ライフサイエンスコーパス: tanning

1 Ever and past-year exposure to indoor tanning.

2 to melanocyte-stimulating hormone, inducing tanning.

3 , knowledge, and behaviors related to indoor tanning.

4 ps recruited using factors related to indoor tanning.

5 mparably high rates of sunbathing and indoor tanning.

6 fy PGC-1 coactivators as regulators of human tanning.

7 sun-protective behaviors and decrease indoor tanning.

8 tem into the hemolymph and initiates cuticle tanning.

9 -alanine and dopamine used in insect cuticle tanning.

10 NBAD as cross-linking agents during cuticle tanning.

11 tial processes of wing expansion and cuticle tanning.

12 compassing the irradiation period, decreased tanning.

13 he most relevant mechanisms involved in skin tanning.

14 ed in the skin regardless of pigmentation or tanning.

15 t response indistinguishable from UV-induced tanning.

16 g facilities, as well as payment options for tanning.

17 f skin cancer and 12-month history of indoor tanning.

18 llow campus cash cards to be used to pay for tanning.

19 e of epidermal pigmentation after UV-induced tanning.

20 st off-campus housing facilities with indoor tanning (96%) provide it free to tenants.

21 ted with red hair colour, fair skin and poor tanning ability (denoted as RHC variants), are associate

22 confidence interval (CI): 0.90, 1.09), skin tanning ability (for dark tan vs. no tan, multivariable-

23 ligo risk was higher among women with better tanning ability (hazard ratio = 2.59, 95% confidence int

24 ity to sunlight exposure (P = .006) and poor tanning ability (P = .003) were associated with a higher

25 ted with red hair color, fair skin, and poor tanning ability (RHC trait), are more prone to melanoma;

26 n hair color, eye color, number of sunburns, tanning ability and number of non-melanoma skin cancers

27 y history; and sun exposure history, such as tanning ability and number of severe sunburns experience

28 ci in the PGC-1beta gene that correlate with tanning ability and protection from melanoma in humans.

29 Poor or no tanning ability was more strongly associated with SCC am

30 skin pigmentation by using hair color, skin tanning ability, and skin reaction to prolonged sun expo

31 me 1 as a novel locus highly associated with tanning ability, and we confirmed this association in 87

32 Age, sex, skin color, tanning ability, hormonal status in women, current smoki

33 Overall, these tanning ability-related loci are similar to the hair col

34 creased the risk of SCC associated with poor tanning ability.

35 its tanning response is comparable to human tanning after exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR).

36 s for the brown color caused by the "sunless tanning" agent dihydroxyacetone in self-tanning products

37 35 individuals who were without makeup, self-tanning agents and/or recent intensive UV exposure.

38 port are candidates for use as cosmeceutical tanning agents.

39 Additionally, indoor tanning among female students was associated with using

40 The prevalence of indoor tanning and frequent indoor tanning were examined as wel

41 lleles of MC1R are associated with decreased tanning and increased melanoma risk, which has been attr

42 Sex-specific associations for indoor tanning and melanoma by anatomic site were examined.

43 inal study of the association between indoor tanning and melanoma in a large cohort of Norwegian wome

44 and sex-specific associations between indoor tanning and melanoma to determine if these trends could

45 lpha and burs beta), responsible for cuticle tanning and other developmental processes in insects.

46 ting PKC activity in vivo selectively blocks tanning and reduces basal pigmentation in the epidermis

47 f a dose-response association between indoor tanning and risk of melanoma and supports the hypothesis

48 The association between indoor tanning and skin cancer is particularly strong among tho

49 r tanning and the association between indoor tanning and sunburn among US high school students.

50 d to further reduce the prevalence of indoor tanning and sunburn and thus prevent future cases of ski

51 Indoor tanning and sunburns, particularly during adolescence an

52 amine the trends in the prevalence of indoor tanning and the association between indoor tanning and s

53 Participant responses to tanning and the dermatologist-determined FST were not si

54 isk prediction model, with a focus on indoor tanning and the melanocortin 1 receptor gene, MC1R.

55 sed behavioral interventions decrease indoor tanning and ultraviolet exposure.

56 lternatives to ultraviolet radiation induced tanning and whether encouraging these options leads to a

57 mone bursicon, which is required for cuticle tanning and wing expansion after eclosion.

58 bacterial sodium channel NaChBac also blocks tanning and wing expansion and leads to depletion of bur

59 uded here showed that in addition to cuticle tanning and wing expansion reported previously, Tcrk is

60 ut NCCAP, but not in NCCAP-c929, also blocks tanning and wing expansion, we conclude that neurotransm

61 con release into the hemolymph together with tanning and wing expansion.

62 added ever-indoor tanning, burns from indoor tanning, and MC1R (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.81).

63 receptor involved in pigmentation, adaptive tanning, and melanoma resistance.

64 se A (PKA), regulates pigmentation, adaptive tanning, and melanoma resistance.

65 c Cr pollution resulted from electroplating, tanning, and the chemical industry.

66 The odds ratios for ease of burning and tanning appeared unbiased.

67 e bursicon and its receptor regulate cuticle tanning as well as wing expansion after adult eclosion.

68 women younger than 40 years initiated indoor tanning at a younger age (16 vs 25 years, P < .001) and

69 res, including appearance motivation, indoor tanning attitudes and norms, and intention to tan indoor

70 , the findings highlight that in addition to tanning bed avoidance, it is critical to emphasize sun p

71 previous findings on the damaging effects of tanning bed exposure on women, particularly young women.

72 Subjects who used a tanning bed had parathyroid hormone concentrations 18% l

73 Subjects who used a tanning bed had serum 25(OH)D concentrations 90% higher

74 certain whether subjects who regularly use a tanning bed have higher 25(OH)D concentrations than do s

75 Subjects who use a tanning bed that emits ultraviolet B radiation (290-315

76 The regular use of a tanning bed that emits vitamin D-producing ultraviolet r

77 ronger policy initiatives designed to reduce tanning bed use among young women.

78 nce for a dose-response relationship between tanning bed use and the risk of skin cancers, especially

79 Compared with tanning bed use at ages 25 to 35 years, we found a signi

80 We sought to evaluate the risk effect of tanning bed use on skin cancers among teenage and young

81 skin cancer, it is already clear that indoor tanning bed use represents an avoidable risk factor for

82 xposed to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation in a tanning bed wearing a 1-piece bathing suit for 10 minute

83 entrations than do subjects who do not use a tanning bed.

84 than do subjects who do not regularly use a tanning bed.

85 t compelling evidence that early exposure to tanning beds advances the date of diagnosis of melanoma

86 previous evidence of the negative effects of tanning beds and provides further justification for stro

87 nd sun exposure in childhood and exposure to tanning beds are important preventable risk factors.

88 from the sun and from the widespread use of tanning beds by populations residing in areas of norther

89 he US reveal extensive sunburning and use of tanning beds in adolescents and adults.

90 cancer for an incremental increase in use of tanning beds of four times per year during both periods

91 nm), which is also the primary component of tanning beds.

92 omponent of the radiation in sunlight and in tanning beds.

93 Strong links between indoor tanning behavior and skin cancer have been demonstrated

94 ntention to tan indoors, frequency of indoor tanning behavior in the past year, and indoor tanner typ

95 -quality educational interventions to change tanning behavior, particularly among women, people with

96 ntion to tan indoors and frequency of indoor tanning behavior.

97 h communications to prevent and deter indoor tanning behavior.

98 he roles of UV radiation exposure and indoor tanning behaviors on skin cancer risk are explored here.

99 te whether skin cancer prevalence and indoor tanning behaviors vary by sexual orientation in the gene

100 is highly associated with outdoor and indoor tanning behaviors.

101 scale may further advance research on indoor tanning beliefs and can guide health communications to p

102 ificantly improved when we added ever-indoor tanning, burns from indoor tanning, and MC1R (AUC = 0.77

103 sinase, have been proposed to participate in tanning, but proof of the true identity of the enzyme(s)

104 The strongest OR for indoor tanning by anatomic site was for melanomas arising on th

105 Excessive sun tanning can result in addictive behavior.

106 The effects of UVR on the skin include tanning, carcinogenesis, immunomodulation, and synthesis

107 the United States, the prevalence of indoor tanning decreased from 15.6% (95% CI, 13.7%-17.6%) in 20

108 students, the adjusted prevalence of indoor tanning decreased from 26.4% in 2009 to 20.7% in 2011.

109 Indoor tanning, defined as any use, first age of use, and total

110 at initiation of indoor tanning, duration of tanning-device use, and dose response with melanoma risk

111 vacations and were more likely to use indoor tanning devices.

112 associations of age at initiation of indoor tanning, duration of tanning-device use, and dose respon

113 esults suggest that the Comprehensive Indoor Tanning Expectations (CITE) Scale provides a reliable an

114 alculated for melanoma in relation to indoor tanning exposure for men and women by diagnosis or refer

115 ediction model incorporating MC1R and indoor tanning extends the work of other skin cancer risk predi

116 Of the 125 colleges, 48.0% had indoor tanning facilities either on campus or in off-campus hou

117 Presence of tanning facilities in off-campus housing was significant

118 Frequency of indoor tanning facilities on college campus and in off-campus h

119 Presence of on-campus tanning facilities was significantly associated with enr

120 nt association between ever-use of an indoor tanning facility and an increased risk of basal cell car

121 icularly strong among those who first used a tanning facility in early adulthood.

122 As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors.

123 yacetone, the browning ingredient in sunless tanning formulations, reacts with amino acids in the out

124 To examine the association between indoor tanning frequency and behaviors related to skin cancer p

125 e: To examine the association between indoor tanning frequency and behaviors related to skin cancer p

126 terature exist in young adults and by indoor tanning frequency.

127 Despite declines in the prevalence of indoor tanning from 2009 to 2015 among high school students nat

128 Examination of subscales across the 3 indoor tanning groups also revealed significant (P < .001) diff

129 le that by Smith et al. with MC1R and indoor tanning had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.75).

130 hree-quarters of those who engaged in indoor tanning had experienced at least 1 sunburn.

131 Although indoor tanning has been suggested to be more common among sexua

132 Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions.

133 ears or older, with 31.5% engaging in indoor tanning in 2011, and among non-Hispanic white female stu

134 male students, with 29.3% engaging in indoor tanning in 2011.

135 elanoma risk and examined the role of indoor tanning in age at melanoma diagnosis.

136 icon (r-bursicon) heterodimer led to cuticle tanning in both species.

137 e used to summarize the prevalence of indoor tanning in different age categories.

138 e stimulation of cAMP signaling in vitro and tanning in neck-ligated blowflies.

139 olleges had the highest prevalence of indoor tanning in off-campus housing facilities (67.7%).

140 asizes the value of both genotype and indoor tanning in skin cancer risk prediction in young people,

141 n treatments produced less erythema and more tanning in skin type IV.

142 est a potential mechanism for differences in tanning in subjects with different skin types.

143 Prevalence of indoor tanning in the past year from 2009 to 2015 and its assoc

144 ion proportional attributable risk of indoor tanning in the United States, Europe, and Australia for

145 anoma cases each year attributable to indoor tanning in the United States, Europe, and Australia.

146 ng catalyze larval, pupal, and adult cuticle tanning in Tribolium.

147 complex belief systems that underlie indoor tanning in young women is a crucial first step in develo

148 complex sets of beliefs that underlie indoor tanning, including positive (motivational) and negative

149 ed by a powerful special interest group: the tanning industry.

150 d linear regression to examine age of indoor tanning initiation in relation to age at diagnosis.

151 Indoor tanning is a known carcinogen, but the scope of exposure

152 Indoor tanning is a likely factor for the steeper increase in m

153 Indoor tanning is associated with an increased risk of skin can

154 Indoor tanning is associated with increased risk of melanoma, b

155 Indoor tanning is common among high school students.

156 Exposure to indoor tanning is common in Western countries, especially among

157 Ultraviolet-light (UV)-induced tanning is defective in numerous 'fair-skinned' individu

158 lnerability to the harmful effects of indoor tanning is greater at a younger age.

159 Skin tanning is one such dynamic response that maintains geno

160 Tanning is one such mechanism in humans, but tanning onl

161 The data further suggest that tanning is part of a p53-mediated adaptive response of m

162 Indoor tanning is prevalent among young adults and women and is

163 Importance: Indoor tanning is prevalent among young adults and women and is

164 ic can be expected to continue unless indoor tanning is restricted and reduced.

165 Indoor tanning is widespread among young adults in the United S

166 irradiation from such artificial sources as tanning lamps can result in severe pain and inflammation

167 To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with

168 onsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws.

169 he body warm, provides information about the tanning materials and techniques.

170 suggests that regular or early use of indoor tanning may increase melanoma risk.

171 P < .001) and reported more frequent indoor tanning (median number of sessions, 100 vs 40, P < .001)

172 ase in melanin production (commonly known as tanning) occurs is not well understood.

173 ) is typically followed by the expansion and tanning of a new one.

174 istologically, whereas ultraviolet B-induced tanning of light-skinned swine was inhibited using these

175 ht on the immediate pigmentation and delayed tanning of melanocompetent skin; the results were compar

176 nal molt, coordinates the plasticization and tanning of the initially folded wings with behaviors tha

177 cyte-stimulating hormone, is known to induce tanning of the skin.

178 It triggers the sclerotization (tanning) of the insect cuticle.

179 Reducing the availability of indoor tanning on and around college campuses is an important p

180 olleges had the highest prevalence of indoor tanning on campus (26.9%), whereas Southern colleges had

181 d specifically focus on the impact of indoor tanning on children.

182 Tanning is one such mechanism in humans, but tanning only occurs post-exposure to UVR.

183 Cuticle tanning (or sclerotization and pigmentation) in inverteb

184 A comprehensive scale assessing indoor tanning outcome expectations was developed.

185 58.4%) of those who did not engage in indoor tanning (P < .001).

186 Modulators of the UV-tanning pathway include sunscreen agents, melanocortin 1

187 This result gives clues on the tanning phenomenon carried out by polyphenols on nitroge

188 Moreover, women who started indoor tanning prior to 30 years of age were 2.2 years (95% CI:

189 ues about the culture that created it, since tanning processes are often specific to certain indigeno

190 seases) and cosmeceutically (e.g., to design tanning products with potential to reduce skin cancer ri

191 less tanning" agent dihydroxyacetone in self-tanning products.

192 Here it is shown that, in addition to tanning, pTpT induces a second photoprotective response,

193 uded 25,861 students who answered the indoor tanning question.

194 e participants' responses to the burning and tanning questions could not be classified using standard

195 es increased with skin types associated with tanning rather than burning, although trend analysis sho

196 en the timing of when women initiated indoor tanning relative to diagnosis.

197 mong high school students nationwide, indoor tanning remains commonplace among certain subgroups, esp

198 than half of respondents engaging in indoor tanning reported frequent use of the devices.

199 tage genome-wide association study (GWAS) of tanning response after exposure to sunlight in over 9,00

200 man pigment induction and modulation, as its tanning response is comparable to human tanning after ex

201 lor additive for the production of a sunless tanning response on skin.

202 melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) mediates the tanning response through induction of cAMP and downstrea

203 hese changes could be detected even before a tanning response was clinically visible.

204 role of intercellular MSH signalling in the tanning response, and suggest a clinical strategy for to

205 after ultraviolet irradiation as part of the tanning response, the major recognized photoprotective r

206 to UV irradiation as part of the UV-induced tanning response, we show that while the microphthalmia-

207 pathologic pigmentation and thus mimics the tanning response.

208 ion are shown to involve p53 "mimicking" the tanning response.

209 t mice, is associated with absence of the UV-tanning response.

210 ator assessment using sun burning and/or sun tanning responses, ethnicity, hair, and eye color.

211 radiation dermal insult and subsequent skin tanning, result in a shift in expression from MC1R in fa

212 The availability of tanning salons on or near college campuses has not been

213 contacted them by telephone inquiring about tanning services.

214 creased with increasing cumulative number of tanning sessions (for highest tertile of use vs. never u

215 iation, and most of the output of artificial tanning sources.

216 Sunbeds were mainly used in tanning studios (74.9%), and many users had never been a

217 which may also provide information about the tanning technique and aging behavior.

218 ported higher rates of sunbathing and indoor tanning than Spanish-acculturated Hispanics.

219 of skin cancer cases attributable to indoor tanning, these findings highlight a major public health

220 nce intervals for the relationship of indoor tanning to melanoma risk and linear regression to examin

221 these trends could be due to greater indoor tanning use among younger women.

222 Artificial tanning use is prevalent among adolescent girls and like

223 Among female and male students, indoor tanning was associated with other risk-taking behaviors,

224 In 2015, indoor tanning was associated with sunburn in the adjusted mode

225 Indoor tanning was available on campus in 12.0% of colleges and

226 The prevalence of indoor tanning was greater among female, older, and non-Hispani

227 Indoor tanning was highest among female students aged 18 years

228 Development of facultative pigmentation (tanning) was important to populations settling between r

229 lvement of these types of enzymes in cuticle tanning, we performed RNA interference experiments to de

230 Records reporting a prevalence of indoor tanning were eligible for inclusion.

231 alence of indoor tanning and frequent indoor tanning were examined as well as their association with

232 Decreases in indoor tanning were found among male (from 6.7% in 2009 to 4.0%

233 The main motivations for tanning were relaxation and increased attractiveness.

234 ant bursicon induces both wing expansion and tanning, whereas synthetic eclosion hormone induces only

235 and least negative perceptions about indoor tanning, while nontanners had the most negative and leas

236 es of bursicon actions in regulating cuticle tanning, wing expansion, and as yet unknown functions.

237 We discuss indoor tanning, with special emphasis on the potential addictiv