ライフサイエンスコーパス: tampon

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 pon) and initial portal radiographs (without tampon).

2 tampon and nonwoven fleece for the reference tampon.

3 safe as the nonwoven cover of the reference tampon.

4 subjects who underwent simulation without a tampon.

5 hether subjects were using test or reference tampons.

6 milar levels throughout the cycles with both tampons.

7 bs, 81% concordance, with kappa of 0.61; for tampons, 82% concordance, with kappa of 0.55).

8 with a kappa statistic [kappa] of 0.71; for tampons, 89% concordance, with kappa of 0.75).

9 copy showed no abnormal findings with either tampon and no changes in vaginal or cervical epithelial

10 cover materials: apertured film for the test tampon and nonwoven fleece for the reference tampon.

11 ed S. aureus-biofilm occurrence in 44 paired-tampon and vaginal-wash-specimens from 18 prescreened wo

12 monstrate that S. aureus biofilm can form on tampons and menses components in vivo.

13 ed by comparing simulation radiographs (with tampon) and initial portal radiographs (without tampon).

14 Comparison of the toilet papers with the tampon applicators studied previously indicates that pre

15 ve rods were significantly different between tampons at the premenstrual visit, when unusually low va

16 produced in medium alone in the absence of a tampon by both methods.

17 es production of TSST-1 in vitro, and cotton tampons cannot be claimed to be inherently safer on the

18 In contrast, a tampon composed of carboxymethylcellulose and polyester

19 To determine whether tampons composed of cotton or rayon differ in their effe

20 Neither cotton nor rayon tampons consistently increased toxin production, nor wer

21 Staphylococci were quantified from tampons/diaphragms in 2003 to 2005, with counts compared

22 were randomly assigned to use either a test tampon during cycle 1 and a reference tampon during cycl

23 ference tampon during cycle 2 or a reference tampon during cycle 1 and a test tampon during cycle 2.

24 a test tampon during cycle 1 and a reference tampon during cycle 2 or a reference tampon during cycle

25 a reference tampon during cycle 1 and a test tampon during cycle 2.

26 luated a flexible vaginal localizer contrast tampon for radiation therapy simulation.

27 (HC2), with kappa higher for swabs than for tampons (for swabs, 81% concordance, with kappa of 0.61;

28 Both self-collected swabs and tampons had high agreement with clinician-obtained brush

29 ized to crossover between test and reference tampons in two consecutive menstrual cycles.

30 ded trial of patient-assessed twice-per-week tampon insertion or intercourse, all patients received l

31 es that the apertured film cover of the test tampon is as safe as the nonwoven cover of the reference

32 ons indicate that the apertured film-covered tampon is safe.

33 f 16 commercially available and experimental tampons on production of TSST-1.

34 l and autopsy findings that death was due to tampon-related toxic shock syndrome.

35 abscess, of a 17-year-old female who died of tampon-related toxic shock syndrome.

36 of interest because of the widespread use of tampons, reported to be about 70% of women in the United

37 ues were observed for the test and reference tampons, respectively.

38 ed during the use of both test and reference tampons than those reported from previous studies.

39 SS has been associated with menstruation and tampon use, and although it is rare, the effects can be

40 Neither tampon was associated with clinically significant microb

41 cuff displacement secondary to the contrast tampon was evaluated by comparing simulation radiographs

42 in the group who underwent simulation with a tampon was minimal (< or = 5 mm in each direction) and s

43 Tampons were identical except for their cover materials:

44 This study compared the safety of a new tampon with a four-winged apertured film cover over its

45 eakage performance with that of a commercial tampon with a nonwoven cover only.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。