戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ories of the evolution of host-microorganism symbioses.
2 hway shared by the rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses.
3 ce of chemically prolific bacteria living in symbioses.
4 nificance of the biodiversity of mycorrhizal symbioses.
5 emodeled by pathways remaining from previous symbioses.
6  required for the establishment of these two symbioses.
7 al adaptation in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses.
8           There is not one but many ambrosia symbioses.
9 le is known of their function in mutualistic symbioses.
10 cteria are highly adapted to engage in these symbioses.
11  of substrates known to power chemosynthetic symbioses.
12 ralizing host defense responses to establish symbioses.
13 own transport activities in these beneficial symbioses.
14 del system to understand mutually beneficial symbioses.
15 s are required for both bacterial and fungal symbioses.
16 esis of infectious disease and in beneficial symbioses.
17 ranscriptional reprogramming facilitates the symbioses.
18 the molecular foundations of human-bacterial symbioses.
19 mportance of the encoded protein in multiple symbioses.
20 t in stabilizing a wide range of mutualistic symbioses.
21  rapid evolutionary changes in host-pathogen symbioses.
22 e (PHB), in maintaining the Rhizobium-legume symbioses.
23 agement of one of the world's most important symbioses.
24 ole in osmoregulation during legume/rhizobia symbioses.
25 o recruit luminous bacteria into light organ symbioses.
26 d not previously been known to exist in such symbioses.
27 the N2-fixing efficiency of Rhizobium-legume symbioses.
28 agonism-to-mutualism transition in heritable symbioses.
29 ns elusive, but may be linked to mycorrhizal symbioses.
30  more targeted studies in other host-microbe symbioses.
31  renowned for establishing complex microbial symbioses.
32 ng crosskingdom signaling and host-bacterial symbioses.
33 nfection and development of rhizobial and AM symbioses.
34 ntly the best understood of all host-microbe symbioses.
35 nce regulation of nodulation in actinorhizal symbioses.
36  raw material for natural selection in coral symbioses.
37 robial nutrition, and host health in diverse symbioses.
38 ation or decoding of calcium-spiking in both symbioses.
39 te change through the establishment of novel symbioses.
40 onal stage in the evolutionary succession of symbioses.
41 fering with plant carbon allocation and root symbioses.
42 osition is not required for establishment of symbioses.
43 lants and other photosynthetic organisms and symbioses(3,4), but there has yet to be any direct link
44 ty generates evolved geographic structure in symbioses among plants and soil organisms.
45                      Mutualisms that involve symbioses among specialized partners may be more stable
46 curs in nonpathogenic bacteria, facilitating symbioses, among other things.
47 odel plant for the analysis of plant-microbe symbioses and for addressing questions pertaining to leg
48 view the current state of knowledge of these symbioses and highlight important avenues for future stu
49 ogy, photosynthetic pathway, nitrogen-fixing symbioses and life histories have relied on either expli
50  is a new variant among reported root nodule symbioses and may reflect an unusual nitrogen transfer p
51 ght on the evolution of plant-cyanobacterium symbioses and may suggest a route to establish productiv
52 ese results highlight the powerful role that symbioses and plant defense play in driving tree growth
53 e results to both the evolution of Wolbachia symbioses and proposed applied strategies for the use of
54 tic algae (Symbiodinium spp.) - unless these symbioses are able to adapt to global warming, bleaching
55                        Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbioses are among the most widespread associations bet
56                         Coral-dinoflagellate symbioses are defined as mutualistic because both partne
57                                    Microbial symbioses are essential for the normal development and g
58                                         Most symbioses are horizontally acquired, i.e., they begin an
59 rboring natives, and suggests that these new symbioses are maladapted.
60                                 Actinorhizal symbioses are mutualistic interactions between plants an
61 in global ecology and biogeochemical cycles, symbioses are poorly characterized in open ocean plankto
62 t novel associations, which suggest that the symbioses are probably more widespread than conventional
63                  While most animal-bacterial symbioses are reestablished each successive generation,
64 des a powerful system to elucidate how these symbioses are regulated.
65 iple, it has been suggested that mycorrhizal symbioses are the stable derivatives of ancestral antago
66             Furthermore, naturally occurring symbioses are typically complex, in which multiple symbi
67                         Eukaryotic-bacterial symbioses are ubiquitous in nature.
68                         Beneficial bacterial symbioses are ubiquitous in nature.
69                                    Microbial symbioses are ubiquitous in nature.
70                               Host-microbial symbioses are vital to health; nonetheless, little is kn
71                                              Symbioses are widespread in nature and occur along a con
72                 Plants that form root-nodule symbioses are within a monophyletic 'nitrogen-fixing' cl
73 abitat partitioning among the chemosynthetic symbioses at hydrothermal vents and illustrate the coupl
74                                        These symbioses became more beneficial with rising [CO2], but
75                                              Symbioses between bacteria and eukaryotes are ubiquitous
76                                              Symbioses between cnidarians and symbiotic dinoflagellat
77                                              Symbioses between eukaryotes and unicellular organisms a
78 ntified at least five independent origins of symbioses between herbivorous ants and related Rhizobial
79                                              Symbioses between metazoans and microbes are widespread
80                                              Symbioses between nitrogen (N)(2)-fixing prokaryotes and
81 ommunities on the one hand, and facilitating symbioses between organisms on the other, is only just b
82 f ecosystems, particularly by disrupting the symbioses between reef-building corals and their photosy
83 mportant in establishing and maintaining the symbioses between roseobacters and phytoplankton.
84                                  Mutualistic symbioses between scleractinian corals and endosymbiotic
85 sis signaling pathway that is shared in both symbioses but also modulate innate immune responses.
86 even in predominantly vertically transmitted symbioses by stabilizing the cooperative association ove
87              It is our hope that mycorrhizal symbioses can be effectively integrated into global chan
88 servations demonstrating that Epichloe-grass symbioses can modulate grassland ecosystems via both abo
89 nce and conjecture that coral-dinoflagellate symbioses change partnerships in response to changing ex
90        In contrast to terrestrial and marine symbioses characterized to date, the symbiont reported i
91                   Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) symbioses contribute to global carbon cycles as plant ho
92  various trophic levels (cyanobacteria, root symbioses, cycad seeds, cycad flour, flying foxes eaten
93  deep-sea hydrothermal vents, chemosynthetic symbioses dominate the biomass, contributing substantial
94 s on host cells and do not produce effective symbioses, emphasizing the importance of understanding t
95 gence of biological complexity, yet how such symbioses first form is unclear.
96 karyotes and encourages exploration of other symbioses for drug discovery and better understanding of
97 mportance to sustainable agriculture are the symbioses formed between more than 80% of terrestrial pl
98 establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses, formed by most flowering plants in associatio
99     This symbiosis bears some resemblance to symbioses found in freshwater ecosystems.
100  conflict may have precluded these wild-type symbioses from rising to ecological dominance.
101 ecruited during the evolution of root nodule symbioses from the already existing arbuscular mycorrhiz
102  of the genes required for nodulation and AM symbioses from the two model legumes, Medicago truncatul
103                               These kinds of symbioses have arisen frequently in animals; for example
104                        Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbioses have evolved a minimum of 78 times independent
105  legume genes required for nodulation and AM symbioses have their putative orthologs in nonlegumes.
106 equencing show great promise for studying EM symbioses; however, metatranscriptomic studies have been
107  known to play a role in marine invertebrate symbioses; (iii) the potential use of hydrogen as an ene
108 genus that forms nitrogen-fixing root-nodule symbioses in a wide range of woody Angiosperms, is accom
109 ermine the consequences of these facultative symbioses in Acyrthosiphon pisum (the pea aphid) for vul
110 ltiple gains of actinorhizal nitrogen-fixing symbioses in angiosperms may have been associated with i
111 us, and little is known about most N2-fixing symbioses in natural ecosystems(12).
112 uestions pertaining to the evolution of root symbioses in plants.
113  in the disassociation of algal-invertebrate symbioses in response to elevated temperature.
114                                    Microbial symbioses, in which microbes have either positive (mutua
115  mechanisms and consequences of multipartite symbioses, including consortia in which multiple organis
116 cies' physiological functions in mutualistic symbioses increased the range of suboptimal environmenta
117       In terrestrial environments, N2-fixing symbioses involve multicellular plants, but in the marin
118                                 Host-microbe symbioses involving bacterial endosymbionts comprise som
119                  Aphids maintain mutualistic symbioses involving consortia of coinherited organisms.
120 ties, especially to certain insect-bacterium symbioses involving likewise host peptides for manipulat
121 ical component in the establishment of these symbioses is nuclear-localized calcium (Ca(2+)) oscillat
122          A defining facet of tick-Rickettsia symbioses is the molecular strategy employed by each par
123 logical importance, but evolution of farming symbioses is thought to be restricted to three terrestri
124 ns, whether in shared ecosystems or intimate symbioses, is fundamentally altering our understanding o
125 model legume used widely for studies of root symbioses, it is apparent that the phosphate transporter
126                                        These symbioses, known as lichens, are one way for fungi to me
127                                       Insect symbioses lack the complexity and diversity of those ass
128                      To form nitrogen-fixing symbioses, legume plants recognize a bacterial signal, N
129 st-microbe interaction; for example, several symbioses like the squid-vibrio light organ association
130                                  Mycorrhizal symbioses link the biosphere with the lithosphere by med
131                                 Why are some symbioses lost over evolutionary time whereas others bec
132      Knowledge of intraspecific variation in symbioses may aid in understanding the ecology of widesp
133                                              Symbioses may be important mechanisms of plant adaptatio
134  molecular insights into mammalian-microbial symbioses may be revealed amid the complexity of the int
135 iversity of microcystins suggest that lichen symbioses may have been an important environment for div
136 imate biological nitrogen fixation of legume symbioses not only in laboratory experiments.
137  plants, but in the marine environment these symbioses occur with unicellular planktonic algae.
138 cance of bacterial communities and bacterial symbioses of corals.
139 e diversity, and recently proposed bacterial symbioses of corals.
140 In contrast, the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbioses of plants with bacteria evolved more recently,
141 host ecology has retained archosaur-specific symbioses over geologic time.
142     To establish compatible rhizobial-legume symbioses, plant roots support bacterial infection via h
143                     In mutualistic ant-plant symbioses, plants host ant colonies that defend them aga
144                                 Host-microbe symbioses play a critical role in the evolution of biolo
145                                    Described symbioses primarily involve heterotrophic protists, incl
146                         For many coral-algal symbioses, prolonged episodes of thermal stress damage t
147 hylogenetic relationships of insect-bacteria symbioses provides the opportunity to assess the effects
148 ion of host cell responses in both AM and RN symbioses, reflecting common mechanisms for plant cell r
149                                         Both symbioses rely on partially overlapping genetic programm
150 ary patterns of actinorhizal nitrogen-fixing symbioses remain unclear to date.
151        The establishment of rhizobium-legume symbioses requires the bacterial synthesis of oligosacch
152 iscovery of nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium-legume symbioses, researchers have dreamed of transferring this
153 es in the environment of the Campeche Knolls symbioses revealed that these are present at high concen
154                    In legume nitrogen-fixing symbioses, rhizobial nod genes are obligatory for initia
155                                  Root nodule symbioses (RNS) allow plants to acquire atmospheric nitr
156                                  Mutualistic symbioses shape the evolution of species and ecosystems
157                     The finding that the two symbioses share common signaling components in legumes s
158                       Interestingly, the two symbioses share overlapping signaling pathways in legume
159 ological settings and invertebrate-bacterial symbioses similar to those of both western Pacific and A
160 carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles) and via symbioses since many novel organisms exhibit restricted
161                          In legume-Rhizobium symbioses, specialised soil bacteria fix atmospheric nit
162                               In mutualistic symbioses, such as division of labor, both parties can g
163  these microarray data with those from other symbioses, such as germ-free/conventionalized mice and z
164                              In antagonistic symbioses, such as host-parasite interactions, one popul
165              Early views on the evolution of symbioses suggested that all long-term, intimate associa
166 ates the range from mutualistic to parasitic symbioses that plants form with diverse organisms, as we
167 ect"), but disfavored in certain mutualistic symbioses (the "Red King effect").
168 ion is thought to be favored in antagonistic symbioses (the "Red Queen effect"), but disfavored in ce
169                           In legume-rhizobia symbioses, the bacteria in infected cells are enclosed i
170                 In rhizobia-leguminous plant symbioses, the current model of nitrogen transfer from t
171 xamines a model system for the study of such symbioses, the light organ association between the bobta
172               In the case of EPS II-mediated symbioses, the reduction in invasion efficiency results
173                                      In both symbioses, the specialized host membrane that surrounds
174                       In cyanobacteria-plant symbioses, the symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium
175 opmental trajectory of horizontally acquired symbioses through the study of the binary squid-vibrio m
176 epends on the ability of reef-building coral symbioses to adapt or acclimatize to warmer temperatures
177 ogical strategies that enable chemosynthetic symbioses to colonize oligotrophic environments.
178 foundly influence the response of reef coral symbioses to major environmental perturbations but may u
179 f facultative and obligate interactions from symbioses to pathogenicity.
180 rative analyses on 106 unique host-bacterial symbioses to test for correlations between symbiont func
181  teemed with organisms that coordinate their symbioses using chemical signals traversing between the
182 e and distinct from previously characterized symbioses, where multiple microbial partners have associ
183 s is best understood in beneficial bacterial symbioses, where partner fidelity facilitates loss of ge
184 s ammonium is contributed by legume-rhizobia symbioses, which are initiated by the infection of legum
185 rk architecture of below-ground plant-fungus symbioses, which are ubiquitous to terrestrial ecosystem
186 al survival in the world's warmest reefs are symbioses with a newly discovered alga,Symbiodinium ther
187                                         Root symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia
188 pteran suborder Auchenorrhyncha show complex symbioses with at least two obligate bacterial symbionts
189 any insect groups depend on ancient obligate symbioses with bacteria that undergo long-term genomic d
190 a: Mollusca) are a family of clams that form symbioses with chemosynthetic gamma-proteobacteria.
191 egative bacterium that forms nitrogen-fixing symbioses with compatible leguminous plants via intracel
192  for lichen-forming fungi that form obligate symbioses with cyanobacteria.
193 ome bacterial metabolites may be specific to symbioses with eukaryotes and encourages exploration of
194           However, little is known about how symbioses with extracellular symbionts, representing the
195  aphid-Buchnera association and other insect symbioses with intracellular microorganisms.
196 e family of caridean shrimp, largely live in symbioses with marine invertebrates of different phyla.
197  inherent to these regions in part thanks to symbioses with microorganisms, and yet these microbial s
198 ts are able to establish mutually beneficial symbioses with microorganisms.
199 ed by marine bacteria that engage in dynamic symbioses with microscopic algae.
200 alacturonide or flg22 treatment and the root symbioses with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and arbuscular m
201 Leguminous plants can enter into root nodule symbioses with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria known as rh
202                Legumes engage in root nodule symbioses with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria known as rh
203                                     Obligate symbioses with nutrient-provisioning bacteria have origi
204 s, and as such, these arthropods have formed symbioses with nutrient-supplementing microbes that faci
205 avourable light environments to establishing symbioses with plants and fungi.
206                     Many microorganisms form symbioses with plants that range, on a continuous scale,
207                                 Legumes form symbioses with rhizobial bacteria and arbuscular mycorrh
208 s of nitrogen stress, leguminous plants form symbioses with soil bacteria called rhizobia.
209 ma proteobacteria that form entomopathogenic symbioses with soil nematodes.
210 utrition through nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbioses with soil rhizobia.
211 capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbioses with soil-borne microorganisms.
212 rbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which form symbioses with the roots of the most important crop spec
213 ungi (AMF) have formed intimate, mutualistic symbioses with the vast majority of land plants and are
214 ngi (order Glomales), which form mycorrhizal symbioses with two out of three of all plant species, ar
215 cter clade of Alphaproteobacteria that forms symbioses with unicellular eukaryotic phytoplankton, suc

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top