ライフサイエンスコーパス: than expected by chance

1 emical properties of the utilized amino acid than expected by chance.

2 th whom subjects spent more time affiliating than expected by chance.

3 tly more similar in their genomic ancestries than expected by chance.

4 occurred more commonly with arthritis and AS than expected by chance.

5 d SAP animals performed significantly better than expected by chance on trial 2 indicating retention

6 species persistence and higher total biomass than expected by chance and tends to promote a higher ro

7 ocated more closely on bacterial chromosomes than expected by chance, which could reflect a history o

8 es form fewer and larger structural clusters than expected by chance and overlap with functional site

9 ase SSc family was statistically more common than expected by chance alone (P = 0.007).

10 timorbidity in the same child is more common than expected by chance alone, suggesting that these dis

11 and asthma in the same child is more common than expected by chance alone-both in the presence and a

12 between species that occurred more commonly than expected by chance suggests an increased advantage

13 individual gene trees showed more congruence than expected by chance, indicating a generally clonal s

14 This network shows higher connectivity than expected by chance, suggesting that its components

15 associated with more mapped reads (coverage) than expected by chance, as a result of the experimental

16 spatial proximity are more similar in design than expected by chance.

17 on and at least 75% lower during development than expected by chance.

18 cantly more CpGs had the same directionality than expected by chance, and four were statistically sig

19 combination, with fewer recombination events than expected by chance occurring in regions of the bz g

20 ng pairs have more conserved gene expression than expected by chance, consistent with a role for sele

21 mates and in the rodents to a greater extent than expected by chance, but the extent of the deviation

22 f these two lineages to a far greater extent than expected by chance.

23 gnificantly more genes correlated with fALFF than expected by chance and identify specific genes corr

24 e plant functional groups disappeared faster than expected by chance, resistance declined dramaticall

25 nfluenza were observed at higher frequencies than expected by chance, an indicator of preselection.

26 glomeruli at significantly greater frequency than expected by chance.

27 actomyosin cables form at a higher frequency than expected by chance, indicating that cable assembly

28 s containing MS indels at a higher frequency than expected by chance.

29 ion favor the same allele--are more frequent than expected by chance, consistent with selective press

30 her number of associations was more frequent than expected by chance, given the number of comparisons

31 ecies occur together more or less frequently than expected by chance while accounting for variation i

32 1) to hypertensive offspring more frequently than expected by chance (P=0.005).

33 these occurred nearly 2-fold more frequently than expected by chance and were computationally predict

34 e show that such loops occur more frequently than expected by chance and, hence, constitute a genuine

35 ncode proteins that interact more frequently than expected by chance, are bound by the same transcrip

36 the primates and rodents far more frequently than expected by chance, but tended to involve very cons

37 were in opposite directions more frequently than expected by chance, implying that compensatory regu

38 se (BMI > or = 40) offspring more frequently than expected by chance, indicting significant allelic d

39 ete complete protein domains more frequently than expected by chance, whereas disruption of domains a

40 d and/or inversely expressed more frequently than expected by chance.

41 nd to fire synchronously far more frequently than expected by chance.

42 tions in two or more genomes more frequently than expected by chance; however, in only two cases, bot

43 of finding more mutations in specific genes than expected by chance may require extremely large popu

44 eam of both Paramecium and Tetrahymena genes than expected by chance given the base composition of th

45 nd more widely distributed within the genome than expected by chance and may reflect the recently act

46 d the variance of the gap lengths is greater than expected by chance.

47 located the baited sites at a level greater than expected by chance, whereas Cebus monkeys did not.

48 of their blink inhibition at levels greater than expected by chance, they inhibited their blinking a

49 his count (n = 18) was significantly greater than expected by chance (P = .016).

50 SNPs of 114 tested was significantly greater than expected by chance under the null hypothesis of no

51 -omission cues was not significantly greater than expected by chance.

52 95% CI, 73%-77%) at >32 weeks, still greater than expected by chance (P < .001).

53 it was 49% (95% CI, 48%-50%), still greater than expected by chance (P < .001).

54 5% level, three at the 1% level) was greater than expected by chance alone.

55 ic morphological differentiation was greater than expected by chance.

56 arative and comparative studies were greater than expected by chance (P < 0.001).

57 rsity of woody plants was similar and higher than expected by chance in both forests, reflecting stro

58 h co-occurrences from NHANES that are higher than expected by chance.

59 TD2 co-occur in tumors at a frequency higher than expected by chance alone, indicating that these mut

60 robe at the experimental positions is higher than expected by chance.

61 usters of three or more genes is much higher than expected by chance.

62 these levels all being significantly higher than expected by chance.

63 izosaccharomyce pombe) were typically higher than expected by chance.

64 een enzyme pairs close in the SMM was higher than expected by chance but was still rare.

65 igh-level shedders of phage 21/28 was higher than expected by chance.

66 dds of having comorbid disorders were higher than expected by chance for most demographic subgroups,

67 gulated and anti-regulated pairs were higher than expected by chance.

68 ) identified three (>20 Mbp) that are larger than expected by chance.

69 m as well--a number more than 25-fold larger than expected by chance.

70 ssess whether niches overlapped more or less than expected by chance.

71 esnakes (Crotalus horridus) were less likely than expected by chance to use areas that also contained

72 However, end homology is commonly longer than expected by chance.

73 physical interactions between their members than expected by chance.

74 e of antiepileptic efficacy in animal models than expected by chance (P-value <0.006).

75 enome tend to be positively coexpressed more than expected by chance.

76 ast nominal levels of significance, far more than expected by chance (p value < 2.2 x 10(-16)).

77 (AP) and strong enhancer (SE)] in LCLs more than expected by chance [45.3-fold enrichment for SE (P

78 ing DA in each of the characters was no more than expected by chance alone so it was concluded that t

79 those in high-latitude cities varied no more than expected by chance within each city.

80 binding also occurred within MS regions more than expected by chance (3.7-fold enrichment, P < 2.0e-0

81 y defined group of genes is represented more than expected by chance within a gene list.

82 arrangements are preserved by selection more than expected by chance.

83 minally associated (p < 0.05) with SHR, more than expected by chance (p = 5 x 10(-40)).

84 at P<5 x 10(-5), which is significantly more than expected by chance (P=0.007).

85 llel expression patterns across species more than expected by chance.

86 igher proportion of genes associated with MS than expected by chance.

87 or light chain CDR replacement (R) mutations than expected by chance, suggesting that these anti-Sm-p

88 ollinator networks are typically more nested than expected by chance alone.

89 n orthologous genomic regions far more often than expected by chance and are strongly associated with

90 had the same depressive syndrome more often than expected by chance and this resemblance was greater

91 ted patterns ("repeats") occurred more often than expected by chance and with 10 ms precision.

92 selected the dominant individual more often than expected by chance in probe videos containing no be

93 milar repeat number was inherited more often than expected by chance, among the members of a sibship

94 each zero usage (disappear) do so more often than expected by chance, and codons that do disappear ar

95 f known signal transduction genes more often than expected by chance, indicating PASE enriches for sp

96 n coefficients were negative much more often than expected by chance, suggesting that weak mass effec

97 tions of phenotypes that co-occur more often than expected by chance.

98 find that certain strains appear more often than expected by chance.

99 sition of multiple types occurred more often than expected by chance.

100 Otherwise, they occurred together more often than expected by chance.

101 to result in similar amino acids more often than expected by chance.

102 copy-number losses that occurred more often than expected by chance.

103 cleotides that occur, as a group, more often than expected by chance.

104 partners (intra-lineage polygyny) more often than expected by chance.

105 tively correlated between markers more often than expected by chance.

106 therosclerosis and occur together more often than expected by chance.

107 more densely interconnected with each other than expected by chance.

108 a larger number of independent linkage peaks than expected by chance overall, indicating that AP is g

109 ds do not seem to infer more false positives than expected by chance.

110 s within more restricted phylogenetic ranges than expected by chance.

111 We find more coding sequence than expected by chance in the introgressed regions, sug

112 ely to have an excess of association signals than expected by chance (P(ARTP) = 0.0051, FDR = 0.07).

113 ermline expression as (a) it is more similar than expected by chance between introns of the same gene

114 aversive emotional responses is more similar than expected by chance, despite the different sensory m

115 onents (gene sets with stronger similarities than expected by chance) contain pairs of eukaryotic seq

116 ogical differences) revealed more similarity than expected by chance, suggesting there is structure a

117 ng in closer proximity to heterozygous sites than expected by chance.

118 that have more weeds and introduced species than expected by chance and plant families that have mor

119 endemism capture significantly more species than expected by chance.

120 s that have more herbicide-resistant species than expected by chance.

121 ve secondary structures that are more stable than expected by chance.

122 that calculated mRNA folding is more stable than expected by chance.

123 there is more correspondence across studies than expected by chance on the third chromosome, the stu

124 e of their diagnoses toward higher suspicion than expected by chance (P=.03, sign test).

125 Only slightly more TASs than expected by chance were predicted to be in regions

126 that are either much more stable or unstable than expected by chance are detected.

127 ist between two specific groups of variables than expected by chance.