ライフサイエンスコーパス: the mean of

1 497 species had a 95% confidence interval of the mean of +/- 0.9 min or less without the use of chrom

2 ram second squared, with a standard error of the mean of +/-0.027 x 10(-11) and a systematic error of

3 rwent B-mode carotid ultrasound to determine the mean of 12 measurements of maximal carotid IMT.

4 (18.8 kg/h (95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean of 12.0-26.8 kg/h)) was 23 times greater than t

5 is significance was detected only when using the mean of 13 pathologists' scores.

6 The mean of (210)Po activity resulted 0.40+/-0.46Bqkg(-1

7 The mean of (238)U activity resulted 0.020+/-0.010Bqkg(-

8 IOP differed from the increase in IOP using the mean of 3 measurements by more than 1.5 mm Hg was 35

9 The mean of 3 seated SBP measurements made up the visit-

10 The mean of 3 serum C-reactive protein measurements was

11 ned agreement between each frailty score and the mean of 35 FS, using a modified Bland-Altman model a

12 3 Omega cm(2) (average +/- standard error of the mean of 4 chips), comparable to other TEER values re

13 500 pinworms per gut, a number far exceeding the mean of 40 per gut for other mice inside and outside

14 report and confirmed by medical records over the mean of 5.2 years of follow-up.

15 ood-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) by using the mean of 6 measurements of a 24-h dietary recall (24-

16 nfidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy .

17 with fatty meal was significantly lower than the mean of 75.8% +/- 16.3% (P < 0.01) with the first do

18 We ask by how much the mean of a complex trait can be increased by selectio

19 ric view of populations, whereby a change in the mean of a health variable at the population level is

20 re (i.e., number of standard deviations from the mean of a normal age- and body surface area-adjusted

21 The rate of change of the mean of a quantitative character is evaluated exactl

22 adaptation can be explained as adaptation to the mean of a rectified signal.

23 eing less than two standard deviations below the mean of a young reference group.

24 sis method that computes a gene set score as the mean of absolute values of weighted moderated gene t

25 ss an NF-kappaB inhibitor such as A20 offers the mean of achieving an anti-inflammatory effect withou

26 pairment was defined as scores >1.5 SD below the mean of age-matched published normative data on at l

27 Using the mean of all HbA1c measures over a mean follow-up of

28 For each patient, the mean of all matched lesions at baseline and study en

29 rst 4 weeks was increased by 30% or more, or the mean of all measurements collected during the 12 wee

30 on (CV<5%) whether they were quantified from the mean of all or only the 2 most-abundant peptides.

31 d widely differing degrees of agreement with the mean of all scores and between each pair of scores.

32 The rate of progression was the mean of all subjects' damage in the worse eye divide

33 Mean differences were calculated as the mean of all the individual percentage differences be

34 in a single serum specimen > or =3 SD above the mean of an age-matched control group.

35 c model that calculate stationary states for the mean of an ensemble of stochastic trajectories revea

36 ated with deciles of baseline hemoglobin and the mean of baseline + year 3 hemoglobin.

37 ed with deciles of baseline WBC count and of the mean of baseline + year 3 WBC count.

38 Every 100 pg/mL above the mean of baseline serum LPS corresponded to an additi

39 IV-infected subjects, each 1 microg/mL above the mean of baseline serum sCD14 corresponded to an addi

40 irst test set, composed of 200 examinations, the mean of bone age estimates from the clinical report

41 1) and two standard deviations (l=3.3) below the mean of comparison subjects.

42 Moreover, using the mean of controls in set 1, we achieved 95% sensitivi

43 Scores higher than the mean of controls plus two SD (>2.466) were designate

44 lier estimate of unfolded state ASA given by the mean of Creamer's upper and lower bounds, a gratifyi

45 P levels in childhood, in adulthood, and for the mean of CRP levels at both time points, respectively

46 The mean of differences was -0.2 L/min with 95% limits o

47 The mean of each item, scored on a scale of 1 (best) to

48 eported by food frequency questionnaires and the mean of eight 24-hour recalls, using urinary methylh

49 The 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, and the mean of estimated thresholds of Oncomelania snail de

50 lity is persistently and significantly below the mean of EU15+ and requires additional concerted acti

51 ch to estimate the posterior distribution of the mean of expression in each cell type, by taking into

52 The variance and the mean of gamete size (volume) of each mating type mea

53 The mean of GCSE core subjects (English, mathematics, sc

54 Most of these studies focused on the mean of gene expression level, but not the variance

55 d MCV were lower than 4 standard errors from the mean of healthy participants correlated with areas t

56 generalized atherosclerosis, was defined as the mean of IMT measured by B-mode ultrasonography at si

57 generalized atherosclerosis, was defined as the mean of IMT measurements at six sites of the carotid

58 t than employing the genetic variation among the mean of inbred families, and that higher degree of i

59 PRs because the method of calculating PPR as the mean of individual PPRs is biased in favor of high v

60 nse was considered to be a success if either the mean of IOP measurements collected during the first

61 d their corresponding surrogate exposures as the mean of local samples and assessed the amount of bia

62 ption that, if they were possible to obtain, the mean of many food records or recalls would be an acc

63 Taking the mean of most of these new estimates indicates that g

64 fter washout does not adequately approximate the mean of multiple IOP measurements.

65 f ovarian cancer cell lines (three SDs above the mean of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells) and

66 this approach, residues are ranked based on the mean of normalized residue scores derived from four

67 were more than two standard deviations below the mean of normative CMR data.

68 extracted, fully inbred genotype will exceed the mean of outbred individuals.

69 N1, with an effect size fourfold larger than the mean of previously reported common variants for lumb

70 ey U test, and the results are summarized by the mean of ranks and a corresponding P value.

71 The mean of ranks is uninformative, and a clinically mea

72 The mean of regressions for the 55 phenophases studied w

73 methods 2 and 3, the highest rCBV value and the mean of repeated rCBV measurements, respectively, we

74 The mean of SED and WL53 had a significantly higher IRbe

75 Among randomized trials the mean of tacrolimus trough concentration during the f

76 e difference of test minus retest divided by the mean of test/retest and expressed as a percent.

77 Time-updated SBP was the mean of that and all previous visits.

78 ted from random fields throughout the tumor, the mean of the 10 longest and widest nucleoli (MLN) was

79 ist joints, the mean absolute deviation from the mean of the 2 measurements was 0.036 mm (SD 0.034),

80 Episodic memory scores computed as the mean of the 2 standardized measures of Logical Memor

81 ich the increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the 3 measurements, differed by more than 0.

82 he mean increase in IOP after washout, using the mean of the 3 measurements, was 5.3 (4.2) mm Hg.

83 The mean of the A(405) readings of the plasma samples co

84 The mean of the absolute difference in length (measured

85 The four properties include the mean of the absolute values as well as the norm of t

86 ghest ankle pressure ("ABI-HI"), and 3) with the mean of the ankle pressures ("ABI-MN").

87 ratio of the maximum FDG activity divided by the mean of the aortic arch background).

88 The mean of the area under the receiver operating charac

89 tically significant paired-pulse depression, the mean of the averaged second EPSPs being 80 +/- 11% o

90 phages and prophages was developed based on the mean of the BLAST score ratio (BSR) of the phage/pro

91 scored one or more standard deviations below the mean of the comparison subjects on the MMSE (N=8, 44

92 etween one and two standard deviations below the mean of the comparison subjects.

93 for all inflamed eyes was 39%+/-7% less than the mean of the control eye scores (mean +/- SEM, P < 0.

94 elow 250 mg/L (> 2 standard deviations below the mean of the control group) were associated with prol

95 erum albumin concentration < or = 3 SD below the mean of the control subjects.

96 ses had 5-HT levels greater than 2 SDs above the mean of the controls, thus defining a subset of SIDS

97 e than 2 standard deviations below and above the mean of the corresponding voxels in the reference po

98 ior progeny value is a linear combination of the mean of the cross's progeny and their standard devia

99 onal synchrony was defined and quantified as the mean of the cross-correlation coefficients of sponta

100 expected difference between 2 cycles is 1/4 the mean of the cycles of 2 rhythms.

101 The mean of the daily peak blood ethanol concentration w

102 The shrunk estimator for mu differs from the mean of the data vectors and ultimately leads to a s

103 ted, with constant variance not depending on the mean of the data.

104 Across patients, for scan ranges 1-6, the mean of the difference between maximal and minimal D

105 The mean of the difference between the biopsy (median 2.

106 lithium dilution with bolus thermodilution, the mean of the differences (lithium dilution-thermodilu

107 The mean of the distribution biased the perceived latera

108 individuals in each group who differed from the mean of the distribution by the greatest magnitude a

109 The mean of the distribution of forward ET rates is high

110 The mean of the distribution of LOI in the cells is cons

111 nd unbiased genes, which relate primarily to the mean of the distributions of mutational effects and

112 s the mean of the second response divided by the mean of the first avoids the error.

113 The mean of the four heme methyl shifts is shown to serv

114 The mean of the fractional SD of the elastance index in

115 The distance from the mean of the generator potential to spike threshold i

116 ctor, and the rhombic axes are controlled by the mean of the imidazole orientations for the two His.

117 The mean of the interobserver coefficients of variation

118 glycosidic bond angles were held constant at the mean of the known solution values, irrespective of t

119 -hat filter, then estimate spot intensity as the mean of the largest 20% of pixel values in the targe

120 >/==" BORDER="0">2 standard deviations from the mean of the log ratios, and a P value of </=0.01.

121 tion is performed for each interval by using the mean of the logarithm of expression ratios in the in

122 It was demonstrated that using the mean of the LRI values predicted by RapidMiner and A

123 the bones of 3 different hands differed from the mean of the measurement by 2.29-4.04%.

124 The mean of the measurements of maximal carotid IMT at 1

125 The LI is defined as the mean of the melting points of specific fatty acids i

126 ients in the honeymoon stage was higher than the mean of the new onset patients, but significantly lo

127 - subjects had a native T1 value >2 SD above the mean of the normal range.

128 Previous works only give the mean of the number of unique sequences in the librar

129 models, basin-wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations.

130 The 95% LOA concerning the mean of the observers' measurements of the longest d

131 The mean of the OD scores for all inflamed eyes was 39%+

132 % CI -9.72 to -7.69]; p<0.0001), superior to the mean of the other two active treatments (doxazosin a

133 e of environmental variance of one trait and the mean of the other.

134 red measurement expressed as a percentage of the mean of the pair plotted against the mean of the pai

135 tage of the mean of the pair plotted against the mean of the pair.

136 Also, the mean of the patient's average tumor dose for the CR

137 With the hybrid method, the mean of the patient's average tumor dose over 8 pati

138 Many past studies have used the mean of the patient's probing depths or attachment l

139 was systematically evaluated and reported as the mean of the percentage of cancer cells remaining wit

140 The significance of the mean of the PLS2 regression coefficients is found to

141 e group was not significantly different from the mean of the population (ie, mean +/- SD, 100 +/- 1),

142 ial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) correlated with the mean of the posterior distribution, a statistic that

143 that the optimal strategy was to aim between the mean of the prior (the screen center) and the mean s

144 ainty appears to generalize differently from the mean of the prior, and an interesting asymmetry aris

145 ontrast sensitivity (WMCS), being defined as the mean of the products of each spatial frequency multi

146 The mean of the radiation dose values for 131 abdominal

147 s [(CROI/CREF) - 1], where CROI and CREF are the mean of the radioactivity concentrations from 90 to

148 The mean of the RAL1/RAL2 site-specific variances (A) wa

149 05-0.95) refers to the ratio of the range to the mean of the relative-intensity (or determined concen

150 .2 +/- 2.6 frames) was 1.7 times longer than the mean of the right coronary artery (20.4 +/- 3.0) and

151 in the CHSH game can be bounded knowing only the mean of the RNG bias.

152 .45 mm2 (range 0.00 mm2 to 35.28 mm2) whilst the mean of the SAL1/SAL2 variances (B) was 0.09 mm2 (ra

153 Calculating PPR as the mean of the second response divided by the mean of t

154 gnals, with the dissimilarity being taken to the mean of the signals over all the pixels.

155 The mean of the six antibody concentrations was signific

156 and corrected for background, by subtracting the mean of the smallest 70% of pixel values.

157 ace energy from liquid metal measurements as the mean of the solid-state surface energies over these

158 l RR intervals (SDNN) and the square root of the mean of the squared differences between adjacent nor

159 P=0.04) and 7% lower 5-minute square root of the mean of the squares of successive N-N differences (9

160 tion of all normal R-R intervals (SDNN), and the mean of the sum of the squared differences between a

161 ved adverse changes in rMSSD [square root of the mean of the sum of the squared differences between a

162 Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% C

163 The mean of the time constants (tauPCr) was 35 s (range,

164 nchyma was segmented automatically, in which the mean of the top 10% late enhancement was calculated.

165 Child-based analyses (i.e., the mean of the two eyes) were used.

166 ndent and interaction analyses were based on the mean of the two eyes.

167 a plot of arteriovenous differences against the mean of the two measurements.

168 ss production in the mixed culture surpassed the mean of the two monocultures.

169 The mean of the two ROIs was used to calculate mean FD b

170 global domain of functioning was computed as the mean of these six domains.

171 t equilibrates selection-pressure asymmetry; the mean of this distribution is generally not the fitne

172 ses, or stroke is 1.34 mg/l to 6.45 mg/l and the mean of this range is 3 mg/l.

173 ites with an affinity approximately equal to the mean of those for HABs and LABs.

174 t, for the large majority of the biomarkers, the mean of three 24-h urine samples could provide a cor

175 essure by the measured flow and expressed as the mean of three measurements at each flow rate.

176 s with uncontrolled hypertension (defined as the mean of three systolic blood pressure measurements o

177 he schizophrenic patients was assessed using the mean of time 1 and time 2 Brief Psychiatric Rating S

178 s no effect on cell motility, as measured by the mean of time to reach the source.

179 computed from folate supplement intake plus the mean of two 24-h recalls completed during the course

180 Urinary sodium excretion was calculated as the mean of two 24-h urine excretions.

181 astolic blood pressure (BP) were recorded as the mean of two measurements taken with a sphygmomanomet

182 plates, signals ranged from <30 to >120% of the mean of vehicle-treated cells for molecules known to

183 reduction [53.6-69.0]; both p<0.0001) and at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 (60.2% reduction [95% CI 54.

184 ity lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 and at week 12.

185 (95% CI, 67% to 83%) (monthly) vs placebo at the mean of weeks 10 and 12 in the moderate- and high-in

186 aseline in LDL cholesterol at week 12 and at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, analysed by intention-to-tr

187 ere percent change from baseline in LDL-C at the mean of weeks 10 and 12, and at week 12.

188 rcent change in LDL-C level from baseline to the mean of weeks 22 and 24 levels and from baseline to

189 For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, between-group difference in

190 For the mean of weeks 22 and 24, LDL-C level with ezetimibe

191 thritis Index pain subscale from baseline to the mean of weeks 4 and 6, comparing AZD3582 with placeb

192 The mean of within-knee standard deviations of JSW in th

193 ociated protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B than the mean of WL5 and WL29.

194 n data the best fitting relationship between the mean of X0 and all the other covariates fitted in th