1 al Center, 95 patients were included in this
systematic review.
2 Forty-one publications were included in this
systematic review.
3 Cochrane
systematic review.
4 achieved can be accepted, avoiding a lengthy
systematic review.
5 excluded if irrelevant to the topic of this
systematic review.
6 spective cohort studies were included in the
systematic review.
7 Fifteen studies were included in this
systematic review.
8 d data on the search characteristics of each
systematic review.
9 tinoid pesticide exposure on human health: a
systematic review.
10 ds, of which 20 studies were included in the
systematic review.
11 Mixed methods
systematic review.
12 s and Jan 1, 2009, and Sept 2, 2016, for one
systematic review.
13 d Vision United States Satellite database of
systematic reviews.
14 d genetic factors were often investigated in
systematic reviews.
15 from 2009 to July 2017 and bibliographies of
systematic reviews.
16 rials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews.
17 mise clinical care, including the science of
systematic reviews.
18 id Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews.
19 mized, controlled trials; meta-analyses; and
systematic reviews.
20 uary 2009 to July 2017 and bibliographies of
systematic reviews.
21 January 2017), and the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews (
19 January 2017).
22 ith multidisciplinary representation using a
systematic review (
1996 to 2016) of meta-analyses, rando
23 Two
systematic reviews,
3 observational studies, and no rand
24 e evidence for causality through a rapid and
systematic review about links between Zika virus infecti
25 This
systematic review aimed to determine dentists' and thera
26 This
systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of PAD an
27 This
systematic review aimed to examine and rank the effectiv
28 -analyses using A Measurement Tool to Assess
Systematic Reviews (
AMSTAR), adding 6 new items to rate
29 One
systematic review and 3 primary studies met inclusion cr
30 We performed a
systematic review and a meta-analysis of individual part
31 This paper provides a
systematic review and analysis of different phenomena th
32 By
systematic review and curation of multiple lines of evid
33 using a dose-response curve generated from a
systematic review and from current and future population
34 ular disease (CVD) risk is also unknown.This
systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the
35 Hence, the present
systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate eff
36 immunotherapy, has been informed by a formal
systematic review and meta-analysis and produced using t
37 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE
38 ealth in adult life.The aim was to conduct a
systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effec
39 potency.To summarize evidence, we executed a
systematic review and meta-analysis examining isoflavone
40 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis examining these issu
41 So far, a comprehensive
systematic review and meta-analysis has not been done of
42 This
systematic review and meta-analysis helps physicians and
43 This
systematic review and meta-analysis included 78 studies
44 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis including studies as
45 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control and
46 ne on the dopamine systems, we carried out a
systematic review and meta-analysis of dopamine measures
47 In 2013, results from a
systematic review and meta-analysis of global zoonotic t
48 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention tria
49 To conduct a
systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to
50 To perform a
systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal stud
51 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis of observational coh
52 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based
53 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis of primary antibioti
54 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
55 ional Chinese medicine (TCM), we conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinic
56 lood pressure (DBP) in healthy individuals.A
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
57 A
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized contro
58 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing
59 We thus undertook a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluatin
60 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in Asia a
61 ninferiority trials of dosing intervals, one
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of de-esc
62 To undertake a
systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that inve
63 The results of a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the consistency,
64 The authors conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of the published rep
65 We further conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis of TMPRSS2:ERG fusio
66 This
systematic review and meta-analysis quantified the prote
67 This
systematic review and meta-analysis supports the use of
68 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk o
69 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether AK
70 The aim of this study was to conduct a
systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the diagn
71 We performed a comprehensive
systematic review and meta-analysis to compare baseline
72 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis to compare prolonged
73 Purpose To perform a
systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if ther
74 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis to establish the eff
75 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the evid
76 Here, we performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impa
77 isorders; therefore, we performed an updated
systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the pote
78 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safe
79 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate whether
80 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the accur
81 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis to generate average
82 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the a
83 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate wheth
84 We conducted a
systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize all rep
85 A
systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken in an
86 We performed a
systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequentia
87 We did a
systematic review and meta-analysis, and identified elig
88 Based on a
systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with cirrh
89 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we analysed data fr
90 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we analysed publish
91 By dealing with such heterogeneity through a
systematic review and meta-analysis, we examine the asso
92 In a
systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no evidenc
93 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we independently se
94 For this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched 14 data
95 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched bibliog
96 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched five el
97 In this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE
98 For this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed,
99 For this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed,
100 For this
systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed,
101 Systematic review and meta-analysis.
102 Therefore, we conducted a PRISMA
systematic review and meta-analysis.
103 in resistance and fasting insulin) through a
systematic review and meta-analysis.We searched PubMed,
104 This study was a
systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
105 We updated a
systematic review and metaanalysis to examine the effica
106 A
systematic review and network meta-analysis was performe
107 For this
systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched
108 We conducted a
systematic review and obtained individual participant da
109 This was a
systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis mod
110 Six
systematic reviews and 2 evidence-based clinical guideli
111 Two
systematic reviews and 28 reports of 27 trials met inclu
112 According to 11
systematic reviews and 32 primary studies, harms in gene
113 Results Eighty-three studies, including 20
systematic reviews and 63 primary studies, met the eligi
114 An update of these
systematic reviews and a search for studies related to r
115 We also searched the Cochrane Library for
systematic reviews and assessment evaluations, the Natio
116 body of research that has been summarised in
systematic reviews and integrated into clinical practice
117 tween Jan 1, 2005, and Sept 2, 2016, for two
systematic reviews and Jan 1, 2009, and Sept 2, 2016, fo
118 l review of relevant publications (including
systematic reviews and meeting abstracts).
119 sis adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-a
120 rence with the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline.
121 e followed the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommenda
122 cording to the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement
123 REVIEW The Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used
124 d according to Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was prep
125 laboration and Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
126 dance with the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
127 delines of the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
128 cording to the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.
129 The systematic review focused on guidelines,
systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and randomized con
130 lines from the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
131 In these
systematic reviews and meta-analysis, we identified stud
132 We searched for published
systematic reviews and new references from PubMed-MEDLIN
133 These results support the need of
systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials to a
134 E from 1946 to present, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
and Cochrane database of Registered
135 r of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
and reference lists.
136 r of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
and reference lists.
137 r of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
and SciVerse Scopus from database in
138 MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
and several other sources from datab
139 tic review of randomized, controlled trials;
systematic reviews;
and large observational studies publ
140 We classified
systematic reviews as "reliable" when they (1) defined c
141 This
systematic review assessed the association between genom
142 This
systematic review assesses microbiologic profiles of per
143 We applied a
systematic review-
based strategy to identify and integra
144 ss, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
Cancerlit, and Web of Science.
145 respecified in a rigorous protocol using the
Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimen
146 PubMed, Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
Cochrane Central Register of Control
147 Eighteen studies were included after
systematic review,
comprising a total of 368 patients wi
148 in outcomes reported in clinical trials and
systematic reviews compromises efforts to compare and su
149 ality of the reviews independently using the
Systematic Review Data Repository.
150 The results of this
systematic review demonstrated that superior technical p
151 The
systematic review demonstrates that uterine transplantat
152 Thirteen studies were included in this
systematic review describing the positive or deleterious
153 We then applied
systematic review evidence on corresponding case-fatalit
154 This
systematic review examined published epidemiologic resea
155 This
systematic review examines all available evidence of the
156 The
systematic review focused on guidelines, systematic revi
157 A
systematic review followed by meta-analysis was conducte
158 Systematic review following the PRISMA guideline.
159 We did three
systematic reviews (
for mortality, diagnostic value, and
160 This
systematic review found sufficient evidence to say that
161 No
systematic review has addressed the effect of isoenerget
162 To date, no
systematic review has characterised the influence of law
163 BACKGROUND & AIMS:
Systematic reviews have provided evidence for the effica
164 The
systematic review identified 19 cohorts.
165 Our
systematic review identified 36 trials (n=4721 participa
166 A
systematic review identified the highest level of eviden
167 We performed a
systematic review in accordance with guidelines from the
168 We conducted a
systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA statemen
169 erview with an indexed database of published
systematic reviews in allergy epidemiology.
170 Results The
systematic review included 47 publications.
171 The current
systematic review includes five randomized controlled tr
172 Systematic reviews indicate that the community prevalenc
173 The aim of this
systematic review is to evaluate whether cone-beam compu
174 effectiveness of using DAs, the aim of this
systematic review is to examine marginal bone and soft t
175 The aim of this
systematic review is to examine the effect of IIP on MFR
176 The purpose of this
systematic review is to provide a clinically relevant, d
177 BS-colonized pregnant women, from this first
systematic review,
is consistent with previous estimates
178 atic review of randomized controlled trials;
systematic reviews;
large observational studies (for adv
179 Recent
systematic reviews link foreclosure to worse health at b
180 ied through EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov), fr
181 e searched for randomized controlled trials,
systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, and clinical practice
182 We included only
systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, interventional studie
183 pectively defined study selection, we sought
systematic reviews,
meta-analyses, randomized clinical t
184 Within the limits of this
systematic review,
NCFs affecting the referral process a
185 We conducted a
systematic review of (1) allergic reactions to botulinum
186 s in these genes and development of CRC in a
systematic review of 11 publications, using sequence dat
187 A
systematic review of 48 peer- reviewed articles with pos
188 One recent, good-quality
systematic review of 56 original studies and 12 previous
189 We performed a
systematic review of clinicatrials.gov using search term
190 A
systematic review of cohort studies and randomized contr
191 A
systematic review of early clinical outcomes in tubercul
192 We performed a
systematic review of foodborne botulism outbreaks to des
193 This
systematic review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL,
194 We did a
systematic review of non-invasive tests used to stratify
195 ter's approach supports successful outcomes;
systematic review of our practice provides a framework f
196 Consistent with PRISMA guidelines, we did a
systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific evidence d
197 We undertook a
systematic review of primary research based on standardi
198 This guideline is based on a
systematic review of published randomized, controlled tr
199 This guideline is based on a
systematic review of published studies on gout diagnosis
200 To conduct a
systematic review of published trials to compare outcome
201 Systematic review of PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and CINAHL
202 ecialty Societies principles, we conducted a
systematic review of qualitative research to establish f
203 We did a network meta-analysis based on a
systematic review of randomised controlled trials compar
204 Expert Panel made recommendations based on a
systematic review of randomized controlled trials from F
205 s Committee based these recommendations on a
systematic review of randomized controlled trials; syste
206 This guideline is based on a
systematic review of randomized, controlled trials and o
207 e committee based these recommendations on a
systematic review of randomized, controlled trials and s
208 e committee based these recommendations on a
systematic review of randomized, controlled trials; syst
209 tion to more recent findings from an updated
systematic review of relevant studies from 2008 to 2017
210 forming laparoscopic surgery, we performed a
systematic review of studies addressing physical ergonom
211 We did a
systematic review of the association between confirmed m
212 European Association of Neuro-Oncology did a
systematic review of the available scientific literature
213 To determine, using
systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether
214 This Review includes a
systematic review of the community and administrative pr
215 Systematic review of the effect of intraoperative techni
216 The search was not a
systematic review of the evidence.
217 We did a
systematic review of the international evidence.
218 Guideline development involved a
systematic review of the literature and a formal consens
219 To provide a
systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis
220 To perform a
systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis
221 Methods An Expert Panel updated the
systematic review of the literature for the period from
222 Systematic review of the literature illustrated high con
223 Methods Two independent readers performed a
systematic review of the literature published as of Febr
224 (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to conduct a
systematic review of the literature to develop an eviden
225 A
systematic review of the literature was conducted in Med
226 A targeted
systematic review of the literature was conducted in MED
227 SCO convened an update panel and conducted a
systematic review of the literature, investigating adjuv
228 olecular biomarker testing for CRC through a
systematic review of the literature.
229 SCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a
systematic review of the medical literature for the peri
230 We did a
systematic review of the qualitative literature to ident
231 accinated populations, updating the previous
systematic review of the same topic.
232 sk stratification and evaluation, we updated
systematic reviews of observational studies.
233 r Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for
Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies.
234 Two previous
systematic reviews of the association between HSV-2 and
235 followed the PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for
systematic reviews of the literature.
236 Randomized trials and
systematic reviews of trials that were published in Engl
237 the published literature, and findings of a
systematic review on administration practices and techni
238 ponse to antidepressant treatment, through a
systematic review on all papers published between 2000 a
239 stores with the use of published data from a
systematic review on iron intake and deficiency rates, c
240 th economic data identified from four recent
systematic reviews on allergic rhinitis, asthma, food al
241 searched PubMed and EMBASE up to 12/2014 for
systematic reviews on epidemiological research on allerg
242 unique articles identified, 27 (11 RCTs, 11
systematic reviews or meta-analyses, and 5 reviews/guide
243 ing on food allergy is inadequate to perform
systematic reviews or meta-analyses, the available data
244 nurse-led self-management programmes in this
systematic review produced beneficial effects in terms o
245 review of randomized, controlled trials and
systematic reviews published through April 2015 on nonin
246 We conducted
systematic reviews (
Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Latin Americ
247 Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42015016395.
248 The quality of
systematic reviews related to the forthcoming Preferred
249 The
systematic reviews reported insufficient evidence to dra
250 eview of 56 original studies and 12 previous
systematic reviews (
sample sizes of primary studies rang
251 The
systematic review search yielded 4,158 reports after ded
252 Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
searched to June 14, 2016.
253 Systematic reviews should inform American Academy of Oph
254 Published
systematic reviews show some evidence of a protective ef
255 This overview of
systematic reviews (
SRs) aimed to synthesize, appraise,
256 Findings from our
systematic review suggest that early-life exposure to BP
257 This
systematic review suggests that first-line antenatal man
258 This
systematic review supports the notion that angiotensin I
259 racted from more than 4000 sources including
systematic reviews,
surveys, population-based disease re
260 controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and
systematic reviews that addressed screening and diagnost
261 This review builds on two 2015
systematic reviews that were conducted by the AABB and t
262 Systematic review The Cochrane Central Register of Contr
263 To update a prior
systematic review,
the workgroup searched MEDLINE, EMBAS
264 ents with suspected botulism, we conducted a
systematic review to describe the clinical features of b
265 We conducted a
systematic review to determine the impact of bowel proto
266 We performed an updated
systematic review to help guide clinical practice.
267 We sought to identify reliable
systematic reviews to assist the AAO Refractive Errors &
268 nt of clinical recommendations, we undertook
systematic reviews to critically assess evidence on the
269 To be included in the
systematic review,
ulcerative colitis and Crohn's diseas
270 We then conducted a
systematic review using the Grading of Recommendations,
271 Therefore, authors of
systematic reviews using oral health randomized controll
272 A
systematic review was conducted in October 2016 in conco
273 provided by other healthcare professionals.A
systematic review was conducted of Cochrane library data
274 This
systematic review was conducted on 4 critical questions,
275 The last
systematic review was conducted over 5 years ago.
276 An integrated
systematic review was conducted to determine if nurses'
277 A
systematic review was conducted to identify randomized c
278 A
systematic review was performed by searching PubMed data
279 This
systematic review was prepared according to guidelines o
280 The aim of this
systematic review was to assess antenatal treatment stra
281 The aim of the
systematic review was to identify whether inpatient peni
282 In this
systematic review we searched for peer-reviewed and grey
283 In this
systematic review,
we expand on previous reviews of obes
284 In this methodological
systematic review,
we identified all PubMed reports of o
285 In this
systematic Review,
we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Psyc
286 In this
systematic review,
we summarize available evidence relev
287 To identify potentially eligible
systematic reviews,
we searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vi
288 olled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews,
Web of Science (ISI database), Physi
289 and syncope, and the bibliographies of known
systematic reviews were also examined.
290 Meta-analyses and
systematic reviews were prioritized; case series and rep
291 We undertook a
systematic review,
which involved searching 15 internati
292 ook, to the best of our knowledge, the first
systematic review with a meta-analysis to quantitatively
293 We did a
systematic review with a scoping component of relevant s
294 A
systematic review with meta-analyses of experimental rod
295 We performed a
systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the eff
296 We did a
systematic review with pairwise and network meta-analyse
297 We describe the findings of a
systematic review with the aim of examining the quantity
298 Rapid and
systematic reviews with frequent updating and open disse
299 The study included
systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses, criter
300 stitute of Medicine standards for conducting
systematic reviews,
would contribute to improved patient