ライフサイエンスコーパス: suspicious

1 gorized as BI-RADS 3 (probably benign) or 4 (suspicious).

2 ort initially diagnosed as reactive (3/6) or suspicious (3/6) for lymphoma.

3 correctly identified 78 of the 85 nodules as suspicious (92% sensitivity; 95% confidence interval [CI

4 Nine other suspicious abnormal foci proved benign and three represe

5 ent who were suspected of having PCa, with a suspicious abnormality (target) at prebiopsy MR.

6 ning mammography results are interpreted as "suspicious abnormality" or "highly suggestive of maligna

7 eed additional imaging evaluation," 125 for "suspicious abnormality," and 2200 for "highly suggestive

8 Among 1,625 (0.6%) women with "suspicious abnormality," most were recommended for biops

9 We describe these suspicious accessions and their possible origins, and ad

10 ant (c.502-2A>G) in the FHL1 gene was highly suspicious among other candidate genes and variants.

11 sion (AMRV), which were further divided into suspicious AMRV (n = 37) and AMRV (n = 33).

12 The grafts with TCMRV, suspicious AMRV (sAMRV), and AMRV showed similar respons

13 Suspicious and definite CAABMR showed a similar prognosi

14 motional facial expressions (neutral, happy, suspicious and fearsome) of an oncoming walking confeder

15 Those interpreted as suspicious and the subsequent histologic reports were re

16 assessment of "malignant," 2.6 for "atypical/suspicious," and 0.02 for "benign." When diagnostic mamm

17 ble method with which to biopsy DBT-detected suspicious architectural distortions not visualized at m

18 and autofluorescence provide a way to target suspicious areas.

19 t was applied to a set of recently collected suspicious artesunate tablets purchased in shops and pha

20 ference between suspicious melanoma and each suspicious atypia group: melanoma versus severe atypia a

21 If a node was defined as suspicious because of an irregular border or mixed signa

22 0002), odd speech (beta = 0.2592, P =.0001), suspicious behavior (beta = 0.2749, P =.0001), and socia

23 negative, and avoidant symptoms; odd speech; suspicious behavior; social dysfunction; and symptoms of

24 f routine DCE-MRI data from 22 patients with suspicious breast lesions initially ruled positive by in

25 Suspicious breast lesions visible only at MR imaging and

26 mber 2011 to December 2013, 40 patients with suspicious breast lesions were included in this institut

27 ncy data were acquired from 78 patients with suspicious breast lesions.

28 ingly used following mammography to evaluate suspicious breast lesions.

29 ive pathologic diagnosis of mammographically suspicious breast lesions.

30 one-third of these cases were histologically suspicious but difficult lesions due to processing artif

31 false-positive control--that of a woman with suspicious but nonmalignant findings at MR imaging--was

32 Deja vu experiences that were suspicious, but not diagnostic, of MTLE occurred in 6 ad

33 ies performed for microcalcifications deemed suspicious by radiologists were analyzed.

34 ns was 29.6, whereas the ODxRS for all other suspicious calcification morphologies was 19.4 (P < .03)

35 eptor scintigraphy (SRS), in each clinically suspicious case.

36 ctive agent administration may be helpful in suspicious cases for differential diagnosis and to elimi

37 specimens, and trichrome staining method in suspicious cases.

38 ells showing atypia are included in a broad "suspicious" category, with reported overall malignancy r

39 e aspiration specimens for cytology from any suspicious celiac lymph nodes.

40 lesions were sampled for biopsy because of a suspicious change at follow-up (two N0 lesions, one each

41 0.3%, 1.7%) and only 0.1% of the cancers had suspicious changes at 6-month follow-up and only one (17

42 One important challenge is to identify suspicious chemicals present in fingerprint residues, wh

43 ta and outside medical records help identify suspicious circumstances and inconsistencies.

44 ning tool for identifying many, but not all, suspicious colonies grown on selective media within 24 h

45 rial pathogens seen in middle Tennessee from suspicious colonies grown on selective stool culture med

46 hology on chromogenic media were compared to suspicious colonies on nonselective TSA II.

47 auve colonies on C-MRSA at 24 h and 48 h and suspicious colonies on TSA II were confirmed as Staphylo

48 The suspicious colonies were analyzed by the Biotyper system

49 A total of 304 suspicious colonies were selected and further identified

50 resection and presented to our service with suspicious conjunctival lesions at a median of 22 years

51 ides a fast ex vivo preliminary diagnosis of suspicious conjunctival lesions with good histologic det

52 ly 2012 through July 2014 of 419 adults with suspicious conjunctival lesions.

53 whose thyroid nodules have indeterminate or suspicious cytologic features on fine needle aspiration

54 ion suspicious for follicular neoplasm," or "suspicious cytologic findings" were 95%, 94%, and 85%, r

55 In patients with follicular neoplasms or suspicious cytology, preoperative TSHR mRNA >1 ng/mug ha

56 s revealed that polysomy FISH, trisomy FISH, suspicious cytology, primary sclerosing cholangitis stat

57 al or repeated prostate needle biopsy due to suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) findings and

58 ing conditions, three exhibited at least two suspicious "DTAC warning criteria" for CNS infection.

59 Fifteen patients (8.2%) had a suspicious enhancing lesion depicted in the contralatera

60 present without classic clinical stigmata or suspicious family history has led to increased reliance

61 pancreas less than 3 cm in diameter without suspicious features in preoperative imaging should under

62 <3 cm) in asymptomatic patients without any suspicious features may be observed with serial imaging

63 Each radiologist identified suspicious findings and rated suspicion of breast cancer

64 CT examination and/or PET-CT scan revealed suspicious findings in the left upper abdomen.

65 Patients had benign or no suspicious findings on clinical examination.

66 Computer-aided detection identifies suspicious findings on mammograms to assist radiologists

67 s (range, 1.2-7.6 seconds) in the absence of suspicious findings on the DWIBS MIPs.

68 phy programs allow depiction of nonpalpable, suspicious findings requiring histologic evaluation, but

69 Nodules or other suspicious findings were classified as positive results.

70 this work, we investigated the effect of one suspicious food contaminant, bisphenol A (BPA), in vivo.

71 Of these 69 CTAs, 10 were falsely suspicious for 11 BCVIs (vertebral, 7; carotid, 4) (fals

72 sis and a segment 7/8 lesion measuring 4 cm, suspicious for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), without

73 Readers marked locations suspicious for a nodule and provided a confidence score

74 ute AMR [23.5%], chronic active AMR [14.7%], suspicious for acute AMR [41.1%], suspicious for chronic

75 Of the 23 deaths suspicious for AE, 15 (12.6% of all deaths, and 65.2% of

76 the patient's primary disease and thus were suspicious for an adverse event (AE) as the cause of the

77 d/or fluid in an unusual location are highly suspicious for an infected aneurysm.

78 ountered when dealing with clinical isolates suspicious for B. pseudomallei or clinical specimens fro

79 e proficient at rapidly recognizing isolates suspicious for B. pseudomallei, be able to safely perfor

80 pathologic examination for 155 neoformations suspicious for being malignant through clinical and/or I

81 population of 22 patients initially screened suspicious for breast cancer.

82 and frequently demonstrates activity that is suspicious for but not diagnostic of ictal activity.

83 proportion of patients with isolated TG, TG suspicious for CAABMR (C4+/DSA- or C4d-/DSA+) and TG wit

84 Until recently, such cases were termed suspicious for CAABMR, and their prognosis remains uncle

85 In each region suspicious for cancer (median number per patient, two; r

86 or changes in signal intensity (SI): normal, suspicious for cancer (nodular focal low SI), or indeter

87 patient showed nodular focal low SI that was suspicious for cancer and corresponded to a focus of chr

88 were asked to characterize different regions suspicious for cancer as benign or malignant on multipar

89 rectal examination that is abnormal but not suspicious for cancer does not affect the overall perfor

90 oxels in the peripheral zone were considered suspicious for cancer if (Cho + Cr)/Cit was at least two

91 opic imaging, proton spectra were considered suspicious for cancer if the ratio of choline plus creat

92 s correlation -based biopsies in all regions suspicious for cancer in each patient, with adequate bio

93 wo independent radiologists delineated areas suspicious for cancer on images (T2-weighted, diffusion-

94 The median size of the region suspicious for cancer was 8 mm (range, 4-13 mm).

95 Regions suspicious for cancer were identified on 3-T multiparame

96 bgroups of patients with at least one lesion suspicious for cancer were included: men with no prior P

97 g a subsequent MR-guided biopsy, the regions suspicious for cancer were reidentified and targeted by

98 205 patients with 216 mammographic findings suspicious for cancer were scheduled to undergo mammogra

99 Of the 44 breasts examined, 29 were suspicious for cancer, of which 15 were found to be posi

100 t "the calcifications are larger and are now suspicious for cancer," 30% would state "the calcificati

101 t core samples were obtained from 25 regions suspicious for cancer.

102 the remaining 48 were classified as "highly suspicious for CCa" (n = 35) or as "probable IAC" (n = 1

103 Among 16 "highly suspicious for CCa" patients who underwent surgery, path

104 R [14.7%], suspicious for acute AMR [41.1%], suspicious for chronic active AMR [2.9%], and only micro

105 re to evaluate stable patients with symptoms suspicious for coronary disease.

106 spected device thrombosis, and 10 tests were suspicious for device thrombosis; these patients were th

107 PET scan was suspicious for distant metastases in 13 patients; three

108 astroenterologist to detect and biopsy areas suspicious for dysplasia.

109 r HHV6 DNA on the basis of clinical findings suspicious for encephalitis.

110 Gram stain positive for organisms, in cases suspicious for endophthalmitis, and in high-risk setting

111 epilepsy, specifying if MTLE; manifestations suspicious for epilepsy; or unaffected.

112 Management of patients with nodules "suspicious for follicular neoplasm" is difficult, since

113 ignificance," "follicular neoplasm or lesion suspicious for follicular neoplasm," or "suspicious cyto

114 patients with suspected AA who had features suspicious for GATA2 mutations, later confirmed by DNA s

115 Skin and rectal biopsies were suspicious for GVHD.

116 011; a total of 263 lesions were reported as suspicious for HCC on pretransplantation magnetic resona

117 weighted imaging; these findings were highly suspicious for high-grade prostate cancer (Fig 1).

118 ur female; mean age, 38 years) with hip pain suspicious for labral disease were examined at both MR a

119 e noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer.

120 One lesion was morphologically suspicious for malignancy at CT and MR imaging but showe

121 Fourteen cases from TMC were suspicious for malignancy based on cytologic evaluation.

122 It contained outlined lesions found to be suspicious for malignancy by two independent radiologist

123 Spectroscopic voxels were considered suspicious for malignancy if the choline level was eleva

124 wing the detection of hypermetabolic lesions suspicious for malignancy in patients with oncologic dia

125 s of posterior segment inflammation that are suspicious for malignancy or infection and require tissu

126 Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual asso

127 oid nodules whose FNA is diagnosed as highly suspicious for malignancy should be resected unless ther

128 with pulmonary nodules with imaging features suspicious for malignancy underwent preoperative PET.

129 s containing a bladder lesion interpreted as suspicious for malignancy were classified as positive.

130 Two cases initially considered suspicious for malignancy were reclassified as benign (t

131 mined significance, follicular neoplasm, and suspicious for malignancy) are histologically benign.

132 s with an imaging report that was flagged as suspicious for malignancy, 131 were identified by the tr

133 were categorized as negative for malignancy, suspicious for malignancy, and positive for malignancy.

134 by rating the number and location of lesions suspicious for malignancy, as well as image quality and

135 tion of more than 43 HU should be considered suspicious for malignancy.

136 -five additional patients had lesions highly suspicious for malignancy.

137 ollicular neoplasms with atypia, atypia, and suspicious for malignancy.

138 flagged by reviewing radiologists as being "suspicious for malignancy." The trigger algorithm was de

139 Partial biopsies of pigmented lesions suspicious for melanoma may lead to delayed melanoma dia

140 SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Tumors clinically suspicious for melanoma with diameter exceeding 5 mm wer

141 aspiration was performed on sites that were suspicious for metastases.

142 US findings were considered suspicious for metastasis if cortical thickening and/or

143 USG for findings that were indeterminate or suspicious for metastasis were 96% (95% CI, 80%-99%), 88

144 Of 36 patients with findings suspicious for metastasis, 23 (64%) had metastasis confi

145 or hemangioma, (2) indeterminate lesion, (3) suspicious for metastasis, or (4) consistent with metast

146 secutive patients with pleural abnormalities suspicious for MPD underwent whole-body positron emissio

147 infant developed an upper air way infection suspicious for nasopharyngitis, which might be a possibl

148 Two drusen suspicious for nGA at baseline were identified, but neit

149 routine B-scan imaging for identifying areas suspicious for nGA in this population from the COMPLETE

150 h clinical and laboratory features that were suspicious for NMOSD.

151 ratin 19 (K19) may show the earliest changes suspicious for PBC, namely, loss of the canals of Hering

152 s found to have a mass in his colon that was suspicious for possible malignancy.

153 mL or less, a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer, and age 50 years or olde

154 r less, and a digital rectal examination not suspicious for prostate cancer.

155 Solid-component masses reported as suspicious for RCC or AML were correlated with histologi

156 experienced interpreters for abnormal uptake suspicious for recurrent disease in the prostate bed and

157 samples from 129 patients with active SSTIs suspicious for S. aureus were collected and characterize

158 200 organisms produced a mauve color on CSA (suspicious for S. aureus) and 180 were positive for S. a

159 nd/or MRI scans identified lesions that were suspicious for SDM in 23 (8.6%) of the 270 patients who

160 g abnormally with no other clinical findings suspicious for TBI.

161 scopy, whereas the two patients with a valve suspicious for tumor at barium enema examination had neo

162 atures of 53 conjunctival lesions clinically suspicious for tumors of 46 patients referred to the Uni

163 All require a nerve biopsy diagnostic of or suspicious for vasculitis and no extra-neuromuscular inv

164 fection cohort) or those with brain findings suspicious for Zika virus infection, with intracranial c

165 for the analytes is high enough to pick out suspicious formulations containing no API or a substitut

166 iggers can be used to identify patients with suspicious imaging findings in whom follow-up diagnostic

167 7 melanomas, 48 benign nevi, and 98 atypical/suspicious, including 48 atypical nevi and 50 melanomas

168 pendent on the doctor's ability to recognise suspicious injuries, such as bruising, bite marks, burns

169 ging of his prostate and pelvis revealed two suspicious intraprostatic lesions with restricted diffus

170 ed with two stimulus confederates performing suspicious/irregular activity, supports the predictions

171 of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), suspicious isolates are now routinely identified to the

172 ould be used to streamline the processing of suspicious isolates.

173 like appearance on mammograms exhibited more suspicious kinetic characteristics (mean T(peak) approxi

174 yes of unilateral retinoblastoma without any suspicious lesion and those performed more than 6 months

175 ugust 2008, LN was determined to be the most suspicious lesion in 352 samples (2.1%) (pleomorphic and

176 First-line evaluation of each suspicious lesion was performed by using the apparent di

177 In screenees without a suspicious lesion, anxiety levels significantly dropped

178 on to confirm the clinical diagnosis for any suspicious lesion.

179 of healthy volunteers (n = 6) and women with suspicious lesions (n = 6).

180 difference was found between the numbers of suspicious lesions (n = 80) or lesion-positive patients

181 ics included fine needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious lesions and mini-laparoscopy to establish the

182 icular potential as home-based remedy for BU suspicious lesions at community level where laboratory c

183 ultrasonography because they had additional suspicious lesions at MR imaging.

184 ere is interest in determining whether these suspicious lesions can be subcategorized, allowing a mor

185 graphy (US)-MR imaging fusion-guided biopsy, suspicious lesions detected at multiparametric MR imagin

186 type of CSE, who initiated it, the number of suspicious lesions detected, how lesions were managed (e

187 Monitoring clinically suspicious lesions for change decreased from 16% (12 of

188 ve to MR imaging-guided wire localization of suspicious lesions identified at MR imaging only, on the

189 nt and a lower annual mean excision rate for suspicious lesions in specialized surveillance (0.81; 95

190 n of clinically or mammographically detected suspicious lesions of the breast.

191 Biopsy was recommended for 32 suspicious lesions on 27 (11%) of 247 MR imaging studies

192 All suspicious lesions underwent biopsy and had benign patho

193 The positive predictive value for all suspicious lesions was 56.6% (47 of 83).

194 Additionally, SUVmean/max and size of suspicious lesions were determined.

195 The remaining 15 suspicious lesions were percutaneously biopsied (10 nega

196 sk women (age range, 28-83 years) who had 92 suspicious lesions with negative findings at mammography

197 nitiated it, whether the physician noted any suspicious lesions, and, if so, how lesions were managed

198 l-thickness punch biopsies are indicated for suspicious lesions, whereas shaves and small punch biops

199 as to instruct on proper biopsy technique of suspicious lesions.

200 preoperative colonoscopy were noted to have suspicious lesions.

201 or directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspicious lesions.

202 zoomed on regions of interest and localized suspicious lesions.

203 sease based on the quantified enhancement of suspicious lesions.

204 ed for initial prostate biopsies and had one suspicious (Likert scale score, >/=3) focus at prebiopsy

205 oth FNAB and CNB were obtained from the same suspicious LN.

206 conserving therapy who do not have palpable, suspicious lymph nodes, who have tumors 3.0 cm or smalle

207 ntrally reviewed and classified as normal or suspicious lymph nodes.

208 hieved nodular PR (nPR) (residual nodules or suspicious lymphocytic infiltrates in a bone marrow biop

209 x confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma patients, two suspicious lymphoma cases, and two patients with reactiv

210 Suspicious macular configurations are easy to recognize

211 Annual screening mammogram demonstrated a suspicious mass in the left breast.

212 n be used as a reference when a child with a suspicious mass is encountered.

213 Diagnostic imaging reveals a suspicious mass, and core biopsy confirms invasive ducta

214 d reconstructed into a volume encompassing a suspicious mass, identified by a radiologist-defined ell

215 Prompt referral of patients with clinically suspicious masses is strongly advocated, before any type

216 Renal transplant recipients with suspicious masses or cancer or both can safely undergo n

217 SILV showed a significant difference between suspicious melanoma and each suspicious atypia group: me

218 woman underwent stereotactic core biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications in the upper outer left b

219 tion help predict the risk of malignancy for suspicious microcalcifications.

220 geted biopsy; nearly 100% of men with highly suspicious MRI lesions are diagnosed with CaP; ability t

221 ssified mutations suggests that there are 10 suspicious mutations likely to cause diseases, and there

222 A total of 258 (28.5%) had a suspicious nerve, 62 (6.8%) had ocular hypertension, 102

223 omas were labeled UDN and as morphologically suspicious nevi by the 9 dermatologists.

224 In cases of laser removal of tattoos, hidden suspicious nevi may be revealed gradually.

225 mber of nevi labeled UDN and morphologically suspicious nevi, specificity of lesion-focused analysis

226 focused analysis to identify morphologically suspicious nevi.

227 US-guided FNA in the most suspicious node at US, or the largest node if all appear

228 Patients with AUS-suspicious nodes had a greater number of positive nodes

229 tal examination was performed and revealed a suspicious nodule in the right lobe of the prostate with

230 ph node involvement, and determining whether suspicious nodules are malignant.

231 so found in benign nodules, testing only GEC suspicious nodules may be helpful in avoiding false posi

232 w-up examinations required for the workup of suspicious nodules.

233 This yielded 64 patients with 93 suspicious, nonpalpable, mammographically occult lesions

234 e hundred forty-one patients with clinically suspicious of CBDS but negative ERC, who had received ES

235 (by the presence of symptoms, signs, or test suspicious of colonic pathology or by family history of

236 The same scholars who are suspicious of generalization are reluctant to embrace ev

237 e (IOP) >21 mmHg or an optic disc appearance suspicious of glaucoma.

238 vely) in our Department as either typical or suspicious of hemangioma 1.5-4 years earlier were enroll

239 d organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for cli

240 T was found in detecting cases of small foci suspicious of lytic lesions on skull radiographs, seen a

241 ho encourage young people to be vigilant and suspicious of others?

242 findings, or (2) mobile mass detected on THV suspicious of thrombus, irrespective of dysfunction and

243 Two orbits from 2 children rated as "suspicious of tumor" received intravenous chemotherapy w

244 ment and judged them as "definitive tumor," "suspicious of tumor," "postsurgical condition/scar forma

245 s (41 breasts) were diagnosed with cancer: 8 suspicious on both ultrasound and mammography, 12 on ult

246 were classified as benign, indeterminate, or suspicious on the basis of US characteristics at retrosp

247 4.3 mm (range, 4-25 mm), and LNs, which were suspicious only in CT or MRI, presented with a mean size

248 nts with visual acuity of worse than 6/12 or suspicious optic discs had detailed examination includin

249 atients with positive family history or with suspicious optic nerve head findings for complete ophtha

250 alified Health Centers detected high rate of suspicious optic nerves, ocular hypertension, and retina

251 spectroscopy was performed in patients with suspicious or biopsy-proved malignant lesions measuring

252 spectroscopy of the breast was performed in suspicious or biopsy-proved malignant lesions that were

253 cues indicative of a potential threat (i.e., suspicious or fearful facial expression).

254 fine needle aspiration biopsy, specifically suspicious or indeterminate thyroid lesions, suggesting

255 gery is favored in patients with concomitant suspicious or malignant thyroid nodules, coexisting hype

256 n to chronic AMR occurred also in cases with suspicious or nondiagnostic findings).

257 stic categories included negative, atypical, suspicious, or positive.

258 Suspicious, oxidase-positive isolates are serotyped in m

259 For women with no suspicious, palpable axillary nodes who undergo breast-c

260 ve if fluid was outside the cul-de-sac or if suspicious parenchymal abnormalities were present.

261 One hundred thirty (71.8%) of 181 AUS-suspicious patients were node positive at surgery compar

262 ical data, recorded the size and location of suspicious peripheral zone tumor nodules on a standardiz

263 as identification on the model of clinically suspicious pigmented lesions, lesions needing a biopsy,

264 Follow-up diagnostic CT was performed in 747 suspicious pulmonary nodules detected at low-dose CT scr

265 tal for initial treatment recommendation for suspicious pulmonary nodules or lung cancer.

266 esponse time, scan prescription data to flag suspicious purchasing patterns and alert physicians and

267 esions in menopausal patients exhibited less suspicious quantitative and qualitative characteristics

268 The control subjects had suspicious radiographs, had undergone CT within 24 hours

269 rmed in 130 consecutive patients with cancer-suspicious regions (CSRs) on multiparametric MR images o

270 equences) was followed by targeted biopsy of suspicious regions and systematic sextant sampling.

271 ode, for which no CAD results were provided, suspicious regions identified with a CAD scheme were cue

272 Fifty-one patients with hematuria or a suspicious renal mass underwent CT urography, during whi

273 Traditionally, the treatment of suspicious renal masses was radical nephrectomy.

274 y of FNA biopsy in 35 of 38 indeterminate or suspicious results.

275 tion, purity, concentration, and toxicity of suspicious samples containing ricin in less than 30 minu

276 nient sensing methods for detecting ricin in suspicious samples must be developed.

277 n different atypia subgroups in the group of suspicious samples.

278 ears), who gave informed consent and who had suspicious screening mammograms and an indication for bi

279 Of the 22 clinically suspicious sites evaluated in 5 patients (4 men, 1 woman

280 By detecting and mapping suspicious sites, guided biopsy of invisible, precancero

281 Latent yaws was defined as lack of suspicious skin lesions or presence of ulcers negative f

282 mple bedside evaluation of itch and pain for suspicious skin lesions.

283 implementable tool for physicians evaluating suspicious skin lesions.

284 d data addressing potential overtreatment of suspicious skin lesions.

285 Suspicious spirit samples from Russia and Kenya were ana

286 ronchial specimens could be useful in highly suspicious SPT cases.

287 Suspicious symptoms should be appropriately investigated

288 osttreatment brain imaging was performed for suspicious symptoms.

289 oing research, clinical problems such as the suspicious thyroid fine needle aspiration, better treatm

290 ool for the clinician managing patients with suspicious thyroid lesions.

291 2 was an asymptomatic 42-year-old woman with suspicious ultrasound findings in her left breast; contr

292 study, we selected cases of natural and non-suspicious unnatural death referred to Her Majesty's (HM

293 iotherapy for uveal melanoma, 2 patients had suspicious uveoscleral nevi, and 1 patient had invasive

294 mutations per sample +/- 21), intermediately suspicious via multiparametric MR imaging (31 mutations

295 sis (34 mutations per sample +/- 19), mildly suspicious via multiparametric MR imaging (37 mutations

296 In particular, the presence of three or more suspicious voxels in a hemiprostate showed a sensitivity

297 gned by the two readers and on the number of suspicious voxels in each hemiprostate, respectively.

298 By using the number of suspicious voxels to define different diagnostic thresho

299 ending mycology results) among patients with suspicious wounds.

300 could help exclude malignancy in women with suspicious x-ray screening mammograms.