivorship research in the cooperative group setting,

259 ith particular relevance to pediatric cancer survivorship research.

260 p care plans and directing their patients to survivorship resources, health care providers can advoca

261 th stage IIIA disease after 3 and 5 years of survivorship, respectively.

262 Incorporating survivorship results into a mechanistic species distribu

263 esponding to difficult emotions, coping with survivorship, running a family meeting, and transitionin

264 d professionals allied to medicine providing survivorship services caring for adults after cancer tre

265 uninterrupted health insurance coverage for survivorship services in young adulthood.

266 tion of care from pediatric to adult-focused survivorship services may help meet the unique medical,

267 nces the desiccation phenotype by increasing survivorship, shifting the niche space, and reducing the

268 cancer survivors in late treatment and early survivorship stages.

269 For example, survivorship studies of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatu

270 possibly time-dependent effects in long-term survivorship studies.

271 s of 1841, and genetic-counseling and cancer-survivorship studies.

272 Prostate Cancer Comparative Effectiveness & Survivorship Study, a population-based cohort of 881 pat

273 cancer survivors participating in a general survivorship survey completed an additional breast cance

274 ns), and not as active members of the cancer survivorship team.

275 s exhibited markedly higher growth rates and survivorship than histoincompatible pairings.

276 k demonstrates a novel mechanism of enhanced survivorship through increased Akt signaling in the fat

277 e number is a remarkably strong predictor of survivorship to adulthood.

278 patients with cancer from diagnosis through survivorship to end of life.

279 resurfacing only resulted in similar implant survivorship to other surgical options in men with large

280 oral evolution in the context of a fecundity/survivorship trade-off.

281 el to address sexual dysfunction in a cancer survivorship treatment setting.

282 chloroplasts, decreased chlorophyll and zero survivorship under cold stress.

283 l tissue conferred beneficial effects on fly survivorship under normal and stress conditions.

284 sm can be adaptive by improving growth rate, survivorship, vigor, longevity, and fecundity.

285 n disorders on prostate cancer treatment and survivorship warrants further study, because both condit

286 s); for patients undergoing AVR+CABG, median survivorship was 9.4 years (<80 years), 6.8 years (80 to

287 The THR survivorship was assessed according to cement type and b

288 In A. stephensi, survivorship was increased by 15% to 45%, while in Ae. a

289 A significant decrease in tadpole survivorship was observed at 209 mug/g while there was a

290 Among both procedures, adjusted survivorship was significantly different across strata o

291 Survivorship was stratified by age and concomitant CABG

292 copper on sperm DNA damage and early larval survivorship was synergistically increased under OA cond

293 ated items on genetics, chemoprevention, and survivorship, was mailed to a stratified random sample o

294 tection, often further reduced fecundity and survivorship when enemy challenged, and resulted in cons

295 hest reproductive output suffered the lowest survivorship, whereas lineages founded by a mixture of d

296 The benefit was increased survivorship, which in turn increased male production fo

297 ssion, we evaluated the selectivity of genus survivorship with respect to geographic range by using a

298 Offspring survivorship within a pregnancy was affected by the size

299 g, bone densitometry, and mammography during survivorship year 1 (days 366 to 730 postdiagnosis).

300 nts have dramatically improved breast cancer survivorship, yet the risk of relapse persists even 15 y