ライフサイエンスコーパス: task

1 enance of all these packages is a burdensome task.

2 tion is used in the execution of a cognitive task.

3 or both (N=63) during a response inhibition task.

4 arameters in most models, this is no trivial task.

5 performed a difficult visual discrimination task.

6 ements of the forelimb on a skilled reaching task.

7 psy patients as they performed a free recall task.

8 cipants performed a verbal paired-associates task.

9 e of a complex reward-guided decision-making task.

10 = 22.12 (2.16)] during a declarative memory task.

11 y interference paradigm with an echolocation task.

12 temporal gyrus during a picture description task.

13 ing sooner during the smoking relapse-analog task.

14 their performance in a reward-based learning task.

15 ht even be enhanced to overcome the previous task.

16 the AX version of the continuous performance task.

17 rforming a threshold-level visual perception task.

18 forming a concurrent delayed match-to-sample task.

19 s that led to reduced performance on the BCI task.

20 ch screen as part of an operant conditioning task.

21 ogical Test Automated Battery and a planning task.

22 of muscles engaged in different steps of the task.

23 PSC across three levels of a working memory task.

24 impaired performance in the latent learning task.

25 ern-based neuroimaging and a decision-making task.

26 participated in the Trier Social Stress Test Task.

27 ng in a food-reinforced operant conditioning task.

28 he blood of cancer patients is a challenging task.

29 tent across levels of difficulty of the same task.

30 potentials from mice performing a detection task.

31 (n = 24) in a memory and a visual perceptual task.

32 In contrast, familiarity was spared in each task.

33 rts in a probabilistic instrumental learning task.

34 itive (money) and aversive (effort) learning task.

35 luding defects in a novel object recognition task.

36 l output neuron on a stimulus discrimination task.

37 us system function in the context of natural tasks.

38 ght which tool is best equipped for specific tasks.

39 tion times during a startle cue in all motor tasks.

40 e their cognitive resources across different tasks.

41 ontrol participants during cognitive control tasks.

42 cological description, counting and identity tasks.

43 ional challenges for common machine learning tasks.

44 tion operation for specialized computational tasks.

45 terface for high-performance data processing tasks.

46 as tested during motor or nonmotor cognitive tasks.

47 rtive for decision-making and working memory tasks.

48 on from perceptual reports in psychophysical tasks.

49 ogical reasoning and visuospatial perception tasks.

50 uced memory impairment using two independent tasks.

51 terized through confidence reports in visual tasks.

52 learning on the weights important for those tasks.

53 rent pooling algorithms are unknown for such tasks.

54 rmation, in such categorical cue combination tasks.

55 the framework to solve other categorization tasks.

56 duced or naturally occurring during reaching tasks.

57 prefrontal regions across multiple cognitive tasks.

58 In task 2, we employed pictures of partially exposed snakes

59 ssessed by measuring performance on the same task 24 h later.

60 al-rTMS, sham-rTMS), all including an N-back task (3 task loads: N1, N2, N3; control condition: N0) i

61 sk and attention-demanding 4-choice response tasks (4CRT) with identical stimuli but two contexts: on

62 d using the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT) and delay discounting procedures.

63 ness using BOLD signal recruitment and multi-task activation indices.

64 nd impaired behavioral adjustment to a novel task after sleep deprivation.

65 same extent in the No-Rotation and Rotation tasks after matching for difficulty.

66 their interaction regardless of attentional task, although a subset of the responses is modulated si

67 ormance during an explorative motor learning task and a decision-making task which had a similar unde

68 trols (HC) performed a variant of the Stroop task and attention-demanding 4-choice response tasks (4C

69 re, we devised a naturalistic face-detection task and combined it with fMRI-guided pharmacological in

70 Being able to focus on a complex task and inhibit unwanted actions or interfering informa

71 Here, using a novel experimental task and nonlinear population receptive field modeling,

72 exes during a stimulus-selective stop-signal task and performed strategy-dependent functional magneti

73 uch false peaks manually is a time-consuming task and prone to human error.

74 etween pupil metrics derived from this novel task and quantitative behavioral traits associated with

75 Task and response selection are strongly interactive: it

76 arameters estimated from the decision-making task and the separate motor noise measurement.

77 ficantly less accurate on the working memory task and their neuronal dynamics indicated that encoding

78 minance of a certain sense during particular tasks and conditions, also called sensory capture.

79 nt during the delay period of working memory tasks and may therefore reflect the representation of in

80 -course of decision making in other, related tasks and report conditions where evidence integration f

81 rip to a lesser extent than during the other tasks and this positively correlated with changes in int

82 tome analysis across different castes, ages, tasks and tissues.

83 n (sentential overt speech production-Speech task) and activation related to cognitive processing (no

84 How animals achieve this task, and its underlying sensory basis, is still unknown

85 ance differences for most clustering-related tasks, and in the number of perceived visual clusters.

86 atients, communication, academic, nonmedical tasks, and transition.

87 eye-movements during a memory guided saccade task are related to fluctuations in the amplitude of exp

88 on step comes first, implying all subsequent tasks are more rapidly solved in 2D.

89 signal variability has been conducted within task-based fMRI contexts on adults and older individuals

90 14.97) (P < .05), and weaker corticothalamic task-based functional connectivity (tbFC) (F1,77 = 5.87;

91 a dominating component can be a challenging task because of noncompatible linear detection ranges or

92 Task behavior and self-reported self-reliance for decisi

93 ks with respect to known biology is a common task but often a computationally costly one.

94 Our approach remembers old tasks by selectively slowing down learning on the weight

95 For simple perceptual laboratory tasks, classic signal detection theory specifies the upp

96 tnatal period underscores the limitations of tasking community health workers in public sector progra

97 With increased task complexity, participants of lower fluid intelligenc

98 n brain connectivity supporting increases in task complexity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans have clear

99 , striatal activity and pupil size reflected task-conditional salience of old and new stimuli, but, u

100 nding postural sway-particularly during dual task conditions- appears to be a better predictor of fut

101 coping strategy that is independent of age, task content and brain region.

102 Performance across all tasks correlated strongly with attention control (measur

103 uid intelligence showed reduced responses to task-critical events.

104 0 sessions shows that SMVM outperforms human task delegation decisions over 80% of the time under com

105 of activation occur in response to different task demands.

106 t location and Y-maze continuous alternation tasks) demonstrate that this PDE4D inhibitor is able to

107 However, cognitive tasks designed to assess visual-spatial attentional bias

108 usly reported results from V2 in a different task, deviated from the predictions for optimal linear r

109 Here we combined resting-state and task-driven functional magnetic resonance imaging to exa

110 But it is a challenging task due to the additive solid supports in traditional m

111 (ToF-SIMS) has received attention for these tasks due to the technique's nondestructive nature, rich

112 completed a probabilistic reversal learning task during acquisition of functional magnetic resonance

113 Participants performed an associative memory task during hr-fMRI in which they encoded and later retr

114 red using the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), in which motivation for high-effort/high-r

115 is subnetwork organization was stable across task-engaged and resting states, suggesting that abstrac

116 network architectures that underlie external task engagement, and highlight selective changes in brai

117 fers latent statistical structure in dynamic task environments to predict forthcoming states.

118 performing a feature-based reversal learning task evaluating performance using Bayesian and Reinforce

119 Task-evoked regional brain activations during the early

120 sion paradigm and implement it in a reaching task experiment.

121 The neurons informative about task features (trial type and maze locations) changed ac

122 The relationship between cells' activity and task features was mostly stable on single days but under

123 ntrol subjects (n = 23) completed a gambling task featuring a decision between a gamble and a safe (c

124 odels of neural networks has hitherto been a task for computing professionals rather than experimenta

125 subfields during a perceptual discrimination task for scenes, faces, and objects.

126 ene expression studies this is not a trivial task for several reasons, including potential temporal c

127 over a heterogeneous population in promising tasks for the detection of AD.

128 Major tasks for the future are to apply these approaches to a

129 he Third International Consensus Definitions Task Force (Sepsis-3) recently recommended changes to th

130 relative accuracy of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and American College of Cardiology/A

131 To issue a new US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for gyne

132 The Task Force achieved a comprehensive position in defining

133 Preventive Services Task Force endorsed aspirin for primary prevention of ca

134 g from the United States Preventive Services Task Force for population-based skin cancer screening.

135 eutics (ASRS ReST) Committee, an independent task force formed to monitor device-related and drug-rel

136 For this task force initiative of the European Academy of Allergy

137 An international task force recently redefined the concept of sepsis.

138 dback on the draft document, which the Joint Task Force reviewed before finalizing the guideline.

139 The task force was unable to reach agreement on a single tes

140 In conjunction with the Joint Task Force, the workgroup reviewed the evidence and deve

141 ars and older for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

142 adults to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.

143 Dual-task gait cost was defined as the percentage change betw

144 e percentage change between single- and dual-task gait velocities: ([single-task gait velocity - dual

145 gle- and dual-task gait velocities: ([single-task gait velocity - dual-task gait velocity]/ single-ta

146 velocity - dual-task gait velocity]/ single-task gait velocity) x 100.

147 locities: ([single-task gait velocity - dual-task gait velocity]/ single-task gait velocity) x 100.

148 , or any other oscillators, for more complex tasks have been challenging in theory as well as in expe

149 echanisms they use for accomplishing similar tasks have diverged considerably and in an unpredictable

150 Visuomotor adaptation tasks have revealed neural correlates of these computati

151 We developed a two-alternative forced-choice task in an automated modified T-maze.

152 and fMRI in a cued visual spatial attention task in humans, which allowed delineation of both the ge

153 of a skilled forelimb food-pellet retrieval task in mice.

154 Finding new phase of matter is a fundamental task in physics.

155 le they performed a modified Eriksen flanker task in which distractors and targets flickered within (

156 ior using conditioned place preference and a task in which mice learn associations between cues and f

157 To test between these alternatives we used a task in which participants were required to reach to eit

158 rmed a complex reward-guided decision-making task in which predicted reward value was independently m

159 rtex while two macaques performed a reaching task in which the gain scaling between the hand and a pr

160 Patients performed a behavioural task in which their action choices were motivated by the

161 e extraction and classification are two main tasks in abnormal ECG beat recognition.

162 d performance on working memory and planning tasks in children 7-12 y old.

163 re consistent across detection and attention tasks in human magnetoencephalography, and in local fiel

164 pplication of economic principles to operant tasks in rodents have allowed for the within-subject, wi

165 One of the main tasks in the analysis of models of biomolecular networks

166 ing two extreme versions of the color-naming task, in three groups: the Tsimane', a remote Amazonian

167 We used Posner's classic endogenous cuing task, in which a centrally presented, spatially informat

168 EEG-fMRI and a sustained selective listening task, in which one out of two competing speech streams h

169 We tested this model using cued recall tasks, in which subjects had to memorize object arrays c

170 This is especially crucial for the tasks, in which the performance is heavily dependent on

171 adults to engage in these processes through task instruction or questions.

172 tate scan, followed by a cognitive reasoning task involving different levels of complexity, followed

173 We devised a series of tasks involving pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral olfact

174 In tasks involving the recognition of actions, patients sho

175 sed cognitive control and the suppression of task irrelevant inputs.

176 istinct neural processes with suppression of task-irrelevant information occurring before conflict re

177 pothesis, we measured fMRI BOLD responses to task-irrelevant stimuli acquired from 15 human participa

178 ive attention requires listeners to suppress task-irrelevant stimuli and to resolve conflicting infor

179 This task is accomplished despite signaling components that s

180 or with which humans and animals engage in a task is often a determinant of the likelihood of the tas

181 An outstanding task is to combine and compare different epigenomes in o

182 be and default mode networks, whereas during task it was driven by connectivity within these networks

183 sham-rTMS), all including an N-back task (3 task loads: N1, N2, N3; control condition: N0) inside th

184 natomy); (2) "synthetic anatomy for surgical tasks" mannequin (medium-fidelity anatomy), and (3) a pa

185 articipants in the laboratory risky decision task (mean age, 34.2 [10.3] years), 44 (59%) were women

186 P = .62), estimated metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs; 11.6 vs 11.7; P = .80), maximum heart rate

187 wild type mice was conspicuously reduced in TASK(-/-) mice.

188 rovement of 0.8% when compared to the single-task model from an average baseline of 78.4%.

189 With the Multi-output multi-task model we observed an average F-score improvement of

190 imaging (fMRI) alongside a perceptual oddity task, modified from nonhuman primate studies.

191 ls over long distances, observers solved the task more efficiently, using the ball positioned closest

192 mally associated with the 'default mode' or 'task negative' network.

193 d dynamic conditions, we found that, in both tasks, observers used suboptimal learning rules.

194 fferentiation potential of single cells is a task of critical importance.

195 , a major payer-provider structure given the task of defining uniform rules for access to and distrib

196 Variant calling is the complex task of separating real polymorphisms from errors.

197 s needed to perform the locality-constrained tasks of entanglement transformation and its classical a

198 role in topographical memory as assessed in tasks of scene memory where the viewpoint shifts from st

199 mulation (left forearm) and visual attention tasks of titrated difficulty in 20 healthy subjects.

200 s in hemodynamic signals in the absence of a task or overt stimulation are used to infer neural activ

201 they performed a selective spatial attention task over the course of 1 month.

202 f skin lesions using images is a challenging task owing to the fine-grained variability in the appear

203 -allergic controls (n = 42) performed a dual-task paradigm and a verbal learning and memory test duri

204 l prefrontal cortex and utilized a series of task paradigms, each measuring a different aspect of rec

205 sounds, but only when the animals engaged in task performance and were attentive to the stimuli.

206 en metacognitive performance and first-order task performance by recording EEG signals while particip

207 activity when receiving negative feedback on task performance from a study investigator.

208 tes that variability in brain signals during task performance is related to brain maturation in old a

209 s dedicated to monitoring behavior to adjust task performance when necessary.

210 re any areas additionally activated for dual-task performance, and compared the neural activity and f

211 imposes a negative impact on attention-based task performance, but also has been associated with enha

212 oups did not differ in online working memory task performance, but the transcranial direct current st

213 even transiently during the delay, impaired task performance, primarily by increasing inappropriate

214 ger spatial segments, which are relevant for task performance.

215 concentration) was not clearly correlated to task performance.

216 sensorimotor control in the basal ganglia of task-performing healthy animals.

217 during a delay period in a spatial attention task preceded subsequent stimulus-driven gamma-band acti

218 a facial emotion and identity discrimination task prior to and following tRNS to either IFC or an act

219 orienting movements in controlled laboratory tasks rather than an animal's more complete, natural beh

220 racy trade-off, and an amplification of both task-related activations in dorsal frontoparietal and ce

221 All Purkinje cells showed task-related activity.

222 Task-related amygdala-based functional connectivity was

223 lywise error P threshold = 0.03), greater IC task-related blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) re

224 uctuations in the amplitude of expression of task-related brain states, or brain state variability, a

225 l frontoparietal and cerebellar regions, and task-related deactivations in default mode network (DMN)

226 We applied graph theoretical analysis to task-related fMRI functional connectivity data from 20 h

227 as no difference in the decoding accuracy of task-related information between switch and repeat trial

228 agnitude of GABAA inhibition observed during task-related synchronization of oscillations in inhibito

229 an ventral regions, with object category and task relevance both contributing significantly to the re

230 Task relevance modulated the influence of predictions on

231 Crucially, task relevance modulated these spectral correlates, sugg

232 the prioritization of sensory input based on task relevance.

233 f tDCS likely depends on tDCS intensity, and task relevant genetic factors (e.g., for WM: COMT val(15

234 ation about the distributional properties of task-relevant categories, in addition to sensory informa

235 between hemispheric counterparts of various task-relevant cerebral regions that are known to exhibit

236 nfluenced by whether or not object shape was task-relevant.

237 al improvement when the expected feature was task-relevant.

238 ts were unable to perform the motion or form task reliably when segment size was smaller than a spati

239 As expected, we found information about task representations in frontal and parietal cortex, but

240 Alternatively, task representations might even be enhanced to overcome

241 iltering out peripheral distractors when the task required a narrow focusing of attention.

242 This task requires subjects to discriminate highly similar sc

243 ight avoidance, and the ability to perform a task requiring basic image recognition were restored up

244 cessing circuits to emerge during a reversal task requiring behavioral flexibility.

245 e suggest that the difficulty of the spatial tasks rests on the neocortex and on the limitations of w

246 urons of mice during an inhibitory avoidance task revealed that CaMKII activity during, but not after

247 ous magnitudes in the context of a numerical task revealing that infants can discriminate number when

248 The results suggest that task rules signaled by the mPFC become incorporated into

249 often a determinant of the likelihood of the task's success.

250 s the association with word learning delayed-task scores was weaker (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.92-1.52).

251 peat a response in the context of a changing task-set, and vice versa.

252 photonic crystal device which performs both tasks simultaneously and is able to couple light at norm

253 c resonance imaging to examine how flexible, task-specific reconfigurations associated with increasin

254 They instead suggest task specificity in the learning of oculomotor plans in

255 the brain's ability to represent stimuli and task states, and that information capacity measured thro

256 In each task, stimuli were ellipses with principal orientations

257 5% CI, 1.23-2.08), and inverted interference task Stroop color word test (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.25-1.96

258 In contrast, saccades do change for tasks such as object following and to a lesser extent du

259 wed deficits in the novel object recognition task, suggesting hippocampal dysfunction.

260 ortices similarly to many types of effortful task switching.

261 al striatum (VS) lesions on a two-arm bandit task that had randomly interleaved blocks of stimulus-ba

262 d outcome uncertainty in a novel delay-based task that incorporates both predictable fluctuations and

263 Using a multi-category valuation task that incorporates rewards and punishments of differ

264 en two urine stimuli in successive trials, a task that mice can easily perform.

265 he causality of a disease locus is a complex task that often requires supporting data from both stati

266 in behaving zebrafish during a reaction-time task that reports alertness.

267 sample information in a perceptual decision task that required information from across multiple spat

268 hippocampal and entorhinal neurons during a task that required rats to use a joystick to manipulate

269 Monkeys performed a visual matching task that required them to detect target stimuli compose

270 serial recall in a Hebb repetition learning task that simulates word-form learning.

271 s fundamental importance to the diversity of tasks that kinesins carry out in cells, no existing quan

272 provide evidence from two different foraging tasks that neurons in primate posterior cingulate cortex

273 d not affect performance in auditory control tasks that required detection of changes in sound intens

274 rain networks that can maintain expertise on tasks that they have not experienced for a long time.

275 In all tasks, the number of neurons required for a given level

276 Upon completion of these tasks, they neither die at the injury site nor are phago

277 Nociceptors accomplish this task through the expression of molecules that function t

278 ng or left/right 2-alternative forced choice tasks to examine perceptual judgments of sound location

279 cal electrodes performing virtual navigation tasks to memorized locations enabled us to investigate a

280 between hippocampal activity during a memory task using fMRI and subsequent longitudinal change in Ab

281 ps of participants on reinforcement learning tasks using a computational model that was adapted to te

282 ally extended patterns were not explained by task variables or temporally discrete sensory stimuli.

283 arrhythmic state, but performance on the SA task varied across the day with a peak in daily performa

284 perform the probabilistic reversal learning task via dynamic adjustment of learning based on reward

285 In contrast, the effect of task was much greater in dorsal than ventral regions, wi

286 hysiology in a context-dependent stop signal task, we found a functional double dissociation between

287 subjects performing a visuospatial attention task, we show that fluctuations in alpha power during a

288 After monkeys became proficient in this task, we tested their ability to generalize to a number

289 The functional magnetic resonance imaging tasks were designed to differentiate between activation

290 led this circumstance in rats by designing a task where actions were consistently rewarded but probab

291 odel of the Episodic Temporal Generalization task, where subjects have to judge whether pairs of audi

292 ve motor learning task and a decision-making task which had a similar underlying structure with the e

293 d coupling with each other during the memory task, which correlated with the global reduction in brai

294 ith previous reports, using other behavioral tasks, which show decreased behavioral efficiency in adu

295 ender, and age performed a passive avoidance task while undergoing functional MRI.

296 complementary processes in a picture naming task with blocks of semantically heterogeneous (HET) or

297 ty of predicting individual behaviors across tasks with patterns of brain activity.

298 otein stability is an especially challenging task, with random substitution yielding stabilizing muta

299 precision-hold, and maximum force-generation tasks, with each hand.

300 r HIST in both classification and regression tasks, yielding nodule classification and rating perform