ライフサイエンスコーパス: terminology

1 oward a more stringent and consistent use of terminology.

2 ng lncRNA classifications, nomenclature, and terminology.

3 embled to define a consensus for OCT imaging terminology.

4 or a reliable and automatic extension of the terminology.

5 and will ultimately define the value of this terminology.

6 ring the need for unity regarding the use of terminology.

7 were used to evaluate implementation of the terminology.

8 ee further supports their argument for a new terminology.

9 tudy concepts often signified with identical terminology.

10 osis and management of ITP and standards for terminology.

11 e term procoagulant platelet as the unifying terminology.

12 gs with a more complex model and alternative terminology.

13 peline, and the addition of patient-friendly terminology.

14 diofrequency power deposition guidelines and terminology.

15 concepts underlying the standardized nursing terminologies.

16 for "next-generation," high-coverage lexical terminologies.

17 ms that authors use are not reflected in the terminologies.

18 s and by projecting concepts between medical terminologies.

19 ap-and-inject" procedure (Current Procedural Terminology 67015, 67025), a vitrectomy (67036), or an i

20 intravitreal injections (Current Procedural Terminology 67028) performed between 2003 and 2012.

21 bination of those three standardized nursing terminologies; 9.6% on Omaha System; 7.1% on Internation

22 vergent evolution (or 'homoplasy' in genetic terminology): a feature or a molecule that is present in

23 rmation is the lack of standards that define terminology, acceptable data and methods, and reporting

24 on options and cardiopulmonary resuscitation terminology among patients and surrogate decision makers

25 utionary features, input and output formats, terminologies and assumptions for different applications

26 The expert group agreed on unifying terminologies and criteria and a classification that del

27 ." Finally, we apply our model to biomedical terminologies and predict that they are missing the vast

28 uous improvement of the standardized nursing terminologies and use in clinical practice.

29 We propose a change in terminology and a new definition of PH due to LHD.

30 s (inpatient setting) and Current Procedural Terminology and Ambulatory Payment Classification codes

31 identified from Medicare Current Procedural Terminology and Ambulatory Payment Classification reimbu

32 as become beleaguered by pitfalls related to terminology and classification; procedural, assay, and s

33 be facilitated by the development of uniform terminology and consensus-based standards on use of the

34 resuscitation and resuscitation options and terminology and could correctly name components of cardi

35 to small biopsies and cytology with specific terminology and criteria focused on the need for disting

36 To develop consensus terminology and criteria for defining atrophy based on O

37 The terminology and definition of correlates have been confu

38 Terminology and definitions for imaging the features of

39 self-management, we found that variations in terminology and descriptions of events, symptoms, and re

40 Modern revisions in the terminology and diagnostic criteria for IIH help guide c

41 specific entities, and provided standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria.

42 has led to inconsistencies in diagnosis and terminology and difficulties in comparing studies from d

43 Addressing ambiguous terminology and feasibility is needed in establishing th

44 ere included according to Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Disease-

45 ss familiarity of their patients with dental terminology and knowledge of periodontal disease to prov

46 ield, we now have a lexicon of epidemiologic terminology and particular methods that have developed a

47 ication for acute pancreatitis to update the terminology and provide simple functional clinical and m

48 onfusion because of the lack of standardized terminology and reporting guidelines.

49 their special report: (a) standardization in terminology and reporting of spatial gradient magnetic f

50 The principles for the terminology and specific application were eventually com

51 More consistent and correct use of terminology and study design principles will improve cli

52 tion/reentry techniques, clarify the related terminology and summarize the published studies in this

53 Difficulties with microbiota terminology and technologies, as well as differences amo

54 iterature does not always utilise consistent terminology and the misuse of some expressions in epidem

55 Heterogeneity of populations, terminology, and end points in the literature confound e

56 delocalization are described in graph theory terminology, and interconnections between local and glob

57 ification and refinement of key concepts and terminology, and second by the incorporation of an addit

58 or with no identifiable standardized nursing terminology, and those with a low-level of evidence.

59 rature in recent decades, yet confusion over terminology, application and utility persists.

60 Multiple definitions and terminologies are currently in use for sepsis, septic sh

61 ical Trials in Chronic GVHD standardized the terminology around chronic GVHD classification systems t

62 tically discussing the sometimes-conflicting terminology as well as renewable sources with a special

63 nding the different dimensions, domains, and terminology associated with physical activity measuremen

64 units in resemblance networks, we introduce terminology based on two notions, P3s (subgraphs of thre

65 the calcium-alkali syndrome, because the new terminology better reflects the shifting epidemiology an

66 finition of terms/codes, the availability of terminology browsers, a recommended list of codes and me

67 tages of NOBLE Coder include its interactive terminology builder tool, ease of configuration, and ada

68 er communication barriers and develop shared terminology, but also resulted in a visible sequence of

69 ariables were interpreted using standardized terminology by certified reviewers.

70 depth and 2) via standardized Current Dental Terminology (CDT) codes related to periodontal treatment

71 Few publications used the terminology 'childhood eczema', 'flexural eczema', 'infa

72 Here we developed new terminology, classification, and computer algorithms for

73 clinicians with an up-to-date summary of the terminology, classification, biological characteristics,

74 = 33,718) with a recorded Current Procedural Terminology code for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or

75 nted unique claims with a Current Procedural Terminology code of 65855 (LTP) submitted by ophthalmolo

76 ication of Diseases code, Current Procedural Terminology code, Hispanic ethnicity, and self-reported

77 d December 31, 2013, with Current Procedural Terminology codes for a subtotal colectomy or total abdo

78 ance was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes for diagnostic VTE imaging.

79 n/gangrene (N=11,770) and Current Procedural Terminology codes for endovascular revascularization (N=

80 nticipated arrival of new Current Procedural Terminology codes in the United States for small-bowel a

81 ing breast cancer, ICD and Common Procedural Terminology codes indicating breast surgery, and claims

82 inclusion if one of their Current Procedural Terminology codes matched any of the operations identifi

83 by Medicare as tracked by Current Procedural Terminology codes on intravitreal injections (67028), re

84 n was standardized across Current Procedural Terminology codes using a z score.

85 year period, 146 distinct Current Procedural Terminology codes were among the top 100 procedures, and

86 nts were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes, and their medical records were review

87 th revision diagnosis and Current Procedural Terminology codes, medication lists, and positive-presen

88 November 30, 2012, using Current Procedural Terminology codes.

89 n 2011 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes.

90 ons were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes.

91 -VEGF injections based on Current Procedural Terminology codes.

92 eatment procedures as per Current Procedural Terminology codes; comorbidities as per International Cl

93 The definitions and terminologies commonly used to evaluate the performance

94 increase of charge delocalization, or in the terminology commonly used in mixed valence chemistry, a

95 e identification of the standardized nursing terminology concepts applicable to a health setting from

96 ew the scientists who introduced the seminal terminology, concepts, methodological approaches, and in

97 sessment tool (ITP-BAT) with definitions and terminology consistent with those adopted for other blee

98 After matching strategy for Common Procedure Terminology (CPT) and year, we compared the accuracy of

99 ed for all active level I Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes from 2011 CMS files.

100 f Medicare beneficiaries, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify patients w

101 ith established patients (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 99213) and a price index measurin

102 pletely defined and notoriously inconsistent terminology, creating a formidable challenge for data in

103 The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) grade 3-4 investigator-report

104 , and toxicity was recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAE) v4.0.

105 y coded for leukoencephalopathy using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event version 4.

106 s never exceeded grade 2 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v2.0).

107 on of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) via tabl

108 therapy by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; vers

109 ient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

110 c events were reviewed and graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03).

111 ure, distant metastasis, and selected Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3) >/=

112 and late reactions were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3).

113 t follow-up and reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3).

114 ade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) ex

115 Toxicity was determined according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) fo

116 Toxicity was recorded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0).

117 ding to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) an

118 uestionnaires and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03).

119 mented prospectively and according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0 criteria bas

120 HFS toxicity grade (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] v3.0) wa

121 on Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0] or Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3]).

122 nsory neuropathy according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and at least 4 o

123 ic and gastrointestinal toxicities by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and peripheral n

124 Any grade 3 or 4 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events cardiac, pulmona

125 all survival, safety as determined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria, and Qo

126 se, headache, and moderate dizziness (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2).

127 ll risk for National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 ALT elev

128 events was recorded and graded using "Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events in Trials of Adu

129 y using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scale or an oxal

130 Adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0.

131 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 was used to

132 ng to the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0) or those w

133 ted symptoms were collected using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 at p

134 recorded and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

135 Adverse events were graded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

136 e events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTC

137 hair preservation assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 scal

138 ccording to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), ph

139 d as grade 3 to 4 chronic conditions (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0).

140 Immune-related Response Criteria and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

141 g the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0.

142 ding to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events version 4.0.

143 d vital signs graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

144 Adverse events were assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03, an

145 m diagnosis were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, grades 3 to 5 (

146 cts were prospectively assigned using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v3.0.

147 earing Association; Brock; Chang; and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3 [CTCA

148 ed to each health condition using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.

149 ociation Ototoxicity Criteria (ASHA), Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0 (CT

150 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0, wa

151 grades were reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, an

152 symptoms were evaluated by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, fr

153 e events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

154 nts after treatment (according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03) i

155 with the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03.

156 al examination and coded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.03.

157 assessed and handled according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

158 orted using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

159 s, which were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

160 t of Cancer Therapy questionnaire and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

161 ined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

162 with the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

163 ent-related National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria grades 3 and 4 adverse events (38 t

164 occurrence of serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria grades 4 or 5) did not differ betwe

165 verity to conditions using a modified Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4

166 rse GI/genitourinary (GU) toxicity by Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (version 3).

167 graded for severity using a modified Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events.

168 resumably caused by hypoxia-ischemia and the terminology currently in wide use for this disorder.

169 re derived from published Current Procedural Terminology data.

170 In a previous publication on new terminology, definitions, and outcome criteria for immun

171 singly useful for chemists to adopt the knot terminology employed by other disciplines.

172 earch has evolved over the past century, the terminology employed to categorize it has failed to evol

173 As numerous publications on IRE with varying terminology exist so far - with numbers continuously inc

174 accommodate and unify the existing skeletal terminologies for the species-specific (mouse, the frog

175 Studies should use detailed and consistent terminology for breastfeeding definition, including freq

176 By a detailed documentation and common terminology for communicating outcomes, these tools hope

177 Yet there is no consensus about the terminology for describing or defining "exacerbation" or

178 Our objective is to provide a guide to the terminology for different technologies in the field whic

179 Regarding a link to caries, standard terminology for exposures (e.g., nocturnal feeding) is r

180 ancer screening and care, such as use of new terminology for indolent and precancerous disorders.

181 epilepsy in addition to revised criteria and terminology for its diagnosis and classification.

182 This revised classification introduces new terminology for pancreatic fluid collections.

183 The adoption of new terminology for resistance should be guided by outcomes

184 logists reviewed these lesions using current terminology for serrated polyps.

185 ng, using universally accepted and agreed on terminology for solid pancreatic neoplasms, is needed.

186 Changing the terminology for some of the lesions currently referred t

187 ablation by outlining a standardized set of terminology for the IRE procedure with the NanoKnife Syt

188 have emerged since the identity, extent and terminology for the regions were considered by the Avian

189 The classic terminology for this condition is 'lipofibromatous hamar

190 ining ICD-9-CM codes with Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition (CPT-4) codes (specific defi

191 chioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), criteria and terminology had not been uniform, so the 2011 classifica

192 Terminology has changed and 'isolated dystonia' is used

193 ate, conflicting, confusing, and overlapping terminology has fostered ambiguity and lack of clarity i

194 Changing terminology has improved definitions and clinical care i

195 unately, unclear or incorrect use of the new terminology has led to semantic misunderstandings that i

196 d in many ways, but general agreement on the terminology has not yet been reached.

197 en identified, and analogous with epigenetic terminology, have been designated "writers," "erasers,"

198 Conventional terminology, i.e. retinotopy, implies that the topograph

199 are extensively annotated within specialized terminologies, implying that synonymy is important for p

200 my and Resections was created to standardize terminology in an area, which previously was characteriz

201 my and Resections was created to standardize terminology in an area, which previously was characteriz

202 discourse of the sentence and the functional terminology in it.

203 herapy according to standardized methods and terminology in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-neg

204 ons suggesting a need for standardization of terminology in periodontitis diagnosis.

205 r chronic liver disease with no standardized terminology in place.

206 the importance of using precise and standard terminology in reporting low-level HCV RNA results for c

207 However, the standard terminology in such collections suffers from low usage i

208 ll require refinement and perhaps additional terminology in the future.

209 To clarify the often confusing terminology in this field, "band warping" is precisely d

210 ep stages and reconciling inconsistencies in terminology in this field.

211 familiarizing readers with key concepts (and terminology) in the construction, validation, and applic

212 The currently used electrographic terminology, including J-point elevation, meets our need

213 nfigurable matching strategies, and multiple terminology input formats.

214 =58), implementation of standardized nursing terminologies into electronic health records (n=12), and

215 s anticipated, the classification system and terminology introduced here will allow new compounds to

216 The Brisbane terminology is being adopted worldwide but its adoption

217 ave investigated functional outcome, but the terminology is inconsistent hereby complicating comparis

218 New terminology is introduced as appropriate based on the ne

219 ondition, and the present review updates the terminology issues, common causes, and potential future

220 Despite similar terminology, it remains unclear whether the subjective f

221 The use of standardized terminology may then allow for a better inter-study comp

222 STROME-ID addresses terminology, measures of genetic diversity within pathog

223 coding system to record standardized nursing terminology names, publication year, country, and study

224 We find that many terms in the formal terminologies never appear in a JCN abstract, and, conve

225 The training data, terminologies, normalizations, evaluations, and annotate

226 Terminologies of ovary development, by somewhat subjecti

227 The terminology of 'renal replacement therapy' should be sup

228 Despite the misleading terminology of a so-called dormant state associated with

229 on of the liver may be achieved and a simple terminology of hepatectomies may be proposed.

230 osal of this anatomical description and this terminology of hepatectomies may find a consensus among

231 It is imperative to accurately define terminology of lower urinary tract symptoms.

232 iterature a body of published work using the terminology of macrophage polarization, most commonly in

233 g concluded that the development of a common terminology of procedures, summarized under the acronym

234 d acknowledging the terrifying and ambiguous terminology of rejection.

235 ding on the number of symptoms assessed, and terminology of symptoms is not consistent.

236 Standardized terminology of the BI-RADS lexicon enables quantificatio

237 al Language System tool and the standardized terminology of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine

238 tance with even simple database concepts and terminology often results in a real obstacle to the full

239 Terminology on evaluation forms is sometimes so difficul

240 ed in formulating recommendations related to terminology or definitions or in those based purely on e

241 ered by the inconsistent or incorrect use of terminology or methods for technical performance and sta

242 ntry and then discuss the basic concepts and terminologies pertaining to rotors and their initiation.

243 Previous differences between these terminologies prevented even simple queries across datab

244 ere paid by Medicare, for Current Procedural Terminology procedures independently billed by mid-level

245 ant kidney specimens by electron microscopy (terminology: PTCL-C, severe; PTCL subgroup C3, very seve

246 veal that the number of standardized nursing terminology publications increased primarily since 2000

247 chemas representing SCN organization or with terminology referring to its widely accepted subdivision

248 py' should be supplanted by more appropriate terminology, 'renal supportive therapy'.

249 Our recommendations include: terminology revision from new-onset diabetes after trans

250 The proposed harmonizing of terminology serves as a basis for future OCT research st

251 and 8.0% on two or more standardized nursing terminology sets.

252 health records for two standardized nursing terminology sets: (1) the North American Nursing Diagnos

253 he proposed novel criteria, definitions, and terminologies should assist in daily practice, as well a

254 The proposed "consensus" terminology should enable to better compare the many var

255 continue to strengthen standardized nursing terminology study designs to promote continuous improvem

256 The search used MeSH terminology such as periodontal maintenance, emotional i

257 Clinicians should clearly understand terminology such as tolerance, dependence, abuse, and ad

258 Now, terminology suggesting established meaningful pathways o

259 ribed according to the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System, the patients were divided into 2 tra

260 listic model for the construction of synonym terminologies that is capable of handling a wide range o

261 The benefits of employing terminology that adequately reflects the extent to which

262 y (GO) provides biologists with a controlled terminology that describes how genes are associated with

263 We adopt a set of terminology that describes water molecules as being "hot

264 intentional change" should preferably have a terminology that distinguishes between genetic changes a

265 Indeed, EVs (a terminology that encompasses microparticles, exosomes, a

266 Historically, the literature is strewn with terminology that has been at best misleading and at wors

267 basic concepts and notations, and propose a terminology that is able to describe any result in liter

268 We review the terminology that may cause confusion and lead to unneces

269 This may be due to the overuse of terminology that stresses regulatory sanctions and thus

270 ttee on MR Safety, has proposed standardized terminology that will contribute to greater safety and u

271 rom nine prominent biomedical ontologies and terminologies: the Cell Type Ontology, the Chemical Enti

272 In modern scientific terminology, this observation reflects the fact that hyb

273 rnative genetic decoding and expand existing terminology to accommodate recently discovered manifesta

274 ed nurses' documentation (n=54), mapping one terminology to another (n=58), implementation of standar

275 t have been formalin fixed; and to help with terminology to be used in reports.

276 he subject, and recently we jointly proposed terminology to bring some semantic clarity to the field.

277 ghting the need for a clinical framework and terminology to define these patients, who may have under

278 wing an initial consideration of appropriate terminology to describe subsolid nodules and a brief rev

279 vised classifications to standardize imaging terminology to facilitate treatment planning and enable

280 , where they serve as a means to standardize terminology, to enable access to domain knowledge, to ve

281 among terms in any domain that reflects the terminology usage in source literature and based on mult

282 nions of different domain experts and in the terminology usages in source literature are rarely addre

283 f respondents were partially aware of common terminologies used in CBCT.

284 to familiarize surgeons with techniques and terminology used in decision analytic papers, to provide

285 to standardize the current nomenclature and terminology used in DILI research.

286 hologists when there are questions regarding terminology used in pathology reports; when there is the

287 amiliar with the specific definitions of the terminology used in the field to keep up with surgical r

288 Study design and terminology used in this rapidly evolving, highly multid

289 duction to LIBs, defining key parameters and terminology used to assess the performance of anode mate

290 ation system was proposed to standardize the terminology used to describe AUB.

291 xt we propose clarifications to the existing terminology used to describe the many facets of neutroph

292 er classifying radiation effects, explaining terminology used to quantify the radiation received by p

293 rofession provided there is consensus on the terminology used.

294 ed the benefits of formalizing languages and terminologies via computational ontologies.

295 ss to a library of biomedical ontologies and terminologies via the NCBO Web services.

296 To improve the terminologies, we deposited 136 unrecognized brain regio

297 After clarifying the existing terminology, we elaborate an operational definition of p

298 Using popular terminology, what forms of peptide synthesis are appropr

299 In this review, we describe relevant TEP terminologies while critically discussing TEP biological

300 A modification of the Ann Arbor descriptive terminology will be used for anatomic distribution of di