ライフサイエンスコーパス: telephone interview

1 factors were obtained using a questionnaire/telephone interview.

2 ty and completed a semistructured diagnostic telephone interview.

3 night eating syndrome with a semistructured telephone interview.

4 ts treated for KC with MMS were selected for telephone interview.

5 medication use were collected via structured telephone interview.

6 ember 31, 1995, participated in a structured telephone interview.

7 logical risk factors were assessed through a telephone interview.

8 ite the person to participate in a 30-minute telephone interview.

9 retrospectively from mothers in a structured telephone interview.

10 le of 58 bioptic drivers was administered by telephone interview.

11 inical and demographic data were obtained by telephone interview.

12 Risk factors were assessed in a telephone interview.

13 performed, and follow-up was established by telephone interview.

14 inical and demographic data were obtained by telephone interview.

15 story and other risk factors was obtained by telephone interview.

16 f 50.1 years elected to respond to SRPMs via telephone interview.

17 -up was obtained by mailed questionnaire and telephone interview.

18 d AD were assessed by structured psychiatric telephone interview.

19 take part then underwent a computer-assisted telephone interview.

20 1 were surveyed by written questionnaire and telephone interview.

21 design, and data were collected by means of telephone interview.

22 ects were asked to participate in a detailed telephone interview.

23 eight, and other factors were ascertained by telephone interview.

24 ischarge by chart review and at follow-up by telephone interview.

25 ood frequency questionnaire and a structured telephone interview.

26 assessed at baseline by a computer-assisted telephone interview.

27 o vaccination were determined by a follow-up telephone interview.

28 istory was obtained from chart review or via telephone interview.

29 Data were collected prospectively through telephone interviews.

30 iodontal disease for use via face-to-face or telephone interviews.

31 were obtained from patients by in-person and telephone interviews.

32 Oral health information was obtained from telephone interviews.

33 elf-reported medication use assessed through telephone interviews.

34 ion was collected by use of diary sheets and telephone interviews.

35 about 50% of eligible participants completed telephone interviews.

36 d transferring), was assessed during monthly telephone interviews.

37 and other risk factors was collected through telephone interviews.

38 osis and as of the study year, in structured telephone interviews.

39 el exposures were confirmed through followup telephone interviews.

40 and healthcare coverage data via structured telephone interviews.

41 tudy for up to five years by means of annual telephone interviews.

42 llowed longitudinally with office visits and telephone interviews.

43 ast cancer risk factors was obtained through telephone interviews.

44 d MG was performed using medical records and telephone interviews.

45 tients' expectations, as determined from the telephone interviews.

46 revious 48 hours in quarterly semistructured telephone interviews.

47 ent in English or Spanish, and available for telephone interviews.

48 r interrogation, patient questionnaires, and telephone interviews.

49 mined through medical records and by mail or telephone interviews.

50 reakfast cereals reported through structured telephone interviews.

51 ion was obtained from patients' standardized telephone interviews.

52 medical history was obtained from structured telephone interviews.

53 ride the economic and logistic advantages of telephone interviewing.

54 by trained personnel using computer-assisted telephone interviewing.

55 in 2013 (n = 7,193) using computer-assisted telephone interviewing.

56 studies conducted in parallel with cellular telephone interviewing.

57 visit questionnaire and were available for a telephone interview 1 to 7 days after the visit were inc

58 Mothers completed a computer-assisted telephone interview 1.5-24 months after their estimated

59 xtraction (54%), mailed questionnaires (6%), telephone interviews (1%), or a death registry (1%).

60 Data were from annual telephone interviews (1998-2003) with an observational c

61 ealth care professionals participated in the telephone interviews; 206 completed the survey.

62 Results For the telephone interviews, 239 of 264 (90.6%) FS attendees, 2

63 nonattendees (n = 299) were contacted for a telephone interview 3-6 months after invitation for scre

64 a 4-item assessment of cognitive function at telephone interviews 3 and 12 months after injury.

65 Among LPSP patients available for current telephone interview, 68% subjectively rated their qualit

66 study, we attempted an additional follow-up telephone interview 8 to 14 years after sterilization.

67 139 subjects (67%) who completed a baseline telephone interview, 84 (60%) received test results and

68 We obtained, by telephone interview, a lifetime history of MD, defined b

69 screening intentions), which we assessed by telephone interview about 3 weeks after random allocatio

70 ve status was administered with a structured telephone interview after up to 7 years.

71 5.00 dollars incentive on participation in a telephone interview among cases and controls in an ongoi

72 served were approached for an audio-recorded telephone interview and 15 participated (4 male, 11 fema

73 HSCT survivors completed a telephone interview and a set of questionnaires a mean o

74 The patients were followed up by means of telephone interview and clinical records, with emphasis

75 ed according to dry eye diagnostic codes and telephone interview and completed the Dry Eye Questionna

76 ritis, ascertained through computer-assisted telephone interview and computerized databases.

77 A telephone interview and descriptive analysis detailing d

78 996 comparing supplement data collected in a telephone interview and from a self-administered questio

79 1999, we ascertained respiratory symptoms by telephone interview and have identified 571 incident cas

80 The HC group completed a parallel telephone interview and set of questionnaires.

81 ling controls were administered a structured telephone interview and the Profile of Moods State (POMS

82 or acute coronary syndrome) were assessed by telephone interview and/or medical record review.

83 A telephone interview and/or patients' hospital files conf

84 Participants were given telephone interviews and asked about known and suspected

85 Data were collected by telephone interviews and chart reviews.

86 g major cardiac events were obtained through telephone interviews and chart reviews.

87 Information was collected through telephone interviews and clinical examinations at 3 and

88 Data were collected through telephone interviews and clinical examinations until 13

89 y assessed cross-sectional data derived from telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires completed

90 cancer risk factors were ascertained through telephone interviews and medical record abstractions.

91 ected information on immune diseases through telephone interviews and performed serological analyses

92 ubjective recovery information obtained with telephone interviews and validated questionnaires admini

93 nsvaginal ultrasonography, computer-assisted telephone interview, and follow-up assessment of outcome

94 east cancer risk factors were ascertained by telephone interview, and logistic regression was used to

95 auci-SS, based on a screening questionnaire, telephone interview, and review of medical records.

96 ents' deaths and invited to participate in a telephone interview, and surrogates for 262 cancer patie

97 y of diabetes was obtained by questionnaire, telephone interview, and/or medical record review.

98 2008, men were recruited, completed baseline telephone interviews, and were than randomized to receiv

99 ) capability of completing questionnaire and telephone interview; and (5) completion of written infor

100 Subjects (N = 1,800) completed a 43-item telephone interview approximately 3 weeks after screenin

101 risk factors was obtained through structured telephone interviews approximately 1 year after diagnosi

102 viduals with RA, for which annual structured telephone interviews are conducted (n=508 in year 1, n=4

103 red with 332 men and 526 women with landline telephones interviewed as controls for 2 case-control st

104 Questionnaire and telephone interview assessed current bowel function and

105 A mutation carriers completed semistructured telephone interviews assessing self-reported disclosure

106 ne 2012, through deaths registry linkage and telephone interview at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months posti

107 collected using a detailed computer-assisted telephone interview at approximately 16 weeks of gestati

108 ry Questionnaire, which was administered via telephone interview at baseline and 2 and 6 mo later.

109 Outcomes were assessed by telephone interview at days 3, 7, 10, and 28.

110 246 patients completed the telephone interview at week 1.

111 Patient outcomes were assessed by means of telephone interviews at 12 and 24 months conducted by ob

112 surgical records and from computer-assisted telephone interviews at 5, 21, and 33 months after prima

113 d at baseline, and at 24 and 48 months, with telephone interviews at 6-month intervals in between.

114 of life was assessed by centrally conducted telephone interviews at baseline and days 50, 106, and 1

115 erican (39%), 745 White (61%)) who completed telephone interviews at baseline and follow-up (on avera

116 elating to self-harm from questionnaires and telephone interviews at eight waves of follow-up, commen

117 Telephone interviews at follow-up were used to collect d

118 taining to self-harm from questionnaires and telephone interviews at seven waves of follow-up, commen

119 mailed buccal-cell collection kits following telephone interviews at the Atlanta, Georgia, study site

120 Follow-up data on families were collected by telephone interview between 1991 and 1996.

121 pairment over time (score </=8 on a modified Telephone Interview Cognitive Screen).

122 A telephone interview collected information about caffeina

123 A telephone interview collected information about psycholo

124 odalities with a low response burden such as telephone interview, computer-assisted interview, and pr

125 ures were obtained from an annual structured telephone interview conducted by a trained survey worker

126 wup data were obtained via structured 1-hour telephone interviews conducted between 2002 and 2006.

127 iled, self-administered questionnaires, with telephone interviews conducted for nonresponders.

128 assic twin genetic analysis using results of telephone interviews conducted from March 2002 through N

129 The first phase included 1-hour qualitative telephone interviews conducted from November to December

130 Telephone interviews conducted in January 2001 with pres

131 Similar results were obtained with the telephone interview data.

132 ental treatment was obtained from structured telephone interviews, dental records, and medical record

133 Telephone interviews done after the index office visit a

134 up was conducted by medical record review or telephone interview during January 2000.

135 Vaccination histories were obtained by telephone interviews during 1995-1996 and were confirmed

136 sessed prospectively via 3 computer-assisted telephone interviews during pregnancy and 6 months after

137 s, respiratory health was assessed weekly by telephone interviews during the first year of life (19,1

138 Risk factor information collected during a telephone interview focused on exposures before and afte

139 on over a 6-month period were eligible for a telephone interview focusing on NSAID use, which include

140 follow-up was available in 86 patients, and telephone interview follow-up was conducted in 85 patien

141 Evaluations included a 25-minute telephone interview followed by a comprehensive mail-in

142 Long-term follow-up was possible by telephone interview for 23 patients (median 36 months, r

143 gnitive function annually using the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) and es

144 dels using cognitive scores imputed from the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status for participant

145 performance was captured using the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status test.

146 performance was measured using the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and functional

147 The Geriatric Depression Scale, Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and Medical Ou

148 The Geriatric Depression Scale, Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and Medical Ou

149 sured using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, and Sickness I

150 ive functioning at 12 and 24 mo by using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified (TICS-

151 Additional cases were identified through the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified or inf

152 d patients and by means of clinical visit or telephone interview for surviving patients.

153 Disability was assessed during monthly telephone interviews for a median of 60 months, and part

154 utilization were ascertained during monthly telephone interviews for up to 2 years.

155 ait speed) and were followed up with monthly telephone interviews for up to 5 years to ascertain expo

156 all the women for 5 years by means of annual telephone interviews; for women enrolled early in the st

157 t cough with phlegm among 52,325 subjects by telephone interview from 1999 through 2004.

158 We surveyed daughters 39-47 years of age by telephone interview from 2005 to 2008 to obtain informat

159 roduct use were retrospectively collected in telephone interviews from 2003-2011.

160 They underwent structured psychiatric telephone interviews from February 1996 through Septembe

161 orrelations ranged from 0.10 to 0.49 for the telephone interview group and from 0.02 to 0.67 for the

162 recalled diet ranged from 60% to 69% in the telephone interview group and from 69% to 79% in the sel

163 ollected from medical records and a parental telephone interview (if the child was older than 3 years

164 Information was subsequently verified by telephone interview in 165 cases and 408 controls.

165 -year-old white adults who participated in a telephone interview in 1990-1991.

166 ospital, office, and clinic) in 41 patients, telephone interview in 20, physical, examination in 15,

167 olled in 1993-1997 who completed a follow-up telephone interview in 2005-2010.

168 on); and (iii) a prospective semi-structured telephone interview in a further 142 patients identified

169 Subjects completed telephone interviews in 1988-2001 and answered questions

170 re conducted at baseline and 48 months, with telephone interviews in between.

171 ine, 24, 48, and 72 months, with semi-annual telephone interviews in between.

172 n Bangladesh, Indonesia, Peru, and Tanzania; telephone interviews in the USA) between Oct 28, 2009, a

173 atients or proxies, who were followed-up via telephone interview, including the Glasgow Outcome Scale

174 Via telephone interviews, information was obtained on 4000 c

175 Of these, 695 subjects received a telephone interview involving an abbreviated version of

176 A telephone interview is effective for obtaining consent f

177 Cause of death was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, and autopsy repor

178 Cause was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, autopsy reports,

179 ctive dietary assessment performed by either telephone interview (n = 154) or self-administered FFQ (

180 (mean change: -1; 95% CI: -2.3, 1.4) and the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (-0.7; 95% CI: -

181 Cognitive function was assessed using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (range: 0-41) at

182 Using the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status cut point of </=

183 er Digit Coding Test and on the basis of the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status) after 1 y.

184 Data were collected using a standardized telephone interview of men from the Vietnam Era Twin Reg

185 Data were from telephone interviews of 511 persons with RA.

186 We used data from medical records and telephone interviews of a random sample of people living

187 Data for the psychometrics came from telephone interviews of a sample of 107 Caucasian/Englis

188 PSOM score was estimated via telephone interview or clinician interview whenever home

189 of the surviving cohort completed at least 1 telephone interview or examination from August 2009 thro

190 re obtained from reporting paediatricians by telephone interview or site visit, and an expert group o

191 r the telephone and subjects who refused the telephone interview (P < 0.0001).

192 After a telephone interview, participants collected daily urine

193 During monthly telephone interviews, participants were assessed for dis

194 Through telephone interview, patients completed our self-develop

195 or instructions in their use; during monthly telephone interviews, PEFR rates were not elicited.

196 p from consenting patients' medical records, telephone interviews, physician questionnaires, and the

197 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after PV by using telephone interview questionnaires.

198 Participants completed a telephone interview regarding PCa-specific symptomatolog

199 TO-I Angiographic Study were contacted for a telephone interview regarding their current HRQOL (physi

200 e hundred fifty-nine hospitals completed the telephone interview, resulting in an overall response ra

201 Telephone interviews revealed that 47% donated solely be

202 Participants completed two telephone interviews (shortly after initiation of transp

203 The goal of our cross-sectional telephone interview study was to generate a diverse samp

204 09, the twins participated in semistructured telephone interviews that primarily focused on psychiatr

205 women (48.3%) who completed the survey and a telephone interview, the weighted prevalence (95% CI) of

206 nsive questionnaire that was administered by telephone interview to 53 patients with WG and 2 control

207 Participants completed a telephone interview to determine whether, after controll

208 Participants completed a telephone interview to measure the prevalence of arthrit

209 tation, the VA LV VFQ-48 was administered by telephone interview to subjects from five sites in the V

210 The VA LV VFQ-48 was administered by telephone interview to subjects with visual acuity rangi

211 d Their Children's Health Study administered telephone interviews to a population-based sample of 2,8

212 eptember 2011.We conducted chart reviews and telephone interviews to characterize North Carolina and

213 ovide qualified justification for the use of telephone interviews to collect axis I and II data.

214 he feasibility of using random digit dialing telephone interviews to locate adults in the continental

215 Each clinician was asked, by telephone interview, to define the probability of revers

216 The automated telephone interview took a mean of 33.5 minutes and was

217 Answers provided during telephone interviews using the Sleep-EVAL system were th

218 made a decision about trial participation, a telephone interview was conducted to assess knowledge of

219 A telephone interview was conducted, recording demographic

220 n day 3, 4, or 5, and on day 14 a structured telephone interview was done blind to the intervention.

221 o select the sample, and a computer-assisted telephone interview was used to collect data on traumati

222 Up to 4 repeated cognitive assessments by telephone interview were completed over 12 years.

223 alidated questionnaires adapted for use in a telephone interview were used to identify people with se

224 Telephone interviews were completed for 302 cases and 55

225 Telephone interviews were completed monthly for more tha

226 Structured psychiatric telephone interviews were conducted from February 1996 t

227 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Telephone interviews were conducted in 2007 in a stratif

228 Telephone interviews were conducted to determine the lif

229 Telephone interviews were conducted with 12,385 physicia

230 Telephone interviews were conducted with 13 neovascular

231 In 1993, structured telephone interviews were conducted with 2,445 of 2,977

232 Telephone interviews were conducted with 228 patients an

233 Telephone interviews were conducted with 246 individuals

234 Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposeful sa

235 Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sam

236 Telephone interviews were conducted with a representativ

237 Telephone interviews were conducted with a total of 207

238 Detailed telephone interviews were conducted with affected indivi

239 Telephone interviews were conducted with both cases and

240 iews were conducted with family members, and telephone interviews were conducted with involved health

241 Telephone interviews were conducted with mothers of 662

242 1997 National Immunization Survey, in which telephone interviews were conducted with parents of 3274

243 Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted with population-base

244 Telephone interviews were done between November 2012 and

245 Telephone interviews were performed with memory aids mai

246 Medical record reviews and telephone interviews were performed.

247 After 4 months, it was determined via a telephone interview whether or not participants had deci

248 thered by a review of hospital records and a telephone interview with a family member or other inform

249 A standardized telephone interview with a series of trauma probes and a

250 ationally representative survey conducted by telephone interview with decedents' next of kin.

251 sthma risk factors were collected in 2012 by telephone interviews with 1,643 participants (stage 2) u

252 ncer risk factor data were collected through telephone interviews with 257 nonsmoking lung cancer cas

253 ng 2001 and 2002 data, the authors conducted telephone interviews with 399 women whose child's birth

254 e predictors of such attitudes, we conducted telephone interviews with 561 family members who had rec

255 Data was collected from telephone interviews with 98 service users using a mixtu

256 Telephone interviews with a nationally representative sa

257 cted by self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews with a randomly selected subsample

258 d decisions was collected through structured telephone interviews with an existing cohort of married

259 Cases of chickenpox are identified by telephone interviews with each child's parent(s) every 6

260 We conducted telephone interviews with executives at 609 of the large

261 terviews with surgeons and scrub nurses, and telephone interviews with Infection Control Nurses.

262 of both programs were identified, including telephone interviews with infection preventionists who c

263 rental smoking information was obtained from telephone interviews with mothers of 731 (84.7% of eligi

264 Data sources included medical records and telephone interviews with patients at 3, 6, 15, and 27 m

265 d from consenting patients' medical records, telephone interviews with patients, and mailed questionn

266 rom consenting patients' medical records and telephone interviews with patients.

267 nd the interpretation of the results through telephone interviews with physicians and genetic counsel

268 eating donors is often requested by means of telephone interviews with relatives of the deceased.

269 We conducted telephone interviews with SLE patients who refused parti

270 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Telephone interviews with successive cohorts of employed

271 We conducted telephone interviews with symptomatic patients who were

272 ected retrospectively from patient notes and telephone interviews with the patients and/or their loca

273 relative separately through a combination of telephone interviews with the relatives (or their proxie

274 risk and protective factors were assessed in telephone interviews with workplace managers.

275 aemic events were determined by a structured telephone interview within 24 h of travel.