戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ent domestications from their wild relative (teosinte).
2 ed selection in domesticated and wild maize (teosinte).
3  14 genotypes of the wild ancestor of maize, teosinte.
4 etween specific genes and trait variation in teosinte.
5 as potential targets of natural selection in teosinte.
6 ze landraces and the wild ancestor of maize, teosinte.
7 igher long-term effective population size of teosinte.
8 igating the inheritance of complex traits in teosinte.
9 ad a role in the domestication of maize from teosinte.
10 orphological traits distinguishing maize and teosinte.
11 envelops the kernel in the maize progenitor, teosinte.
12 de deficit of diversity in maize relative to teosinte.
13 ize to that observed in its wild progenitor, teosinte.
14  during the domestication of maize from wild teosinte.
15  to phenotypic differences between maize and teosinte.
16 aracters that distinguish Chalco from Balsas teosinte.
17  are prevalent in Mexican races of maize and teosinte.
18 e architectural difference between maize and teosinte.
19  structure between maize and its progenitor, teosinte.
20 in teosinte for traits that are invariant in teosinte.
21 pared with its highly branched wild ancestor teosinte.
22 ive genetic analyses that maize evolved from teosinte.
23 ferences between maize and its wild ancestor teosinte.
24 ie the evolutionary divergence of maize from teosinte.
25 ze from colorless kernels of its progenitor, teosinte.
26 n example application to data from maize and teosinte.
27 rted to collect the seeds of the wild grass, teosinte.
28 ent expression levels in maize compared with teosinte.
29  maize and has generally been referred to as teosinte.
30  expression in inbred relative to outcrossed teosinte.
31 plant and ear architecture between maize and teosinte.
32 minance in maize compared to its progenitor, teosinte.
33  restored compatibility with Tcb1-s carrying teosintes.
34 , maize, and its closest wild relatives, the teosintes.
35 enic stocks that carry structurally distinct teosinte A1 Sh2 haplotypes (from Z. mays spp. mexicana C
36 nt at low copy number in all maize lines and teosinte accessions examined, and JITA sequences occur i
37 f tb1 is expressed at twice the level of the teosinte allele, suggesting that gene regulatory changes
38 ight linkage was confirmed between Rf3 and 2 teosinte alleles (Rf K-69-6 and Rf 9477) and between Rf3
39               We compare the effects of nine teosinte alleles of tb1 that were introgressed into an i
40  Tu1 rearrangement is not found in ancestral teosinte and arose after domestication of maize.
41 hat hybridization does occur between Spanish teosinte and cultivated maize in Spain, and that current
42 its that are phenotypically invariant within teosinte and for which teosinte is discretely different
43 he data suggest that the differences between teosinte and maize involve, in part, developmental modif
44 e in situ hybridization to assay 160 diverse teosinte and maize landrace populations from across the
45 ored in a large number of accessions of both teosinte and maize to take a second look at the geograph
46 sequencing and genomic comparisons to Balsas teosinte and modern maize, we show herein that the earli
47 nome comparisons between varieties of maize, teosinte and other grasses are beginning to identify the
48  the natural variation for complex traits in teosinte and that some of the minor variants we identifi
49                            Flowering time of teosinte and tropical maize is delayed under long day le
50 rogeny of a testcross between an F(1) of two teosintes and a maize inbred line, we identified cryptic
51  Hybridization or introgression between some teosintes and maize occurs at a low level and appears mo
52 d in a sample of diverse maize landraces and teosintes and tested for selection.
53 ase in apical dominance in maize relative to teosinte, and a region of the tb1 locus 5' to the transc
54  cis-regulatory divergence between maize and teosinte, and a transposon insertion that inactivates Bx
55  grasses, including sudangrass, maize, rice, teosinte, and sugarcane.
56 he maize gene pool from its wild progenitor, teosinte, and that only one was incorporated throughout
57 eral studies indicate that some varieties of teosinte are cytologically indistinguishable from maize
58 hat the key traits differentiating maize and teosinte are each under multigenic control, although for
59 vars that are most closely related to Balsas teosinte are found mainly in the Mexican highlands where
60  morphological differences between maize and teosinte are located on the first four chromosomes.
61 d feminized whereas the axillary branches of teosinte are long and end in a male inflorescence under
62  long day lengths ZmCCT alleles from diverse teosintes are consistently expressed at higher levels an
63 ld relatives of maize, collectively known as teosinte, are a more varied and representative study sys
64  comparisons of relative protein levels with teosinte as well as by quantitative measurements of mRNA
65 d to approximately 5% the population size of teosinte before it experienced rapid expansion post-dome
66 proliferation, and the transcription factors TEOSINTE BRANCED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF 15 (TCP15) and TCP22, w
67  an ortholog of the maize domestication gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1 (TB1) and identify 17 coding mutatio
68                      The cycloidea (cyc) and teosinte branched 1 (tb1) genes code for structurally re
69                                     The gene teosinte branched 1 controls major differences in archit
70  Here we show that the miR319-regulated TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLODEA, PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR
71 rovide biochemical and genetic evidence that TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF1 (TCP) transcription
72                             We show that the TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1-CYCLOIDEA-PCF20 (TCP20) and TCP22 pr
73 ns, including those of CINCINNATA-like TCPs (TEOSINTE BRANCHED, CYCLOIDEA and PCF1/2) and members of
74 and has been demonstrated to target TCP (for TEOSINTE BRANCHED/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTORS [
75 stabilizes Arabidopsis CIN (CINCINNATA) TCP (TEOSINTE-BRANCHED, CYCLOIDEA, PROLIFERATION FACTOR 1 AND
76     Whereas some domestication loci, such as teosinte branched1 (tb1) and brittle endosperm2 (bt2), h
77         Previous research has identified the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene as a major contributor to
78                    Regulatory changes at the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene have been proposed to unde
79 ral allelic series for complex traits at the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene in natural populations of
80 TL and molecular analysis suggested that the teosinte branched1 (tb1) gene of maize contributed to th
81 election of a gain of function allele of the teosinte branched1 (tb1) transcription factor that acts
82                       The domestication gene teosinte branched1 (tb1) was previously identified as a
83  shading and is dependent on the activity of teosinte branched1 (tb1), a major domestication locus co
84 tory region of the maize domestication gene, teosinte branched1 (tb1), acts as an enhancer of gene ex
85 ulating transcription factors orthologous to Teosinte branched1 (Tb1).
86 he wheat Dormancy-associated (DRM1-like) and Teosinte Branched1 (TB1-like) genes and the reduced expr
87 sum sativum) homolog of the maize (Zea mays) TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 and the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thal
88 ) and analyzed the expression of the sorghum Teosinte Branched1 gene (SbTB1), which encodes a putativ
89 s of BRANCHED1, the pea homolog of the maize TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 gene were quantified in axillary buds
90 maize inflorescences, and, together with the teosinte branched1 gene, it regulates vegetative lateral
91 t and a reduction of the branching regulator TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 in the stalk.
92  (Hv.HOMEOBOX1) and INTERMEDIUM-C (INT-C; Hv.TEOSINTE BRANCHED1).
93 tion, we examined nucleotide polymorphism in teosinte branched1, a gene involved in maize evolution.
94 wnregulated genes have promoters enriched in TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, and PCF (TCP) binding sit
95                               The CINCINNATA-teosinte branched1, cycloidea, PCF (CIN-TCP) transcripti
96      Here we show that, inside the buds, the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF (TCP) transcription f
97 T and TFL1 activities belong to the TCP (for TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF) family of transcript
98 ted three new putatively SL-related TCP (for Teosinte branched1, Cycloidia, and Proliferating cell fa
99 by separate loci, and that the orthologue of teosinte branched1, the major gene controlling branching
100   Five SNPs in the maize domestication gene, teosinte branched1, were significantly associated with e
101                                              TEOSINTE BRANCHED1-CYCLOIDEA-PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR1
102 ssay and isolated six class I members of the TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF (TCP) transcription fac
103                                              TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR1
104 hybrid system, the transcription factor gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL FACTOR1-
105                          Here we report that teosinte branched1/cycloidea/proliferating cell factor1-
106 code a new member of the plant-specific TCP (TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR
107                               Plant-specific TEOSINTE-BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF (TCP) transcription fac
108 s significantly smaller in landraces than in teosintes, but the largest component of GS variation was
109 s our previous association mapping effort in teosinte by testing 123 markers in 52 candidate genes fo
110 opment, although genetic tests indicate that teosinte cl alleles are not active during kernel develop
111  sequencing of 10 lines derived from a maize-teosinte cross.
112                       Cytolines with Z. mays teosinte cytoplasms were generally indistinguishable fro
113    Domesticated maize and its wild ancestor (teosinte) differ strikingly in morphology and afford an
114    Maize and its closest wild relatives, the teosintes, differ strikingly in the morphology of their
115 e-copy allele were identified from maize and teosinte diversity panels, indicating that copy number v
116 c analysis indicated that the Mexican annual teosintes divide into two clusters that largely correspo
117             Our analyses reveal that Spanish teosinte does not group with any of the currently recogn
118  the transcriptome analyses of a large maize-teosinte experimental population.
119 itor (teosinte) were investigated in a maize-teosinte F2 population through the use of molecular mark
120 , we identified cryptic genetic variation in teosinte for traits that are invariant in teosinte.
121 s was also assayed in 31 additional maize or teosinte genotypes, resulting in the discovery of 1966 c
122  genes for 38 diverse maize genotypes and 24 teosinte genotypes.
123 tions in the maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) gene teosinte glume architecture (tga1) underlie a reduction
124 omestication is controlled by a single gene (teosinte glume architecture or tga1), belonging to the S
125  present in Balsas teosinte, others, such as teosinte glume architecture1 (tga1) and sugary1 (su1), c
126              Furthermore, a target of Cg1 is teosinte glume architecture1 (tga1), a gene known to hav
127 ic-level data from modern landraces and wild teosinte grasses [1, 2], augmenting archaeological findi
128 st a reference panel of modern landraces and teosinte grasses using D statistics, model-based cluster
129      It was polymorphic among populations of teosinte growing wild, but regularly present in populati
130 ature leaves of nonflowering id1 mutants and teosinte grown under floral inhibitory photoperiods reve
131  hot spots were not detected in at least one teosinte haplotype.
132 ts was detected in at least one of the three teosinte haplotypes and two of these hot spots were not
133 reover, novel hot spots were detected in two teosinte haplotypes.
134 on trait variation in natural populations of teosinte has not been investigated.
135 he evolution of maize from its wild ancestor teosinte has yet to be found in that poorly studied regi
136 ar morphology between domesticated maize and teosinte; however, the effect of tb1 on trait variation
137                tb1 mutants of maize resemble teosinte in their overall architecture.
138  phylogenetic analyses of the Mexican annual teosintes indicated that ssp. parviglumis diversified in
139 phological traits that distinguish maize and teosinte indicates that they are under the control of mu
140 lumbian distribution of maize, and four wild teosinte individuals (Zea mays ssp.
141  conducted association mapping in 584 Balsas teosinte individuals.
142                                Expression in teosinte inflorescence development suggests a role in pe
143 tric, favouring the introgression of Spanish teosinte into cultivated maize, rather than vice versa.
144 epistatic effects of these genes transformed teosinte into maize.
145 vidence for postdomestication gene flow from teosinte into maize.
146 the morphology of Zea mays ssp. parviglumis (teosinte) into the currently recognizable maize.
147                                          The teosinte introgressions separate into three distinct phe
148 of domesticated maize from its wild ancestor teosinte is a dramatic example of the effect of human se
149 ally invariant within teosinte and for which teosinte is discretely different from its near relative,
150 ize has one dominant axis of growth, whereas teosinte is highly branched.
151 idization simulations, we infer that Spanish teosinte is of admixed origin, most likely involving Zea
152 e between maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and the teosintes, its closest relatives, was utilized as a sour
153 nd in Chalco teosinte sheaths whereas Balsas teosinte leaf sheaths are green and glabrous.
154 e loci between the three populations of wild teosintes, maize landraces, and maize inbred lines.
155                       The ancestor of maize, teosinte, makes 2 rows of kernels, and modern varieties
156 ably dissimilar to its recent wild ancestor, teosinte, making it an extremely interesting model for t
157 h short and long day lengths, and of a maize-teosinte mapping population under long day lengths.
158 n and create a wide range of maize and maize-teosinte mapping populations.
159  the phenotypic difference between maize and teosinte maps to a 1-kilobase region, within which maize
160 ene-rich region of maize (Zea mays), the Zea teosintes mays ssp. mexicana, luxurians and diploperenni
161 ence that maize was domesticated from Balsas teosinte of southwestern Mexico.
162 ons of maize's closest relatives, the annual teosintes of Mexico, are unreceptive to maize pollen.
163 king sequences of y1, y2 and their maize and teosinte orthologs show local rearrangements and inserti
164 the nucleotide variability present in Balsas teosinte, others, such as teosinte glume architecture1 (
165                  We genotyped 237 individual teosinte plants for 93 microsatellites.
166 c variation and that introgression from wild teosinte populations appears to have played a role in hi
167  We find that Ab10 occurs in at least 75% of teosinte populations at a mean frequency of 15%.
168   An analogous gene Tcb1-s was found in some teosinte populations but not in sympatric or parapatric
169  plants of each of 22 maize landraces and 21 teosinte populations from Mexico sampled from parallel a
170 the absence of maize, Tcb1-s can increase in teosinte populations without improving their fitness.
171 ze-like tb1 haplotypes are present in extant teosinte populations, and our findings also suggest a mo
172                 At two regulatory loci, most teosintes possess alleles that encode functional protein
173                  Genetic tests indicate that teosinte possesses functional alleles at all enzymatic l
174 riously, sequence data show that most of our teosinte samples possess a promoter element necessary fo
175 anthocyanin accumulation are found in Chalco teosinte sheaths whereas Balsas teosinte leaf sheaths ar
176  a 1-kilobase region, within which maize and teosinte show only seven fixed differences in their DNA
177                           The Mexican annual teosintes show genetic substructuring along geographic l
178 cross between maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and teosinte (ssp. parviglumis) was grown for the analysis.
179 among a collection of maize inbred lines and teosinte strains.
180                                    The maize/teosinte study system is an excellent example of how cro
181 datasets of cultivated maize and two Mexican teosinte subspecies.
182 d responses were of the same magnitude as in teosinte, suggesting that EOD-FR-mediated mesocotyl resp
183 ity of events are observed in both maize and teosinte, suggesting that these variants predate domesti
184 al-cytoplasm accessions of Mexican maize and teosinte, supports the conclusion that these alleles hav
185 cleotide polymorphism (SNP) data for Spanish teosinte, sympatric populations of cultivated maize and
186 uted to the morphological diversification of teosinte taxa as well as to the domestication of maize.
187 of cultivated maize and samples of reference teosinte taxa.
188 t group with any of the currently recognized teosinte taxa.
189  known morphological differences between the teosinte taxa.
190                                              Teosinte, the progenitor of maize, is restricted to trop
191 nding variation for complex traits in Balsas teosinte, the progenitor of maize.
192 nd shape compared with their counterparts in teosinte, the progenitor of maize.
193                                          The teosintes, the closest wild relatives of maize, are impo
194 vasculature of axillary internodes, while in teosinte, this expression is highly reduced or absent.
195 programmed to develop into tassels (male) in teosinte, to become ears (female) in maize, and (ii) the
196 plasmid found in one source of Zea luxurians teosinte, to the atp9 mitochondrial gene and its 3' flan
197  that agricultural selection of domesticated teosinte was underway by 5,400 (14)C years before the pr
198                 By contrast, GS variation in teosintes was best explained by temperature and precipit
199 y, origin or genetic composition of 'Spanish teosinte' was unknown.
200 e contribute to standing variation in Balsas teosinte we conducted association mapping in 584 Balsas
201 he population and ecological genomics of the teosintes we highlight recent advances in the study of m
202 lling ear rank differences between maize and teosinte, we tested whether zfl2 might have been involve
203 nd 6 Rf alleles from different accessions of teosinte were found to be homozygous viable, consistent
204 s between maize and its presumed progenitor (teosinte) were investigated in a maize-teosinte F2 popul
205 red between Tripsacum dactyloides, maize and teosinte (Z. mays ssp. parviglumis).
206  (Zea mays subsp mays) was domesticated from teosinte (Z. mays subsp parviglumis) through a single do
207 mays ssp. mays) from its wild ancestors, the teosintes (Z. mays ssp. parviglumis and mexicana).
208 nally, we detect introgression from the wild teosinte Zea mays ssp. mexicana into maize in the highla
209 rviglumis), but the contribution of highland teosinte (Zea mays ssp. mexicana, hereafter mexicana) to
210    Molecular analyses identified one form of teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) as the progenitor o
211 tory gene indeterminate1 (id1), and tropical teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) under floral induct
212  the genetic history by which the wild grass teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) was domesticated in
213          Maize was domesticated from lowland teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis), but the contributi
214 ce compared with its probable wild ancestor, teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis).
215 anched1 (tb1) gene in natural populations of teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis, Z. mays ssp. mexica
216 tropical/semitropical origins, together with teosinte (Zea mays subspecies parviglumis) and a modern
217 ence that maize was domesticated from Balsas teosinte (Zea mays subspecies parviglumis), a wild relat

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top