1 The chi(
2)
test was used to compare the rates of BI-RADS final assessmen
2 regression was performed for pre-RA confounders, and chi(
2)
test was used to evaluate periodontal variables and RA activi
3 The sequence kernel
association test was used to interrogate variant burden among 54 lysosoma
4 glycemic status, was determined, and a Mantel-Haenszel
chi2 test was used to investigate for a trend.
5 -Meier survival estimates were generated and the Mantel-
Cox test was used to compare curves.
6 nts at least 1 year prior to randomization; the Breslow-
Day test was used to test for interaction of treatment effect in
7 A 2-tailed Fisher
exact test was used to assess for differences in ocular features be
8 The Fisher
exact test was used to compare proportions; the Student t test was
9 Fisher
exact test was used to compare the proportion of CMV viremia and CM
10 Fisher's
exact test was used to screen for association with VTE; competing r
11 y organs was assessed irrespective of study, and the
Levene test was used to determine whether ADC repeatability differed
12 The
Levene test was used to determine whether ADC repeatability differed
13 McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic accuracies.
14 The
McNemar test was used to assess agreement among the ECG criteria agai
15 The
McNemar test was used to evaluate differences in nodule detection rat
16 The cold
pressor test was used to produce pain, and a modified progressive-rat
17 A skin
prick test was used to ascertain atopy.
18 A stratified log-
rank test was used to compare overall survival between treatment g
19 rank-sum test were used to compare means, and the log-
rank test was used to compare time-to-outcome events.
20 Log-
rank test was used to compare time-to-parasitemia between interven
21 The Wilcoxon signed
rank test was used to assess for differences among treatment group
22 rimination between health and disease; Wilcoxon signed
rank test was used to assess the effect of treatment.
23 The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed
rank test was used to compare area measurements and P values of <.
24 Wilcoxon signed
rank test was used to compare changes in drug prices and number of
25 characteristics across groups, and the Wilcoxon signed
rank test was used to compare SNR measurements before and after em
26 The Wilcoxon signed-
rank test was used to calculate P values.
27 The Wilcoxon signed-
rank test was used to compare baseline and hyperoxic parameters.
28 The Wilcoxon signed-
rank test was used to compare BH SPARSE-SPACE and RT SPACE images.
29 The Wilcoxon signed-
rank test was used to compare paired nonparametric data; Spearman
30 The Wilcoxon signed-
rank test was used to examine changes in subarachnoid space measur
31 The Wilcoxon
rank test was used to calculate the mean difference in maximum sta
32 s of ERBB2 was added to the model, and the likelihood
ratio test was used to determine improvement in fit.
33 Sustained silent
reading test was used to evaluate sustained silent reading speeds, wh
34 Gray'
s test was used to determine the variation in cumulative incide
35 A core
simulation test was used to evaluate the effectiveness of indigenous mic
36 Paired
t test was used to analyze changes in readability measures, wor
37 A paired
t test was used to determine significant differences between MR
38 A two-sample
t test was used to calculate significance between groups, and S
39 DN was normalized to the SI of the pons, and a one-sample
t test was used to test for differences between baseline normal
40 Paired Student
t test was used to assess the significance of differences in du
41 r exact test was used to compare proportions; the Student
t test was used to compare means.
42 A two-tailed Student
t test was used to compare the T1 and T2 results in metastatic
43 Student
t test was used to determine any demographic differences betwee
44 A two-sided
t-
test was used to evaluate between-group differences in mean H
45 A variance weighted
t-
test was used to identify differential expression.
46 The Cochran-Armitage
trend test was used to examine the significance of trends in mortal
47 The Mann-Whitney
U test was used to assess the difference between groups.
48 The Mann-Whitney
U test was used to compare the distribution of grades at each s
49 A two-sided Mann-Whitney
U test was used to detect differences in APT-weighted (APTw) an
50 The Kruskal-
Wallis test was used to compare the rabbit characteristics across gr