ライフサイエンスコーパス: tap water

1 +/- 0.2 versus 4.1 +/- 0.2 mEq/L in rats on tap water).

2 mydomonas reinhardtii algal cells (algae) in tap water.

3 in pools were much higher than in the input tap water.

4 3.9 ng/L, respectively, but not in the input tap water.

5 to grow in fluoride concentrations found in tap water.

6 rent from the DBP concentrations in the cold tap water.

7 using various bacterial DNAs in drinking and tap water.

8 four times higher than that found in regular tap water.

9 ion to determine the risk of Q fever through tap water.

10 he determination of Hg(2+) concentrations in tap water.

11 onmental samples, such as, serum, urine, and tap water.

12 t affected by the presence of common ions in tap water.

13 ne liposomes and produced photochemically in tap water.

14 of gastrointestinal illness attributable to tap water.

15 13 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) in drinking water) or tap water.

16 ing water, while the control group was given tap water.

17 outbreak of M. abscessus linked to hospital tap water.

18 es of 80-127% from human urine and canal and tap water.

19 led water as well as low levels of iodate in tap water.

20 nary protein excretion as rats that received tap water.

21 nasogastric tube, followed by 5 to 10 mL of tap water.

22 ective and is able to quantify diclofenac in tap water.

23 and approximately 60-90% for purged AOX from tap water.

24 strogenic activity was found in the filtered tap water.

25 Elk River and 15% of the state population's tap water.

26 nd also to maintain consumers' confidence in tap water.

27 ea americana), were identically labeled with tap water.

28 ed to the determination of zinc in foods and tap water.

29 in neighbourhoods having a higher access to tap water.

30 g(2+), most common heavy metal ions found in tap water.

31 ing to the complexity of the ions present in tap water.

32 ment brought samples more closely similar to tap waters.

33 mutagenic, respectively, than corresponding tap waters.

34 s higher than its concentration in the input tap water (1-6 ng/L).

35 were acutely rehydrated by giving access to tap water 2 h before experiments, inhibition of the PVN

36 spectrometry-based method to detect ricin in tap water, 2% milk, apple juice, and orange juice.

37 Whilst washing with the control tap water (28mug/L As) reduced the concentration of As i

38 Flushing reduced tap water 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (4-MCHM) concentra

39 lar NaCl (500 mosmol l(-1)), 27 responded to tap water (5 mosmol l(-1)) and 20 and 19 responded to ma

40 Among samples of hospital ice and tap water, 63% were positive for RGM, 50% of which were

41 detect low concentrations of VX in preserved tap water 91 days after spiking suggests applicability o

42 In tap water, a low limit of detection of 0.1 nM for ENRO w

43 ations were estimated during pregnancy using tap water analyses and modeling.

44 d to triplicate 1 L samples of a chlorinated tap water and a chlorinated indoor pool water.

45 Bacteriophages MS2 were spiked in tap water and concentrated with the new CUF-MAF concentr

46 than 100 cells/mm3, the association between tap water and cryptosporidiosis was even stronger (odds

47 has been applied for the analysis of spiked tap water and fish samples showing good recovery percent

48 Optimized method was applied to tap water and food samples after microwave digestion met

49 Tap water and HOC spike in Suwannee River NOM were used

50 real water samples was demonstrated in local tap water and in effluents of sewage plants.

51 is observed between reduced availability of tap water and increased incidence of suspected cholera i

52 time to determine FQs in real samples, i.e. tap water and milk, without any prior concentration step

53 his system is capable of detecting Hg(2+) in tap water and pond water.

54 ian arsenic concentrations measured in NHBCS tap water and previously published for formula powder, f

55 the real sample analysis of Hg(2+) in fish, tap water and river water.

56 Samples of pure Cu and Fe oxidized in tap water and salty water, respectively, were studied in

57 earers should avoid exposing their lenses to tap water and should empty their cases and use fresh len

58 died whether this interaction could occur in tap water and thus confer enteric viruses protection aga

59 enses for orthokeratology, storing lenses in tap water and topping off remained significant exposures

60 Arsenic concentration in household tap water and urine samples were measured using inductiv

61 ials fed either chlorinated or chloraminated tap water and were sampled at water ages ranging from 1

62 hical distributions of the isotope ratios of tap waters and the assumption of a "continental supermar

63 water were similar to the TCAA levels in the tap water, and a slight reduction was observed after the

64 t reaction matrices such as distilled water, tap water, and different bacterial growth media were tes

65 e water microbiology was most divergent from tap water, and each step of treatment brought samples mo

66 uantitatively determine NG and DNAN in soil, tap water, and river water by using ultrafast LC-MS/MS.

67 al water sampled from an industrial area and tap water, and this methodology was compared to stir-bar

68 lic water pipe network, individual household tap water, and urinary THM measurements.

69 trasonic dental scaler units with the use of tap water as a control.

70 Clinicians should be aware of municipal tap water as a potential cause of methemoglobinemia and

71 r frequency, a study of the role of domestic tap water as a potential source of AK was undertaken.

72 nriched water whereas the other set received tap water as the mobile phase water.

73 egarding residential history, consumption of tap water at home, and dietary intake during the pericon

74 sensor performance was firstly examined with tap water at varying DO levels.

75 ies with endemic NTM should consider similar tap water avoidance and engineering strategies to decrea

76 ne the bioaccessibility of Pb particles from tap water, based on the Relative Bioaccessibility Leachi

77 of water (groundwater, artificial seawater, tap water, bay water) indicated that the method has pote

78 he estimated fraction of AGI attributable to tap-water-borne viruses was between 6% and 22%, dependin

79 ticulate lead (Pb) levels can be measured in tap water, but the hazard linked to particulate Pb inges

80 Tap water can reflect integrated features of regional hy

81 ed for detection Hg(2+) ions from samples of tap waters, carp and saltwater fishes with satisfactory

82 In the infusion brewed with tap water, catechins appeared to be epimerisation from t

83 he spill to understand resident perceptions, tap water chemical levels, and premise plumbing flushing

84 centrations and several exposure indicators (tap water concentration, water-use activities, multirout

85 As expected based on variable tap water concentrations and toxicokinetic properties, t

86 Tap water concentrations were measured in the distributi

87 Adenoviruses were common, but tap-water concentrations were low and not positively ass

88 Home tap water consumed as a beverage and dietary supplement

89 ate, total vitamin C intake, and quantity of tap water consumed.

90 Tap water consumption is associated with GII in malfunct

91 If tap water consumption rates gradually decreased over tim

92 d outperformed the Bayesian method if actual tap water consumption rates were systematically overesti

93 iewed published studies that compared direct tap water consumption to consumption of tap water re-tre

94 ap water for arsenic, which we combined with tap water consumption to estimate arsenic exposure throu

95 Tap water consumption was not related to gastrointestina

96 ion was stronger among men with above-median tap water consumption.

97 The process of boiling tap water (containing HAAs) for the preparation of powde

98 e sensors are placed in simulated and actual tap water contaminated by heavy metals.

99 5% iodine water, (3) 0.05% MMI water or, (4) tap water (controls).

100 Three real water samples including tap water, creek water, and river water were analyzed an

101 409 women in early pregnancy to assess their tap water DBP concentrations, water use, other risk fact

102 reen tea leaves were infused separately with tap water, deionised water, spring water, reverse osmosi

103 ntration down to 0.1mg/L is detected in PBS, tap water, deionized water, and bottled water.

104 timating levels of trihalomethanes (THMs) in tap water during pregnancy and maternal water use and by

105 BTHM concentrations in residential tap water during pregnancy ranged from 0.06 to 7.1 mug/L

106 stems can contribute to Cr(VI) occurrence in tap water, especially in the presence of a trace level o

107 We eliminated tap water exposure to the aerodigestive tract among high

108 loped colitis (F0(DSS)), or non-supplemented tap water (F0(Ctrl)) and hence remained healthy, and of

109 Compared to controls drinking tap water, fetal weight was always reduced by corticoste

110 rious ambient motions, including light wind, tap water flow and normal body movement.

111 stered 5% dextran sulfate (DSS) dissolved in tap water for 5 days followed by a 5-day recovery period

112 1), BR n = 8) or untreated (control, n = 11) tap water for 5 days.

113 We also tested women's home tap water for arsenic, which we combined with tap water

114 Group 2 rats (n = 25) received tap water for the same period and served as the control

115 THM concentrations in blood and residential tap water from 150 postpartum women from three U.S. loca

116 used identical methods to collect samples of tap water from 2 cities and measured their levels of cal

117 ath associated with culturable N. fowleri in tap water from a US treated drinking water system.

118 tributable to consuming fecally contaminated tap water from an IWS.

119 ples (in this case, streamwater, lake water, tap water, groundwater, and mineral water).

120 le keeping a very good limit of detection in tap water, i.e. 0.8ppb.

121 ed for consumption of 0.5 M NaCl solution or tap water in a 2-bottle choice test.

122 Calcium levels in the tap water in Beijing were 15-fold higher than in Framing

123 in the UK and supports advice to avoid using tap water in contact lens care routines.

124 s of cryptosporidiosis; however, the role of tap water in endemic disease is unclear.

125 ty analysis to examine the potential role of tap water in the transmission of endemic C. parvum infec

126 His only reported water exposure was tap water; in particular, tap water that was used to sup

127 is AuNPs based technology in minced beef and tap water indicates the possibility of its using in vari

128 red idiosyncratically at high levels in some tap waters, indicating distribution and/or premise plumb

129 Tap water iodine concentrations were low or undetectable

130 Urinary iodine concentrations and tap water iodine concentrations were measured in June-Ju

131 rofiles were found for the clinical and home tap water isolates.

132 determine the similarity between corneal and tap water isolates.

133 Test results obtained with tap water, lake water and milk samples show that assay p

134 In rats that drank tap water, left kidney GFR averaged (in microliter/min p

135 (1) Results yielded the Tap Water Line in China is delta(2)H = 7.72 delta(18)O +

136 orrected data with precisions of SD-(delta D Tap Water < 34/1000 and accuracy within 11/1000.

137 the spike and recovery trials with seawater, tap water, mineral water, and alcoholic beverages and by

138 We measured arsenic in home tap water (n = 874), urine from 6-week-old infants (n =

139 etected in surface waters and in Barcelona's tap water (NE Spain) which caused consumer complaints.

140 ction (qPCR)-measured enteric viruses in the tap water of 14 Wisconsin communities supplied by nondis

141 omochloromethane) were measured in blood and tap water of U.S. adults in the National Health and Nutr

142 somal dominant PKD were provided with either tap water or 55 mM K3citrate/67 mM citric acid solution

143 so highly selective and can be used in plain tap water or bottled water to test fluoridation levels.

144 Dams drank either tap water or water containing MMI.

145 nses (OR, 8.00; P = 0.04), storing lenses in tap water (OR, 16.00; P = 0.001), and topping off contac

146 g a set of liquid water samples with delta D Tap Water over the range of 39-407/1000 with uncorrected

147 a combination of the 3 tastants, or placebo (tap water) over a period of 60 min.

148 when ingested with 16 oz of room temperature tap water, phenylpropanolamine increased SBP by 82+/-2 m

149 Consumers assess their tap water primarily by its taste, odor, and appearance.

150 The analysis of spiked tap water proved the biosensor capability to be used as

151 rect tap water consumption to consumption of tap water re-treated at the point of use (POU) and studi

152 rk City population, the calculated number of tap-water-related cases per year in the non-AIDS subgrou

153 L(-1) in orange juice and 164.2 fg mL(-1) in tap water, respectively, demonstrating at least two orde

154 bly allows to detect PA in real samples like tap water, river water and matchstick.

155 ) and Hg(2+) in environmental water samples (tap water, river water, and lake water).

156 eadspace method was applied to analysis of a tap water sample and a monitoring well sample from a gas

157 Finally, a tap water sample is analyzed for the anions in this stud

158 eloped approach was used to analyze a spiked tap water sample, with good measured recoveries (69-119%

159 in a standard diet, as well as a chlorinated tap water sample.

160 pathogen detection from rivers, canals, and tap water samples after simple water pretreatment.

161 reover, the aptasensor was applied in spiked tap water samples and showed good recovery percentages.

162 rovides a direct way to determine mercury in tap water samples at the parts-per-trillion level.

163 780 tap water samples have been collected from 95 cities acr

164 Mineral, spring and tap water samples of different geographical origins (7 c

165 The analytical recoveries from tap water samples of the six regulated PAH varied from 8

166 The stability of VX was determined in five tap water samples representing a range of water quality

167 obtained in buffer solution, minced beef and tap water samples respectively, with a broad detection r

168 he method is demonstrated with deionized and tap water samples spiked with carbamate insecticides.

169 Validation on tap water samples spiked with different concentrations o

170 preconcentrate target analytes from diluted tap water samples with an enrichment factor of around 80

171 Of tap water samples, 97% showed fecal coliform contaminati

172 In preserved tap water samples, VX recovery was between 81 and 92% of

173 ifying P. aeruginosa and P. fluorescens from tap water samples, which are both opportunistic pathogen

174 neous electroanalysis of three FQs in spiked tap water samples, with recovery values remarkably close

175 ely determined for the first time in 11 real tap water samples.

176 onding dipeptides were detected in authentic tap water samples.

177 ation of Pb(2+) was successfully measured in tap water samples.

178 speciation analysis of arsenic in river and tap water samples.

179 he biosensor may be used to detect Cu(2+) in tap water samples.

180 n of fluoride in various matrixes, including tap water, seawater, and urine.

181 resonator is able to detect ZnO NWs in real tap water, showing the potential as ZnO NWs screening pl

182 ite 3, 57%) but varied less markedly than in tap water (site 1, 35%; site 2, 75%; site 3, 68%).

183 national-scale survey of Stable Isotopes in Tap Water (SITW) across China.

184 extracts from soil, hamburger, and finished tap water spiked with VX.

185 impact consumer confidence and perception of tap water still occur and may increase.

186 lected from 3 urban source waters (municipal tap water, streamwater, and wastewater treatment facilit

187 s low in Uvira, improving the reliability of tap water supply may substantially reduce the incidence

188 d cholera cases attributable to a suboptimal tap water supply reached 23.2% of total admissions (95%

189 Following a day without tap water supply, the suspected cholera incidence rate i

190 National Children's Study (NCS), about 2000 tap water, surface wipe, and air samples were collected

191 e within the homes varied significantly with tap water temperature and location: 19 (76%) of 25 bathr

192 epimerisation may take place more readily in tap water than in distilled water owing to the complexit

193 isulfides was significantly higher in common tap water than in ultrapure water.

194 water exposure was tap water; in particular, tap water that was used to supply water to a lawn water

195 For the tap water, the digestion efficiency was 47.2% (+/-11.1%

196 Household tap water THM concentrations ranged between 3-129 mug L(

197 otal exposure metric than did ingestion, but tap water THM concentrations were more predictive of blo

198 U)/ml, were reduced 3- to 5-fold by flushing tap water through the units, but they returned after uni

199 Placebo-treated rats were then given tap water to drink ad libitum, and DOCA-treated rats rec

200 the same surgical procedures but were given tap water to drink.

201 tation (+/+) were fed AIN-76A diet and given tap water to drink.

202 Using tap water to store RGP lenses and topping off solution i

203 ionized water, commercial bottled water, and tap water under a rotating electrode configuration.

204 Their only reported water exposures were tap water used for household activities, including regul

205 inadequate clearance of chloramine from the tap water used for portable dialysis.

206 ID) for Cd(2+) determination in drinking and tap waters using the Cd-EDTA-BSA-AuNP conjugate as signa

207 Male Sprague-Dawley rats received tap water (vehicle) and 30 mM L-buthionine sulfoximine (

208 ed a significant association between GII and tap water versus POU-treated water consumption (IDR = 1.

209 tings with network malfunction, consumers of tap water versus POU-treated water had increased GII [in

210 of nonregulated DBPs were observed after the tap water was heated for 24 h.

211 nd a slight reduction was observed after the tap water was heated for 24 h.

212 Tap water was less contaminated; any restrictions for ta

213 Beginning in 1995, a sample of tap water was taken from the participants' homes; a tota

214 s in the various natural waters (lake water, tap water, waste water with boric acid, waste water with

215 was less contaminated; any restrictions for tap water were canceled by April 1, 2011.

216 ontrol study, persons who drank any unboiled tap water were four times more likely than persons who d

217 ted with moistening of culturette swabs with tap water were isolated from a single clinic before coll

218 neighbourhoods with a higher consumption of tap water were more affected by water supply interruptio

219 BQs (0.25 nmol L(-1)) in both pure water and tap water were transformed to other products after UV254

220 of detection of 2 x 10(4) CFU/mL in milk or tap water, which compares well with those of state-of-th

221 5 different samples of both minced beef and tap water with 10(3) and 10(4) CFU/mL were 94.7 and 90.4

222 Heating of the tap water with low pH led to a more significant increase

223 For tap water with lower water ages, there were significant

224 ted into a device for analysis of nitrate in tap water with standard addition as a single run and mul

225 rent sources (river, lake, coastal water and tap water) with a detection limit of 0.2mg/L - compared

226 (2-nitrophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol) in tap water, with no sample preparation steps.

227 e, up to 38% of the silver mass in products; tap water yielded the lowest amount, </=1.5%.