ライフサイエンスコーパス: symbiosis

1 14 LIKE is, the one responsible for loss of symbiosis .

2 cating that FeoAB is the iron transporter in symbiosis.

3 symbiotic interface in both AM and rhizobium symbiosis.

4 esting nutritional constraints upon algae in symbiosis.

5 he specialized bacteria in this multilateral symbiosis.

6 YP132C, has important functions unrelated to symbiosis.

7 ctors indicate the nutritional nature of the symbiosis.

8 es that help maintain a complex multilateral symbiosis.

9 ding of phosphorylation signaling cascade in symbiosis.

10 r conditions where hosts didn't benefit from symbiosis.

11 curred exclusively during Medicago-rhizobium symbiosis.

12 previously implicated in an insect-bacterium symbiosis.

13 ronic intracellular infection that underlies symbiosis.

14 processes that determine the outcome of the symbiosis.

15 he first organisms to engage in this type of symbiosis.

16 d normal growth and established an effective symbiosis.

17 provides insight into mechanisms regulating symbiosis.

18 s involved in plant response to WS during AM symbiosis.

19 alistic outcome of the Rhizopus-Burkholderia symbiosis.

20 y additionally stabilize NCR peptides during symbiosis.

21 ycota formed the sole ancestral plant-fungus symbiosis.

22 roups that would not exist without heritable symbiosis.

23 ammonium transporters are induced during AM symbiosis.

24 ories of nonorthologous genes are induced in symbiosis.

25 the miR172 node in the common bean-rhizobia symbiosis.

26 se symbiotic Pi transporters is required for symbiosis.

27 the modern predominance of the Glomeromycota symbiosis.

28 MI2 and is required for the legume-rhizobium symbiosis.

29 avior that is established only in the mature symbiosis.

30 rcadian clock is adjusted at early stages of symbiosis.

31 g the molecular basis and evolution of coral symbiosis.

32 tive to phosphate-mediated regulation of the symbiosis.

33 garded as being functionally involved in the symbiosis.

34 the regulation of the arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis.

35 combined are necessary for a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis.

36 nance, and phenotypic effects of the farming symbiosis.

37 ein present exclusively in plants forming AM symbiosis.

38 utionary history of the coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis.

39 pendence beyond the original benefits of the symbiosis.

40 s are shared with the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

41 mbionts perform poorly in just one aspect of symbiosis.

42 rolase receptor at the earliest stages of AM symbiosis.

43 CR) peptides, to control the outcome of this symbiosis.

44 apable of establishing a stable host-microbe symbiosis.

45 ensable for the establishment of root nodule symbiosis.

46 mportance for understanding human-microbiota symbiosis.

47 he establishment of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis.

48 estricted to the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis.

49 steps leading to this type of social insect symbiosis.

50 e our understanding of the soybean-rhizobial symbiosis.

51 ariation in host capacity to profit from the symbiosis.

52 MtLYK3 and LjNFR5/MtNFP receptors triggering symbiosis.

53 of which function in preceding phases of the symbiosis.

54 phic function expressed by ECM fungi when in symbiosis?

55 trogen-fixing bacteria, asking how labile is symbiosis across different host clades.

56 Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), a widespread mutualistic association of

57 During arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS), considerable amounts of lipids are gene

58 ring plants that form arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, an ancestral mutualism between soil fungi and

59 isms of (per)chlorate respiration, including symbiosis and a hybrid enzymatic-abiotic metabolism.

60 y displacement of an ancestral heterotrophic symbiosis and a report of pure culture of a thioautotrop

61 ified NF-YB and NF-YC subunits for rhizobial symbiosis and binding to the promoter of MtERN1 (for Eth

62 ABC transporter (STR) that are required for symbiosis and conserved uniquely in plants that engage i

63 view highlights the roles that developmental symbiosis and developmental plasticity have in evolution

64 an overview of the molecular program for AM symbiosis and discuss these recent advances.

65 called Aiptasia herein) model for cnidarian symbiosis and dysbiosis (i.e., "bleaching").

66 Historically, conceptualizations of symbiosis and endosymbiosis have been pitted against Dar

67 ired for the establishment of the ancient AM symbiosis and has been recruited for the rhizobia-legume

68 portance to the stability of the coral-algae symbiosis and holobiont functioning, in particular under

69 ling responses for parallel establishment of symbiosis and induction of lateral root formation.

70 and is emerging as a genetic model to study symbiosis and pathogenesis.

71 Type III secretion system is a key bacterial symbiosis and pathogenicity mechanism responsible for a

72 a previously unknown signaling link between symbiosis and plant development.

73 Recent results for the aphid-Buchnera symbiosis and related systems illustrate that, whereas h

74 idence of an interaction between mycorrhizal symbiosis and soil nitrogen availability.

75 Our results demonstrate uncoupling of symbiosis and the symbiotic root developmental signallin

76 n receptors (t-SNAREs) that are dedicated to symbiosis and used cell-specific expression analysis tog

77 YMRK are recruited in Nod factor-independent symbiosis and, hence, may be conserved in all vascular p

78 lant cells fine-tune their biology to enable symbiosis, and an exciting coalescence of genome mining,

79 ding of the early stages of the squid-vibrio symbiosis, and more generally inform the transcriptional

80 lain the breakdown of the coral-Symbiodinium symbiosis, and possibly some of the numerous coral disea

81 is also required for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, and rad1 mutants show reduced colonization.

82 cellular environment needed for a successful symbiosis, and the absence of these peptides can break d

83 SCULAR MYCORRHIZATION 1) is crucial for this symbiosis, and we demonstrate that it is required and su

84 hanism in the context of the algal-bacterial symbiosis are discussed.

85 tes of evolution of the two populations in a symbiosis are important determinants of which population

86 ute to a more comprehensive understanding of symbiosis as a major driving force of ecological adaptat

87 ese properties establish the Rm-Burkholderia symbiosis as a powerful system for identifying reproduct

88 Collectively, our findings highlight symbiosis as a strategy for an herbivore to metabolize o

89 text dependent: whereas hosts benefited from symbiosis at high light intensity, carrying endosymbiont

90 In the legume-rhizobium symbiosis, bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS) are essent

91 n contrast to the S. meliloti-Medicago model symbiosis, bacteroids in the S. fredii HH103-Glycyrrhiza

92 This symbiosis bears some resemblance to symbioses found in f

93 stems, coral reefs, depend upon a functional symbiosis between a cnidarian animal host (the coral) an

94 We show mutualistic and specific symbiosis between a eusporangiate fern and fungi of the

95 r 140 years, lichens have been regarded as a symbiosis between a single fungus, usually an ascomycete

96 An unusual symbiosis between an uncultivated unicellular cyanobacte

97 support for this hypothesis in the cleaning symbiosis between crayfish and ectosymbiotic branchiobde

98 The symbiosis between crayfish and their worms can shift fro

99 defence mechanism resulting from an unusual symbiosis between finger millet and a root-inhabiting ba

100 gest the possibility of an active functional symbiosis between fungus and plant.

101 The mutualistic symbiosis between gut microbiota and host immunity raise

102 different evolutionary stages in the ancient symbiosis between legumes (Fabaceae) and nitrogen-fixing

103 The nitrogen-fixing symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia is highly relevan

104 In the symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia, the symbiosome e

105 candidates contributing to variation in the symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia.

106 The symbiosis between leguminous plants and soil rhizobia cu

107 and ecological background of this important symbiosis between plants and bacteria.

108 itive biological interactions, including the symbiosis between plants and ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi.

109 Intracellular arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis between plants and glomeromycotan fungi leads

110 d LAESI-MS to explore the well characterized symbiosis between soybean (Glycine max L.

111 Shallow water reefs depend on the obligatory symbiosis between the habitat forming coral host and its

112 toxins to defend themselves against a deadly symbiosis between the third and the fourth trophic level

113 Symbiosis between unicellular dinoflagellates (genus Sym

114 tal data uncover an unrecognized mutualistic symbiosis between Varroa and DWV, which perpetuates a lo

115 ion in the regulation of a mutually obligate symbiosis, between the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) a

116 play extensive roles in host-gut microbiota symbiosis beyond dietary polysaccharide digestion, inclu

117 y susceptible to 'bleaching' (stress-induced symbiosis breakdown), but stress-tolerant symbionts can

118 eins play important roles not only in legume symbiosis but also in other processes critical for legum

119 onts, suggesting that symbionts could escape symbiosis, but only under conditions where hosts didn't

120 r understanding of the D. discoideum farming symbiosis by establishing that the bacterial partner, Bu

121 suggests that hosts controlled the costs of symbiosis by manipulating symbiont load according to lig

122 ere, we test the stability of this three-way symbiosis by sequencing host and symbiont genomes for fi

123 ible role in water and nutrient transport in symbiosis calls for further studies on mechanisms of hos

124 d systems illustrate that, whereas heritable symbiosis can expand ecological range and spur diversifi

125 Developmental symbiosis can generate particular organs, can produce se

126 riation is fundamental to understanding when symbiosis can lead to new higher-level individuals, such

127 Ultimately, symbiosis can lead to symbiogenesis, or speciation throu

128 In the Dictyostelium discoideum farming symbiosis, certain amoebas (termed "farmers") stably ass

129 ndifference, thus resulting in the states of symbiosis, colonization, commensalism, latency, and dise

130 Legume-rhizobium symbiosis contributes large quantities of fixed nitrogen

131 Here we show that although essential for symbiosis, D14L is dispensable for AMF-induced root arch

132 fungi, representing at least four origins of symbiosis, decompose SOM extracted from forest soils.

133 ACTOR expression in ECM roots suggested that symbiosis-dependent auxin signaling is activated during

134 and organizes concepts such as developmental symbiosis, developmental plasticity, genetic accommodati

135 The symbiosis develops deep within the root cortex with mini

136 acteroids in the S. fredii HH103-Glycyrrhiza symbiosis do not undergo NCR-induced and bacA-dependent

137 We found that the loss of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis dramatically alters community structure in the

138 ion of the host light organ, the site of the symbiosis, during space flight.

139 Host adaptations to symbiosis (e.g., immune-system modification) may impose

140 r arboreal lifestyle is thought to make this symbiosis especially important for sloths.

141 Analysis of the host lipidome confirmed that symbiosis establishment was accompanied by specific chan

142 adjustments in host lipid metabolism during symbiosis establishment, mediated by DGKs, are required

143 eins was highest at early time-points during symbiosis establishment.

144 The attine ant-fungus agricultural symbiosis evolved over tens of millions of years, produc

145 Coral-algal (Symbiodinium spp.) symbiosis exemplifies this dichotomy: the partnership is

146 e gains control over its transmission is the symbiosis expected to transition from antagonism to mutu

147 ithin an aphid host influence the outcome of symbiosis for both symbiont and host.

148 e between heterotrophic and chemoautotrophic symbiosis for the giant mud-boring bivalve Kuphus polyth

149 etained from the ancestral peridinin plastid symbiosis for transcript processing in their current, se

150 study revealed that the DGKs involved in the symbiosis form a previously uncharacterized clade of DGK

151 In the symbiosis formed between Mesorhizobium loti strain R7A a

152 The soybean-B. elkanii symbiosis has a low nitrogen-fixation efficiency, but B.

153 C and nifH), the process of colonization and symbiosis has been analyzed, revealing compounds importa

154 Bacterial symbiosis has played a fundamental role in the evolution

155 Here we report the discovery of symbiosis ICEs that exist as three separate chromosomal

156 ion of functional nodules in WT, whereas the symbiosis-impaired mutants maintain an altered community

157 hment in early life, through to host-microbe symbiosis in adulthood, the gut microbiota plays a vital

158 F-kappaB in order to enable establishment of symbiosis in Aiptasia.

159 The role of symbiosis in bacterial symbiont genome evolution is well

160 e, but her vigorous promotion of the role of symbiosis in cell evolution unquestionably had a major i

161 (Phaseolus vulgaris) PI3K severely impaired symbiosis in composite P. vulgaris plants with endosymbi

162 The molecular mechanisms of symbiosis in cultivated peanut with a 'crack entry' infe

163 ke, but differs from liverwort-Glomeromycota symbiosis in maintaining functional efficiency of carbon

164 ghted the important role of the lucinid clam symbiosis in maintaining the health and productivity of

165 ation during the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis in Medicago truncatula In this study, we show

166 nisms that control the establishment of this symbiosis in the actinorhizal tree Casuarina glauca.

167 tal role in the establishment of root nodule symbiosis in the common bean.

168 ysaccharides mediate aspects of host-microbe symbiosis in the gut, including some affecting health.

169 downstream responses separating defense from symbiosis in the roots of the 80-90% of land plants able

170 he evolution of social parasitism-an adverse symbiosis, in which the superorganismal colonies formed

171 al responses within the early stages of this symbiosis, including gene expression patterns consistent

172 e Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis, incompatibility between symbiotic partners fr

173 ycetes are also present in C. geophilum with symbiosis-induced, taxon-specific genes of unknown funct

174 cycle efficiency, development of industrial symbiosis, innovative designs and policies, and ecologic

175 ample of an ecologically important defensive symbiosis involves the woodland fly Drosophila neotestac

176 Nitrogen fixation in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis is a crucial area of research for more sustain

177 However, when symbiosis is advantageous and resistance is relaxed, sym

178 The fungus-growing ant-microbe symbiosis is an ideal system to study chemistry-based mi

179 The best understood function in symbiosis is an improvement in plant mineral nutrient ac

180 The negative role of NFS2 in symbiosis is contingent on host genetic background and c

181 luence over symbiont community assembly when symbiosis is disadvantageous to the host.

182 ators of the legume-rhizobia nitrogen-fixing symbiosis is emerging.

183 velopment of their bacterial partners during symbiosis is even greater than previously recognized.

184 s is increased and subsequent development of symbiosis is impaired.

185 The ambrosia beetle-fungus farming symbiosis is more heterogeneous than previously thought.

186 We demonstrate that liverwort-Mucoromycotina symbiosis is mutualistic and mycorrhiza-like, but differ

187 , arbuscules degenerate prematurely, and the symbiosis is not maintained.

188 Our work shows that obligate symbiosis is not static but instead is subject to short-

189 The end result of this remarkable symbiosis is reduced deoxynivalenol mycotoxin, potential

190 A model for heritable symbiosis is the association of aphids, a clade of sap-f

191 ese isoforms, SYP132A, is induced during the symbiosis, is able to localize to the peribacteroid memb

192 Excision of the Mesorhizobium loti symbiosis island ICEMlSym(R7A) is indirectly activated b

193 Symbiosis islands are ICEs that convert nonsymbiotic mes

194 Symbiosis islands are integrative and conjugative mobile

195 Our results suggest that long-term symbiosis may more readily be established in cases where

196 deprivation to host plants, revealed that AM symbiosis modulates the expression of specific root gene

197 t origin for M. elongata - M. cysteinexigens symbiosis, most likely over 350 million years ago and co

198 l interaction, the size of the effect of the symbiosis (negative to positive) on plants and the depen

199 mechanistically unresolved interplay between symbiosis, nutrient, and hormone (gibberellin) signaling

200 Differential expression in symbiosis of a repertoire of fungal and plant genes invo

201 future directions and opportunities for the symbiosis of protein cages and polymers.

202 sms between fungi and bacteria, we studied a symbiosis of the fungus Rhizopus microsporus (Mucoromyco

203 work is to verify the potential impact of AM symbiosis on the plant response to WS To this aim, the e

204 During symbiosis, organisms use a range of metabolic and protei

205 Despite their close symbiosis, our results show that ectomycorrhizal fungi a

206 omposition that were concomitant to changing symbiosis outcomes.

207 t they show a continued capacity to form the symbiosis over evolutionary time, even though the partne

208 been linked to ecological nutrient cycling, symbiosis, pathogenesis, and cardiovascular disease.

209 ants is a direct consequence of the disabled symbiosis pathway rather than an indirect effect resulti

210 ary studies in legumes showed that a 'common symbiosis pathway' is required for the establishment of

211 n biosynthesis is a key target of the common symbiosis pathway.

212 NAD1 is specifically present in root nodule symbiosis plants with the exception of Morus notabilis,

213 Taken together, the results show that AM symbiosis positively affects the tolerance to WS in toma

214 it via competition, predation, mutualism or symbiosis processes.

215 acA, a membrane protein that is critical for symbiosis, provides protection against all bactericidal

216 aled the existence of genes conserved for AM symbiosis, providing clues as to how plant cells fine-tu

217 e organogenesis and infection processes; and Symbiosis Receptor Kinase (SYMRK) and Histidine Kinase1

218 Symbiosis receptor kinase (SYMRK) is indispensable for a

219 nowledge, this is the first report revealing symbiosis-related genes in a genome-wide manner in peanu

220 utualism breakdown and the response of a key symbiosis-related trait, domatium entrance hole size, wh

221 anisms governing this flow and its impact on symbiosis remain poorly understood.

222 In nature, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis represents the default state of most root syst

223 Establishment of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis requires the recognition of rhizobial molecule

224 we review recent studies at the frontier of symbiosis research that are applying functional genomic

225 integration, work that heralds a new era in symbiosis research.

226 The legume-rhizobial symbiosis results in the formation of root nodules that

227 ily younger nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium legume symbiosis (RLS)(8) or by reverse genetic analyses of dif

228 indispensable for activation of root nodule symbiosis (RNS) at both epidermal and cortical levels an

229 que biological phenomena such as small RNAs, symbiosis, self-incompatibility and circadian rhythms.

230 lution is well understood, yet the ways that symbiosis shapes host genomes or more particularly, host

231 alysis of NF-kappaB levels following loss of symbiosis show that NF-kappaB levels increase only after

232 tion showed that Epr3 is integrated into the symbiosis signal transduction pathways.

233 Calcium channels required for symbiosis signaling have been identified, and connection

234 been identified, and connections between the symbiosis signaling pathway and key transcriptional regu

235 These do not only activate a common symbiosis signaling pathway that is shared in both symbi

236 key symbiotic receptor kinase of the common symbiosis signaling pathway, required for both the rhizo

237 in the sense that they have lost the common symbiosis signaling pathway, which enables intracellular

238 etyl chitotetraose (CO4) activate the common symbiosis signaling pathway, with resultant calcium osci

239 In symbiosis, sitABCD and mntH were expressed throughout no

240 ysis of an insertion mutant, we identified a symbiosis-specific MYB-like transcription factor (MYB1)

241 PAM has two major membrane sub-domains, and symbiosis-specific transporter proteins are localized in

242 ture-based studies were not included, except symbiosis studies that served as models for more complex

243 ange of metabolites involved in a tripartite symbiosis system of moss, cyanobacteria, and fungus.

244 ummer maxima can cause the breakdown of this symbiosis, termed coral bleaching.

245 in microorganisms that arises as a result of symbiosis, termed the Foraging-to-Farming hypothesis.

246 Arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) is a mutual symbiosis that involves a complex symbiotic interface ov

247 mammals and these microbes have developed a symbiosis that is sustained through the host's continuou

248 During arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis, the plant gains access to phosphate (Pi) and

249 Symbiosis-the close and often long-term interaction of s

250 In the legume-rhizobium nitrogen-fixing symbiosis, thousands of rhizobium microsymbionts, called

251 obiota suggests a mechanism of host-directed symbiosis throughout development.

252 rs to disrupt commensal bacteria-host immune symbiosis to reveal autoimmune demyelination in genetica

253 marily to obtain carbon have been adapted in symbiosis to scavenge nutrients instead.

254 ular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rely on this symbiosis to scavenge phosphorus (P) from soil.

255 gi occurred via the repeated evolution of a 'symbiosis toolkit', with reduced numbers of PCWDEs and l

256 Preexisting coordinated regulation of symbiosis traits by BinK presented an efficient solution

257 Dysfunction of this symbiosis under changing environmental conditions has le

258 rding its relevance for the establishment of symbiosis under different environmental conditions.

259 We estimated the fitness consequences of symbiosis using the interaction between the protist host

260 Induction of MtCBS1 expression during symbiosis was found to be dependent on Nodule Inception

261 re were no conditions where this nutritional symbiosis was mutually beneficial.

262 dulation (new organ made on the root through symbiosis), we show that GmCLV1A functions locally and h

263 ihood of loss and retention of the N2-fixing symbiosis, we tested for correlations between symbiotic

264 RT-specific transcriptional responses to AM symbiosis were quantitatively most pronounced for crown

265 or the study of the cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis, were colonized with the "normal" (homologous)

266 volve in preference to partner choice in any symbiosis where partner quality cannot be adequately ass

267 noglobulin A (SIgA) enhances host-microbiota symbiosis, whereas SIgM remains poorly understood.

268 Humans are now understood to be in complex symbiosis with a diverse ecosystem of microbial organism

269 symbiotic species, but evolves rapidly once symbiosis with ants has broken down, with a "morphorate

270 cribe Cycloclasticus that have established a symbiosis with Bathymodiolus heckerae mussels and poecil

271 tic root developmental signalling during pre-symbiosis with CERK1 required for AMF-induced root archi

272 cially in processes important for successful symbiosis with corals.

273 shaping plant architecture and inducing the symbiosis with endomycorrhizal fungi.

274 ion of S. fredii HH103 bacA neither affected symbiosis with Glycyrrhiza nor increased bacterial sensi

275 e was found to be strictly down-regulated in symbiosis with Gunnera manicata and Blasia pusilla, wher

276 nterparts adapted to changing conditions via symbiosis with human cultivators.

277 cotina establishing the earliest mutualistic symbiosis with land plants.

278 Legumes fix atmospheric nitrogen through symbiosis with microorganisms and contain special traits

279 rd suggests why this tendency occurs and how symbiosis with negative emotions may arise, in art and i

280 Both bacteria undergo symbiosis with nematodes, which is followed by an insect

281 roorganisms, including a mutually beneficial symbiosis with photosynthetic dinoflagellates (Symbiodin

282 ium that can live either independently or in symbiosis with plants from distinct taxa.

283 Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, in symbiosis with plants, facilitate acquisition of nutrien

284 highlights a further facet of the effect of symbiosis with rhizobia on the ecologically important tr

285 umber of nodules formed by the legume in its symbiosis with rhizobia.

286 Dinitrogen fixation by plants (in symbiosis with root bacteria) is a major source of new n

287 us-a basidiomycete fungus-in ectomycorrhizal symbiosis with Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), is able to

288 itrogen fixation in the open ocean, lives in symbiosis with single-celled phytoplankton.

289 s) on the growth of Medicago truncatula, its symbiosis with Sinorhizobium meliloti, and on soil micro

290 of Populus trichocarpa roots in mutualistic symbiosis with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicol

291 Photorhabdus luminescens is known for its symbiosis with the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabd

292 ngi, with their vast filamentous networks in symbiosis with the roots of most plants can alter a larg

293 id allows all Rhizobium species to engage in symbiosis with the same host in a single agricultural pl

294 erate bacterial viruses (phages) may enter a symbiosis with their host cell, forming a unit called a

295 distinguish UCYN-A1 and UCYN-A2 lineages in symbiosis with two distinct prymnesiophyte partners in t

296 r mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form a mutualistic symbiosis with two-thirds of land plants, providing phos

297 ism, lignocellulose digestion, and microbial symbiosis) with wide-ranging applications in diverse bio

298 functional relationships among RTs during AM symbiosis, with a potential impact on root system archit

299 fer from extremophile bacteria which live in symbiosis within the lichen thallus.

300 s relevant because this microbe enhances the symbiosis without interfering with the host and its nodu