ライフサイエンスコーパス: terminally ill patient

1 were 158 physicians caring for at least one terminally ill patient.

2 sions for an acutely unstable critically and terminally ill patient.

3 inistration of a high dose of an opiate to a terminally ill patient.

4 thus inappropriately treated or untreated in terminally ill patients.

5 ed the survival and quality of life of these terminally ill patients.

6 ally ill patients and satisfaction among non-terminally ill patients.

7 e a low threshold for treating depression in terminally ill patients.

8 rfere with the quality of remaining life for terminally ill patients.

9 nt or relatives is reasonable and ethical in terminally ill patients.

10 sisted suicide, but the process might burden terminally ill patients.

11 ss the critical issue of palliative care for terminally ill patients.

12 s can mediate impressive tumor regression in terminally ill patients.

13 and communication issues for critically and terminally ill patients.

14 n a clinically plausible view of the care of terminally ill patients.

15 ourts' reasoning might undermine the care of terminally ill patients.

16 in specialties likely to involve the care of terminally ill patients: 500 in the spring of 1994, 500

17 Of the 988 terminally ill patients, 59.4 percent were over the age

18 Of the 2094 respondents who cared for terminally ill patients, 76% reported that they made eff

19 Of the 988 terminally ill patients, a total of 60.2% supported euth

20 The terminally ill patients also completed the Schedule of A

21 It commences during palliative care of terminally ill patients and continues into bereavement.

22 rvention improved most HR-QoL measures among terminally ill patients and satisfaction among non-termi

23 hological distress often causes suffering in terminally ill patients and their families and poses cha

24 suicide are important issues in the care of terminally ill patients and while oncology patients expe

25 ata on the effectiveness of interventions in terminally ill patients are lacking.

26 This is especially true when terminally ill patients are ready to die in the face of

27 To manage delirium in terminally ill patients, clinicians must be able to diag

28 Terminally ill patients commonly experience substantial

29 w decisions are made when the preferences of terminally ill patients conflict with physicians' recomm

30 Understanding why some terminally ill patients desire a hastened death has beco

31 st by a primary care physician to evaluate a terminally ill patient desiring assisted suicide.

32 Many terminally ill patients enroll in a hospice late in thei

33 Although half of terminally ill patients experienced moderate to severe p

34 In our survey of terminally ill patients, family members, usually women,

35 We interviewed 988 terminally ill patients from six randomly selected US si

36 courts of appeals have ruled that competent, terminally ill patients have a constitutional right to p

37 Fewer than 50% of severely or terminally ill patients have an advance directive in the

38 Understanding of prognosis among terminally ill patients impacts medical decision making.

39 le of 28 nurses who have been taking care of terminally ill patients in a cancer hospital in Tianjin,

40 ncrease the dose of intravenous morphine for terminally ill patients in excruciating pain (odds ratio

41 Diagnosing and treating depression in terminally ill patients involve unique challenges.

42 rticipation of physicians in the suicides of terminally ill patients is increasing, and the concrete

43 Although terminally ill patients often have suicidal thoughts, th

44 In addition, a small percentage of terminally ill patients receiving comprehensive care rea

45 are no data on the attitudes and desires of terminally ill patients regarding these issues.

46 Most Oregon physicians who care for terminally ill patients report that since 1994 they have

47 496 (50%) terminally ill patients reported moderate or severe pain

48 ion to relieve pain or other discomfort in a terminally ill patient, resulting in death, he/she will

49 he will be criminally prosecuted; (6) when a terminally ill patient's suffering is overwhelming despi

50 In this survey, a small proportion of terminally ill patients seriously considered euthanasia

51 Support of terminally ill patients' spiritual needs by the medical

52 ugh 98% said their usual practice is to tell terminally ill patients that they will die, 48% specific

53 oncologists report routinely informing their terminally ill patients that they will die.

54 cribe medications to be self-administered by terminally ill patients to hasten their death.

55 Eighty-four percent referred terminally ill patients usually/always, but generally fo

56 rts' ruling: their assertion that competent, terminally ill patients who are being kept alive on life

57 on life support are equivalent to competent, terminally ill patients who do not require such support.

58 At the follow-up interview, half of the terminally ill patients who had considered euthanasia or

59 Participants included terminally ill patients who were 55 years or older with

60 lternative to physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients who wish to hasten death.

61 wer use of high-technology interventions for terminally ill patients will produce significant cost sa

62 hanasia and physician-assisted suicide for a terminally ill patient with prostate cancer who has unre

63 the use of physician-assisted suicide for a terminally ill patient with unremitting pain and 6.5% su

64 iative medicine provides end-of-life care to terminally ill patients with a focus on pain and symptom

65 uated for its tolerability and usefulness in terminally ill patients with advanced IPF.

66 hological issues facing elderly patients and terminally ill patients with cancer, less is known about

67 ny options that can be freely considered for terminally ill patients with extreme suffering.

68 horts: an autopsy cohort (n = 68) comprising terminally ill patients with postmortem confirmation of